Antigravity and the Ultimate
Spacecraft Propulsion System
Source: Global Net
There is considerable confusion with the concept of
antigravity and its related subjects. If we imagine a magnet
arrangement with one magnet located stably above another, 'like' poles
together, we have repulsion and a magnet suspended in space. Visually
it resembles a form of antigravity but of course it is no more
antigravity than is rocket propulsion.
In this example not only are we not reversing gravity or
counteracting it directly but we are only acting on surfaces (or more
strictly, acting with a 2D-to-3D interface), with Newtonian forces.
The phenomenon of antigravity, or gravity, does not function on
Newtonian forces (as covered in other web-site articles).
Let us make a comparison between 1) the above magnetic
or electromagnetic field (magnetic field created by electricity)
example, and 2) true antigravity. Consider the upper magnet, in the
above example, held above the lower magnet by means of strings secured
in a horizontal manner so that the magnet can move vertically. Like
poles are facing.
Now let us raise the upper magnet and then release it.
Initially it will fall as a result of the gravitational force being
greater than the repulsion between the magnets. The upper magnet will
fall past the balance point owing to its momentum, mass times
velocity, and continue until the repulsive force is greater than the
gravitational force plus the diminishing momentum. Now, while
stationary, with no momentum (no
velocity) the repulsion is greater than the gravitational effect and
it will move upwards. Again it moves beyond the balance point due to
momentum, etc. It will thus oscillate with diminishing amplitude until
it settles stationary in the balance point.
If we now consider a similar set up but have an
antigravitational field instead of a magnetic field, what would happen
when we raise the upper mass and let it go? We can consider that the
antigravity field has a source below the suspended object and the
field diminishes with distance from the source appropriately.
When we release the mass it falls since the
gravitational effect on the mass is greater than the antigravitational
field at this point. What happens when the mass reaches the balance
point? It stops abruptly. Why?--because there is no inertia, no
momentum , even though the object had velocity. A gravitational and
antigravitational field act 4D to 3D and penetrate totally any mass.
There is no momentum since the antigravitational field and the
gravitational field act
instantaneously on all atoms and their nuclei. At the balance point,
the upward thrust on the object from the antigravity is equal to the
downward thrust of gravity. Now this also means of course that an
object, in general, falling under gravity, is not manifesting inertia
even though it is accelerating--there is no gravitational force until
the motion is arrested by a surface, creating a Newtonian force. A
falling body is locked on to the flow; it is not pushing its way
through spacetime with inertia and Newtonian forces. There is a
complete failure to grasp this difference (see other web-site
articles).
Now since antimatter would of course relate to
antigravity, let us comment on the antimatter that is speculated to
exist in the universe, which if it came into contact with our matter
could annihilate both with the release of considerable energy. What
form would this antimatter take? Could it be that the electron's
(negative) charge is reversed in polarity along with the reversal of
its antiparticle, the positron? This type of reversal wouldn't of
course make any difference--the electron becomes the positron and vice
versa.
But what about atoms? Would antimatter have positive
particles revolving around a negative nucleus (the opposite of our
atoms). No, this still wouldn't work--the design of the atom would
have to be completely changed and it wouldn't then respond to our
atoms as an opposite to cause complete annihilation, since this is the
test of the true opposite.
The positively charged nucleus at the centre of the atom
is a white hole, which means energy is coming into our 3rd dimension,
whereas electrons have properties similar to black holes--energy
spiralling inwards into their centres and out of the 3rd dimension. If
they were reversed, the atom wouldn't be stable. However, we did say
'antimatter that is speculated to exist in the universe'. Thus this is
a dead end
for our antigravitational search in this direction.
Let us now present three widely different principles of
realistic antigravity in increasing order of sophistication and
effectiveness, and follow this with three respective examples:
1) an atomic antimatter reactor,
The third system that we shall describe satisfies the
condition for the ultimate spacecraft propulsion method and is one
which utilises the principle of attunement or resonance with the
gravitational oscillation of the planet or any cosmic body. This
method is 4th-to-3rd dimensional and involves wave motion.
