by James Rogers
March 26, 2022
from ConservativeWoman Website








Two years

that trampled on

freedoms earned over centuries...

The concept of 'man-made climate change' has always been a complete falsehood.

I used to think it was a simple scam that enabled governments to raise taxes and levies on prosperous Western societies; but it is now a much bigger, and more complicated, matter.

Whether or not, back in 1992, with Al Gore's book Earth in the Balance, our current situation was the planned destination, or whether or not other agendas have been piggy-backed on to environmentalism, we don't know.

Two years ago we were presented with another 'inconvenient truth', that the government - indeed governments almost everywhere - were suspending our liberties 'for a few weeks'.

As March 2020 dragged into April and May, stuck in their homes,

people began to do their own research...

It became obvious to me that what was happening was not about a 'deadly virus', and I stated my belief was that vested interests were working to ensure that the temporary socialization of our society and economy became permanent.

Expressing this belief cost me many relationships.

In spring 2020, despite Johnson's effective parliamentary coup to rule by decree, I did not believe that our government's C-19 (Covid-19) strategy represented those vested interests.

By autumn though, I did. Dr Mike Yeadon and friends demolished the Corman-Drosten Paper on PCR tests.

This dishonest paper asserted that PCR testing for C-19 was both valid and necessary, and we know that (Matt) Hancock based his whole act and legal authority on there being legions of 'infectious' people around, all procured by PCR tests.

Two of the signatories of the Corman-Drosten Paper, Maria Zambon (also a senior Sage member) and Joanna Ellis, are senior staff of Public Health England, so the British government knew full well that their strategy was based on scientific fraud...

At Christmas 2021 we learned that in spring 2020 our government certainly did not believe that C-19 was a deadly illness:

they worked in offices together, celebrated birthdays and Fridays together, all in the face of the 'worst viral pandemic since 1919'.

Nothing about C-19 has made any sense whatsoever. It was a purposely manufactured 'crisis' and entirely sustained by propaganda and massive government over-reach.

For the past 25 years various viruses created problems that were dealt with quite quickly, and emergencies were normalized swiftly.

Isn't that one of the principal functions of government?

 

To keep society calm, stable, well-managed and productive?

 

So why was a cold virus, fatal only to 0.1 per cent of those who caught it, allowed to dominate our lives for two years?

Two years in which the democratic values and legal freedoms that took centuries to generate have been well and truly stomped on, and the integrity of science trashed.

Why have governments, health services and academics all around the world willfully ignored the undeniable damage that the jabs have done?

 

Why have they ignored the fact that the jabs never worked as advertised?

 

Why have the media been complicit in this?

In WWII governments came down very hard on defeatism and fear-mongering.

Anyone claiming the nation was doomed was arrested and faced a possible death penalty. With C-19, governments went out of the way to generate fear.

With our own money, they bought the media, and created the illusion of a devastating 'crisis' needing radical solutions that only governments could provide.

Foolish people and lazy thinkers accepted this without question, especially as governments paid people not to work, and/or allowed them to 'work from home'.

What was for them not to like...?

In 2020 and 2021 a lot of people saved a lot of money - but they never questioned the true cost of submitting to regulation.

Governments abused their powers and trampled on freedoms, and in parallel, without too many people noticing, they proceeded to create digital systems that will enable them to keep the people subdued and manipulated for ever.

In all probability, digital ID, health records and currency are nearly ready to be implemented; they are just waiting for the 'right time'. What the signal will be and who will give it are interesting questions to ponder.

Governments' responses to C-19 also created significant economic problems, all of which have been and will be disproportionately be borne by small businesses and lower income households while making big business much, much richer.

These economic issues have been compounded by what is happening in Ukraine. Nothing about this 'crisis' makes any sense either. It is clear that the West has been manipulating Ukrainian politics for over 20 years.

So, together with 'pestilence' and 'war', the other 'crisis' that has been rolling along for 25 years is 'climate change', or more accurately, the West's source(s) of energy.

