by Makia Freeman
November 2, 2016
from
Freedom-Articles-ToolsForFreedom
Website
Spanish version
Makia
Freeman is the editor of alternative news / independent media site The
Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com (FaceBook here),
writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects
of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity
can create a new system of peace and abundance. |
If it's not Islamophobia,
it's Russophobia.
Tired of Western propaganda?
Get Vladimir Putin's
perspective
with words straight from the
horse's mouth.
Vladimir Putin in particular, and Russia in general, have been the
focus of an intensive high-drama propaganda campaign of late.
Are you buying it...? For the time
being, Russophobia has replaced Islamophobia as the
driving force behind the lies.
Various US officials have been
frantically warning Americans that the Russians are behind
everything:
They might as well add making your
girlfriend break up with you, making your toast get burnt and making
your car run out of fuel for all the evidence they have presented.
Many of these totally unfounded
allegations stem from (naturally) the Clinton campaign, home to
career criminals Bill and Hillary
Clinton, who are desperately seeking to find something to gain
some sort of shred of popularity or advantage over Trump, who fills
up arenas with 1000s of people more easily than Clinton can fill a
high school gym with 50.
Many US officials and war hawks are
trying to get in on the action:
-
CIA man Mike
Morell indicated it would be a good idea to covertly
kill Russians to make them "pay
a price"
-
Hillary Clinton called Vladimir Putin the "grand
godfather of extreme nationalism" and blamed him for
the rising popularity of right-wing leaders
-
even standing VP Joe
Biden came out and said that,
"We're sending a message
to Putin... it will be at the time of our choosing
and under the circumstances that have the greatest
impact".
It seems there is no depth to which some
US leaders won't stoop in order to gain some political advantage,
even it means lying, demonizing and destroying geopolitical
partnerships in order to garner a few brownie points.
Russophobia
is in full swing
before the US
Presidential Election
to distract
American voters.
Vladimir Putin - It's All About
Distraction During Election Season
You would think Russian President
Vladimir President would be agitated by all of this mud-slinging.
At times he has been, for instance when
he issued
a warning a few months ago about an impending WW3 due to NATO's
constant aggression and advancement towards Russian borders.
However, judging by his own words and mostly calm demeanor, he has
seen through the agenda and understands what is going on.
Putin spells out how it's all inflamed
rhetoric before an election season, an old trick used by politicians
to distract when they have no meaningful solutions for internal and
domestic problems.
Here is Vladimir Putin in his own words:
"You
can expect anything from our American friends... the only
novelty is that for the first time, on the highest level, the
United States has admitted involvement in these activities, and
to some extent threatened [us] - which of course does not meet
the standards of international communication.
As if
we didn't know that US Government bodies snoop on and wiretap
anyone? Everyone knows this...
Apparently, they are nervous. The question is
why. I think there is a reason. You know, in an election
campaign, the current government carefully crafts a pre-election
strategy, and any government, especially when seeking
re-election, always has unresolved issues.
They need to show, to explain to the voters why
they remain unresolved. In the US, there are many such
problems... for example, the massive
public debt is a time bomb for the US economy and global
financial system... more examples can be cited in foreign
policy...
In these conditions, many choose to resort to the
usual tactics of distracting voters from their problems... try
to create an enemy and rally the nation against that enemy...
Iran
and the Iranian threat did not work well for that.
Russia is a
more interesting story."
And that's exactly what this whole thing
is: a giant story. However, as Voltaire once said, if you can make
someone believe absurdities, you can make them commit atrocities.
Let's see what else Vladimir Putin has
to say on other topics of interest.
Blame everything
on
the Russians...
Russian Hacking - A Laughable
Claim so the Clintons and DNC Can Try to Avoid Culpability
Let's face it:
the whole Russophobia
affair is about avoiding blame, dodging responsibility and evading
liability.
Thanks to WikiLeaks, Project Veritas and
many other sources, we know the entire Hillary Clinton campaign has
been rigged beyond belief:
-
fake primaries
-
fake speeches
-
fake
images
-
fake videos
-
fake crowds
-
fake supporters
-
fake debates
There is seemingly no depth of
criminality to which that woman won't sink.
She's selling out the presidency before
she even gets there, such as the stunt of trying to promise future
presidential executive orders to mega donors. There is not a shred
of evidence that Russia is affiliated with WikiLeaks or behind any
of the DNC hacks.
As this Zero Hedge article NSA
Whistleblower: US Intelligence Worker Likely Behind DNC Leaks, Not
Russia states:
"On
'Judge Napolitano Chambers,' the Judge said that while the DNC,
government officials, and the Clinton campaign all accuse the
Russians of hacking into the DNC servers, 'the Russians had
nothing to do with it.'
