by Elizabeth Howell
August 27, 2025
from Space Websites

View of the

US McMurdo Station in Antarctica

on November 11, 2016.

(Image credit: MARK RALSTON/AFP via Getty Images)



Antarctica is an isolated,

confined environment

similar to those that might be

on future Moon or Mars bases...

More than 40 percent of respondents to a new survey experienced a sexual assault or sexual harassment during recent Antarctic research expeditions, according to the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF).
 

Antarctica is a common analog for spaceflight or stay on a "future" Moon base or Mars settlement due to its remote nature.

NSF pledged to work with its own participants, as well as to share information with other organizations working in remote environments, for assessment, prevention and follow-up.

"NSF is committed to fostering and maintaining a culture free from sexual violence wherever NSF-funded activities are conducted, including in Antarctica," a spokesperson told Space.com over email about the report, which was released in July.

 

"NSF is dedicated to keeping the USAP [U.S. Antarctic Program] community safe."

Video also HERE...

In a report in Nature, a scientist and past participant in NSF polar work said the survey is "an important step" towards addressing issues with harassment.

"Surveys like this play a critical role in documenting lived experiences that have too often been ignored or minimized," said Asa Rennermalm, a physical geographer and polar scientist at Rutgers University in New Jersey.

Nature's report added that NSF (like NASA) has been threatened with large budget cuts by the White House, and the entire government is also being targeted by the Trump administration for matters relating to diversity, equity and inclusion.

These two factors, the Nature report added, make it unclear to what capacity NSF can respond to the findings.

The NSF spokesperson told Space.com, however, that the foundation pledged to use the survey results "as a way to ensure continuous program improvement based on lived experiences," particularly because of the quality of the data collection.

Antarctica is an example of an isolated, confined environment - just like a spacecraft or a potential future base on the moon or Mars.

A term for such locations, Isolated, Confined, and Extreme environments (ICE - read 'Psychosocial Issues in Isolated and Confined extreme Environments'), simply put, includes zones where humans must work in an operational (and often dangerous) environment far from the usual supports of home.

Submarines, research bases and spacecraft are some examples of ICE and there are decades of studies regarding how to support individuals in these environments, according to a separate 2021 study in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

The teams that will work best in ICE should be properly screened and selected to deal with,

"leadership, coping and interpersonal skills training... during and after long-duration missions," the authors of the 2021 study said.

The study was co-authored by the University of Southern California's Lawrence Palinkas and the University of British Columbia's Peter Suedfeld, who are frequently cited among both ICE researchers and space scientists.

Generally speaking,

NASA has spent decades integrating studies of ICE to improve conditions for its astronaut training and living.

For example:

ISS crews are put through many rounds of ICE environment training before leaving, including working in caves, underwater habitats, and wilderness excursions.

Astronauts in space speak with a psychologist at least once every two weeks, according to the Canadian Space Agency.

Long-duration astronauts in particular are given rest days to pursue hobbies, call family or friends, and generally to relax.

Satellite imagery of

McMurdo Station in Antarctica.

 (Image credit: DigitalGlobe via Getty Images)

Antarctic scrutiny

Regarding Antarctica, USAP has been under recent scrutiny by the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

The committee started an investigation after a 2022 report by NSF and partners, concerning sexual assault and harassment during NSF activities in Antarctica.

The House committee found "serious deficiencies" in 2024 with how NSF was managing USAP, and made recommendations for remedies.

(The committee has also, more generally, investigated sexual assault, sexual harassment, blacklisting and similar activities in scientific programs since 2017.)

The new NSF survey, done alongside several external partners, canvassed 2,760 individuals who deployed with the NSF Office of Polar Programs between 2022 and 2024.

Roughly 25% of those canvassed, or 679 people, completed the survey. Participants, however, were asked to complete different inventories that had their own response rates.

For example, 521 individuals completed a "victimization inventory", in which 40.7% of respondents said they had experienced at least one instance of sexual assault or sexual harassment.

Among the victimization respondents, the survey found that more than half of those affected by these incidents (59%) were female.

Responses were nearly evenly split (48% and 52%) between those deployed less than a year, and those deployed for between one and four years.

A "bystander inventory" generated 572 responses, in which nearly 70% (68.7%) of respondents said they had witnessed an incident of sexual assault or sexual harassment.

Nearly half (44.5%) said the most recent incident they witnessed was part of a series of issues.

(Broadly speaking, assault or harassment was classified into four categories by NSF: as "sexual harassment and stalking", "unwanted sexual attention", "sexual coercion, and "sexual assault.")

NSF emphasized to Space.com that the Antarctic survey was not meant to be representative,

"of the specifics of spaceflights," but the spokesperson noted that sharing the results may allow "other organizations operating in remote environments [to] learn and benefit from our approach."

 

"It is essential to conduct a needs assessment or data collection to inform and guide strategic efforts, ensuring they are grounded in the strengths of an organization while also assessing risk factors that are specific to your environment and community," the spokesperson added.

 

"While prevention efforts can be adapted, it is critical to understand the dynamics of the participants."

Recommendations of the Antarctic survey, in NSF's words, include:

• Decrease the prevalence of victimization and bystander incidents.

• Increase both formal reporting and informal disclosures by decreasing barriers to reporting and improving trust, and accountability.

• Increase positive norms related to intervening as a bystander.

• Decrease norms that support and encourage behaviors.

• Increase recognition of problem behaviors that can lead to perpetration of behaviors.

• Increase supervisors' engagement in and initiation of SA/SH prevention efforts.

The foundation has already implemented some of the report recommendations, including case tracking of incidents and better bystander intervention training.

More details are available in a memorandum about the report.

"We are carefully reviewing the recommendations, and considering our next steps to ensure that we continue to take effective actions within our available resources," the spokesperson added.

For example, NSF said the program office is ready to assist those participants who experienced sexual assaults, and has a dedicated web page available for reporting and other needs.