AlienMind
The Verdants
15. - Within a
Hyperversal Community
How many aliens are there among the -X3 population (“-“ for
negative energy users, “X” for Hyperversals, and “3” for the fact
that they don’t merely work via a positive-negative
energy scheme, but appear to have refined a third, more complicated
dynamic)?
One hyperversal
stated that the -X3’s numbers number
either 1.3x the number of the Verdants, or, if the remark were to be
construed differently, the -X3’s may number 1.3
quadrillion individuals. In either case, the -X3’s are numerous.
Given such numbers, it may be safe to assume that
the -X3’s are limited to our part of Virgo, if not the entire Virgo
cluster. They are unabashedly mega-population in
their outlook. Nonetheless, marginally more independent Hyperversals
air critiques that suggest there is good, safe
precedent for humans who choose to remain independent of the
Verdant-IFSP mega-population. There is definitely
diversity among Hyperversals.
At a later juncture, a hyperversal stated that more programmatic
mega-populations are 1.3 times as numerous (in
total number of individuals) than are smaller, or independent
aggregations.
* It may only be coincidence that the 1.3
figure matches the more loosely-stated ratio of the -X3’s compared
to Verdants. Part of the -X3’s ambiguity about
their numbers has to do with the fact that potentially offensive new
populations are considered less dangerous if
they have been absorbed by a larger collective, hence the -X3’s
don’t want us to blithely assume that independence
is the way to go. However, there are complex, universe-wide
ecological considerations that might be hard to discern
were we to take the 1.3-to-1 ratio too literally. It’s a prickly
subject, given the Verdants’ expansion in our local vicinity.
On the one hand, no one wants to encourage Verdants to think that
they can simply spawn without constraint in
order to be a power, of sorts, in our intergalactic neighborhood. On
the other hand, Hyperversals consistently state
that Hyperversals learned to moderate their numbers. Each hyperversal mega-population appears to be tasked with
monitoring the ecology of a number of current cycle
mega-populations.
Hence, a given hyperversal population like
the -X3’s may be less in number than are current cycle aliens, yet
Hyperversals know that current cycle aliens who
fail to moderate will suffer a lack of resources and a lack of good
graces in the future, when they will have to
contend for habitable replacement planets. They could even be left
out. They need to be taught to moderate, yet
conflict must be avoided.
For those who might wonder whether a population like the Verdants
could begin to threaten the entire Virgo cluster
by overgrowing it, the prospect is dim. There are too many
competitors, all of whom have to deal with major, great-scale crises involving other populations. Common sense within any
galaxy would compel moderation. In the Verdant
case, we must question whether the Verdants have become a kind of
problem child, in a sense, analogous to a
badly behaved kindergarten class in which the teacher (the -X3’s)
can only manage the mayhem, rather than
impose tight controls. Imagine an entire universe of similar
dilemmas.
However, given their more advanced technology, Hyperversals can
out-stage upstarts like the Verdants.
Hyperversals communicate and interact on a scale that Verdants can
only imagine. They ultimately control when the
next cycle will be initiated.
To date, Hyperversals have been cryptic and not particularly
forthcoming about some aspects of their history. They
sometimes suggest that their response to inquiry about their
background is answered within a subtly expanded
awareness surrounding the consideration. In other words, they don’t
chew on the words one at a time, which leaves
some humans wondering. Of course, Hyperversals may think that if a
human doesn’t quite assimilate their replies,
then he or she may not be ready to comprehend them, in the first
place.
The sharpest criticism of the -X3’s is that their strategy appears
to be Malthusian. Humans have questioned whether
the -X3’s have a tendency to think too much about themselves and how
they will be affected if too many current
cycle aliens try to make it into the next universe cycle. Indeed,
for all we know, this same kind of dialogue has gone
on for billions of years. It appears to be a process of give and
take.
In response to concerns about their strategy of competing tensions
regarding humankind, -X3’s reply that the
roundness we see in them (their tendency to round all considerations
up to the universal level or down to zero, the
absence of passion) is a kind of non-viciousness. Meanwhile, some
humans will see it as an insular, if not elitist
distancing that some Hyperversals fail to recognize in their own,
peculiar way.
One obvious critique is that the -X3’s
divisive policies, i.e. their coordination with the Verdants, are
framed to thwart broad, universal scale interactions by
current cycle aliens - a pre-emptive strategy, of sorts. The -X3’s
reply that they need to work with all populations,
including some offenders, in order to steer everyone toward a
sustainable ecology, hence we’ve seen some Hyperversals act in liaison with the Verdants, while, at the same
time, other Hyperversals are sharply critical of the Verdants.
There have been disjointed, if not disturbing moments during human-hyperversal
interactions, to date. For example,
there’s a recurring argument that revolves around the following:
Some Hyperversals, who argue for immersion within the one-ness and cohesion of their sub-sector of the universe, say
that humans need to sacrifice in order to bring
themselves up to minimum standard.
They say humans will more quickly
become healthy, ecological non-sexuals, if
we do so. Meanwhile, there’s a catch: Hyperversals who tend to lump
all consideration into the one, singular notion
of their sub-sector can suffer defects of mind that they don’t quite
see beyond. Those Hyperversals and their
genetically engineered intermediaries who linger at the margins of
acceptability, who are tasked with doing conflict-ridden security work toward such “one-ness,” tend to bias the
process by seeing through a murky filter.
You may wonder: what does that mean? How might it actually occur, in
real life? Here’s how: A hyperversal whose
must track Verdant manipulations in this vicinity can become coarse,
if not arrogant, compared to more healthy
Hyperversals. Humans have witnessed just that.
* It helps to remember
that we live on an outlying fringe of the
Virgo
supercluster. More concentrated, urbane populations deep within Virgo may be of more interest to Hyperversals. As
a result, a regime like that of the Verdants may have gone too long
without correction. However, if I’m not mistaken,
some Hyperversals are aware that it’s dangerous to allow Verdants to dunder in and militarize our vicinity, to thumb
their noses at the populations of this and other galaxies.
