| 
			  
			  
				
				
				 
				by Natasha LongoJune 14, 2013
 
				from
				
				PreventDisease Website       
					
						
							| 
							 Natasha 
							Longo has a master's degree in nutrition and is a 
							certified fitness and nutritional counselor. She has 
							consulted on public health policy and procurement in 
							Canada, Australia, Spain, Ireland, England and 
							Germany. |      
			Nestle and Mead Johnson Nutrition recently dismissed 
			calls to remove 
			
			genetically-modified organisms 
			(GMO) from their infant formula products in the US and now evidence 
			is coming forth on long-term risks related to infant formulations.
   
			Epidemiological research has indicated a 
			relationship between infant formula feeding and increased risk of 
			chronic diseases later in life including obesity, type-2 diabetes, 
			and cardiovascular disease.    
			Researchers stated that the 
			comprehensive metabolic implications of formula vs. breast-feeding 
			play a role in long-term health risks.    
			
  
 
			Nestle and Mead Johnson Nutrition recently dismissed calls to remove 
			genetically-modified organisms (GMO) from their infant formula 
			products in the US, citing the approved use of GMOs by several 
			national and global regulatory bodies.
   
			According to anti-GMO campaign group, 
			GMO Inside, these companies "likely" use GMO ingredients such as 
			soy, corn and sugar in their popular infant formula products.   
			In the letter, the campaign group urged 
			Nestle USA's Paul Bulcke, Abbott Laboratories' Miles White, 
			and Mead Johnson Nutrition's R. Kasper Jakobsen to, 
				
				"take a proactive stand and announce 
				a phase out of all GMOs in your infant formulas in 2013."   
				"Similac, Enfamil, and Gerber Good 
				Start - which combined account for more than 90% of all infant 
				formula sales in the US - are exposing American and Canadian 
				babies to potentially grave health risks by using genetically 
				modified ingredients," said a statement accompanying the letter. 
			Parents who feed their newborn and young 
			babies
			
			any of Nestle Gerber's product lines are 
			risking their infant's health by exposure to an abundance 
			of toxic genetically modified ingredients that the company claims 
			are "safe."   
			GMO Inside issued its call 
			to Nestle USA, Mead Johnson Nutrition and Abbott Laboratories just 
			days after Abbott Laboratories shareholders voted not to remove GMOs 
			from the company's Similac infant formula range.         
			Study Shows 
			Infant Formula Linked To Chronic Disease
 
			The new data, published in the
			
			Journal of Proteome Research, 
			suggests that babied fed on formula, rather than breast milk, 
			experience metabolic stress that play a role in long-recognized 
			links between formula-feeding and an increased risk of obesity, type 
			2 diabetes and other conditions in adult life.   
			Led by Dr Carolyn Slupsky from 
			the University of California, Davis, USA, the research team used an 
			infant rhesus monkey model to comprehensively compare the metabolic 
			implications of formula- and breast-feeding practices by measuring 
			urinary and blood metabolites in addition to sampling cytokines and 
			fecal microbial profiles. 
				
				"We show that formula-fed infants 
				are larger than their breast-fed counterparts and have a 
				different gut microbiome that includes higher levels of bacteria 
				from the Ruminococcus genus and lower levels of bacteria from 
				the Lactobacillus genus," explained Slupsky and her colleagues, 
			...adding that the formula-fed infants 
			also had higher serum insulin coupled with higher amino acid levels, 
			while amino acid degradation products were higher in breast-fed 
			infants.   
			Previous research has shown that babies 
			fed a dairy-based formula
			
			grow up to have higher blood pressure 
			than babies who are breast-fed, British researchers reported.
 Babies fed enriched bottle milk are also
			
			more likely to be obese by the age of five.
 
 Human milk oligosaccharides, or HMO, produce short-chain fatty acids 
			that feed a beneficial microbial population in the infant gut. Not 
			only that, the bacterial composition adjusts as the baby grows older 
			and its needs change.
 
 Earlier studies have shown that breast milk lowers the incidence of 
			diarrhea, influenza and respiratory infections during infancy, while 
			protecting against the later development of allergies, type 1 
			diabetes, multiple sclerosis and other illnesses.
   
			As scientists have learned more about 
			the role intestinal flora plays in health, they have gained 
			appreciation for how an infant's early diet can affect this 
			beneficial microbial universe.
 The report by San Diego bioengineers was based on in vitro 
			tests comparing the digestion of fresh human breast milk and nine 
			different infant formulas.
   
			It was online in the journal 
			
			Pediatric Research. 
				
				"Our findings support the contention 
				that infant feeding practice profoundly influences metabolism in 
				developing infants and may be the link between early feeding and 
				the development of metabolic disease later in life," Dr Carolyn 
				Slupsky stated.   
			
 
			Study details   
			Slupsky and her colleagues used the 
			rhesus monkey model to compare the comprehensive metabolic 
			implications of formula- and breast-feeding practices using NMR 
			spectroscopy to characterize metabolite fingerprints from urine and 
			serum, in combination with anthropometric measurements, fecal 
			microbial profiling, and cytokine measurements.   
			They found that the infant monkeys fed 
			formula were larger, and had different microbiota make-up to their 
			counterparts fed breast milk.   
			Indeed, they noted that the formula fed 
			monkeys had higher levels of bacteria from the Ruminococcus genus 
			and lower levels of bacteria from the Lactobacillus genus in their 
			gut.   
			Additionally, the formula-fed infants 
			were found to have higher serum insulin, coupled with higher amino 
			acid levels - while amino acid degradation products were higher in 
			breast-fed infants.   
			Slupsky and her team also observed 
			increases in serum and urine galactose and urine galactitol in the 
			second month of life in formula-fed infants - along with higher 
			levels of immune factors including TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma, IL-1-beta, 
			IL-4, and other cytokines and growth factors at week 4. 
				
				"These results demonstrate that 
				metabolic and gut microbiome development of formula-fed infants 
				is different from breast-fed infants and that the choice of 
				infant feeding may hold future health consequences," said 
				Slumpsky and her colleagues. 
			More than 35 percent of formula-fed 
			babies in the United States consume GMO soy formula.    
			Babies on soy formula appear to grow 
			with many problems associated with the gastrointestinal tract. These 
			formulas contain very high concentrations of genistein, from 32 to 
			45 milligrams, which is higher than the amount found to affect 
			menstrual cycles in women.    
			GMO Soy formulas also contain 
			other soy isoflavones that likely affect genistein's actions in the 
			intestine.          
			Sources 
				
			 
			
 
			  |