|

by Anton Troianovski, Jonathan Swan,
Eric Schmitt and Julian E. Barnes
August 08, 2026
from
TheNewYorkTimes Website
Article also
HERE
|
Xinyun Wu
contributed reporting from Taipei.
Anton Troianovski writes about American foreign
policy and national security for The Times from
Washington. He was previously a foreign correspondent
based in Moscow and Berlin.
Jonathan Swan is a White House reporter for The
Times, covering the administration of Donald J. Trump.
Contact him securely on Signal: @jonathan.941
Eric Schmitt is a national security correspondent
for The Times. He has reported on U.S. military affairs
and counterterrorism for more than three decades.
Contact him securely on Signal: @ericschmitt.36.
Julian E. Barnes covers the U.S. intelligence
agencies and international security matters for The
Times. He has written about security issues for more
than two decades.
A version of this
article appears in print on Aug. 9, 2026, Section A,
Page 1 of the New York edition with the headline:
Shrinking Supply Of U.S. Munitions Has Wide Effects. |

Buildings targeted by
airstrikes in Tehran in April.
Bombing Iran burned
through thousands of multimillion-dollar missiles
that contain
precision parts from a global web of suppliers
and can take years to
produce.
Credit: Arash
Khamooshi/Polaris
for The New York
Times
The
Iran war
has
depleted U.S. weapons stockpiles,
resulting
in a significant erosion of firepower.
A more
drawn-out Iran conflict
benefits
Moscow and Beijing,
some
analysts say...
President
Trump's
war against Iran has depleted U.S. weapons stockpiles to
troubling levels, siphoning supplies from Asia and Europe, according
to senior officials.
The rapidly shrinking supply of air-defense missiles and other
critical weaponry in Europe and Asia not only leaves the U.S.
military less equipped, but could also leave Russia and China
feeling emboldened should they contemplate a potential conflict with
the United States, experts said.
Bombing Iran burned through thousands of
multimillion-dollar missiles that contain precision parts from a
global web of suppliers and can take years to produce....
Defending against Iran's retaliatory barrages has
worn down U.S. stocks of air-defense missiles to an extent that has
privately alarmed top officials in the Trump administration and has
led to the United States' delaying deliveries to European and Asian
customers.

A mural showing Iranian missiles
attacking a
U.S. Navy ship in Tehran
earlier this
year.
Credit: Arash
Khamooshi/Polaris
for The New
York Times
The Iran campaign,
has forced the Pentagon to rush ships,
aircraft and air-defense units from across Europe and Asia to
the Middle East, an effort with cascading consequences
for equipment maintenance and troop morale, U.S. officials said.
The result is a significant erosion of American
firepower in those regions, a shift with long-term implications that
are a growing concern in the military and intelligence communities,
senior U.S. and Western officials said.
Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said the
United States has,
"more than enough firepower to carry out any
operation the president orders at any time and place."
But experts say the munitions crisis - part of
which Mr. Trump inherited from President
Joseph R. Biden Jr. - is almost
certain to outlast his presidency.
Tom Karako, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic
and International Studies (CSIS)
in Washington, said the depletion of munitions was a,
"generational annihilation of the means of
conventional deterrence."
The impact on how decisions are made in Beijing
and Moscow, he said, could resonate for years.
"It's impossible for that not to have a
significant effect on the decision calculus of Russia and
China," said Mr. Karako, who has been tracking U.S. weapons
stockpiles.
"They may do something quite deliberate and
at the time of their choosing, because keep in mind - we're
going to take years to reconstitute."
In meetings in the lead-up to the Iran war, Gen.
Dan Caine, the chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, informed the president of,
the risks of dipping deeper into drained
stockpiles, according to two officials with knowledge of the
exchanges.
Mr. Trump still decided to go ahead,
believing the war would be over quickly.
A spokesman for General Caine declined to
comment on his private conversations with the president.
After attacking Iran alongside Israel on Feb. 28,
Mr. Trump repeatedly promised victory within weeks.
More than five months later, he
remains unable to bend Iran to his will, or even to find a way
to end the war...
The munitions shortage
is said to have played a role in persuading
Mr. Trump to put aside a major bombing campaign
late last month.
But it also shows how the president's
decision to attack Iran has left the United States and its
allies more vulnerable to other threats.
The Trump administration has worked with military
contractors to try to accelerate and expand production.
But even accounting for those efforts, it
could take more than two years for the United States to
replenish the more than 1,500 Patriot air-defense interceptor
missiles that have been used in the Iran war.
The current U.S. inventory of those missiles is
fewer than 1,700, according to two people briefed on the stockpile
who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive
military details.
Mr. Trump has been enraged about
news stories covering the
munitions shortages.
He has ordered a massive leak hunt across his
government and is demanding criminal prosecutions.
He has told advisers in private that any
discussion of the munitions crisis signals weakness to the
country's enemies, and he continues in public to downplay the
issue, deny it exists or blame his predecessor.
"Our defense companies are making more
munitions than ever before, while rapidly expanding their
plants and equipment at record levels," Ms. Leavitt, the
White House press secretary, said in a statement.
"Anyone entrusted with access to
classified military information who leaks it to the media is
betraying that trust and breaking federal law, and should be
prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law."
Sean Parnell, the chief
Pentagon spokesman, said reports of weapons shortages are false,
adding that the United States has,
"everything required to strike at the time
and place of the president's choosing."
The most immediate impact of the munitions
shortage is being felt in Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital.
President Volodymyr Zelensky
of Ukraine said this week that the
number of air-defense missiles being provided to his country by
Western allies had dropped threefold this year compared with 2025.
On Wednesday, Ukraine failed to intercept any of
the 28 missiles fired by Russia, which killed at least 17 people.
More interceptors, Mr. Zelensky said,
"could have saved the lives of those killed
today."