Video animation -
Virgo Supercluster
Generally speaking, when older, more experienced
Hyperversals try to
steer lesser populations toward a higher
standard, they may, at times, rationalize what they do in terms of
cold perspectives of old (when some societies from
the previous universe cycle didn’t survive).
In the end, although Hyperversals have more advanced science, they
tend to live in isolation from recently evolved populations.
They
have legitimate reasons for obscuring themselves.
They don’t want current cycle aliens to grab up and copy their
technology. They don’t want unqualified upstarts
trying to initiate a new universe cycle.
So, older Hyperversals use hybrid and other intermediaries to
interact with recently evolved aliens. Based upon
what we’ve seen, such intermediaries are smarter and have larger
brains than aliens like the Verdants or
the grays.
They live within more advanced technology.
Although sentient, some Hyperversals appear to have engineered
certain “emotional” genes out of themselves,
hence they can watch Verdants manipulate crimes against humanity
without feeling much. In part, this is due to the
fact that Hyperversals live at great remove in terms of custom,
habit and experience. Hyperversals, and their
intermediaries who do security work can be inwardly cynical yet
idealistic regarding the contorted affairs of lesser
aliens.
So, where does that leave us?
We’re now learning that vast numbers
of hyper-advanced aliens (Hyperversals)
manipulate and steer lesser, current cycle aliens toward better
ecology yet sometimes make mistakes.
For example, Hyperversals and their genetically-engineered intermediaries may
assume that human error is genetically based, or
that extremes of human violence and greed represent solely human
shortcomings. Meanwhile, we have evidence
that human events have been directly manipulated by IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets) operatives.
Due to hyperversal skepticism of the Verdant IFSP, Hyperversals
sometimes intervene in a messy, Verdant-related
situation, then withdraw and “discuss” it among themselves
telepathically, using mind-activated technology. Such
discussions can, at times, degrade into diagrammatic, instantaneous
echoings, rather than thoughtful conversation.
As a result, mistakes are made and people may suffer.
This is an important aspect of human-hyperversal
interactions.
*Later, we’ll discuss the ironies of diagrammatic resonance in place
of thoughtfulness, a distinction that cuts across,
and separates some offenders from more thoughtful others.
Although widely traveled and accustomed to studying “lesser” aliens,
some hyperversal societies are relatively
stagnant. They may change little during our lifetimes, while human
society changes rapidly. So, from our
perspective, it may at times seem as though Hyperversals fail to
comprehend the dangers of our predicament. They
aren’t as vulnerable as we are.
On the other hand, one key aspect of hyperversal life should favor a
better understanding of our situation. If, as Hyperversals insist, the universe has been re-cycled at least once,
then it should have been re-cycled before that,
perhaps many times over and over again. Humans have heard subtle
talk in this regard.
This suggests that
successively more advanced Hyperversals exist and should, by now, be
capable of ghosting the latest generation of
Hyperversals in order to tend to what they do. Being less burdened
by the need to herd newly evolved aliens toward
a basic universal ecology, older generations of Hyperversals may
have preserved their vital sensitivities.
They
should be able to sympathize with decent humans.
*One hyperversal
(who apparently derived from the last universe
cycle) suggested hyperverversals from successively previous cycles
may be even more prone to condemn a
potentially dangerous new population of sexuals. It was a sobering
moment.
What do we know about hyperversal society, their interaction and
inter-communications? Over time, I’ve witnessed
some of their intercommunications and critiques of one another.
The
tone and character of intercommunications is
subtle, couched in terms of deep awareness of multiply
inter-dimensioned basics - fine and sometimes elusive
details that always begin from a premise of basic, universal
hyper-dynamics. Their science is more complex and is
premised on a better, basic understanding of the universe. It’s as
though they begin from a greater variety of
understandings - across a variety of different horizons, so to speak.
Nonviolence among Hyperversals appears to be the understood rule,
although political and cultural disagreements
definitely occur. In some such cases, each “side” may try to assert
a larger, more enduring premise for his or her
actions. Nonetheless, in a case like that of the Verdant IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets)
intervention here on Earth, dissenting Hyperversals, or,
in some cases, categorically more advanced Hyperversals, feel free
to assert that humans need to know basic
details about the Verdants.
Such Hyperversals offer complex yet
easily understood critiques of Verdant excess and the Verdant resort to manipulated violence (violence that is framed
to seem indirect). Complex statements about
human feelings and a human kind of existential predicament are
offered. Sometimes, a hyperversal will make a
statement (verbal, graphic and deep with subtle details) about a
typical human’s daily work or social predicaments,
essentially showing that Hyperversals have some of the same
feelings. This is done deliberately.
When humans discuss a topic, we often reference a variety of
national and cultural viewpoints. Hyperversals
communicate in ways that suggest a vastly larger awareness. For
example, in one case mention was made about
the
Markarian Chain of galaxies (below
image) deep within the center of
the Virgo supercluster.
Markarian's Chain is
a stretch of galaxies that forms part of the Virgo Cluster.
It's called a "chain"
because, when viewed from Earth, the galaxies lie along a smoothly
curved line.
It was named after
the Armenian astrophysicist, B. E. Markarian, who discovered it in
the mid 1970s.
Member galaxies
include M84 (NGC 4374), M86 (NGC 4406), NGC 4477, NGC 4473, NGC
4461, NGC 4458, NGC 4438 and NGC 4435.
It's located at RA
12h 27m and Dec +13° 10′.
The best human representation is
but a photo, but the hyperversal representation was much deeper and
detailed in ways that I could only begin to
appreciate - showing a number of different (integrated) aspects of large elliptical galaxies that involved mergers of
entire galaxies, some of them ongoing.
Imagine seeing a telepathic
map of the politics, dynamics and culture of
Europe for example, if you had never seen such a thing. Many of the
details would be there, yet you wouldn’t have
enough background information to absorb it all. In other words,
mitigating against any outward vulgarity in hyperversal disagreements are the fantastically complex,
multicultural, historical and scientific understandings that
Hyperversals share, even if they aren’t always part of the same
universal bailiwick.
