by Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
December 2008

from NewsWithViews Website


Dennis Laurence Cuddy, historian and political analyst, received a Ph.D. from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (major in American History, minor in political science). Dr. Cuddy has taught at the university level, has been a political and economic risk analyst for an international consulting firm, and has been a Senior Associate with the U.S. Department of Education.

Cuddy has also testified before members of Congress on behalf of the U.S. Department of Justice. Dr. Cuddy has authored or edited twenty books and booklets, and has written hundreds of articles appearing in newspapers around the nation, including The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and USA Today. He has been a guest on numerous radio talk shows in various parts of the country, such as ABC Radio in New York City, and he has also been a guest on the national television programs USA Today and CBS's Nightwatch.





December 1, 2008

[Note: Gerald Celente of Trends Research Institute has been heralded by THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, CNBC, CBS, etc. and he has recently said by 2012 the U.S. will become “an undeveloped nation” with tax revolts and a lot of homeless people and crime. Also recently, accidental fires created a state of emergency in California, which is just a reminder of the havoc that could be created by a few Iranian agents here if war should break out between the U.S. and Iran.

Regarding the terrorist attack in India last week, it was by a Pakistani group with links to Pakistan’s ISI intelligence service about whom I’ve written. The group is called Lashkar-e-Taiba which opposes India’s involvement in Kashmir, about which I wrote in my July 23, 2007 column “Javier Solana and the Larger Plan.” Also, remember that in my Sept. 22, 2008 NEWSWITHVIEWS column, “Threats Used for Coercive Compliance,” I wrote (over two months before last week’s attack) that “globally, threats can be non-Communist as well, as India feels threatened by Pakistan and vice versa (watch Kashmir in the future).”

And concerning the Obama administration’s continuing the Power Elite’s planned alternation of power by including many Clintonistas, two examples are Rhodes scholars Dennis Blair (named director of National Intelligence) and Susan Rice (named U.S. ambassador to the U.N.).]

In a previous NewsWithViews column, I mentioned that globalization has returned us to the late 1800s where workers underbid each other for jobs whose conditions weren’t safeguarded by health regulations. “Robber barrons” ruled, and these were people like John D. Rockefeller (his nephew Percy became a member of Skull & Bones in 1900).

With the beginning of the 20th century, Theodore Roosevelt was president and came to be known as a “trust buster” against Rockefeller’s Standard Oil and others, but major corporations that were split up still had interlocking directorates.


Thus, Rockefeller’s power was maintained, and he is portrayed in Robert Minor’s 1911 cartoon in THE ST. LOUIS POST-DISPATCH as welcoming Karl Marx to Wall Street, with Marx carrying a book titled SOCIALISM. Rockefeller was able to use his great wealth to “buy” politicians who would see to it that through laws, rules and regulations, their “owners” were not adversely affected—a type of corporate Socialism.

In August of the same year (1911), McCLURE’S magazine published an article titled “Masters of America: The Seven Men,” which warned that,

“all fundamental resources, all industries capable of forming a unit, are being drawn together toward monopoly control…. And if corporate centralization of power continues unchecked, what is the next great popular agitation to be in this country? For state socialism?”

Education was an important component of the Rockefeller plan, and he hired a reassuring Baptist minister, Frederick Gates, to set up his General Education Board in 1902 to oversee this effort.


From this position, Gates wrote Occasional Letter No. 1 (published 1912), stating that,

“in our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people (rural folk) yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand… unhampered by tradition.”

Rockefeller education initiatives applied to city schools, too, as Mayor John Hylan of New York City said in THE NEW YORK TIMES (March 27, 1922):

“One of my first acts as mayor was to pitch out… from the educational system of our city the Rockefeller agents” and others who planned “to fit the children for the mill and factory.”

The Rockefeller Foundation throughout the 20th century would try to influence many aspects of American education, for example supporting the School-Health Coordinating Service begun in 1939. But the Rockefeller plan’s educational component ultimately has been to facilitate globalism.


In Edith Roosevelt’s 1962 article “The Universal Theocratic State,” she revealed:

“Curriculum are being drafted to indoctrinate our children in what John D. Rockefeller, Jr. called ‘the church of all people.’… plans are being made to set up regional world Universities whose objectives would include… ‘to build a world outlook’….”

At the end of the next decade, the Rockefeller Foundation supported a 3-volume set, including James Becker’s Schooling for a Global Age, attempting to convince parents and the general public of the necessity of a global perspective,

“otherwise children and youth enrolled in globally oriented programs may find themselves in conflict with values assumed in the home.”

