| 
			 
 
  by Paul B. Dennis
 
			1997 
			from
			
			WorldNewsStand Website
 
			The brotherhoods of the world include 
			more than 10% of the population, and are the most powerful secret 
			weapon ever invented. In common, they swear oaths of secrecy about 
			the content of meetings, promote personal contact with the 
			leadership, and engage in meaningless rituals which provide a firm 
			tradition and slightly mystic atmosphere. Often they drink a 
			symbolic toast at meetings, and have a changing watchword 
			combination used to identify members from outsiders. 
 Such groups are known as unions, fraternities, lodges, social clubs, 
			religions, societies, foundations, etc. Except in the rare cases of 
			revolutionary brotherhoods, such organizations never claim to be 
			directly against a government or society, just little bits of it 
			that enough people agree with to form the organization. For example, 
			one organization formed to outlaw gun ownership, and another 
			immediately formed to fight it. Once enticed to attend meetings, 
			clever speeches then mold public opinion without ever seeming to. If 
			the propaganda seems to drift of the common subject of the group 
			from time to time, it is always shown to relate in some subtle way, 
			as an analogy or an event that might effect their group.
 
 Secret societies are the strength of all revolutionary movements, 
			and are used to control the public. They give members the feeling of 
			being on the "inside," and that creates loyalty. To get anywhere in 
			politics, education, the media, the union, or the military, you must 
			join one, but since members swear absolute secrecy about meetings it 
			is a surprise to most non-members that they even exist. Modern 
			brotherhoods usually don't swear the lowest rank into the order, so 
			most of the brotherhood's members are oblivious to the loyalty oaths 
			that the leadership swear to.
 
 Such organizations are set up to look like the members know who the 
			leaders are, but really those leaders are just members of a larger 
			and more powerful brotherhood that controls many masonic lodges, 
			which in turn is controlled by an ever higher one. In spite of the 
			upper echelon's knowledge that they are fooling the lower members, 
			it never occurs to them that they might in turn be fooled by some 
			group even higher. That's because it is a fulfilling idea to think 
			you've made it to the top circle. If later promoted to a circle they 
			didn't know existed, they again think they've made it to the top, 
			but must still take orders from those they think lead the circle. 
			When you get to the top of this vastly complex pyramid you find that 
			a handful of people can distribute propaganda text directly to the 
			leadership of the lowest level, and suddenly slant propaganda about 
			some issue to millions of members at the same time; But only the 
			highest circle ever knows who the ultimate ruler is, or what the 
			total objective of the effort is.
 
 The ruler of a hierarchy of masonic lodges is, in a very real sense, 
			king for life, and powerful enough to base a dynasty on the control 
			of such lodges. To remain hidden and therefore safe from the mob, 
			the king selects a member of the ignorant public who has the gift of 
			speech making, and raises him to rule through the use of brotherhood 
			propaganda, and by providing specially trained advisors to organize 
			his revolutionary government. Naturally, the new "ruler" thinks he 
			has risen to power by the force of his personality and never 
			suspects the real situation. If he ever catches on, he finds that a 
			new yokel has risen a revolution against him and the cycle repeats. 
			In this way, single families have formed the top tiers of longlived 
			secret empires, who rule by first twisting the mob one way, then 
			another, then using one group to fight a second, and so the mob is 
			always kept busy and under control. This is the ultimate machiavellian strategy, and is the only political type which 
			explains all the evidence available in this book.
 
 Because a kingdom of masonic lodges has members totaling a 
			respectable fraction of the population, the founding of new lodges 
			is impossible to keep secret from the hidden king. However, for the 
			king it is as simple as pie to create new ones, since he already has 
			a great number of subjects highly skilled in organization and 
			recruiting methods.
 
 Masonic lodges go back as far as written history, and their use has 
			been to propagandize issues, and to put peoples on the streets in 
			protest over some issue or other that suddenly appears all over the 
			official press, which is the most important single brotherhood of 
			all in today's world. Long ago such news came from a minister 
			listing decrees before a crowd of citizens.
 
 Because independent religions were themselves secretive and powerful masonic lodges, they could not be tolerated by rising kings. 
			However, churches were useful in controlling larger numbers of 
			people than other single lodges, so their organization was patiently 
			infiltrated with agents of the secret king, who then used their 
			positions to add more agents to the inner tiers the lodge. 
			Eventually the entire churches were subverted, which were then 
			used in aid of the king to produce new agents from the best of the 
			flock, and to propagandize.
 
 The whole masonic pyramid is even profitable, because there is 
			always substantial tribute from the lowest level, often called union 
			dues. Masonic theory is no doubt the origin of pyramid letter 
			schemes.
 
 One event which was obviously impossible without a vast network of 
			secret cells was the communist revolution of Russia. Considering 
			that the power of masonic hierarchies to inform the king of 
			competition is the only thing that keeps a true king in power, one 
			must wonder how the Russian Czar was taken completely by surprise by 
			the huge communist network of masonic cells. Because the Czar's 
			personal advisors did not command or later take any part in the 
			revolution, we can clearly deduce that the Czarist government 
			controlled no masonic lodges at all.
 
 Believe it or not, the king of a world-spanning masonic empire has 
			controlled all masonic lodges for centuries, and steered all 
			figurehead kings and governments with personal advisors trained from 
			birth for the job. Governments fall when they learn too much, and 
			the replacement governments are always another puppet formed from a
			masonic lodge groomed in advance for the occasion. You can see how 
			an organization that commands its members from secrecy is far more 
			secure than any kingdom where the mob knows your identity. Because 
			of that simple truth, all kingdoms were controlled this way, and 
			what we call history is just a record of the outward appearances 
			created for the unknowing masses.
 
 More recently, the USSR and USA were held in an "apparent" cold-war 
			balance long enough to procure the advanced technology and weapons 
			that the American and Soviet people built for them. They are now 
			feeling capable of finally enacting their super-government, where 
			they can finally outlaw masonic societies, and take what they feel 
			is their rightful public throne. Can they do it? Look around, they 
			are doing it.
 
 It is possible that these families have, by breeding themselves with 
			the genius bloodlines which appear over centuries, turned themselves 
			into literal supermen, and left us nobodies with a depleted 
			gene-pool in the act. The finesse and modern successes of the 
			kingdom's rulers might also be accounted for by a tradition in the 
			art of the triple-cross taught from birth, and honed from long 
			centuries of practice on simpler peoples. We will probably never 
			know for sure, even if we ever gain true freedom.
 
 In regards to attaining freedom, it is absolutely impossible to 
			happen until secret societies are universally taught about in 
			schools, and strictly outlawed. Masonic kings have never yet allowed 
			an understanding of the purpose or pyramidal organization of unions 
			and large social clubs to trickle into the public's general 
			knowledge, and that fact alone keeps them safe. The only loyalties 
			that citizens should be influenced by are friends, family, species, 
			religion, nation, and the sustainability of our planet. As long as 
			such societies can remain hidden and offer advantage for loyalty, we 
			will never be truly free.
 
 
			  |