Some Hyperversals are keenly aware of legal implications in daily
events, which suggests that they, too, are
bounded by basic legal considerations. What is the basis for such
legal distinctions? Is it formalized, or is it a more
generic kind of convention? It’s possible that among Hyperversals,
law takes on a unified character, i.e. merged
values for scientific, ecological, and crime-specific
considerations. What does that mean? An earlier chapter
describes a topological structure of mind (and language).
Legal
definitions based on
the topology of alternate-cycle
commonality can be more precise than is concretized, singular
wordform (which can be propped up for deceptive
misuses).
When legal definitions are fractionally interlinked so
that you can see them all at the same time, they are
easier to comprehend. So, among Hyperversals and other aliens,
unified values and definitions help to integrate
entire categories of meaning in order to make sense of the universe.
This allows for a greater back and forth
conversation between more ideas so that they can agree on
intermediate values more effectively. When Hyperversals communicate, they do so with multiple
implications - topologically.
We can easily imagine a universal code against murder, violence, and
destruction, yet we can also see that a
population like the Verdants may try to shrug off certain universal
laws by arguing in favor of Verdant authority in a
physical location - a departure that can degrade into petty, if not infantile ideas about the universe.
For example:
what rules apply when one galaxy overuses negative energy and speeds
the universal clock, thus depleting universal resources and shortening the life of surrounding galaxies?
*Such a problem may have arisen when a
–X3-related hyperversal reportedly responded to a disturbance to his
large elliptical galaxy, causing him to leave his
(loosely construed) “retirement garden” to attend to the matter. The
problem appears to have been Verdant
overuse of negative energy and
delta t (the change of time by use of electrogravity and negative energy).
When cited for violating the intergalactic ecology, Verdants may
offer a variety of tacky excuses. For example, they
may pose the IFSP’s lesser conscript planets as a kind of window
dressing to cover for the Verdant population
explosion. Cases of the sort underscore the need for larger
conventions and carefully metered constraints on any
given population.
Is there gender among Hyperversals? Apparently there is, but among
non-sexual populations the distinction isn’t as
graphic as it is for a human. I’ve listened to some Hyperversals who
seem to know the feelings and impulses of
sexuals from a subjective perspective. Nonetheless, hyper-advanced
science can go in a variety of directions. It can
verge on seemingly unfathomable new categories and then assume a
different kind of character. For a more earthly
analogy, consider the following. When humans become honest enough to
observe and respect the intricate logic
that already exists in Earth’s ecology, then human science will
advance categorically. Hyperversals engage in a
different kind of conversation with nature and a re-cycling
universe. There may already be a more advanced order
of being that they, too, must observe and respect more carefully in
order to better themselves.
For Hyperversals, the notion of species may stretch the old human
idea of possibilities. One hyperversal says that Hyperversals tend to be non-sexual, which is encouraging. Imagine
what the universe would be like, over time, were
they all sexuals. I assume, as appears to be the case, that “at
present,” Hyperversals may be more modest in
number than are our current cycle populations, yet
Hyperversals are
far more capable. The problem with making
assumptions about Hyperversals’ numbers is that our notion of time
is definitely not the limit elsewhere, even though
we’re beginning to understand the nature of time and the
hyper-dynamics of “negative” and alternate cycle energy.
When Hyperversals can both see and ascertain that you understand
their terms of existence, the basic universal
assumptions of their lives, they are more sympathetic—especially if
you prove that you live by similar standards.
Some Hyperversals have nurtured and have regularly helped me (and
others) develop a larger understanding in
ways that I can never sufficiently express gratitude for. As a
result of some of their efforts, in tandem with those of other neighboring aliens, we now have a preliminary critique of
the Verdants. Over time, we will probably refine that
critique to acknowledge that, even though we may not agree to be
part of the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets), some of its efforts will, in the
end, have helped to evolve us.
It’s all part of a very large drama involving numerous galaxy
groups. One hyperversal explicitly stated that Verdants
have taken some places in at least six galaxy groups surrounding our
own
Andromeda-M33-Milky Way group. Given
that we’re all being drawn closer to the Virgo cluster, we will must
coexist with Verdants, but hopefully will do so on
mutually more evolved terms. Meanwhile, Hyperversals communicate and
exchange information on a universal
scale. In comparison, the Verdant case is small-scale, strange as
that may sound to some. At intervals, we actually
hear limited mention about events deep within Virgo, and also
mention of the interaction of various superclusters.
At one point, one hyperversal said that the (boy in the bubble)
–X3 who I and others have communicated with is like
I am in comparison to all of humanity: more advanced in some ways,
but not broadly representative of the
aggregate in other ways. At a different time, a hyperversal said
that the human image of the –X3’s only goes about
as far as that of Aunt B. of Andy of Mayberry does in comparison to
the rest of the United States (yes, those were
the words).
At times, the politics of larger interactions can strain and distort hyperversal aliens’ approach to humankind.
Sometimes is seems as though a given hyperversal group’s desire to
control others is equal to their attention to the
basic ecology.
Moments of the sort involve psychological and
structural ironies, some of which may have little to do
with humans, more to do with the history and experience of very
long-lived Hyperversals. In other words, humans
are seen through the filter of political ironies involving other
aliens in, or affecting, our galaxy group. We may also
be mistaken for having the same tendencies as did our less-educated,
war-like predecessors, some of whom may
have been marginally manipulated (at some remove) through various
off-world interventions.
It helps to imagine how it might be for an entirely different,
advanced species to look down on strange “hair-heads,”
as one hyperversal humorously suggested we might be seen at a
glance.
For an alien who has lived thousands, if
not millions of years, the current human generation may seem
transitory and uncertain.
After all, human history was
a sordid, bloody parade of self-serving primitives taking too much
while claiming to do so in the name of God
(although rarely, if ever, allowing fair and free discussion about
the nature of “God” and the universe. Even now our
government tries to deny that intelligent life exists on other
worlds).
|
When hyperversal control freaks dunder in and begin to manipulate,
it helps to remember that any and all
individuals in the universe are capable of error.
I sometimes note
one error in particular, actually a bundling of
errors. It has to do with the fact that the entire universe is the
only definitive “singular” quantity. It can’t be observed
as a whole, but can only be modeled as a relatively faint and subtle
near-whole. When a given regime or group of
manipulators peers out at all the rest they sometimes make the
mistake of assuming that they definitively
encompass the entire universe.
