The Wall Street Journal has 
			confirmed what many suspected, that the West's so-called "evidence" 
			of the latest alleged "chemical attacks" in Syria, pinned on the 
			Syrian government are fabrications spun up from the West's 
			own dubious intelligence agencies.
			
			The Wall Street Journal reveals that the US is citing claims 
			from Israel's Mossad intelligence agency fed to the Central 
			Intelligence Agency (CIA), a repeat of the fabrications that led up 
			to 
			the Iraq War,
			
			the Libyan War, and have been used 
			now for 3 years to justify continued support of extremists operating 
			within and along Syria's borders.
			
			Wall Street Journal's article, "U.S., 
			Allies Prepare to Act as Syria Intelligence Mounts," 
			states:  
One crucial piece of the emerging case came from Israeli spy services, which provided the Central Intelligence Agency with intelligence from inside an elite special Syrian unit that oversees Mr. Assad's chemical weapons, Arab diplomats said.
The intelligence, which the CIA was able to verify, showed that certain types of chemical weapons were moved in advance to the same Damascus suburbs where the attack allegedly took place a week ago, Arab diplomats said.
Both Mossad and the CIA are clearly compromised in terms of objectivity and legitimacy.
			Neither exists nor is expected to 
			provide impartial evidence, but rather to facilitate by all means 
			necessary the self-serving agendas, interests, and objectives of 
			their respective governments.
			
			That both 
			Israel and the United States, as 
			far back as 2007 have openly conspired together
			
			to overthrow the government of Syria 
			through a carefully engineered sectarian bloodbath, discredits 
			entirely their respective intelligence agencies. 
			This is precisely why an impartial, 
			objective third-party investigation has been called for by the 
			international community and agreed upon by the Syrian government - a 
			third-party investigation the US has now urged to be canceled ahead 
			of its planned military strikes.
			
			The
			
			Wall Street Journal reports: 
			
In an email on Sunday, White House National Security Adviser Susan Rice told U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power and other top officials that the U.N. mission was pointless because the chemical weapons evidence already was conclusive, officials said.
The U.S. privately urged the U.N. to pull the inspectors out, setting the stage for President Barack Obama to possibly move forward with a military response, officials said.
			The US then, not Syria, is attempting a 
			cover-up, with fabrications in place from discredited, compromised 
			intelligence sources and the threat of impending military strikes 
			that would endanger the UN inspection team's safety should they fail 
			to end their investigation and withdraw.   
			
			
			The Wall Street Journal also reiterated that the US is planning 
			to fully sidestep the UN Security Council and proceed with its 
			partners unilaterally:
...if the U.S. chose to strike, it would do so with allies and without the U.N., in order to sidestep an expected Russian veto.
The US proceeds now with absolute disregard for international law, all but declaring it has no intention of providing credible evidence of its accusations against the Syrian government.
It is a rush to war with all the hallmarks of dangerous desperation as the West's proxy forces collapse before the Syrian military.
			Western military leaders must consider 
			the strategic tenants and historical examples regarding the dangers 
			and folly of haste and imprudence in war - especially war fought to 
			protect special interests and political agendas rather than to 
			defend territory. 
			
			The populations of the West must likewise consider what benefits 
			they have garnered from the last decade of military conquest their 
			leaders have indulged in. 
			Crumbling economies gutted to feed the 
			preservation of special interests and the growing domestic security 
			apparatuses to keep these interests safe from both domestic and 
			foreign dissent are problems that will only grow more acute.
			
			Outside of the West, in Moscow, Beijing, and Tehran, leaders must 
			consider a future where Western special interests can invade with 
			impunity, without public support, or even the tenuous semblance of 
			justification being necessary.
