by Mike Adams

March 31, 2013
from NaturalNews Website

If you talk to the global warming crowd, carbon dioxide - CO² - is the enemy of mankind.

Any and all creation of CO² is bad for the planet, we're told, and its production must be strictly limited in order to save the world.

• But what if that wasn't true?

• What if CO² were actually a planet-saving nutrient that could multiply food production rates and feed the world more nutritious, healthy plants?

CO² is a vital nutrient for food crops

As it turns out, CO² is desperately needed by food crops, and right now there is a severe shortage of CO² on the planet compared to what would be optimum for plants.

Greenhouse operators are actually buying carbon dioxide and injecting it into their greenhouses in order to maximize plant growth. The science on this is irrefutable.

As just one example, the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food says:

CO² increases productivity through improved plant growth and vigor. Some ways in which productivity is increased by CO² include earlier flowering, higher fruit yields, reduced bud abortion in roses, improved stem strength and flower size. Growers should regard CO² as a nutrient.

If you want to understand why CO² is an essential nutrient for food crop growth, check out this informative slide show.

It explains that "CO² may be rapidly depleted during crop production" daylight hours, because the plants pull all the CO² out of the air and use it in photosynthesis.

The CO² found in modern-day atmosphere is 340ppm. But food crops would grow far faster if the concentration of CO² were closer to 1000ppm, or roughly 300% higher than current levels.

In fact, most greenhouse plant production causes a "CO² depletion" to happen, shutting down photosynthesis and limiting food production.

As the "Carbon Dioxide in Greenhouses" fact sheet explains:

Ambient CO² level in outside air is about 340 ppm by volume.

 

All plants grow well at this level but as CO² levels are raised by 1,000 ppm photosynthesis increases proportionately resulting in more sugars and carbohydrates available for plant growth.

 

Any actively growing crop in a tightly clad greenhouse with little or no ventilation can readily reduce the CO² level during the day to as low as 200 ppm.

Thus, greenhouse plants are "running out" of CO². They are starving for it.

And when you add it to food crops, you get higher yields, improved taste, shorter flowering times, enhanced pest resistance and other benefits.
 

Why we should pump carbon dioxide into greenhouses

This brings up an obvious answer for what to do with all the CO² produced by power plants, office buildings and even fitness centers where people exhale vast quantities of CO².

The answer is to build adjacent greenhouses and pump the CO² into the greenhouses.

Every coal-fired power plant, in other words, should have a vast array of greenhouses surrounding it. Most of what you see emitted from power plant smokestacks is water vapor and CO², both essential nutrients for rapid growth of food crops.

By diverting carbon dioxide and water into greenhouses, the problem of emissions is instantly solved because the plants update the CO² and use it for photosynthesis, thus "sequestering" the CO² while rapidly growing food crops. It also happens to produce oxygen as a "waste product" which can be released into the atmosphere, (slightly) upping the oxygen level of the air we breathe.

This is a brilliant solution because humans want to live on a world with low CO² that supports frozen ice caps in order to keep ocean water levels low, but they want to eat a volume of food that requires high CO² for production.

The answer is to concentrate CO² into greenhouses where food production is multiplied by CO² nutrition.

I'll bet you've never heard Al Gore talk about CO² as "nutrition." He declares it a pollutant and wants to tax you for producing it. But CO² is actually a key nutritive gas for food crops.

Without carbon dioxide, we would all have starved to death by now.
 

Shutting down power plants to destroy America's power infrastructure

The U.S. government's solution to power plant emissions, however, is to just shut down coal-fired power plants, causing rolling blackouts across the USA, especially during hot summer days.

The EPA has forced hundreds of power plants to shut down across the USA, achieving a loss of power infrastructure that vastly exceeds what would even be possible by an enemy invasion of high-altitude warplanes dropping bombs.

The EPA, under the excuse of "saving the planet," is destroying America's power infrastructure and leading our nation into a third-world scenario where power availability is dicey and unsustained.

It seems to be just one part of the overall plan to,

• gut America's economy

• offshore millions of jobs

• put everybody on welfare

• destroy small businesses

But what if we harnessed coal-fired power plants instead of shutting them down? What if we used them as "CO² generators" that fed CO² into vast greenhouse operations that produced organic, high-growth foods that could feed the nation?

Coal-fired power plants can produce both electricity and food nutrition at the same time.

Better yet, if you combine this concept with aquaponics, you get simultaneous production of plants and fish while using no soil, no GMOs and one-tenth the water of conventional agriculture.

See, the solutions to all our problems already exist.

The only reason we are suffering as a nation is because political puppets try to brainwash us into believing complete falsehoods like,

"carbon dioxide is a dangerous pollutant" or "the people don't need healthy foods; they need medications and vaccines."

When societies believe falsehoods, they crumble and collapse. That's where America is headed, of course.

And it's all being accelerated by deceptive bureaucrats who want to convince you that growing real food is bad and we should all be punished for exhaling carbon dioxide, an essential nutrient for food crops.

Carbon dioxide is not the enemy it's been made out to be. It's actually plant nutrition that helps regrow rainforests, food crops and wetlands.

In fact, higher CO² levels in the atmosphere would make the planet more lush and abundant in terms of plant life, forests, trees and food crops.