by A Lily Bit
July 21, 2023

from ALilyBit Website
 

To be labeled as paranoid entails believing in unsubstantiated delusions of danger and persecution.

However, if the evidence supports the perceived danger convincingly, it cannot be deemed delusional. Conversely, dismissing the evidence and hoping it to be false might indicate a more pronounced form of mental illness.

The issue at hand transcends mere differences in philosophy or political viewpoints.

If you happened to grow up during the Cold War era, your generation was carefully taught that those who sought to undermine our national sovereignty and overthrow our Constitutional government were engaging in nothing short of treasonous acts.

I leave it to your discernment to assess whether the group discussed is, indeed, guilty of such grave offenses.

If one group exerts a resounding control over national governments and multinational corporations, wields significant influence through media control, foundation grants, and education, and skillfully navigates the prominent issues of the time, they essentially hold sway over the vast majority of available options.

For over seventy years, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the powerful financial entities backing it have actively pursued these endeavors while zealously promoting the notion of the "New World Order."

The CFR operates as the influential arm of the Ruling Elite within the United States of America.

Counting among its members the most influential politicians, academics, and media personalities, the organization strategically employs its influence to embed the concept of the New World Order into American society.

Its "experts" craft scholarly works to guide decision-making, academics extol the virtues of a united world, while media members disseminate this message.

To comprehend how such influential figures in America became members of an organization actively working to undermine the Constitution and American sovereignty, we must delve back to at least the early 1900s, though the origins of this story can be traced even further (depending on one's perspective and beliefs).

Numerous Americans, privy to inside information, have attested to the existence of a ruling power elite clandestinely controlling the U.S. government.

Felix Frankfurter, a Justice of the Supreme Court from 1939 to 1962, asserted,

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes."

In a letter dated November 21, 1933, President Franklin Roosevelt conveyed to an associate,

"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson."

On February 23, 1954, Senator William Jenner issued a cautionary speech, expressing his concern:

"Outwardly, we possess a Constitutional government.

 

However, operating within our governmental and political structure, there exists another entity representing a different form of government - a bureaucratic elite that deems our Constitution outdated."

To effectively exert control over a government, all that is required is dominance over the nation's money supply through a central bank with a monopoly on the issuance of money and credit.

This has been successfully implemented in Western Europe, exemplified by the establishment of privately owned central banks like the Bank of England.

Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley, who mentored Bill Clinton during his time at Georgetown, penned his observations about the ambitions of investment bankers who hold sway over central banks.

According to Quigley,

their ultimate aim is nothing short of establishing a global system of financial control in private hands, capable of dominating the political systems of individual countries and the world economy as a whole.

This control, he posits, would be exerted in a feudalistic manner, with central banks worldwide colluding through secret agreements made during frequent private meetings and conferences.

In the early 19^th century, the Bank of the United States (1816-1836) attempted to function as an American central bank.

However, President Andrew Jackson was not convinced of its merits and perceived it as a threat to the nation. Jackson expressed his concerns, citing the bold attempts made by the bank to control the government and the distress it had recklessly caused.

He foresaw that perpetuating such an institution or establishing a similar one could lead to a dire fate for the American people.
 

Thomas Jefferson strongly opposed the concept of a Central Bank. He deemed it an institution deeply hostile to the principles and structure of the Constitution. Jefferson warned that allowing private banks to control the issuance of currency, first through inflation and later deflation, would give rise to powerful banks and corporations that would gradually strip the people of their property.

In the end, he feared that the descendants of those who conquered the continent would wake up to a homeland without ownership, left homeless.
 

Doesn't this depiction closely resemble the current situation in America?

The United States managed to operate without a central bank until the early 20^th century when, as Congressman Charles Lindbergh Sr., contended,

"The Money Trust" orchestrated the 1907 panic, compelling Congress to establish a National Monetary Commission.

Under the leadership of Senator Nelson Aldrich, who was John D. Rockefeller Jr.'s father-in-law, the Commission proposed the creation of a Central Bbank.

