by Tyler Durden
April 24, 2018

from ZeroHedge Website




 

 

Technocrats around the world have been pushing for Universal Basic Income in order to offset the jobs to be lost to the robot revolution.

 

Finland experimented with UBI and has now abandoned the project. The pros and cons are finally being revealed.

Source



"I felt a great disturbance in the farce, as if millions of socialist voices suddenly cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced.

 

I fear something rational has happened."

With high-profile champions such as Richard Branson, Facebook boss Mark Zuckerberg, and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, backing the idea of governments giving non-working people money (from working people) to do nothing - what could go wrong?

Well, two years after enthusiastically beginning its experiment with a universal basic income - in which people are paid an unconditional salary by the state instead of benefits - Finland (after experimenting with it) is abandoning the project as government enthusiasm wanes and additional funding requests are rejected.

As a reminder, The Telegraph explains Universal basic income is a form of cash payment given to individuals, without means testing or work requirements.

 

In some models this is at a rate sufficient to cover all living expenses.

Proponents argue that:

  • The lack of expensive means-testing leads to a higher proportion of the budget going to recipients. This would be more efficient
     

  • The transparency of universal payments would drastically reduce the need to detect benefits fraud
     

  • One scheme could replace the current complex arrangement of government benefits, rebates and tax rebates
     

  • Work will always benefit recipients of this welfare, rather than the 'benefits trap' that leaves part-time workers

Critics argue that:

  • Universal income may be inflationary and, in attempting to move all individuals out of poverty, it may simply raise the level of the poverty line
     

  • It may reduce the incentive to work and studies have found some evidence to support this.
     

  • A reduction in taxable income would reduce the government's ability to cover other expenses, such as healthcare

Universal income as a policy dates from at least Thomas Paine's 1795 Agrarian Justice.

 

It is currently more closely aligned with left-wing politics, where it would be funded through income from nationalized assets.

Several countries have experimented with a universal basic income, including,

  • Finland

  • Canada

  • Kenya

  • the Netherlands

And now Finland has killed the plan... (via The Guardian):

Since January 2017, a random sample of 2,000 unemployed people aged 25 to 58 have been paid a monthly €560 (£475) , with no requirement to seek or accept employment.

 

Any recipients who took a job continued to receive the same amount.

Furthermore, the government has also imposed stricter benefits plans, introducing legislation making some benefits for unemployed people contingent on taking training or working at least 18 hours in three months.

"The government is making changes taking the system away from basic income," Kela's Miska Simanainen told the Swedish newspaper Svenska Dagbladet.

Of course, the liberal socialist gliterrati are up in arms over Finland's decision.

Olli Kangas, an expert involved in the trial, told the Finnish public broadcaster YLE:

"Two years is too short a period to be able to draw extensive conclusions from such a big experiment. We should have had extra time and more money to achieve reliable results."

However, as we previously noted, as automation and AI destroy millions of middle-income jobs, permanently forcing (primarily male) workers from the workforce.

 

Americans are beginning to reconsider their attitudes toward a radical policy tool that's popular among some segments of the left:

Universal Basic Income.

According to CNBC, a recent poll conducted by Northeastern University and Gallup found that 48% of Americans support the measure.

 

In an association that's hardly a coincidence, the poll also showed that three-quarters of Americans believe machines will take away more jobs than they'll generate...

 

 

 

 

Unsurprisingly 65% of Democrats want to see a universal basic income and 54% of people between the ages of 18 and 35 do.

 

In comparison, just 28% of Republicans support UBI.

 

While proposals for universal basic income programs vary, the most common one is a system in which the federal government sends out regular checks to everyone, regardless of their earnings or employment.

 

That system is being tested in Canada as well as Stockton, California, which recently emerged from bankruptcy but remains mired in poverty.

 

Perhaps Finland's failure will wake some of the free shit army up that it can't end well...