In the mid-1980s, Seattle schools “Rockefeller Project” promoted “global education,” and in 1987 the Rockefeller Foundation helped finance Global Perspectives in Education’s,

“The United States Prepares for its Future: Global Perspectives in Education, Report of the Study Commission on Global Education.”

In November 1992, when Bill Clinton was elected president, David Rockefeller, Jr., who was on the board of the National Center on Education and the Economy, “celebrated” Clinton’s victory which would give NCEE the chance to implement a “cradle-to-grave” plan “to integrate education and human resource development” that could require radical changes in attitudes, values and beliefs.

Changing attitudes, values and beliefs were also aspects of “social control” which, like education, was an important component of the Rockefeller plan.


In order to control people, the Rockefellers knew they had to have the ability to monitor what people do. In that regard, investigative reporter Thomas Lawson in EVERYBODY’S magazine (August 1904) learned,

“about the greatest information bureau in the world. A ‘Standard Oil’ agent is in every hamlet of the country.”

Of course, it was also an important aspect of control to be able to manage what information the American people received.


In that regard, in 1905 U.S. Rep. Joseph Sibley (Rockefeller Standard Oil payoff man in Washington) wrote a letter to John D. Archbold (Standard Oil’s money provider) saying,

“An efficient literary bureau is needed, not for a day or a crisis but a permanent healthy control of the Associated Press and kindred avenues. It will cost money but it will be the cheapest in the end.”

John D. Rockefeller, his son and grandson were all interested in eugenics, with Rockefeller Foundation money supporting the Eugenics Record Office and in 1926 the founding of the American Eugenics Society. And a few years later, on April 11, 1933, Rockefeller Foundation president Max Mason assured its trustees that “the rationalization of social control” would be the concern of their Social Sciences program.


Then in the next decade, Rockefeller Foundation medical director Alan Gregg in 1945 sought to fund research into whether wartime psychology could be relevant for the civilian society.

At the beginning of the next decade, John D. Rockefeller III founded the Population Council in 1952 to develop population control measures worldwide. These efforts were vigorously promoted through the 1960s, and in 1973 the same John D. Rockefeller III authored The Second American Revolution applauding sexual liberation and the “humanist revolution” while disparaging “old-fashioned nationalism” (remember my earlier remark about the Rockefeller plan changing attitudes, values and beliefs).

The progression of this plan continued into the 1980s with Arthur S. Miller’s The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change (1987) sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. In his book, Miller asserted that “ours is the age of the planned society…. No other way is possible.”

Four years later, the National Commission on Children, with John D. Rockefeller IV (U.S. Sen. Jay Rockefeller) as Chairman, issued its 1991 report, “Beyond Rhetoric: A New American Agenda for Children and Families,” stating that many others (e.g., health professionals, the media, etc.) besides parents “must help children form attitudes.”


It also proposed values education programs built on “common values” which, of course, eliminates exclusively Biblical values.



December 15, 2008

Twas the night before Christmas, and with great elation,
Barack Obama was planning to “change” the nation.
Corporate stockings were hung at the Congress with care
in the hopes that bailouts soon would be there.

The public was nestled all snug in their beds,
while visions of tax cuts danced in their heads.
Women in their kerchiefs and men in their caps
had unfortunately settled for political c___.

When over the airwaves there arose such a clatter,
people sprang from their lethargy to see what was the matter.
Away to the TV, they flew like a flash,
heard economic bad news and feared for their cash.
Stocks on the Dow hit a new fallen low,
creating more fears down the tubes we would go.

When what to our tearful eyes should appear
but Congressional leaders allaying our fears.
With their leader Obama so lively and quick,
we knew in a moment there must be a fix.
More rapid than politicians fleeing all blame,
Barack whistled and called his allies by name.

Now Daschle, now Geithner, now Gates and Biden,
on Rahm, on Pelosi, on Reid and Clinton (Hillary).
"To the top of the world," we heard him call,
“Proclaim our agenda, Socialism for all!”…

Obama flashing his smile spoke in such prose
that the world was in awe at this king that arose.
He sprang to his throne, to his team gave a whistle.
National sovereignty was gone without the firing of missiles.

But I heard him exclaim from his lofty height,
Now I possess such great power, there’s no use to fight (it)!

In addition to the educational and social control elements of the Rockefeller plan, the economic component has also been important.


Mayor John Hylan (mentioned in Part 1) of New York City, in the March 27, 1922 NEW YORK TIMES claimed that the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of others “virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes.”


These “selfish purposes” would even include helping the Nazis, as on July 15, 1941 Major Charles Burrows of military intelligence wrote that Standard Oil of New Jersey was diverting 20% of its oil going to the Canary Islands instead to refueling Nazi submarines with 6 of the oil-ships manned mainly by Nazi officers.

