by Umair Haque

May 23, 2018

from Eudaimonia Website








How the U.S. Collapse

is Made of a New Kind of Poverty

Consider the following statistics:

  • The average (North) American can't scrape together $500 for an emergency.

  • A third of (North) Americans can't afford food, shelter, and healthcare.

  • Healthcare for a family now costs $28.000 - about half of median income, which is $60.000.

By themselves, of course, statistics say little.


But together these facts speak volumes. The story they are beginning to tell is this.

The U.S., it seems, is becoming something like the world's first poor rich country. And that is the elephant in the room we aren't quite grasping. After all, authoritarianism and extremism don't arise in prosperous societies  - but in troubled ones, which are growing impoverished, like the U.S. is today.


What do I mean by all that? Let's begin with what I don't mean...


I don't mean absolute poverty. (North) Americans are not living on a few dollars a day, by and large, like people in, for example, Somalia or Bangladesh. America's median income is still that of a rich country, around $50.000, depending on how it's counted.


Nor do I really mean relative poverty  - people living below median income. While that's a growing problem in the U.S., because the middle class is imploding, that is not really the true problem these numbers hint at, either.

The U.S. appears to be pioneering a new kind of poverty altogether. One for which we do not yet have a name.


It is something like living at the knife's edge, constantly being on the brink of ruin, one small step away from catastrophe and disaster, ever at the risk of falling through the cracks.


It has two components:

  •  massive inflation for the basics of life

  • coupled with crushing, asymmetrical risk

I'll come to what those mean shortly...

The average (North) American has a relatively high income, that of a person in a nominally rich country. Only his income does not go very far. Most of it is eaten up by attempting to afford the basics of life.


We've already seen how steep healthcare costs are.


But then,

  • there is education

  • there is transport

  • there is interest and rent

  • there is media and communications

  • there is childcare and elderly care

All these things reduce the average American to constantly living right at the edge of ruin  - one paycheck away from penury, one emergency away from losing it all.

But this isn't true for the U.S.'s peers. In Europe, Canada, and even Australia, society invests in all these things  - and the costs of basic necessities societies don't provide are regulated.


For example, I pay $50 dollars for broadband and TV in London  - but $200 for the same thing in New York  - yet in London, I get vastly more and better media for my money (even including, yes, (North) American junk like Ancient Aliens). That's regulation at work.


And when basic goods like healthcare or elderly care or education are provided and managed at a social scale, that is when they are cheapest, and often of the best quality, too.


Hence, healthcare costs far less in London, Paris, or Geneva  - and life expectancy is longer, too.

So if you are earning $50.000 in the U.S., it is a very different thing than earning $50.000 in France, Germany, or Sweden  - in the U.S., you must pay steeply for the basics of life, for basic necessities.


Thus, incomes stretch much further in other countries, which enjoy a vastly higher quality of life, even though people there earn roughly the same amount, because they pay vastly less for basic necessities.


(North) Americans are rich, but only nominally  - their money doesn't buy nearly as much as their peers does, where it matters and counts most, for the basics of life.

What happens when societies don't understand all the above? Well, a strange thing has happened to the (North) American economy.


While it's true that things like TVs and Playstations have gotten cheaper, the costs of the basics of life have skyrocketed. All the things that really elevate people's quality of life  - healthcare, finance, education, transport, housing, and so on  - have come to consume such a large share of the average household's income that they have little left to save, invest, or spend on anything else.


And what's worse, while the basics of life have seen massive inflation, wages and incomes (not to mention savings and benefits and safety nets and opportunities) for most have stagnated.


The result is an economy  - and a society  - that's collapsing...

Yet all that is the straightforward effect of giving, for example, hedge funds control over drugs, or speculators control over housing, healthcare, and education  - they will of course maximize profits, whereas investing in these things socially, or at least regulating them, minimizes real costs, and maximizes accessibility, affordability, and quality.

