
	by Mike Whitney
	April 19, 2010
	from 
	GlobalResearch Website
	
	
	The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) 
	knows that High-Frequency Trading (HFT) manipulates the market and 
	bilks investors out of tens of billions of dollars every year. 
	
	 
	
	But SEC chairman 
	
	Mary Schapiro refuses to step in and 
	take action. Instead, she's concocted an elaborate "information gathering" 
	scheme, that does nothing to address the main problem. Schapiro's plan - to 
	track large blocks of trades by large institutional investors -  is an 
	attempt to placate congress while the big Wall Street HFT traders continue 
	to rake in obscene profits. 
	
	 
	
	It achieves nothing, except provide the cover 
	Schapiro needs to avoid doing her job. 
	
	High-frequency trading  
	is algorithmic-computer trading that finds "statistical patterns and pricing 
	anomalies" by scanning the various stock exchanges. It's high-speed robo-trading 
	that oftentimes executes orders without human intervention. But don't be 
	confused by all the glitzy "state-of-the-art" hype. 
	
	 
	
	HFT is not a way of "allocating capital more 
	efficiently", but of ripping people off in broad daylight. 
	
	It all boils down to this: 
	
		
		HFT allows one group of investors to see the 
		data on other people's orders ahead of time and use their supercomputers 
		to buy in front of them. It's called front-loading, and it goes 
		on every day right under Schapiros nose. 
	
	
	In an interview on CNBC, HFT-expert Joe 
	Saluzzi was asked if the big HFT players were able to see other 
	investors orders (and execute trades) before them. 
	
	 
	
	Saluzzi said, 
	
		
		"Yes. The answer is absolutely yes. The 
		exchanges supply you with the data, giving you the flash order, and if 
		your fixed connection goes into their lines first, you are 
		disadvantaging the retail and institutional investor."
	
	
	The brash way that this scam is carried off is 
	beyond belief. 
	
	 
	
	The deep-pocket bank/brokerages actually pay the 
	NYSE and the NASDAQ to "colocate" their behemoth computers ON THE FLOOR OF 
	THE EXCHANGES so they can shave off critical milliseconds after they've 
	gotten a first-peak at incoming trades. It's like parking the company 
	forklift in front of the local bank vault to ease the transfer of purloined 
	cash. 
	
	 
	
	Due to the impressive research of bloggers like 
	Zero Hedge's, Tyler Durden and Market Ticker's, Karl Denniger, many people 
	have a fairly good grasp of HFT and understand that the SEC needs to act. 
	But Schapiro has continued to drag her feet while issuing endless 
	proclamations about pursuing the wrongdoers. Baloney. She needs to stop 
	yammering and shut these operations down. 
	
	In a recent posting, Market Ticker explained some of the finer-points of 
	high-frequency trading, such as, how the banks/brokerages probe the 
	exchanges with small orders in order to find out how much other investors 
	are willing to pay for a particular stock. 
	
	 
	
	Here's a clip:
	
		
		"Let's say that there is a buyer willing to 
		buy 100,000 shares of Broadcom with a limit price of $26.40. That is, 
		the buyer will accept any price up to $26.40. But the market at this 
		particular moment in time is at $26.10, or thirty cents lower.
		
		So the computers, having detected via their 'flash orders' that there is 
		a desire for Broadcom shares, start to issue tiny 'immediate or cancel' 
		orders - IOCs - to sell at $26.20. If that order is 'eaten' the computer 
		then issues an order at $26.25, then $26.30, then $26.35, then $26.40. 
		When it tries $26.45 it gets no bite and the order is immediately 
		canceled.
		
		Now the flush of supply comes at $26.39, and the claim is made that the 
		market has become 'more efficient'."
	
	
	Nonsense; there was no "real seller" at any of 
	these prices! 
	
	 
	
	This pattern of offering was intended to do one 
	and only one thing - manipulate the market by discovering what is supposed 
	to be a hidden piece of information - the other side's limit price!
	
	With normal order queues and flows the person with the limit order would see 
	the offer at $26.20 and might drop his limit. But the computers are so fast 
	that unless you own one of the same speed you have no chance to do this - 
	your order is immediately "raped" at the full limit price! 
	
	The presence of these programs will guarantee huge profits to the banks 
	running them and they also guarantee both that the retail buyers will get 
	screwed as the market will move MUCH faster to the upside than it otherwise 
	would.
	
	If you're wondering how Goldman Sachs and other "big banks and hedge funds" 
	made all their money this last quarter, now you know." ("High-Frequency 
	Trading is a Scam", Market Ticker)
	
	The HFT uber-computers are able to find out the highest price that traders 
	will pay in a millisecond and then extort that full amount millions of times 
	to maximize profits. Clearly, this has nothing to do with efficiency 
	or innovation. It's high-tech highway robbery; institutional 
	bid-rigging on a grand scale, tacitly sanctioned by industry lackeys 
	operating from within the administration. 
	
	 
	
	Schapiro was picked by
	Team 
	Obama for this very reason; because she was known as a regulator 
	with a "light touch" when she headed Finra the financial industry's self 
	policing agency. As Finra's chief, Schapiro managed to keep her head in the 
	sand during
	
	the Madoff scandal and the auction-rate 
	securities flap. 
	
	 
	
	She also issued far fewer fines and penalties 
	than her predecessor. 
	
	 
	
	Here's
	
	an excerpt from the Wall Street Journal
	which sums up Schapiro's regulatory doctrine:
	
		
		"The Financial Services Institute, a trade 
		group, was meeting, and Ms. Schapiro addressed the crowd about Finra’s 
		efforts to fight frauds aimed at senior citizens. Frank Congemi, 
		a financial adviser, asked what Finra was doing to regulate “packaged 
		products” such as complex mortgage securities. 
		 
		
		Mr. Congemi says that Ms. Schapiro replied:
		
		
			
			“We have rating agencies that rate 
			them.” 
		
		
		The credit-rating agencies, by this time, 
		were being heavily criticized for having given triple-A ratings to 
		mortgage bonds that became unsalable as foreclosures rose." 
		
		(Wall 
		Street Journal)
	
	
	If the financial crisis has taught us anything, 
	it's that the system is NOT self-correcting. And it takes more than just 
	rules. 
	
	 
	
	It takes regulators who are willing to 
	regulate.