President Volodymyr Zelensky of
Ukraine in Germany,
where Ukrainian
soldiers trained
on the Patriot
air-defense missile system in 2024.
Credit: Pool
photo by Jens Buttner
The fundamental problem, analysts say, is that Russia has ramped up
its missile production to a greater extent than Ukraine's Western
supporters have been able to manufacture air defenses.
The Iran war exacerbated the
mismatch.
Representative
Jason Crow, a Colorado Democrat
who sits on the House Armed Services and Intelligence Committees,
said the,
"antiquated" U.S. defense procurement process
"doesn't allow us to actually keep pace with the rapidly
evolving nature of warfare."
"Frankly, our adversaries don't have those hindrances," Mr. Crow
said.
The United States and its allies have begun to
hoard air-defense missiles amid the global supply crunch.
Mr. Trump, asked by a reporter in the Oval Office
on Thursday about Mr. Zelensky's plea for more missiles, shot back:
"We want missiles too."
Mr. Trump regularly insists that Mr. Biden's
support for Ukraine is to blame for any shortfalls in U.S. weapons
stocks.
He said on social media on Thursday that the
United States had,
"massive amounts of 'munitions,' especially
of certain types."
It is true that the United States has a vast
arsenal of less advanced munitions, including more than 100,000
guided bombs that are dropped from aircraft, according to the
Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The problem with many of those weapons is that
they have to be released close to their targets, putting more
warplanes at risk of getting shot down.
High-end cruise missiles avoid that risk because they can be
launched from hundreds of miles away.
But the U.S. military largely exhausted its
stocks of certain types of long-range missiles - such as the Army
Tactical Missile Systems, or
ATACMS, and Precision Strike
Missiles (PrSM)
- during the Iran war, officials said.

An Army Tactical Missile System
displayed
during the inauguration of a new artillery plant
of the
ammunition maker Rheinmetall,
in Unterluess,
Germany, last year.
Credit:
Annegret Hilse/
Reuters
Long-range missiles would be critical in a war against China or
Russia, countries with far more advanced air defenses than Iran.
Both governments are tracking U.S. stockpiles
closely, estimating them through public sources like the
congressional budget process and defense contractor announcements,
as well as via their spy satellites and other surveillance systems,
according to a U.S. official familiar with defense intelligence.
"The situation is shaping up very favorably,"
a popular Russian pro-war blogger, Aleksandr Kots,
recently wrote.
"The less precision-guided weaponry the U.S.
has, the less will reach Ukraine."
Even if Mr. Trump's successor wants to ramp up
aid to Ukraine, Mr. Kots added,
"doing so will be impossible with empty
arsenals."
The long-term impact of the depletion may be
greatest in Asia, where the United States has long been preparing
for the possibility of a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, the
self-governing island that Beijing claims as its own.
The U.S. military's Indo-Pacific Command became a
major source of munitions for the Iran war, with many of its
Tomahawks and other long-range missiles in the region - critical to
a fight with China - transferred from its stocks.
Hundreds of advanced air-defense interceptors have been sent to the
Middle East from South Korea and elsewhere in Asia, while a carrier
strike group and some of the Navy's highest-end destroyers were
deployed from the region to support the Iran campaign.
U.S. troops in South Korea would be more
vulnerable in a war with North Korea because the Pentagon has
redirected tactical surveillance assets to the Middle East and
withdrawn air defenses, a U.S. official said.
The depletion has wide-ranging effects.
In Asia, some U.S. officials fear that
South Korea and Japan will doubt the ability of the United
States to protect them with nonnuclear defenses, and will be
more inclined to seek their own nuclear weapons to establish
more credible deterrence.
In Europe, U.S. allies are already
looking to increase weapons purchases from other countries,
given the production backlog in the United States.
Russia and
China have long understood that
the U.S. stockpile is limited, officials say, and now understand
that inventories will take time to be refilled to levels that would
allow for the execution of certain war plans.
In that sense,
a more drawn-out Iran conflict benefits
Moscow and Beijing, some analysts said...

Workers make repairs to buildings
that were
targeted by U.S.-Israeli airstrikes in Tehran in April.
Credit: Arash
Khamooshi/Polaris
for The New
York Times
"The longer this war runs and the more we
continue to exchange fire with Iran, the worse the munitions
problem becomes for the United States, and the larger and more
visible this window of vulnerability becomes," said Todd
Harrison, a defense analyst at the
American Enterprise Institute.
Dara Massicot, an expert on the
Russian military at the
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace,
said that Moscow had already been reassessing its assumptions about
U.S. military stockpiles before the start of the Iran war.
The four years of conflict in Ukraine,
she said, might have shown Russian military planners that the United
States was slower at ramping up weapons production than they had
believed.
"That's the wrong kind of math to go into the
Russian system, because then they start changing their
perception of their own power vis-à-vis NATO," said Ms. Massicot,
who recently returned from a trip to Ukraine.
"It causes them to come to conclusions that
we may not want them to."
|