Despite being unconstitutional, as the power to "coin Money, regulate the Value thereof" is granted solely to Congress (Article I, Section 8, U.S. Constitution), the Federal Reserve Act was passed in December 1913.

The act was ostensibly intended to stabilize the economy and prevent future panics, but as Lindbergh warned Congress, it effectively established the most enormous trust on earth, creating an invisible government controlled by the money power, which had already been demonstrated to exist through the Money Trust investigation.

As time went on, it became evident that the Federal Reserve consistently generates inflation and federal debt at will, rather than fostering economic stability.

The nation endured the Great Depression and numerous recessions, all pointing to the fact that the Federal Reserve's actions do not result in true stability.
 

Congressman Louis McFadden, who served as the Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency from 1920 to 1931, made a startling declaration:

"When the Federal Reserve Act was passed, the people of the United States were unaware that a global banking system was being established here.

 

It would become a super-state controlled by international bankers and industrialists, working in tandem to enslave the world.

 

The Federal Reserve has gone to great lengths to conceal its powers, but the truth is that it has taken over the reins of government."

Despite its name, the Federal Reserve system is privately owned by member banks, allowing it to devise its own policies without Congressional or Presidential oversight.

Acting as the overseer and reserve supplier, the Fed granted banks access to public funds, substantially bolstering their lending capacity.

As per Devvy Kidd's insights in "Why A Bankrupt America?" the Federal Reserve pays approximately $23 to the Bureau of Engraving & Printing for every 1,000 notes printed.

To illustrate, printing 10,000 $100 notes (totaling one million dollars) would cost the Federal Reserve $230. However, they then secure collateral from the U.S. government, pledging assets equal to the face value of the currency. These assets, which include our land, labor, and other valuables, are collected by the IRS, acting as their agents.

This arrangement effectively grants private banks the authority to create profits at their discretion, as Congress authorized the Fed to regulate and generate money, thereby facilitating inflation.

In line with Lindberg's perspective, the new law provided the means to induce inflation whenever the trusts desired it. This allowed them to sell stocks at high prices during periods of excitement, and later trigger a panic to buy them back at lower prices.

He warned that a day of reckoning would emerge within a few years, which materialized in 1929 with the Stock Market crash and the onset of the Great Depression.

Among the critical powers vested in the Fed was the ability to buy and sell government securities, while extending loans to member banks to enable their purchase. This created a built-in mechanism for banks to profit, especially when the government debt increased.

The passage of the income tax in 1913 provided a means to repay the debt, solidifying this system further.
 

In 1895, the Supreme Court declared a national income tax as unconstitutional. However, in response to this, Senator Nelson Aldrich proposed a constitutional amendment in Congress, which seemed reasonable to the American people.

The amendment suggested an income tax of only one percent on incomes under $20,000, with the assurance that it would never increase.

Though the tax was touted as a means to "soak the rich" due to its graduated structure, the wealthy had already devised plans to safeguard their wealth.

Gary Allen's 1976 book "The Rockefeller File" explains that around the time the 16th Amendment was approved by the states, the Rockefeller Foundation was fully operational.

During this period, Judge Kenesaw Landis ordered the breakup of the Standard Oil monopoly, leading John D. Rockefeller to create four significant tax-exempt foundations. By using these foundations, he not only avoided taxes but also secured a method to pass down his assets through generations without estate and gift taxes.

Each year, the Rockefellers could allocate a significant portion of their incomes to these foundations and deduct the "donations" from their income tax liabilities.

The foundations not only exchanged ownership for control of wealth but also served as a convenient tool for promoting interests that would benefit the wealthy.

Numerous foundation dollars were "donated" to causes that supported the use of drugs while undermining preventive medicine.

This played into the hands of oil companies and drug manufacturers (many of which were owned or controlled by the Rockefeller family) as many drugs were derived from coal tar derivatives, making them the primary beneficiaries of such actions.

With the ability to lend substantial sums to the government through the Federal Reserve, a means to repay the debt via income tax, and an escape from taxation for the wealthy using foundations, the final piece of the puzzle was finding an excuse to borrow money.