The second system is also a genuine antigravity method
which utilises control over gravitational nodes, which means the
gravitational field (see web-site articles on superspace and gravity).
This method operates more with 3rd-dimensional components.
The first one we shall present harnesses the white-hole
repulsive properties of the centre of atoms. Let us now give three
appropriate examples utilising these principles, starting with the
latter, the antimatter reactor. For this example, any of the inert
gases would be more effective than other elements. The inert gas does
not react chemically with any other element. It has a stable structure
of completed electron shells due to a powerful nodal force within the
nucleus.
If we subject the inert gas to high pressure and
temperature we can strip away the (negative) electrons surrounding the
positively charged nucleus. The atoms thus become highly ionised.
If we now apply a powerful magnetic field, the nucleus
of the inert atoms, consisting of protons and neutrons, is disturbed.
Remember the fractal principle we have discussed in other articles in
which true wholeness exists in its own right at different natural
entity levels of the universe, for example, a planet, solar system, or
an atom, or even its nucleus. Thus by disturbing or even removing any
protons or
neutrons does not remove the inner white-hole property of the nucleus.
Under these conditions these centres or nodes of atoms are
exposed--powerful energy is coming into our 3D. This is quite
compatible with quantum physics that tells us everything is under
continuous creation--this creative energy is coming into our reality
to create it, through natural entities, such as atoms. This is also
the source of the power of the atomic bomb--a neutron splits the
nucleus, exposing the nodes of the fissile material releasing huge
quantities of 'white-hole' energy. However, the magnetic field does
not disturb the nucleus of the inert gases to create this dangerous
mode.
This outflow of energy from the central nodes of these
exposed atomic nuclei would push against any matter giving rise to
repulsion. Thus this is a potential method for creating a localised
antigravitational field. This system has apparently been achieved
secretly, and since we haven't heard about it publicly we can only
assume it is the work of the secret government. But they have more
advanced systems than this now.
Let us now describe the second method which operates at
the subatomic particle level, but whereas the previous system creates
an antigravitational field, this one manipulates Earth's powerful
gravitational field--or any other such field in the cosmos.
This system has also been achieved by Earthman using
electromagnetic principles. The most notable pioneers in this field
have been John Searle and Otis Carr. Searle built many levity discs,
some 10 feet or more in diameter. His system was said to be based on
an armature of two counter-rotating discs at the perimeter of which
were a series of stator electromagnets. The centre was positively
charged and the
perimeter negatively charged. Many of his discs, rising powerfully and
vertically, could wrench out clumps of grass from the ground--similar
to some observed UFOs--and were lost in space.
He eventually succeeded in controlling them with radio
frequencies. He also had a similar generator providing free
electricity to his home in the village of Mortimer, England, until he
was subject to a destructive raid by law enforcement officers who
confiscated his generator.
Otis Carr and company in the U.S had a similar
experience and had actually built a full-sized spacecraft (photographs
were available). The government confiscated it and threatened the
company members with imprisonment if they continued with their
research.
Both these inventors were apparently creating a form of
antigravity, which we can speculate fairly positively was of the type
in which a vortex of gravitational nodes was formed. If one envisages
a doughnut-shaped energy configuration encompassing the disc, which is
a scalar field, for a particular rotation, gravitational nodes
descending vertically under the force of gravity would be swept around
the disc and then underneath and upwards and round again, delineating
and penetrating the vortex region or toroid shape. With the same
principle as the twister and tornado, which can lift a vehicle, the
gravitational nodes coming up under the disc and resonating with the
nodes of atomic structure of the disc, would drag the levity disc
upwards. Thus in this example gravity is reversed. The spacecraft
'falls' up.
The educated will say this is a 'bootstrap' mechanism
(one can't lift oneself up by one's bootstraps because of the equality
of action and reaction--Newton's laws). However, gravitational-type
fields do not obey Newton's laws (see other web-site articles).
