
	by Rob Waugh
	17 February 2012
	
	from
	
	DailyMail Website
	
 
	
		
			| 
			Search giant allegedly used 'cookie'
			 
			to monitor browsing habits.Bypassed Apple's safety measures.
 Privacy group says, 'This is bad news for the company. It's time for 
			Google to do a better job'
 | 
	
	 
	 
	
	
	
	Apple iPhone 4S
	
	The smartphone's Safari 
	browser 
	
	is the most popular mobile 
	web browser
	
	Google is alleged to have 
	bypassed privacy features built into the browser
 
	
	
	Google and
	
	Facebook may have used a computer 
	'trick' that allows them to monitor web browsing via Apple's Safari browser 
	to build up advertising 'profiles' - circumventing Apple's safety measures.
	
	The search giant bypassed privacy settings built into Apple's Safari web 
	browser on iPhones, PCs and Macs, according to a recent report.
	
	Other advertising companies, and Facebook, reportedly used a similar method. 
	Safari is the most popular mobile web browser, used in all models of Apple's 
	iPhone and iPad. 
	
	
	Google allegedly circumvented the protection to build up profiles of web 
	users, using a 'cookie' that collected advertising information. The move has 
	caused outcry among privacy advocates.
	
	It comes shortly after EU privacy groups wrote to the search giant to ask it 
	to 'halt' a new privacy policy that would allow it to 'share' customer data 
	between services such as Search, Gmail and YouTube.
	
	Google allegedly used a 'trick' which sends a blank message to the browser 
	to make it accept unauthorized 'cookies'. Apple says it is 'working to put a 
	stop' to the practice. The code was uncovered by a Stanford University 
	researcher Jonathan Mayer and was reported in the Wall Street Journal.
	
	Google has since disabled the code, and claims that the report is in error, 
	and that its cookies only collected anonymous information. The revelation 
	caused outcry among online privacy advocates.
	
	San Francisco's Electronic Frontier Foundation says, 
	
		
		'Coming on the heels of Google's 
		controversial decision to tear down the privacy-protective walls between 
		some of its other services, this is bad news for the company.
		
		'It's time for Google to acknowledge that it can do a better job of 
		respecting the privacy of Web users.'
	
	
	Google says that the report was in error.
	
		
		'The Journal mischaracterizes what happened 
		and why,' says a spokesperson. 
		
		 
		
		'We used known Safari functionality to 
		provide features that signed-in Google users had enabled. It’s important 
		to stress that these advertising cookies do not collect personal 
		information.'
	
	
	
	
	Under fire
	
	Google is accused of 
	'bypassing' Apple's privacy protection 
	
	to gather advertising 
	information
	
		
		'Unlike other major browsers, Apple’s Safari 
		browser blocks third-party cookies by default,' says the spokesperson.
		
		 
		
		'However, Safari enables many web features 
		for its users that rely on third parties and third-party cookies, such 
		as 'Like' buttons. Last year, we began using this functionality to 
		enable features for signed-in Google users on Safari.
		
		'To enable these features, we created a temporary communication link 
		between Safari browsers and Google’s servers, so that we could ascertain 
		whether Safari users were also signed into Google, and had opted for 
		this type of personalization.'
		
		'However, the Safari browser contained functionality that then enabled 
		other Google advertising cookies to be set on the browser. We didn’t 
		anticipate that this would happen, and we have now started removing 
		these advertising cookies from Safari browsers. 
	
	
	European regulators recently wrote to Google CEO
	Larry Page calling on the search giant to halt the introduction of 
	its new 'one-size-fits-all' privacy policy.
	
	The policy was due to come into effect on March 1, and would allow Google to 
	share what it knows about users between services such as Google Search, 
	Gmail and YouTube.
	
	The move horrified privacy advocates and bloggers-tech site ZDNet said 
	that Google would 'know more about you than your wife does' and said the 
	policy was 'Big Brother-ish'.
	
	The European Union working party asked for Google to stop the new policy 
	while the working group investigate whether personal data is protected.
	
		
		‘We call for a pause to ensure that there 
		can be no misunderstanding about Google’s commitments to information 
		rights of EU citizens.’ 
		
		‘Given the wide range of services you offer, and the popularity of these 
		services, changes in your privacy policy may affect many citizens in 
		most EU member states,’ the group wrote to Google Chief Executive Larry 
		Page