As fate would have it, in 1914, World War I began, and with American involvement, the national debt skyrocketed from $1 billion to $25 billion.

In the 1913 presidential election, Woodrow Wilson defeated incumbent William Howard Taft, who had pledged to veto legislation establishing a central bank. To ensure Wilson's victory and divide the Republican vote, J.P. Morgan and Co. provided financial support to Teddy Roosevelt and his Progressive Party.

An eyewitness account reveals that in 1912, Bernard Baruch, a wealthy banker, brought Wilson to Democratic Party headquarters.

During this encounter, Wilson underwent an "indoctrination course" and, in return, agreed that if elected, he would support the projected Federal Reserve and the income tax and seek advice regarding potential involvement in the European war and the composition of his cabinet.

Colonel Edward M. House emerged as Wilson's key advisor during his two terms in office.

Charles Seymour, House's biographer, referred to him as the "unseen guardian angel" of the Federal Reserve Act, skillfully guiding it through Congress.

Another biographer described House's belief that the Constitution, originating from eighteenth-century minds, had become thoroughly outdated, advocating for its replacement.

In 1912, House anonymously published a book titled "Philip Dru: Administrator," featuring a protagonist, Philip Dru, who governs America and implements radical changes, including a graduated income tax, a central bank, and the concept of a "League of Nations."

World War I resulted in a substantial national debt, while those who had supported Wilson reaped immense profits.

Bernard Baruch assumed leadership of the War Industries Board, granting him dictatorial control over the national economy. Alongside the Rockefellers, he reportedly earned over $200 million during the war. Cleveland Dodge, another Wilson supporter, sold munitions to the allies, while J.P. Morgan extended loans totaling hundreds of millions, with the assurance of U.S. entry into the war.

Although profit was certainly a motive, the war also served as a convenient justification for advocating the idea of world government. According to William Hoar's revelations in "Architects of Conspiracy," government investigators during the 1950s discovered that the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, a long-time proponent of globalism, had been planning several years before World War I to involve the United States in a general war to pave the way for world government.

However, a significant obstacle existed, as Americans were unwilling to be entangled in European conflicts. Thus, some kind of incident needed to be orchestrated as provocation, much like the explosion of the battleship Maine that led to the Spanish-American War.

In this case, the sinking of the Lusitania, carrying 128 Americans, by a German submarine provided the necessary provocation, arousing anti-German sentiments. U.S. propaganda depicted all Germans as Huns and fanged serpents, while those opposing the war were labeled traitors.

Such propaganda effectively rallied public support for the war effort.

At the time, what remained undisclosed was that the Lusitaniawas carrying war munitions destined for England, making it a legitimate target for the Germans. Moreover, the Germans had taken out significant advertisements in New York newspapers, cautioning Americans against boarding the ship.

Evidence strongly suggests a deliberate plan to sink the ship by the Germans.

Colin Simpson, author of "The Lusitania," revealed that Winston Churchill, head of the British Admiralty during the war, had ordered a report to assess the political impact if a passenger ship carrying Americans was sunk. The British had managed to decode German naval messages, granting them knowledge of the whereabouts of U-boats near the British Isles.
 

According to Commander Joseph Kenworthy of British Naval Intelligence, the Lusitania was intentionally directed into an area where a U-boat was waiting, with its escorts withdrawn. Consequently, despite Wilson's reelection in 1916 under the slogan "He kept us out of war," America soon found itself embroiled in a European conflict.

Unbeknownst to the American public, Colonel House had already negotiated a secret agreement with England, committing the U.S. to participate in the war.

Following the war and the signing of the Versailles Treaty, which imposed harsh war reparations on Germany, the stage was set for a leader like Hitler to rise in Germany.

During the Paris Peace Conference, Wilson presented his famous "fourteen points," with the fourteenth point proposing a "general association of nations" - the League of Nations - as the initial step toward the vision of One World Government.