This is a method then which utilises gravitational nodes
that normally drag a body down to the surface of, for example, Earth,
producing the gravitational force when the body's motion is arrested.
In this case, the nodes are manipulated to move upwards, dragging the
fixed nodes within the structure of the craft, by resonance, upwards.
By adjusting
the direction and shape of the vortex field the craft has complete
maneuverability.
Now we come to the third example and ultimate propulsion
system which does not interfere with nature directly. The bodies of ET
spacecrafts have been referred to as made of crystalline or ceramic
material. Some of these advanced designs are apparently created in
space using the
psychokinetic powers of several minds.
The most important special property of this material is
that the frequencies of the atoms can be easily entrained, that is,
brought into coherence. A form of scalar or quantum-wave generator,
which produces a frequency spectrum covering the frequencies of cosmic
bodies, such as the Earth or Sun, will be required to create the
initial conditions (on a much more advanced level, minds would do it
and no controls would be required). The oscillations emanating from
the generator will be vortexual, encompassing the body of the ship. By
means of mode-locking, the atomic oscillations of the craft's body
will begin to match those of the generator frequencies until all
atomic frequencies of the ship are in phase (this would also include
the interior of the craft and occupants).
[As we have described in other articles, whenever the
frequencies of parts (in this case, the atoms) are put into phase, a
collective whole is quantum regenerated. That is, a whole single
quantum-state oscillation is created from what we might call a
virtual-state matrix, which has a higher frequency (it is more than
the sum of the atomic frequencies).]
Thus the spacecraft is now creating a single
high-frequency oscillation encompassing the whole ship with all atomic
frequencies within the ship in step. The energy vortex of this
oscillating entity is similar to that of a planet, Sun, or any cosmic
body, such as, to take the extremes, a galaxy or universe, but these
possess immensely high frequencies of which the craft may not be
capable.
The spacecraft interacting with a cosmic body is a
little like two electromagnets run by AC. If two such magnets are
positioned each within the field of the other and the frequencies are
such that like poles are in step there will be repulsion between the
poles (as with two north poles or two south poles of a permanent
magnet).
However, it is not as simple as this. The oscillations
of the fields of the spacecraft and cosmic body are not only
manifesting electromagnetic energies, but scalar/quantum frequencies,
which are higher-dimensional. We have a 4D-to-3D interaction, and a
more advanced spacecraft will utilize the higher-order regions of the
spectrum. What does this mean? It means the relationship between the
poles of the spacecraft and, say, a planet is 4th dimensional, which
we must imagine as interacting mainly internally, not externally.
To illustrate this, envisage the ship within the solar
system and interacting with the Sun's oscillations--which strictly
embrace the whole space of the solar system. Then the spacecraft's
oscillations are inside the solar system's oscillations. This means
that interacting waves will operate on resonance, predominantly. If
the craft attunes its positive wave to the positive wave of the Sun,
they will not repel since one is inside the other. They attract, go
into resonance and will lock on in a manner to pull the ship towards
maximum intensity at the Sun's physical location.
At high efficiency this will not only be very powerful
but free from inertia. In fact the craft will not be pushed (as one
does with Newtonian forces) toward the Sun but will simply be wherever
the Sun's wave is at any moment. There is harmony between the two
oscillating systems and it is not appropriate to talk of mass,
inertia, force or even kinetic or potential energy! There is, of
course, acceleration without force (violation of Newton's second law).
When a body acts
holistically with its environment and the environment creates motion
of the body, there is no inertia to consider.
The spacecraft can thus move towards or away from a
planet or star by controlling phase angles of its frequencies relative
to the frequencies of the planet or sun. However, when the frequencies
are either completely in phase ('attraction') or 180 degrees out of
phase ('repulsion'), the velocity will be very great owing to the
extremely high frequencies of the planet (this has nothing to do with
the Schuman resonance) and even greater for our Sun. One can estimate
theoretically that this speed will be greater than the velocity of
light and by many times for interaction with the Sun. Before we
explain how the craft attains intermediate speeds and also how it
moves laterally, let us anticipate the relativity objection to the
speed being greater than that of light.
