|
by Alexander Dugin
July 08, 2026
from
MultipolarPress Website
Article also
HERE
Alexander Dugin reveals
why
escalation must be mutual
or
negotiations with the West
become a
trap....!
As expected, no peace between Iran and the United States ever
materialized.
The US resumed bombing Iranian territory. Tehran
struck American military bases in Bahrain and once again closed the
Strait of Hormuz.
It didn't work, and it could never have worked.
You don't make deals with
Dajjal. 1
That is a basic tenet of Shia metaphysics...
Delaying the war and maintaining the mere appearance of negotiations
always and in every circumstance plays into the hands of the West.
In
Iran, just as in our own war with
the West, there is an ironclad rule:
escalation must be mutual.
The enemy escalates, we escalate.
Only then can we influence the process.
Otherwise, the enemy escalates unilaterally,
entirely in its own interests, while we are left merely reacting
in a passive, follow-the-leader mode.
In essence, this kind of one-sided escalation
during wartime creates a system of external control.
By the way,
Why aren't statues of Baal being burned in
Russia?
Why aren't we raising a storm over the
criminal
networks connected to
Epstein?
Why do we fail to respond in any meaningful
way to the direct participation of Western countries - the
Baltic states, Britain, and Germany - in the war against us,
even though we ourselves report on it?
Iran goes to the negotiating table and ends up
with nothing.
For outsiders, this is obvious.
Sometimes you see things more clearly from
the outside.
Incidentally, right after the first US and
Israeli strikes on Iranian leadership, the
IRGC eliminated a significant part
of the sixth column.
Apparently, some still remain...
Negotiations can be held, but only in your own interests and never
publicly. As soon as they become open and public, they instantly
turn into an information weapon that only the West uses, and
exclusively for its own purposes.
That's why any mention of Witkoff, Kushner, or even
Kirill Dmitriev, at a certain point, becomes a blow to the
morale of the soldiers at the front and to the patriotic mood of the
country.
Just one mention is enough...
It's the same with the seemingly harmless
broadcast of an old Vladimir Pozner program on Channel
One. 2
The same thing is happening with the Iranians.
At the funeral of Imam Khamenei and his
family, furious curses were hurled at the negotiators with
'Dajjal':
Pezeshkian and Araghchi...
I don't think they are personally to blame.
This is simply how the laws of information warfare work.
The West sets these rules, and it is the only one
that uses them unilaterally...!
Notes
-
Translator's note (TN): Dajjal is
the one-eyed false messiah and ultimate deceiver in Islamic
eschatology. In Shia tradition in particular,
he embodies absolute evil and
deception, making any form of compromise with him
impossible.
-
TN: Dugin refers to reruns of old
programs by Vladimir Pozner, a well-known Russian
television journalist with liberal and pro-Western leanings.
Even seemingly harmless broadcasts of this kind are viewed
by many patriots as subtle instruments of information
warfare that erode public morale and the will to resist.
|