A few years later, on July 26, 1950 Gen. William Donovan (former head of the O.S.S.) as chairman of the American Committee for a United Europe (ACUE) wrote a memo on how to promote a European Parliament. By 1958, the Federalist European Movement received over 53% of its funds from the ACUE, which itself was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and others.


The globalist Bilderbergers held their first meeting in May 1954, and have also been funded by the Rockefeller Foundation.

In the next decade (1960s), James Simon Kunen in The Strawberry Statement (1968) revealed Esso (Rockefeller) money went to Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) “to make a lot of radical commotion so they can look more in the center as they move more to the left.”

This “move more to the left” was exemplified by David Rockefeller in his August 10, 1973 article in THE NEW YORK TIMES. David Rockefeller had attended the London School of Economics (founded by Fabian Socialists), which from 1924 to 1949 had received $3 million from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Laura Spelman Rockefeller Memorial Fund. And in David’s article he praised the economic and social “success” of the brutal Chinese dictator, Chairman Mao, who had killed millions of innocent Chinese civilians.

This was also the same year (1973), David Rockefeller founded the Trilateral Commission (TC) with the Marxist-praising Zbigniew Brzezinski as its director.


In Holly Sklar’s Trilateralism - The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management (1980), she revealed these “ruling elites” would use debt “as part of an economic and political destabilization campaign to strangle a rebellious nation into submission.”


And in Sen. Barry Goldwater’s With no apologies (1979), he explained that what Rockefeller’s TC,

“proposes is an international economy managed and controlled by international monetary groups through the mechanism of international conglomerates manufacturing and business enterprise…. What these Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved.”

One mechanism of this “worldwide economic power” was revealed at the September 11, 1987 “Fourth World Wilderness Congress” held in Colorado with David Rockefeller as a speaker. There was talk at the Congress about creating the International World Conservation Bank that would collateralize 30% of the Earth’s land surface (relevant to “debt for nature” swaps).

Another mechanism of the “worldwide economic power” has been GATT, which on December 1, 1994 Sen. Earnest Hollings revealed “is being pushed by David Rockefeller and the Trilateral Commission."


About GATT, House speaker Newt Gingrich said it was,

“a very big transfer of power from the United States to a new organization (World Trade Organization).”

Acknowledging what was occurring as within David Rockefeller’s realm of activities, Gary Hufbauer’s and Jeffrey Schott’s Western Hemisphere Economic Integration (1994) was dedicated “To David Rockefeller.”


And in it one reads about an,

“integration agenda,… the need for some institutional mechanism to administer the arrangements,… and the case for a common legal framework.”

Each of these elements are related to David Rockefeller’s globalist Power Elite efforts described in his David Rockefeller: Memoirs (2002), which will be quoted later.

Economic integration will ultimately be a global synthesis of Western Capitalism and Eastern Communism into a World Socialist Government, and President-elect Barack Obama is the Power Elite’s choice to lead Americans into a Socialist future with his campaign emphasis on “spreading the wealth around.”


It will be as Edward Bellamy related in his 1888 novel Looking Backward: 2000-1887, wherein he projected that around 2000 A.D. Americans would come to allow their economy to be managed by a “Great Trust” (Socialist) rather than maintain a free enterprise Capitalist system.

What usually compels people and nations to accept what they otherwise would not is some sort of crisis like the current international economic one.


Relevant to this, Gideon Rachman in “And Now For A World Government” (Financial Times, December 8, 2008) writes:

“For the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible, (and) would involve much more than cooperation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws.”

He then quotes Australian historian Geoffrey Blainey as writing that,

“for the first time in human history, world government of some sort is now possible,” and Rachman assesses that “the financial crisis and climate change are pushing national governments toward global solutions, even in countries such as China and the U.S. that are traditionally fierce guardians of national sovereignty.”

Relevant to Obama, Rachman comments on the importance of his appointment of Rhodes scholar Susan Rice as U.S. Ambassador to the U.N.


Then Rachman refers to,

“a recent report from the Managing Global Insecurity (MGI) project, whose small U.S. advisory group includes John Podesta, the man heading Mr. Obama’s transition team and Strobe Talbott (Rhodes scholar), the president of the Brookings Institution, from which Ms. Rice has just emerged.”

Rachman relates that the MGI report,

“talks about ‘global governance’ rather than world government, but Jacques Attali, an advisor to President Nicholas Sarkozy of France, argues that:

‘Global governance is just an euphemism for global government.’…

So, it seems, everything is in place. For the first time since homo sapiens began to doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, and opportunity and a means to make serious steps towards a world government.”

Return to The Controlled Global Education

Return to The Rockefeller Internationalism

Return to Temas / Sociopolitica

Return to The Global Elite