When other competing structures do
the same, we see a fairly simple, but
dangerous irony: the one group’s structured observation (modeled as
nearly-singular) is distorted and amplified by
the second group’s structured observation(s). In other words, it’s
the mathematic equivalent of STRUCTURE x
STRUCTURE, which is prone to distortion and error. Rather than
divide their observations into the larger
commonality, they multiply their error, instead. Hence we see too
many whole-numbered misconceptions, not
enough humility and forbearance.
When one limited group of hyperversal manipulators tries to lord it
over a large variety of other distorted structures
(i.e. when Hyperversals lead Verdants into doing convenient
dirty
work), the result is cold, cruel and destructive.
Even among the best of all aliens there are structural distortions,
but among the most corrupt and materialistic alien
interactions the distortions are categorically worse. This is
further complicated by old-age syndromes and the
genetic elimination of emotion, in some cases.
The best that any
newly-evolving population can possibly do is
simply recognize that it’s safer and better to not immerse in the
contorted maelstrom of offending aliens’ doings.
Instead, it’s better to cautiously observe such offenders from a
distance - being careful to work toward a finer, more
considerate multiversal continuum in which such offenders lapse into
“singular” distortions away from the more
evolved majority (although they must be tended to).
When Verdants and their cohorts dunder in, disastrously
overpopulated and aggressive, if not destructive of entire
planets, humans need to step back to study the phenomenon carefully
and not succumb to the bully temptation to
leap in and trade away human sovereignty, nearby planets, and more
(especially when this galaxy needs to reduce
population because it will merge in the future).
Instead, we need to
remember that part of
the human elite is already
corrupted and
disposed to waste the lives of billions, to squander
the planet’s ecology in exchange for a parrot’s
perch on some puny IFSP starship. Their first strategy is to say
that “we” can cut a deal with the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets), that, in fact,
they already have!
A tiny human elite will say that certain
technologies can be “ours” if we just play along (even
though the deal is bought with the blood of innocents and funded
through narcotics trafficking by government
shadow agencies).
To survive in a decent way, we can’t wait for the worst to happen.
Instead, we must act on a global scale, not merely
within one nation. Change of the sort cannot be purchased in a
store, nor made solely on the internet.
Alien math and science clearly indicate that the way of the future,
the most intelligent and enduring choices, are
finer and more subtle, hence more universally capable and
sustainable. We don’t need to withdraw from all alien
interactions, but we do need to raise public awareness and discuss
all alien issues more widely before we become a
kind of IFSP slave-market.
When the majority says No! and will not
let an offending minority destroy their planet,
when government is within the people who won’t play along with the IFSP’s bizarre “Earth Changes” strategy, then
the old regime will grind to a halt.
Some “direct operatives” will
try to escape, but for now, they want to squelch all
news of their crimes, to silence those public figures who could
expose them at any moment. To survive, the
conscientious must take risks and seek a wider audience.
This is not
a time to hide from such realities and merely
pamper oneself or one’s own small family.
There are preliminary indications, direct statements by Hyperversals
that those Hyperversals who support the
Verdant expansion are working on but a group of three elliptical
galaxies.
This may be reference to the galaxies
Centaurus A
(image
right), our Milky Way-Andromeda elliptical-to-be, and one other, i.e. possibly
N5102, also known as
The
Lenticular Galaxy (image left) which is actually a dwarf elliptical galaxy in
the Centaurus A galaxy group - where Verdants
originate.
* N5102 is only
0.214 times the apparent size of
Andromeda.
In other words, competing Hyperversals can
see a logic in throwing off the IFSP’s scheme here, which has
limited, if not conditional backing, at best.
The hyperversal "security section" cited for working on the
three ellipticals may be the cosmic equivalent of a sewer
squad containing some offenders who, in yet another twist of the
universal ecology, must be bundled together
AWAY from more gentle, constructive others.
When it is all seen from
above, we can see that the most dangerous
elements can't be allowed to just wander off wherever they want to
go. Ugly as it may seem, in some ways they are
all part of the same basic tendency.
At times, Hyperversals caught within that limited, Verdant-related
“event horizon” of sorts try to make me slack off
and not continue some of my rigorous, probably first-ever (native)
human cultivation of certain hyper-dynamics.
Such Hyperversals routinely intervene to try and change the human
community discussion/telepathic topic when we
outline their basic mode and concepts too explicitly—as if they want
to change the subject.
Admittedly, diversions of
the sort involve various motives - some Hyperversals fear that the
wrong humans may learn too much, and others
simply want to obscure their own, misguided doings. Diversions of
the sort tend to be abrupt and coarse in
character - involving offenders who seem to be bundled into the
Verdant-manipulated terracides, and more.
To some readers, this may seem like a cold slap in the face, but it
is a fact of life. The old politics of the 20th
century are gone. The politics of the 21st century involve a variety
of alien populations. It’s better to know, than to
be deceived for not having inquired.
Taken as a whole, Hyperversals have evolved away from lower-order
animal impulses. Nonetheless, some of the
following may discomfort those who shy away from explicit
investigative reporting. Perhaps it’s best to describe what
is about to be said in terms of a two (or more) sided analogy:
-
On
the one hand, in order to escape being caught
within the crunch of that singularly hell-like event horizon of
destroyers and extreme violators, we need to be
honest, studied, increasingly more humble and sensitive.
-
On the
other hand, it’s nice to know that if we persevere
and help to re-generate a more gently abiding and beautiful
universe, we can be part of a larger, hyper-intelligent
community.
The physics of the universe allow such a community to
endure for us, whether we recognize it within our
seemingly isolated “physical” bodies, or not.
Mass destruction leads
to a dead end, a misery that mass offenders
pretend not to recognize. Meanwhile, a better way is ever being
re-generated, yet it takes effort and commitment.
No one in this universe is immune, in such regard. You won’t be
accepted and integrated into higher orders of mind
if you don’t behave accordingly. You won’t be a match.
It’s that simple; alternate cycle hyper-dynamics can be ordered
according to such distinctions (within certain
limitations).