Napolitano then mentioned Binney, arguing the NSA
veteran and whistleblower who 'developed the software that the NSA now uses, which allows it to capture not just metadata but
content of every telephone call, text message, email in the
United States of every person in [the country]' knew the NSA had
hacked the DNC - not the Russians.
If
Judge Napolitano and Binney are right and the NSA did hack the
DNC, what was the motive?
According to the Judge,
'members of the intelligence community
simply do not want [Clinton] to be president of the United
States.'
'She
doesn't know how to handle state secrets,' Napolitano continued,
and since 'some of the state secrets that she revealed used
the proper true names of American intelligence agents operating
undercover in the Middle East,'
...some of these agents were
allegedly captured and killed, prompting NSA agents to feel
compelled to act.
Whether NSA agents hacked the DNC or not, one
thing is clear: there's no real evidence linking the DNC and
Arizona and Illinois voting system hacks to the Russian
government."
Vladimir Putin:
sticking it to the US.
The Mythical "Russian Threat"
Vladimir Putin directly addressed
another mythical story, that of the so-called Russian threat and Russian
aggression, at the recent Valdai forum in Sochi from
October 24-27, 2016:
"There is another mechanism to ensure the transatlantic
security, European security, the OC security and their attempt
at turning this organization (NATO) into an instrument of
someone's political interests.
So what the OC is doing is simply
void.
Mythical threats are devised like the so-called Russian
military threat. Certainly this can be (used to) gain some
advantage, get new budgets, make your allies comply with your
demands, make NATO deploy the equipment and troops closer to our
border...
Russia is not trying to attack anyone. That would be
ridiculous... The population of Europe is 300 million... and
the population of the US is 300 million, while the population of
Russia is 140 million, yet such menaces are served as a pretext.
Hysteria has been fueled in the US with regard to Russia's
alleged influence with the current presidential election.
Is
there anyone who seriously thinks that Russia can influence the
choice of the American people? Is the US a banana republic? The
US is a great power. If I'm wrong please correct me."
Here's what he had to say about who the
real aggressor is when it comes to the US
(around) and Russia:
"Is
it known to you that Russia, in the 90s, completely halted (as
did the USSR) any strategic aviation in the further afield
regions of patrol, i.e. not in the closer abroad.
We halted such
activity completely. US geostrategic aviation however, with
nuclear weapons on board. They continued to encircle us! What
for? Who are you concerned about? Or why are you threatening us?
We continued with the non-patrol year after year. It is only
since about 3 years ago that we restarted aviation patrol
further abroad.
Which
party is the provocateur here? Is it us?
We
have only 2 military bases abroad. They are known areas of
terrorism dangers... US bases on the other hand are all over the
world. And you are telling me that I am the aggressor?
Have you
any common sense?
What
are US forces doing in Europe, including nuclear weaponry? What
business have they got there? Listen to me. Our military budget,
while increased slightly from last year, in the dollar
equivalent, is about US$50 billion.
The military budget of the
Pentagon is almost 10 times that amount. $575 billion, I
think Congress singed off on. And you're telling me I'm the
aggressor here? Have you no common sense at all? Is it
us putting our forces on the border of the US? Or other states?
Is it NATO, or who, that is moving their bases closer to us?
Military infrastructure! It's not us. Does anyone even listen to
us? Or try to have some kind of dialogue with us?
The repeated
answer we get is 'mind your own business' and 'each country can
choose its own security measures'. Very well, so will we...
And
finally, on the antiballistic missile defense system, who was
it that exited from the treaty which was vital to the entire
system of international security? Was it us? No. It was the
States. In a one-sided way, they simply withdrew from the
treaty.
Now they are threatening us, turning their missiles
towards us, not only from Alaska, but also from Europe too...
We
want to develop normal relations in the sphere of security, in
the fight against terrorism, in the non-proliferation of nuclear
weapons. We want to work together with you... so long as you
want that too."
More David Icke humor:
right now
everything is the fault
of Vladimir Putin and the Russians.
US Repeatedly Broke Its Promises to
Russia and Destroyed Trust
The Western MSM is so one-sided in its
coverage of geopolitical events like Ukraine and Syria.
Anyone not
toeing the line with US-UK-NATO interests is painted in a bad light.
In point of fact, it has actually been the US who has been breaking
agreements with Russia since the end of the Cold War.