According to Ray Stannard Baker,

Wilson's official biographer, the idea for the League of Nations did not originate with Wilson himself. In fact, not a single concept in the Covenant of the League was original to the President.

 

Colonel House was the one responsible for authoring the Covenant, and Wilson merely revised it to match his own language.

The League of Nations was indeed established, but its ambitious plan for world government ultimately failed as the U.S. Senate refused to ratify the Versailles Treaty.

Pat Robertson, in his work "The New World Order," reveals that Colonel House, along with other internationalists, recognized that America would not support any world government scheme without a shift in public opinion. In response, after a series of meetings, it was decided to establish an "Institute of International Affairs" with branches in both the United States and England.

The British branch was named the Royal Institute of International Affairs, led by members of The Round Table, a group initiated by Cecil Rhodes in the late 1800s with the goal of uniting English-speaking peoples worldwide under their governance.

On July 29, 1921, the American branch, known as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), was incorporated in New York.

Founding members included Colonel House and prominent figures in international banking, such as,

J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Otto Kahn, and Jacob Schiff.

This same group had previously orchestrated the establishment of the Federal Reserve System, as reported by Gary Allen in the October 1972 issue of "AMERICAN OPINION."

The Council on Foreign Relations had its inaugural president as John W. Davis, the personal attorney of J.P. Morgan, while Paul Cravath, who represented Morgan interests, served as the vice-president.

Professor Carroll Quigley described the CFR as a front group for J.P. Morgan and Company, in conjunction with the small American Round Table Group.

Over time, Morgan's influence waned, and the Rockefellers took the helm, embracing the idea of a one world government as it aligned with their business philosophy.

John D. Rockefeller, Sr. famously stated,

"Competition is a sin," and they saw global monopoly as the ideal approach as their international presence expanded.

Antony Sutton, a research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution for War, Revolution, and Peace, expounded on this philosophy, explaining that while J.P. Morgan and J.D. Rockefeller once sought monopoly control over industries, they later realized that the most effective means to secure an unchallenged monopoly was through political influence.

They maneuvered to make society work for the monopolists under the guise of pursuing the public good and the public interest.

In 1906, Frederick C. Howe shed light on this strategy in his book "Confessions of a Monopolist," unveiling the rules of big business: acquire a monopoly, manipulate society to serve their interests, and recognize that politics was the most lucrative business of all.
$1 / month

As corporations expanded globally, national monopolies became inadequate in protecting their interests.

The need arose for a one-world system of government, covertly controlled from behind the scenes, a plan that had been in the works since the time of Colonel House. To execute this agenda, weakening the United States both politically and economically was deemed essential.

During the 1920s, America experienced a period of prosperity fueled by easy credit availability. Between 1923 and 1929, the Federal Reserve significantly expanded the money supply by sixty-two percent. When the stock market crashed, many small investors suffered ruin, but the "insiders" were unscathed.

In March 1929, Paul Warburg tipped off about the impending crash, allowing the largest investors to exit the market, as detailed in Allen and Abraham's book "None Dare Call it Conspiracy."

With their fortunes preserved, these insiders were able to acquire companies at a fraction of their actual worth. Shares that had previously sold for a dollar now cost mere nickels, leading to a tremendous increase in the buying power and wealth of the affluent.
 

Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Banking Committee, boldly declared that the market crash was no accident. Rather, it was a meticulously orchestrated event designed by international bankers to create an atmosphere of despair, thereby paving the way for their domination over the entire population.

Curtis Dall, who managed syndicates for Lehman Brothers, an investment firm, was present on the New York Stock Exchange floor during the crash.

In his book "FDR: My Exploited Father-In-Law," he revealed that the crash was a calculated scheme by the World-Money powers to exploit the public by creating a sudden shortage of call money in the New York Market.

The crash served as a pivotal moment for Wall Street to usher in their chosen presidential candidate, FDR. While portrayed as a champion of the common people, the truth was that Roosevelt's family had deep-rooted ties to New York banking since the eighteenth century.