Sometimes, it seems as though the –X3’s lack of pending concern
about the doings of their security sections
prevents them from acting effectively, as we must (being more
vulnerable). Will they try to thwart humankind’s
attempts to interact with close neighbors? Will they try to toss
bones into our efforts, rationalizing it all in their own,
peculiar terms? If their (presumed) trade with Verdants is too
comfy, we may suffer, as a result.
* Some Hyperversals
retort that our brush with the IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets) will force us to expand our
awareness BEFORE we dunder off and attempt to
portray neighboring aliens as potential enemies. After our brush
with the Verdants, our closest neighbors will seem mild in
comparison and we’ll be better informed about alien basics.
The –X3’s argue that a merged (more greatly interacting) quality is
necessary for our future survival, yet one
critique is that the –X3’s divisive politics and cutoffs (as they
affect Earth) are framed to thwart universal-scale
interactions by newcomer aliens.
The first cold gatekeepers (i.e.
that “security section” tending to three ellipticals)
may try to obscure their own manipulations and the facts of a
larger, more considerate diversity. A good, relatively
advanced person can see past them, but a killer-regime accolyte will
be tempted to jump in with the worst (as seems
to be the Verdant strategy).
The sewer squad will “take care of
them,” ironically.
-
Are Hyperversals’ pre-emptive behaviors intended to avert reckless
newcomers before they can do too much short-term damage?
-
Does a larger universal convention already exist
regarding such offenders?
-
In other words, are the Verdants a small-scale balance of powers pawn, or are they
population offenders being steered toward
confrontations that may help to moderate Verdant wastefulness?
As is
usually the case, the truth probably lies in
both scenarios (and probably more).
Nevertheless, sometimes is seems as though the –X3’s and related
others are dancing around the obvious: they’re
implicated in a number of staged-as-though-IFSP communications, and
the Verdants know it (although Verdants
aren’t equal to it).
On the other hand, such Hyperversals have a
breadth of perspective that the Verdants simply
don’t; they’re better in various ways. So, caught on the one hand
looking bad for doing run-on, crappy routines ad
nauseum, while also criticizing the Verdants on the other hand, they
don’t want us to dwell on the details. In all
fairness, by tending to what populations like the Verdants do,
Hyperversals can tease out the details so that
potential victim populations can see it all more clearly. This, in
turn, lets Verdants know that they’re being
monitored.
*In the past, certain
Verdants have let slip that they
see the hyperversal community constraint as
suffocating, at times.
Meanwhile, the survival of life on Earth hangs in the balance, in
part due to the IFSP’s high velocity intervention.
Ironically, after so many have died as a result of the IFSP’s
“direct operatives’” schemes (see the history of those
noted above), the tendency of IFSP strategists is to act as though
the deaths of human innocents makes them, the
remote manipulators of such deaths, holy, in some strange way. We
see this kind of crap in human politics, also.
*I discuss
the Verdant case at intervals because it’s highly
political and is oft-mentioned by Hyperversals. It helps to
illustrate alien thinking on a number of subjects.
Speaking more generally, one hyperversal made the following
caricatured comment, of sorts: At a juncture when
hyperversal policy was in question, he showed a large expanse of
space, in the middle of which was a huge, soft
blue-gray orb-space (hyperversal community) that dominated the
entire scene - and, out in further reaches of
space, revolving in a neat little circle around the central
orb-space were small orb-spaces bobbing along, one after
the other, like little boats in a bathtub (i.e. humans and other
aliens who evolve in the current universe cycle). The
comment, of sorts, was shown as a kind of critique of the
mono-mindset of overly regime-minded Hyperversals.
Over time, along with others, I’ve observed Verdants defer to
–X3’s
and related Hyperversals, smoothly cognizant of
their existence. In fact, when pressured and criticized regarding
IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets) “direct operatives’” crimes against humanity,
one Verdant impulsively blurted out that the Verdants’ strategy had
been cleared with a hyperversal population.
The irony is that Verdants may, in part, have smoothed the way for
their expansion scheme by offering biological
and other materials in trade with one (or a few) local group(s) of
Hyperversals.
The fact that Hyperversals reportedly contacted Verdants to cue them
as to Earth’s location suggests that there is
some technological connection, if not a trading interaction between
such Hyperversals and the Verdants. We can
assume, of course, that the –X3’s need large quantities of
resources, which can’t be reaped from empty space.
They need diverse genetic and manufactured materials, plus
minerals.
Given that Verdants have the most
opportunistic and easily manipulated (large) regime on this fringe
of Virgo, the –X3’s likely trade with them, at least
on some scale. This poses the ghastly irony of the IFSP’s allegedly
slave-like use of lesser aliens to do the IFSP’s
dirty work, mining and processing of materials, which are then, in
at least some part, skimmed off of the top by –X3’s.
In other words, the worst (but not all) Hyperversals may think
Verdants can be used to essentially steal time from, if
not eliminate, newly-evolved populations (stealing time as it
relates to delta t and mass/energy).
*One advanced
hyperversal suggested that
Bearden’s delta t (change of time caused
by electrogravity) is really a kind of “alternate
t,” in a larger sense, but this involves a higher category of
integration involving multiple universe cycles.
The fact
that another (Verdant-abetting) group of Hyperversals is here
looking over the shoulder of the IFSP’s manipulated
violence scheme may be due to a larger order in the universe in
which all offending parties move in train—in a
deceptive, seemingly one-way river of time. Meanwhile, better minds
can exceed such offenders, accordingly.
One hyperversal suggested that after seeing certain hyperversal
offenders, we’ll be able to see how Hyperversals can
say that the death of some planets (and species) can come back to
haunt a manipulator. Ultimately, as was
suggested earlier, various low order impulses may bundle into one
another (away from the better kind), both as an
irony of the universal ecology, and to make management of such
offenders easier. More advanced aliens act in a
way that isn’t just right for their time, but is best for all of
time.
Sometimes, it seems as though a basic test of Hyperversals’
competency is their simple vulnerability. Those who
seem too smugly certain of themselves tend to be strangely weighted.