If the reader still wishes to remain faithful to the
special theory of relativity, which has been telling us that no object
can go faster or as fast as light (except the theoretical and
never-found tachyons that only exist beyond the speed of light), we
should indicate that the special theory gives a good representation of
the illusions of the 3rd dimension. Nevertheless, physicists overlook
the fact that there
is within the theory a 'contingency' for faster than light travel (and
not meaning tachyons). The observed body, which is approaching the
velocity of light (and therefore contracting along its forward
dimension into invisibility at the speed of light), from its point of
view, time slows down and at the velocity of light, time has stopped.
But just as the body has contracted from the outside-observer
viewpoint, from the viewpoint of the body, the environment has
contracted, and thus at the speed of light (as measured by the
observer) there is no distance (from the viewpoint of the body). Or,
near to light velocity (as measured by the observer), distance is much
reduced and the object can be travelling faster than light velocity
from its point of view; and at infinite velocity at this observed
velocity of light. One might see that one is playing around with
illusions even though they are real (illusion means assigning wrong
causes, and exhibiting apparencies).
Now let us briefly explain how the ship's speed is
controlled. This is achieved by adjustment of the phase angle between
the craft's oscillations and the Sun's. This is like drawing the sine
waves for each of the oscillations, craft and Sun and superimposing
them. If they are perfectly superimposed then one has maximum
attraction. However, if they are displaced anywhere from 0 to 180
degrees, one wave will counteract the other to different degrees
throughout the range, full attraction to full repulsion. Thus by means
of the resultant of the two waves any value of velocity can be
determined. Note that enormous accuracy is required in these settings,
which would
be achieved by utilising the accurate oscillations of crystals
(similar to the use of crystals in our computers).
Now to maneuver the craft along the surface of the
planet or cosmic body, in addition to tilting the craft appropriately
with some possible directional manipulation of the vortex, the craft
can fly along ley lines, that is, grid vortices. Just as two pebbles
dropped in a pond create ripples which interfere to produce a grid
pattern of oscillating regions (and cancelled regions) all natural
entities, Sun, planet, atom, etc. have interference patterns around
them. Where there is an interception point in which two waves
reinforce one another, a
black-hole/white-hole oscillation occurs, that is, a 4D-to-3D vortex
acting perpendicular to our 3D plane.
Just as the spacecraft can utilize the cosmic bodies
described above, it can similarly attract and repel from these strings
of vortex locations which form the grid network of, say, a planet (in
the case of an atom it forms the electron structure). There isn't the
space in this article to cover interdimensional travel, which is
achieved by matching frequencies to a desired destination; all
locations have
different frequency patterns.
We have briefly described three methods which
considerable research indicates are in use either here on planet Earth
or elsewhere in the cosmos. As a final point one may consider that the
antimatter reactor would only repel against mass a short distance. But
recognizing that one pole, the white-hole of the nodes, is inside the
other pole, which is the gravitational field (compare the 3rd method
described above), also that all energy is oscillating or cyclic, then
the positive
aspect (outgoing) of the antimatter reactor will repel against the
negative (ingoing) gravitational flow continuously as it pushes
against the gravitational field, seeking the minimum gravitational
intensity.
Another query with this system, might be that the
reactor located under the craft is a chamber and the wall nearest to
Earth will be affected by the repulsive force. Not really. Imagine an
asteroid inside a large container a few feet off the Earth's surface,
the container's mass will 'merge' with the mass of the asteroid, and
the force of each mass--planet and asteroid--will act on the
container.
As a final point, the third system follows universal
principles and is another demonstration of the application of the
ubiquitous components of nature's computer system.
by Noel Huntley, Ph.D.
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~noelh/Antigravity.htm
2) subatomic particle/field system, and
3) one operating on wave motion.