FDR's uncle, Frederic Delano, served on the original Federal Reserve Board. FDR himself attended Groton and Harvard, and during the 1920s, he worked on Wall Street while sitting on the boards of eleven different corporations.

According to Dall, FDR's political ideas and ammunition were meticulously crafted in advance by the CFR-One World Money group, a fact that most Americans were unaware of.

He skillfully employed this prepared "ammunition" to secure the support of internationalist factions.

In 1934, FDR took America off the gold standard, allowing for unchecked money supply expansion, leading to decades of inflation and substantial credit revenues for banks.

By raising gold prices from $20 an ounce to $35, both FDR and Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Jr. (son of a founding CFR member), granted international bankers significant profits.

FDR's most notable program, the New Deal, relied heavily on borrowing to be financed. Interestingly, the very individuals who had played a role in causing the Great Depression lent money to America to recover from its aftermath.

Subsequently, through the establishment of the National Recovery Administration (NRA) in 1930, proposed by Bernard Baruch, these same individuals were granted authority to regulate the nation's economy.

FDR appointed Hugh Johnson, a disciple of Baruch, to lead the NRA, with assistance from CFR member Gerard Swope. Armed with extensive powers to oversee wages, prices, and working conditions, the NRA bore a striking resemblance to what Herbert Hoover referred to as "pure fascism" and likened to Mussolini's "corporate state."

Eventually, the Supreme Court ruled the NRA unconstitutional.

During FDR's tenure, the Council on Foreign Relations wielded considerable influence over the political landscape of the United States. Key members included Treasury Secretary Morgenthau, Secretary of State Edward Stettinus, War Secretary Henry Stimson, and Assistant Secretary of State Sumner Welles.

Since 1934, nearly every U.S. Secretary of State has been a member of the CFR, and this trend extended to ALL Secretaries of War or Defense, from Henry L. Stimson to Richard Cheney.
 

The CFR has also exercised significant control over the CIA since its inception, starting with Allen Dulles, a founding CFR member and brother of John Foster Dulles, who served as Secretary of State under President Eisenhower.

Allen Dulles had been a participant in the Paris Peace Conference, joined the CFR in 1926, and later became its president.

John Foster Dulles had once been a young protege of Woodrow Wilson during the Paris Peace Conference. As a founding member of the CFR, he held significant positions within the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, further solidifying his ties to the Rockefellers.

During the 1940 presidential election, FDR triumphed over the internationalist Wendell Willkie, who later became a member of the CFR and authored a book titled "One World."

Congressman Usher Burdick voiced concerns on the House floor, alleging that Willkie's campaign was financed by J.P. Morgan and New York utility bankers.

Despite low support among Republicans, the media portrayed him as the primary Republican candidate.

Since then, the majority of presidential candidates have been CFR members. Even President Truman, who wasn't a member, was advised by a group of "wise men," all of whom were CFR members.

In the 1952 and 1956 elections, CFR Adlai Stevenson contested against CFR Eisenhower.

The 1960 election witnessed CFR Kennedy (who some believe was assassinated because of his unwillingness to comply with all their plans) competing against CFR Nixon.

In 1964, the GOP caused a stir by nominating its candidate over Nelson Rockefeller, leading the Rockefeller and CFR wing to depict Barry Goldwater as a dangerous radical.

The 1968 election featured CFR Nixon running against CFR Humphrey, and in 1972, CFR Nixon faced off against CFR McGovern.

CFR-affiliated candidates who have vied for the presidency include George McGovern, Walter Mondale, Edmund Muskie, John Anderson, and Lloyd Bentsen.

In 1976, we had Jimmy Carter, a member of the Trilateral Commission, which was established by David Rockefeller and CFR member Zbigniew Brzezinski to foster economic collaboration between Japan, Europe, and the United States, with the aim of managing the world economy and facilitating a peaceful evolution of the global system.

Additionally, we have seen CFR directors George Bush (1977-79) and Bill Clinton, all of whom have advocated for the "New World Order" under the control of the United Nations.

However, it's worth noting that,

the present UN organization is the brainchild of the CFR and stands on land in Manhattan donated by the family of the former CFR chairman, David Rockefeller, as described by Pat Robertson.