The gravity of their presumption is almost
singular, weighted (in an E.T. way) toward their physical being, or
regime. It’s as though they seem TOO condensed,
when, instead, more well-dimensioned minds communicate out into the
universe, less confined by singular
pretensions.
Rather than overgeneralize about Hyperversals, I should note that
callous Hyperversals may represent the lowest of
their kind, those whose impulses tend to be bunched, ever so
singularly, into the nearest specious scheme like that
of the Verdants, for example.
Ultimately, humans may need to be concerned about some equalitarian
societies that cut themselves off from others
in the universe. Some equalitarian societies live in relative
luxury, although on fairly equal terms - unlike humankind’s rich vs. poor scheme at present.
Hyperversals live in relatively
easy, unmolested techno-splendor. They travel the
universe.
They get universal news, and they live for “millions” of
years, according to at least one hyperversal’s
report. As a result, some Hyperversals can be subtly condescending -
as if to suggest that the hell of IFSP
destruction and criminality that we’re going through is intended to
dissuade us of our sexuality - for ecological
reasons.
*In other words, too bad that we’ve lost control of our
government, but if left as we are, humans could
become a threat.
The question, from our perspective is: a threat to what, or
whom?
One of the most arrogant Hyperversals has stated
that there is no legal order to rely upon. His drift was that humans
must conform within a hierarchical kind of
schema, or perhaps perish. Meanwhile, there is a precisely defined,
if not mathematical order of being in all that
happens, nearly tao-like consequences, albeit more active in
character than is the traditional Taoist outlook. It’s
inconceivable that hyperversal societies don’t have carefully
evolved legal structures, although some may assert
that humans haven’t signed legitimate treaties with off-world
governments.
Ironically, humans who fawningly accept the dogma of the
Verdant/gray IFSP don’t hear a word about Hyperversals.
Instead, they hear infantile remarks about “angels” and invisible
others, instead. And why do IFSP (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets) aliens omit
mention of Hyperversals? Apparently, it’s because some Verdants in
the IFSP want to play God and take the lion’s
share of whatever they can get—for the Verdants, primarily.
One
Verdant tried to convince Phillip Krapf that Verdants are the only superpower, when, instead, they aren’t even
remotely like such an entity.
* The greater order
of being isn’t about power and control but interacts mutually on
more highly evolved terms, irrespective of
technological prowess.
Absence of sexuality among some Hyperversals has made them more
civilized and capable but I’ve noticed that
some can dunder into a place and, whether wittingly or not, play to
an epic sense of grandeur.
They can casually sit
and watch humans die by the millions, in part due to IFSP
manipulations. Meanwhile, Hyperversals will openly
explain what is going on, even though we can’t possibly compete with
IFSP goons when our public remains
uniformed, our government hijacked and corrupted by cabal elements
who, whether they know it or not, work to
divide and corrupt humankind (to the advantage of IFSP aliens).
Watching from a distance, the typically detached
and aged yet “healthy” hyperversal can observe, adding his or her
own, colossal sense of drama to it all - while our
planet gets trashed by a criminal regime that cuts secret deals with
the IFSP.
One hyperversal remarked that such a situation can drive a planet to
death, a people to slave-like desperation,
and, in the end, life has simply been extinguished. Ironically,
potential problems for Hyperversals will have been
eliminated.
Ours wouldn’t be the first planet to die due to a misguided
intervention. Humans are getting a preliminary look at a
kind of
Munchhausen’s syndrome among aliens, yet few such aliens
will admit to it. Instead, they glibly suggest that
we could eliminate the evil gene or engineer our sexuality out in
order to be more normal. Meanwhile, if various government whistleblowers are correct, only a corrupt human cabal
has been introduced to the genetic tools
needed to do so and they prefer to profit in order to secure
themselves, rather than help humankind.
Were human
science to develop an enzyme that extends human life (like the one
that
the Buck Institute and other scientists have
developed), big corporations would say, no, they can’t market such a
thing because it would force them to pay
pensions for years beyond what they’ve planned. So, ghastly as that
might sound to those who would prefer to
extend their lives, under the current regime, progress of the sort
is unlikely.
We could try to paint a happy face on our
exopolitical (off-world
political) dilemma, as one hyperversal suggested
we do, but that would be irresponsible.
Hyperversals need to hear
critiques. Hyperversal aliens exist and are fallible.
We can’t treat them as though they don’t have age-related, coldly
detached limitations. There are offenders in
some of their security (and policy) sections who have technology for
which they, alone, could never be responsible.
One hyperversal noted that, rather than repeat a well proportioned
good behavior scheme wherever possible, some
offending hyperversal individuals (and subcultures) will try to
screw up on purpose, then try to impose an
authoritarian imprimateur, or role model, on the spectacle - thus
reinforcing and acting out the desired authority
role.
Apparently, some Verdants suffer the same defect. With pathetic,
post-apocalyptic populations like the grays in tow,
some Verdants apparently engage in a kind of thrill-seeking while
trying to make use of some of the most corrupt
humans on this planet.
The question is whether Verdant regimes
recognize the dangers in doing so.
Verdants may think they can get ahead by being the coldest, most
calculating aliens in our inter-group
neighborhood (below insert), but there is one most important catch:
The Verdant
home galaxy will probably be delta t (or alt. t)
depleted and dangerous long before other, surrounding galaxies (it
already has an unusually high number of
supernovas).
Local Group
from
Wikipedia Website
A
member of the Local Group of galaxies, irregular galaxy
Sextans A is 4.3 million light-years distant.
The
bright Milky Way foreground stars appear yellowish in
this view.
Beyond them lie the stars of Sextans A with young blue
star clusters clearly visible.
The Local Group is
the group of galaxies that includes our galaxy, the
Milky Way.
The group comprises
about 30 galaxies (including dwarf galaxies), with its
gravitational center located somewhere between the Milky
Way and the Andromeda Galaxy. The galaxies of the Local
Group cover a 10 million light-year diameter (see 1 E+22
m for distance comparisons) and have a binary (dumbbell)
shape.
The group is
estimated to have a total mass of (1.29 ± 0.14) ×
1012
M☉. The group itself is one of many within the Virgo Supercluster (i.e. the Local Supercluster).