So the average (North) American, who is left high and dry, must borrow, borrow, borrow, just to maintain a decent quality of life  - because handing capitalism control of the basics of life has caused massive, skyrocketing inflation in necessities, while flat-lining his income.

  • Healthcare didn't used to cost half of median income even a decade ago, after all  - but now it does.


  • So what happens when, in a decade or two, healthcare costs all of median income?


  • How can an economy  - let alone a society  - function that way?

  • What happens if the average American steps over the line?


  • Misses a mortgage payment, gets ill and is unable to pay a few bills on time, can't pay the costs of healthcare?

Then they are punished severely and mercilessly.


Their "credit rating" (note how banks and hedge funds don't have them) is ruined. They can easily find themselves out on the street, without finance, without a second chance, without access to any kind of redress or support . And then they are rejected, shunned, and ostracized.


They might not have an address anymore  - so who will hire them?


They are no longer a part of society  - they have fallen through the cracks, and finding one's way back is often next to impossible: Asymmetrical risk  - corporations and lobbies and banks bear no risk at all, precisely because the average (North) American bears them all now.

So (North) Americans aren't just absolutely or relatively poor, but poor in a new way entirely.

  • First, the basics of life exploded in price, to the point that they are now unaffordable for many, maybe most, households.

  • Second, (North) Americans bear the risks of paying those unaffordable costs to an extreme degree, bearing the risks that institutions should, and so those risks are now ruinously high.

A bank or hedge fund or corporation might go bankrupt, and liquidate its assets, and its owners stay rich  - but if a (North) American's credit rating is ruined, loses his job, cannot pay his bills, or even if he declares bankruptcy, he falls through the cracks, hounded, embattled, institutionally black-marked.


He finds himself outside society, with little way to get back in. Little wonder then that (North) Americans work so much harder than anywhere else  - they are always one step away from losing it all, from genuine ruin, but their peers in truly rich countries aren't.

Marx probably would have called this immiseration. Neo-Marxist theorists call it precarity. And while there's truth in both those ideas and perspectives, I think they miss three vital points.

  • We don't see the U.S. as a poor country, but we should begin to.


  • (North) Americans live fairly abysmal lives  - short, lonely, unhappy, full of work and stress and despair, compared to their peers.


  • That is because they cannot afford better ones  - predatory capitalism coupled with total economic mismanagement of social investments has made the basics of life ruinously unaffordable.

In this way, it's effectively a poor country  - yes, there's a tiny number of ultra-rich, but they are outliers now, off the map of the normal. Because it's not just any kind of poverty, yesterday's poverty, or even poverty as we are used to thinking about it.

The U.S. is pioneering a new kind of poverty...


The kind of poverty that's developed in the U.S. isn't just bizarre and gruesome  - it's novel and unseen. It isn't something that we understand well, economists, intellectuals, thinkers, because we have no good framework to think about it.


It's not absolute poverty like Somalia, and it's not just relative poverty, like in gilded banana republics. It's a uniquely (North) American creation. It's extreme capitalism meets Social Darwinism by way of rugged self-reliance crossed with puritanical cruelty.

The kind of poverty America's pioneering today isn't absolute, or even relative, but something more like perfectly tuned poverty, strategic poverty, basic poverty - nominally well-off people whose money doesn't go far enough to make them actually live well, constantly living at the edge of ruin, and thus forced to choke down their bitter anger and serve the very systems which oppress and subjugate with more and more indignity and fear and servility by the year.

The U.S. is still an innovator today.


Unfortunately, what it's innovating now is a new kind of poverty. Yet poverty is poverty. What happens in societies where poverty is growing? Authoritarianism rises, as people lose faith in democracy, which can't seem to offer them working social contracts.


Authoritarian soon enough becomes fascism :

"this country, this land, its harvest  - it is only for the true volk!", the cry goes up, when there is not enough to go around.

And the rest of the dark and grim story of the fall into the abyss you should know well enough by now. It ends in words we do not say. Still, history, laughing, has told this tale to us many times.


And it is telling it to tomorrow, again, in the tale of (North) American collapse...