The original concept for the UN emerged from the Informal Agenda Group in 1943, led by Secretary of State Cordell Hull.

 

All members, except Hull, were CFR affiliates, and the idea was first proposed by Isaiah Bowman, a founding member of the CFR.

During the drafting of the United Nations charter in 1949, the American delegation included,

CFR members Nelson Rockefeller, John Foster Dulles, and John McCloy, alongside individuals like Harry Dexter White, Owen Lattimore, and Alger Hiss, who were alleged to be communist agents and also CFR members.

In total, forty-seven CFR members were part of the United States delegation, effectively exerting significant influence over the outcome.

Since then, the CFR, along with its allies in the mass media, foundations, and political groups, has consistently advocated for granting more authority and power to the United Nations.

Instances like Bush and the Gulf War have been presented as calls for a "New World Order."

Notably, Admiral Chester Ward, who was a CFR member for over a decade, became one of its staunchest critics.

In his 1975 book, "Kissinger on the Couch," he exposed the inner workings of the organization, stating,

"The most powerful cliques in these elitist groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and national independence of the United States."

A significant portion of CFR members hold ideologies favoring a one-world government, and their long-term objectives were officially outlined in September 1961 in State Department Document 7277, adopted during the Nixon Administration.

The document aimed at the eventual elimination of all armed forces and armaments except those needed for internal order within nations and for the UN's peace forces. The goal was to make the global government so robust that no nation could challenge its authority.

Within the CFR, there exists a smaller yet more influential group composed of Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Their primary aim is to secure the world banking monopoly, regardless of who ends up controlling the global government.

According to Ward, the Rockefeller brothers lead this faction.

It is essential to recognize that this is not a fringe or lunatic group; rather, it consists of members belonging to one of the most powerful private organizations globally. They determine and wield control over American economic, social, political, and military policies.

Their influence extends to leaders in academia, public service, business, and the media, as stated in the CFR's 1993 "Annual Report."

According to their own description, the Council on Foreign Relations was founded with the aim of familiarizing private Americans with the increasing responsibilities and obligations of the United States. They intended to establish an organization that continuously studied U.S. foreign policy for the benefit of its members and a wider audience of interested Americans.

Through numerous sponsored programs, CFR members engage in exchanging views with American and foreign officials, policy experts, and corporate business leaders.

They discuss foreign policy issues, consider international concerns relevant to the business community, and collaborate with affiliated groups of community leaders across the United States, often meeting with decision-makers.
 

The CFR maintains that it hosts various perspectives while advocating for none, and it claims to have no official affiliation with the U.S. government.

However, the reality suggests otherwise, as evidenced by many Council members being elected as presidents of the United States, serving in cabinet and sub-cabinet positions, and occupying prominent roles in Congress, the Supreme Court, the Joint Chiefs, the Federal Reserve, and various other federal bureaucracies.

While the CFR denies direct affiliation with the government, its pervasive influence effectively positions its members as the government machinery.
 

One recurring view expressed by the CFR, as highlighted in the 50^th anniversary issue of "Foreign Affairs," their official publication, was an article titled "Reflections on Our National Purpose" by Kingman Brewster, Jr.

According to Brewster, our national purpose should entail transcending our nationality and taking calculated risks to encourage others to share their sovereignty with us, implying a movement towards global cooperation and shared governance.

These "risks" involve reducing our military capability to a point where we would be defenseless against the "peace-keeping" forces of a global UN government.

The idea is that we should willingly relinquish our sovereignty in the name of the "world community."

Subsequently, we once witnessed the case of Spc. 4 Michael New, a U.S. soldier stationed in Germany, who refused to wear the uniform of the UN and faced an "administrative discharge."

He rightfully contends that he took an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution, not the United Nations. Many other Americans, including myself, have taken the same oath, and we firmly believe it is our sworn duty to protect the Constitution.

Simultaneously, those attempting to dismantle the Constitution and undermine our sovereignty is being rewarded with honors and positions.