US leaders
lied to Russian leaders at the time, by promising that NATO would
not extend any further eastward, and possibly even hinting that
Russia could join NATO.
As Eric Zuesse explains in his article America
Trashes NATO Founding Act - Rushes Weapons to Russia's Borders:
"The
NATO Founding
Act was agreed to between the US and Russia in 1997 in order
to provide to Russia's leader Boris Yeltsin some modicum of
assurance that America wouldn't invade his country.
When his
predecessor Mikhail Gorbachev had ended the Soviet Union and its
Warsaw Pact military alliance in 1991, the representatives of US
President GHW Bush told him that NATO wouldn't move 'one inch to
the east' (toward Russia), but as soon as Gorbachev committed
himself to end the Cold War, Bush told his
agents, regarding what they had all promised to Gorbachev
(Bush's promise which had been conveyed through them),
'To hell
with that! We prevailed, they didn't'.
In other words:
Bush's
prior instructions to them were merely his lies to Gorbachev,
his lies to say that the US wouldn't try to conquer Russia (move
its forces eastward to Russia's borders).
But, now, since
Gorbachev was committed and had already agreed that East Germany
was to be reunited with and an extension of West Germany (and
the process for doing that had begun), Bush pulled that rug of
lies out from under the end of the Cold War..."
Bill Clinton carried on
the great American legacy
of exceptionalism (that is, excepting
themselves from obeying international law) spearheaded by Daddy
Bush
of surrounding and dominating Russia by allowing NATO into,
-
the Czech
Republic
-
Hungary
-
Poland
Russia got shafted by trusting the US
numerous times after the fall of the Soviet Union.
Here's Vladimir
Putin once again on America's
broken promises (below video in April 2016):
"In the early 2000s, we agreed with the Americans
to destroy weapons-grade plutonium, on both sides.
We were
talking about the excessive amounts that were manufactured by
both the US and Russia. This is the enriched uranium from which
nuclear weapons are made. 34000 tonnes, from both sides.
We
signed an agreement, and decided that this material would be
destroyed in a specific manner. It would be destroyed in an
industrial way - for which special plants needed to be built. We
fulfilled our obligations - we built the necessary plant.
Our
American partners did not.
Moreover, recently they announced
that rather than destroy the enriched material in the manner
that we agreed, and signed an international agreement on, that
they would dilute it and store it in a holding capacity.
This means they retain the potential to bring it back...
Surely our American partners must understand that, jokes are one
thing, such as creating smear campaigns against Russia, but
questions of nuclear security are another thing entirely... they
must learn to fulfill their promises.
They
once said they would close down Guantanamo. And? Is it closed?
No."
Incidentally, this is the exact same
plutonium agreement which made the news last month, when as reported
on October 3rd, 216, Russia
suspended their deal with the US on disposal of plutonium from
decommissioned nuclear warheads.
A decree signed by Vladimir Putin
lists,
"the radical change in the
environment, a threat to strategic stability posed by the hostile
actions of the US against Russia, and the inability of the US to
deliver on the obligation to dispose of excessive weapons plutonium
under international treaties, as well as the need to take swift
action to defend Russian security" as the reasons for why
Russia chose to suspend the deal.
Conclusion - Wake up and Smell the Russophobia
Expect Vladimir Putin and Russia to keep
being demonized by the Clintons - and more importantly the NWO
manipulators who so desperately want them in power.
Although the
Clintons are a powerful modern American mafia family, replete with a
long body count behind them, it's important to remember they are
lackeys for far greater and more pervasive powers (check out some of
Hillary's lovey-dovey letters to Lynn Forester de Rothschild here).
There's a lot at stake here. Right now, Vladimir Putin and Russia
are being used with the sole purpose of getting Clinton elected.
Although Putin is not perfect and has his own dark side, he deserves
respect for standing his ground and refusing to become another US
puppet.
If we are to believe his own words, he has no qualm with
Americans or even America itself, but rather the selfish,
imperialistic and murderous
agenda of the NWO agents running the
USA:
"We
have a great deal of respect and love for the United States, and
especially for the American people... [however] the expansion of
jurisdiction by one nation beyond the territory of its borders,
to the rest of the world, is unacceptable and destructive for
international relations."
It's up to the American public to
switch
off CNN ('Clinton News' Network) and all the other duplicitous MSM
(Mainstream media)
channels and get truly informed.
Vladimir Putin is reaching out his
hand to America, in the hope that enough Americans can reclaim their
country and work together with other nations in peace.
On the issue
of Vladimir Putin and Russia,
the MSM is not just one-sided, it's
outright lying.
Sources
|