The two most massive members of the group are the Milky
Way and the Andromeda Galaxy. These two Spiral Galaxies
each have a system of satellite galaxies.
-
The Milky Way's
satellite system consists of Sagittarius Dwarf
Galaxy, Large Magellanic Cloud, Small Magellanic
Cloud, Canis Major Dwarf, Ursa Minor Dwarf, Draco
Dwarf, Carina Dwarf, Sextans Dwarf, Sculptor Dwarf,
Fornax Dwarf, Leo I, Leo II, and Ursa Major Dwarf.
-
Andromeda's
satellite system comprises M32, M110, NGC 147, NGC
185, And I, And II, And III, And IV, And V, Pegasus
dSph, Cassiopeia Dwarf, And VIII, And IX, and And X.
-
The Triangulum
Galaxy, the third largest and only other ordinary
spiral galaxy in the Local Group, may or may not be
a companion to the Andromeda galaxy but probably has
Pisces Dwarf as a satellite.
The other members
of the group are gravitationally secluded from these
large subgroups:
IC10, IC1613,
Phoenix Dwarf, Leo A, Tucana Dwarf, Cetus Dwarf,
Pegasus Dwarf Irregular, Wolf-Lundmark-Melotte,
Aquarius Dwarf, and Sagittarius Dwarf Irregular.
|
Then, Verdants will either have to go begging or may
try to “conquer” extra-galactic terrain through
abductions and mobbed up technology schemes (like their intervention
here). Whether Verdants admit it or not,
there are major obstacles to doing so. Hyperversals have repeatedly
stated that all suitable galaxies are already
deeply inhabited. Hyperversals should know: they’re responsible for
ensuring that all galaxies moderate and reduce
population as the current universe cycle is depleted.
Meanwhile, the Verdant regime moves in on other galaxies and takes
advantage of vulnerable populations. In order
to pull it all off, they must sell Hyperversals on the coldness and
brutal efficiency of IFSP manipulations - as though Verdants are helping
Hyperversals get rid of potential war-like
offenders, while also evolving others.
You can see the hypocrisy in it: Verdants are the worst population
offenders we’ve encountered, to date.
They steal
in and try to trade with vulnerable populations. They run the clock
on other galaxies and hope that Hyperversals will
see them as a vulgar, but necessary mixer of sorts - forcing other
galaxies to interact on a larger scale. Meanwhile,
by their own admission to Krapf, Verdants are
intellectually-marginalized sexuals who change sex mates every few
decades or so—out of boredom.
They use epic amounts of energy and
take more for themselves than does any
other population in this small part of Virgo. They take 13 planets
to themselves for every home planet occupied by
lesser conscript aliens.
According to
Phillip Krapf’s numbers, they
spawn another 23 billion Verdants for every 6
billion aliens on a conscript planet.
Is that
good ecology?
Worse yet, there are indications that
some in the Verdant
bureaucracy dismiss previous generations of Hyperversals as ineffective old geezers, in a sense, and try to take
advantage of them, even though Hyperversals
are far more advanced and capable, albeit removed from the struggles
of newly-evolved populations.
Etched into my memory is one morning, more than a year after first
learning about Hyperversals, when there were a
series of callous remarks by a seemingly-hybrid intermediary alien
whose electrogravity indications, apparent
associations (and observations by other aliens) suggest that he
works for a generation of Hyperversals who preceded the recent generation of
Hyperversals (yes, they make
certain, discreet appearances, of sorts, and
usually do so in ways that suggest more advanced capabilities).
The
given hybrid coldly and distantly said that
sexuals can be so dangerous that the deaths of some
potentially-dangerous sexuals’ planets are unavoidable. He
repeated such remarks as though oblivious to the fact that humans
are endangered by the IFSP’s aggressive
manipulations. It was as though we were allowed no time to educate
our people before the IFSP does too much
damage. Of course, the apparent hybrid works for a hard-liner from
an older hyperversal generation whose job it is
to be blunt about such scenarios. The older hyperversal has made a
variety of remarks, some encouraging, others
coldly distant.
Distressed by the predicament, I couldn’t help thinking that humans
live in a remote location that may best be
described by way of analogy. If the universe were but our one,
single planet, we would live in a tiny hamlet (earth)
hiding within the shadow of a volcano (our future merged elliptical
galaxy) adjoining a tiny, remote island (the Milky
Way) that is part of a group of islands (the local galaxy groups
- see above insert)
situated somewhere near a modest-sized city (the
Virgo supercluster).
In other words, some of the Hyperversals
attending to our situation may be like a nearly-invisible consulate on a small island far out in the South Pacific,
or the Indian Ocean. They try to perform their
responsibilities according to a certain plan. In this analogy, the
Verdants would be a single tribe living in a number
of villages on nearby islands - far from greater population centers
(like the
Horologium supercluster, or the
Shapley
supercluster).
The greater population centers of the universe may not hear much
about our distant, relatively small predicament.
They have other crises to attend to. In terms of the analogy above,
the death of the gray planet would like a small,
lushly forested South Pacific island that was mined and depleted
under the illusion of false promises by foreign
officials, whose interests leveled all forests, leaving the island a
treeless, desert wasteland. (There is just such an
island, by the way.)
Meanwhile,
the gray's planet isn’t merely ruined;
it’s completely, irrevocably dead, and grays have
been removed to work on what, by way of analogy, is yet another
island in a tacky little casino (that fancies itself
“economically” important).
In other words, humans should be aware that Verdants may try to play
up to more advanced Hyperversals by posing
an implicit deal, of sorts: the Verdants will do grotesque dirty
work, yet stay in touch.
Verdants will help kill off
dangerous new populations and help avert the risk that other alien
worlds in the vicinity will interact with each other
independent of hyperversal inputs. Verdants may try to sell the
scheme by saying it ensures that no renegade early
move to precipitate a premature universe cycle will find adherents
where Verdants go. As a result of Verdant
ruthlessness, lesser aliens will come crawling to Hyperversals in
desperation - seeking the consideration of anyone
more capable than the Verdants.