At least they are not hypocritical; they display an overwhelming arrogance.

"In short, the 'house of world order' must be constructed from the bottom up rather than from the top down... Eroding national sovereignty gradually and discreetly will be more effective than the old-fashioned direct assault…"

Richard N. Gardner, former deputy assistant Secretary of State,

in "Foreign Affairs" in April 1974.

James Warburg, son of CFR founder Paul Warburg and a member of FDR's "brain trust," testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 17, 1950,

"We will have world government, whether you like it or not - through conquest or consent."

Was this an AMERICAN speaking, or a dangerous lunatic?

Who are these individuals threatening to CONQUER us?

They are a group that wields significant power and influence, slowly implementing their agenda day by day.

Members of the CFR in the mass media, education, and entertainment spheres promote their propaganda of "humanism" and world brotherhood. They advocate for a world government, urging us to set aside nationalities and patriotism in favor of global harmony. They claim we can resolve our own issues without the need for morals, or  - as they see everything as relative.

However, if we possessed moral character and values, we would recognize the true evil behind their actions.

These individuals are evil because they prioritize money and power, letting greed drive their actions towards achieving their goals. They have abandoned morality and conscience, viewing these principles, along with our Constitution, as "outdated."

It is insanity to amass more wealth than one could ever spend, yet still, it never suffices. They feel compelled to control governments, instigate wars, and conspire to rule the world - all to safeguard their fortunes from the grasp of the "common people" who may awaken to their unscrupulous means of acquiring wealth and demand accountability for their crimes.

That is why they perpetually sow division among us through "diversity," Affirmative Action, and other divisive programs.

They pit black against white, men against women, rural against urban, straight against gay, and ranchers against environmentalists, among countless others, to divert our attention from their actions.

We, as We The People, are held to a much higher standard.

If we so much as threaten the President or a public official, we are swiftly charged with a crime. Yet, the One-World-Gang can openly threaten the Constitution and the liberties of We The People, the sovereign rulers of this nation, and face no consequences.

They may not fear the power of man, believing they have orchestrated everything to ensure their continued dominance in this world. However, among them are individuals who have sworn an oath before God to uphold and defend the Constitution - the President, members of Congress, and the military.

They may one day discover that they indeed have something to fear if they betray their solemn oath.
 

Colonel House, a figure with a controversial past, still had relatives controlling the CFR long after his tenure. Karen Elliot House served as Chairman of the Membership Committee and is a member of the Nominating Committee, alongside Jeane Kirkpatrick.

David Rockefeller held the title of "Honorary Chairman of the Board" after serving as Chairman from 1970 to 1985, and "Director Emeritus" after being a Director from 1949 to 1985.

Peter G. Peterson served as Chairman, Admiral B. R. Inman as Vice Chairman, and Thomas Foley and Jeane Kirkpatrick as Directors on the Executive Committee.

These private citizens enjoyed frequent access to government officials and policy makers, yet the outcomes of their meetings could only be shared with other government officials, corporate officers, or law partners.

They were strictly prohibited from disclosing any attributed statement to the public through newspapers or TV, as mentioned in the "Annual Report."

Shouldn't OUR public officials be prevented from holding secret meetings with private groups?

Public officials should exclusively discuss public business and policy matters in a public forum.

The Public, which is us, must be remembered.

There is much more to uncover about this group and their plans for America.

As Gary Allen wrote in "The Rockefeller File",

they are allegedly involved in various regional government plans that aim to erase city, county, and state lines, subjecting us to the control of federal bureaucrats.

Additionally, they advocate for stringent "land use" controls, aiming for federal control over everything.

Their intentions seem to be focused on controlling the federal government itself and all their goals can be rediscovered in the UN's "Sustainable Development Goals."

There are also numerous allegations of involvement in activities like,

• gun running

• drug smuggling

• prostitution

• sex trafficking,

...as well as several mysterious assassinations and "suicides" of witnesses and individuals who have come too close to the truth.

However, this is a complex and separate issue that merits further investigation.