Once again,

there's not much about the West's renewable energy strategy that makes sense...

That carbon dioxide is a 'problem' makes no rational sense.

Power generation by means of nuclear technology, fracking and even creating energy from burning household waste makes perfect sense:

• yet all have been eschewed in favor of more expensive and damaging options

• windmills and solar energy, the construction, maintenance and operation of which costs far more than the alternatives...

They desecrate the environment and provide nowhere near as much energy as is required.

It is clear that we are all going to have to consume less energy than we do now. How this will be managed is another interesting question. It seems it will be possible only with coercion.

Coercion? Impossible...?

Not at all:

How easy was it for governments to 'persuade' people to get jabbed?

 

How easy was it for them to get them to turn on their neighbor for not being jabbed?

 

How easy was for them to make useless face masks a symbol of virtue and integrity?

 

How easy has it been for governments to get people to believe that the Ukrainian government is a squeaky-clean 'victim'?

When the power cuts come - and they will:

why else has the government been pushing 'smart meters' for ten years?

Watch out for the signs in windows that proudly claim,

'Happy to sit in the cold and dark to save polar bears' or 'Don't drive, save the world' or 'Proud to eat raw food so we don't have to buy Russian gas'...

It's been so easy for 'them' to make new truths, which in turn must create deniers, who are unequivocal demons.

Ever wondered,

Why we are being continually told that 'racism' is a huge stain on the world, and that footballers must kneel before every game?

 

Why are we constantly being made to feel bad about being white?

 

Why were Britons not allowed to continue the good progress in race relations that commenced in the mid-1980s, and saw Britain morph into a nation that was very comfortable with itself in the 1990s?

Why has racism become a 'devastating problem', when we all know that our society is tolerant and benevolent?

Because governments use 'racism' as a method of dividing and conquering...

Similarly, all the tripe about LBGTQ...

It easy for governments to accomplish their prime task of economic devastation and the socialization and total control over society, if people are too busy arguing about,

'micro-aggressions', not feeling 'safe', the 'right to choose gender' and why there aren't enough black people playing cricket for England...

Those who 'went green' are,

the same people who insist that Britain is a 'racist country', the same people who voted 'remain' and demanded the result of a democratic referendum be overturned, the same people who hated Trump, declared that he would bring about disaster and were happy when a senile man became leader of the free world.

They are the same people who wear masks and demand that you get jabbed, the same people who demanded lockdown regulation and cheered the £400billion spent on it all, the same people who are holding fundraisers for Ukraine.

They are the same people who believe in the 'toxic privilege of white males' and the same people who believe that gender is not a matter determined by nature and science.

These are people who believe in the 'greater good'; they are no doubt genuinely nice people, but they are wrong about almost everything.

 

They have believed everything that the BBC and Guardian have told them for 25 years.

Has anyone else noticed how every vox pop and interview with a sports star involves questions about 'emotions'?

Emotion is now the sole currency of television, it has become far, far more important than reason.

 

Emotions can be manipulated, and so can people - think about all of those who spent Thursday evenings banging pots for the NHS (which had shut down).

These people ceased to do their own reading and research, they stopped thinking critically and rationally, they feel guilty about being comfortably off and they have no qualms at all about sacrificing individual freedom and democracy if doing so justifies their beliefs and helps 'their side' win.

The very fact that society - even the Royal Society - can entertain unscientific, and totally uneconomic, ideas about the climate, about viruses and the basic biology of gender, tells us everything about the situation we are in.

Governments are manipulating everything, and a huge section of society has swallowed, or is too polite or afraid of being controversial, to stand against it.

In the not-too-distant future, it is highly likely that the 'crises' of pestilence, war and energy will create economic devastation.

I guess that this will be the point where they impose their systems of control and universal basic income, and if you want your 'income', you'd better get a jab - yes, there's a fair chance it will kill you, but it's for the greater good...

Our society will be socialized permanently, our lives will change for ever, and this will be cheered to the rafters by people whose mindset has been trained to 'care' about things other than their basic freedoms...