
	by Paul Joseph Watson
	August 30, 2011
	
	from
	
	PrisonPlanet Website
 
	
		
			| 
			New Facebook-style social networking 
			is 
			part of Google’s plan to  
			“own your online ID” | 
	
	
	
	
 
	
	
	
	Eric Schmidt
 
	
	Google CEO Chairman 
	
	Eric Schmidt has tacitly 
	admitted that the company’s 
	
	Facebook-style social networking platform, 
	
	Google+, is little more than a sprawling advertising database for the 
	benefit of big corporations to target end users.
	
	During an interview with National Public Radio in Edinburgh over the 
	weekend, Schmidt responded to a question about why Google+ had adopted 
	real-name policies and in doing so eliminated anonymity for its users.
	
		
		“He (Eric) replied by saying that G+ was built primarily as an identity 
	service, so fundamentally it depends on people using their real names if 
	they’re going to build future products that leverage that information,” NPR 
	journalist Andy Carvin
		
		told Bloomberg Businessweek.
	
	
	In other words, Google+ is a honey trap designed to sucker people into 
	revealing as many details about their personal interests, consumer habits 
	and spending patterns as possible, so that such information can be sold to 
	large corporations who can then use targeted advertising to sell products.
	
		
		“It begs the question of whom Google built this service for? You or them,” 
	asks blogger Fred Wilson, noting how “this is an admission by the company 
	that it wants to be an identity gatekeeper.”
	
	
	Schmidt’s admission makes sense when you consider the fact that Google’s 
	GMail service uses the content of 
	
	supposedly private email communications to 
	create context-specific ads that are displayed alongside email messages.
	
	2011 
	Bilderberg attendee Schmidt has repeatedly made his disdain for privacy 
	well known.
	
	During a 2009 CNBC appearance, the Google honcho 
	
	stated, 
	
		
		“If you have 
	something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn’t be doing 
	it in the first place,” in response to concerns over Google’s lack of 
	privacy protections for its search engine results.
	
	
	The company has also been in hot water on numerous occasions for breaking 
	privacy laws in Canada and Europe over its 
	
	Street View service.