| 
			  
			  
			
			
  by Paul Joseph Watson
 July 17, 2012
 from Infowars 
			Website
 
			  
			  
				
					
						| 
						Geoengineering threatens to 
						worsen droughts, starve millions |  
			
 
			  
			 
			  
			An experiment funded by Microsoft founder 
			
			Bill Gates will see thousands of tonnes of
			
			sulphur particles sprayed over New Mexico as part of a 
			geoengineering study, despite the fact that even staunch 
			environmentalists have warned the process could have catastrophic 
			effects on the earth’s eco-system.
 
				
				“David Keith, one of the 
				investigators, has argued that solar geoengineering could be an 
				inexpensive method to slow down global warming, but other 
				scientists warn that it could have unpredictable, disastrous 
				consequences for the Earth’s weather systems and food supplies,”
				
				reports the Guardian.
 “His US experiment, conducted with American James Anderson, will 
				take place within a year and involve the release of tens or 
				hundreds of kilograms of particles to measure the impacts on 
				ozone chemistry, and to test ways to make sulphate aerosols the 
				appropriate size.
   
				Since it is impossible to simulate 
				the complexity of the stratosphere in a laboratory, Keith says 
				the experiment will provide an opportunity to improve models of 
				how the ozone layer could be altered by much larger-scale 
				sulphate spraying.” 
			The Harvard University project, 
			in which sun-reflecting particles will be sprayed from a balloon at 
			an altitude of 80,000 feet above Fort Sumner, New Mexico, is being 
			funded by Bill Gates, who earlier this year
			threw his 
			financial muscle behind manipulating the earth’s climate via 
			geoengineering.
 The risks involved in spraying the upper atmosphere with sulphur 
			particles are so brazen that even environmentalists who support the 
			man-made global warming mantra have sternly warned against it, such 
			as Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist Doug Parr, who slammed 
			attempts to geoengineer the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous”.
 
 Indeed, the consequences could be devastating for poor people in the 
			third world.
 
			  
			Rutgers University meteorologist Alan 
			Robock has,  
				
				“created computer simulations 
				indicating that sulfate clouds could potentially weaken the 
				Asian and African summer monsoons, reducing rain that irrigates 
				the food crops of billions of people.”
 “Imagine if we triggered a drought and famine while trying to 
				cool the planet,” Robock told a geoengineering conference in 
				2010.
 
			Stephen Schneider of Stanford 
			University, who proposed a bizarre plan to send spaceships into the 
			upper atmosphere that would be used to block out the Sun, admits 
			that geoengineering could cause, 
				
				“conflicts between nations if 
				geoengineering projects go wrong.”
 “Impacts include the potential for further damage to the ozone 
				layer, and disruption of rainfall, particularly in tropical and 
				subtropical regions - potentially threatening the food supplies 
				of billions of people,” said Pat Mooney, executive director of 
				the Canadian-based technology watchdog ETC Group.
   
				“It will do nothing to decrease 
				levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere or halt ocean 
				acidification. And solar geoengineering is likely to increase 
				the risk of climate-related international conflict - given that 
				the modelling to date shows it poses greater risks to the global 
				south.” 
			Aside from the unknown dangers, what is 
			known about what happens when the environment is loaded with sulphur 
			dioxide is bad enough, since the compound is the main component of 
			acid rain, which
			
			according to the EPA, 
				
				“Causes acidification of lakes and 
				streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high 
				elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and 
				many sensitive forest soils.   
				In addition, acid rain accelerates 
				the decay of building materials and paints, including 
				irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part 
				of our nation’s cultural heritage.” 
			The health effects of bombarding the 
			skies with sulphur dioxide alone are enough to raise serious 
			questions about whether such programs should even be allowed to 
			proceed.
 The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur:
 
				
					
					
					Neurological effects and 
					behavioral changes
					
					Disturbance of blood circulation
					
					Heart damage
					
					Effects on eyes and eyesight
					
					Reproductive failure
					
					Damage to immune systems
					
					Stomach and gastrointestinal 
					disorder
					
					Damage to liver and kidney 
					functions
					
					Hearing defects
					
					Disturbance of the hormonal 
					metabolism
					
					Dermatological effects
					
					Suffocation and lung embolism 
			According to the
			
			LennTech website,  
				
				“Laboratory tests with test animals 
				have indicated that sulfur can cause serious vascular damage in 
				veins of the brains, the heart and the kidneys. These tests have 
				also indicated that certain forms of sulfur can cause fetal 
				damage and congenital effects.    
				Mothers can even carry sulfur 
				poisoning over to their children through mother milk. Finally, 
				sulfur can damage the internal enzyme systems of animals.” 
			Even pro-geoengineering scientist 
			Mark Watson, admits that injecting sulphur into the atmosphere 
			could lead to, 
				
				“acid rain, ozone depletion or 
				weather pattern disruption.” 
			Given the fact that Bill Gates is a
			
			member of a secret billionaire’s club that meets to discuss 
			the threat caused by overpopulation, many find it insidious that 
			he is simultaneously funding projects which threaten to 
			depopulate poor areas of the world by causing droughts 
			which could potentially kill millions through starvation.
 
			  
			  |