Meanwhile, if so meager - albeit quickly learning - a person as myself
(and those in communication with me) can see
through such a scheme at this early date, thanks to persistent
coaching from native aliens and other Hyperversals
put off by the Verdants, then the Verdant scheme to buddy up to
Hyperversals may be in trouble. Ironically, the Verdant scheme probably causes competing, non-IFSP aliens to
interact more tightly together. Rather than avert
alien interactions outside of the Verdants’ bully scheme, Verdant
dundering should cause a yet-larger convention to
cohere.
Now, here's an unexpected irony:
We, as a newly evolved people, need
to remember that Hyperversals can be
highly civilized. They seem to be sensitive to human suffering, and,
due to their relatively insular remove from
people like us, some Hyperversals can sometimes come across like the
former children of gentle, trusting societies.
They are categorically more civilized than the Verdants and have a
greater, finer kind of insight, which can be
enormously helpful. Nonetheless, the Verdants' predatory opportunism
seems to have found a way to manipulate Hyperversals’ vulnerabilities. Verdants' sheer, specious indulgence
(their many planets, their vast rake of resources
to please their own crowd, their desire to travel and sexually
indulge beneath the light of billions of other stars) has
found a way to take maximum advantage of hyperversal aliens.
The most advanced Hyperversals are non-sexuals: neither as brutal
and predatory, nor as territorial as the
Verdants. The difference between non-sexuals and sexuals is one of
the defining themes of life in this universe.
Hyperversals have moderated their numbers, certainly their primitive
impulses. They live within
community/communities of mind, a much more advanced social premise.
Meanwhile, Verdants aren’t yet a
community of mind - by any stretch; they don’t treat others as
equals.
So, Verdant opportunists have found a way to twist and manipulate
some Hyperversals for Verdant gain. In their
animal-like rush to take too much, Verdants, like spoiled children,
have learned to traumatize lesser populations in
order to take advantage of them. Through the IFSP’s (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets) direct
operatives, they essentially sponsor and manipulate
mass killing, i.e. the many crimes against humanity promoted (and
profited) by the IFSP’s direct human operatives.
In other words, in part, Verdants coldly and methodically threaten
the survival of entire planets, Verdants worsen
tensions and conflicts in order to profit by doing so.
Verdants spokespersons say that’s but a tangential irony of their
larger, cosmic responsibilities, yet Verdants use a
target population's resources and pepper surrounding star systems
with small, token surrogate populations who
work for the IFSP. Verdants make cold criminals of
deeply-infiltrated, direct operatives yet turn around and tell
Hyperversals that Verdants need to be on the scene to tend to such
crimes (as if all people on the target planet are
as dangerous as the IFSP’s worst direct operatives).
Verdants may
feel a compulsion to foul humans in order to be
able to later say that we, humans, were violent and cruel, hence we
can’t turn around and claim that Verdants are
cruel for having manipulated numerous terracides. This is a very
real issue of our time. The Verdants may want us
to ape their peculiar habits and say that “(name of a lost planet)
died for YOUR sins, too,” so to speak.
And the Hyperversals?
Of course they monitor such doings, probably
appalled, for the most part.
Verdants have
learned to maneuver people(s) like us into atrocious spectacles,
orgies of violence and religious warfare, extremes
of (partly Verdant-sponsored) greed and pretension to #1 military
status. Like bizarrely spoiled children, the most
corrupt Verdant manipulators have learned that the more ghastly and
atrocious the planet-killing spectacle, the
more aghast and in thrall are the Hyperversals—who may try to help
the struggling peoples.
Hyperversals may
respond with epic gestures and help provide greater universal
context (noting possibilities that seem obvious to Hyperversals yet aren't attainable by humans, at present).
Nonetheless, it makes Hyperversals feel good to offer
some guidance - which Verdants probably see as superfluous.
The
IFSP
moves in for the kill and plays the
Hyperversals for sheer, specious gain.
* Some of the
worst Hyperversals do material deals with the Verdants—they
profit by Verdant overkill (various human and other community
researchers have probed this specific relationship in
detail).
Meanwhile, Verdants try to sell their scheme to Hyperversals by
saying that although their direct human operatives and the Verdants
profit by causing war and conflict, plus irreparable destruction of
Earth’s environment, Verdants will make sure that humans will be
turned into non-sexuals - via the
Verdant breeding program. Verdants argue that
either the death of planet Earth, or its degradation, will have been
worth it.
*I literally hear such arguments at
various junctures. Verdants occasionally boast that they physically
dominate at least one large galaxy (containing
more than 100 billion stars). Having tended to a wide variety of
alien populations, Verdants argue that as a mega-population, they’re like the ancient ancestors of many
Hyperversals.
In short, Verdants say that their
understandings more closely approximate those of Hyperversals than
do the smaller, isolated perspectives of lesser
populations, hence Hyperversals should see the logic in the IFSP’s (Intergalactic Federation of
Sovereign Planets)
design.
One hyperversal who is apparently older, if not more advanced than
the –X3’s (“-“ for
negative energy users, “X” for Hyperversals, and “3” for the fact
that they don’t merely work via a positive-negative
energy scheme, but appear to have refined a third, more complicated
dynamic)
stated that the Verdants are seen as
a test case that will force the Virgo galaxy supercluster’s
populations to organize in order to limit offenders of the
sort.
If such is the case, then Verdants aren’t actually favored by Hyperversals. Instead, Verdant corruption is
expected to spur others to do better.
Hyperversals have a way of
rounding out any problem of the sort by seeing it
in a larger perspective (which is characteristic of basic
hyper-dynamics, although it can fall short of universality and
can mistake the simple event horizons of a single galaxy and certain Hyperversals’ technology for the sum total of
the universe - I’ve seen this and it is most immodest).
As is
apparently the case among larger, universe-wide
hyperversal interactions, the errors of any one population
invariably stimulate either a corrective response on a
larger scale, or a failure among the given population - a crisis in
which more advanced parties can offer guidance
and further insight.
*Some
Hyperversals would say that, with time
and patience, advanced consciousness should
prevail anywhere, at any time, because any failure to assimilate
such insights is due to crude, lower-order
misconceptions.
In other words, all quantities derive from the
whole, which is deeply inter-dimensioned with a finer,
gentler kind of genius.