Kudrytskyi's dismissal was decried by many in the energy industry and also prompted alarm in Brussels.
At the time, Kudrytskyi told POLITICO he was the victim of the relentless centralization of authority that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his powerful head of office Andriy Yermak often pursue.
He said he feared "corrupt individuals" would end up taking over the state-owned company.
According to his supporters, it is that kind of talk - and his refusal to remain silent - that explains why Kudrytskyi ended up in a glass-enclosed cubicle in a downtown Kyiv courtroom last week, where he was arraigned on embezzlement charges.
Now, opposition lawmakers and civil society activists are up in arms, labeling this yet another example of Ukraine's leadership using lawfare to intimidate opponents and silence critics by accusing them of corruption or of collaboration with Russia.
Zelenskyy's office declined to comment...
Others who have received the same treatment include Zelenskyy's predecessor in office, Petro Poroshenko, who was sanctioned and arraigned on corruption charges this year - a move that could prevent him from standing in a future election.
Sanctions have frequently been threatened or used against opponents, effectively freezing assets and blocking the sanctioned person from conducting any financial transactions, including using credit cards or accessing bank accounts.
Poroshenko has since,
accused Zelenskyy of creeping "authoritarianism," and seeking to "remove any competitor from the political landscape."
That may also explain why Kudrytskyi has been arraigned, according to opposition lawmaker Mykola Knyazhitskiy, who believes the use of lawfare to discredit opponents is only going to get worse as the presidential office prepares for a possible election next year in the event there's a ceasefire.
They are using the courts "to clear the field of competitors" to shape a dishonest election, he fears.
Others, including prominent Ukrainian activist and head of the Anti-Corruption Action Center Daria Kaleniuk, argue the president and his coterie are using the war to monopolize power to such a degree that it threatens the country's democracy.



