For decades, governments and scientists worldwide have been denying
the existence of discrete operations which (for various reasons) use
military aircraft to spray our skies with chemical toxins.
Such operations have often been
dismissed as conspiracy theories, or in many cases a
misinterpretation of condensation trails (contrails).
Governments are now finally admitting
geoengineering is a reality and have stated that despite any
detrimental affects to our health, will continue these operations
Geoengineering Initiatives Being Used To Accelerate The Pandemic?
They’ve been called chemtrails, aerial spraying, aerosol emissions,
cirrus clouds, among many other terms.
The largest reports come from Canada and
U.S. but it happens all over the world including countries such as,
the United Kingdom,
If you live in these countries, just look above you as
you’ll see them at some point throughout day or week.
Often these jets leave just a thick wisp
of a trail or they leave a long line of dashed trails across the
There are thousands of photos on the
web of these patterns.
The federal laws in almost every nation on earth do not allow
commercial aircraft to cross flight paths so close and so quickly.
These jets are therefore under military control. And what about the
prismatic colors often observed in the resultant aerosol haze
illuminated by sunlight?
If the haze was primarily water vapor,
carbon monoxide and negligible amounts of hydrocarbons, the
prismatic colors would essentially be that of a rainbow.
But, instead it is either magenta and
green or broad bands of orange and yellow. All elements through
which sunlight passes give a signature color which is totally unique
to that element.
Through spectroscopy a number of heavy
metals have been shown to be ever-present in our breathable
atmosphere. All heavy metals, as you may know, cause the dementia
symptoms associated with Alzheimer’s Syndrome. One purpose which is
now well documented according to researchers, is to manipulate the
Karsten Brandt, German
“The Federal Army is Manipulating the
The disruption of radar signals is the main purpose theorizes Mr.
Brandt in the interview.
“I was surprised that this
artificial cloud was so wide-spread. The radar images are
stunning considering the needed tons of dispersed elements -
although, the federal army claims that only small amounts of
material were propagated. The military heads claim that the
substances used are not harmful.”
Johannes Remmel, German Green party
“The government must provide
explanations to the unsuspecting population.”
While radar is tracking suspicious
aircraft, the Germany Military then uses counterfeit satellite
imagery to hide their operations.
Since Chemtrails are so widespread across the world, it is easy to
rule out the idea that this is just military performing operations
to disrupt radar signals as part of some sort of drill.
The forefront of these operations in the United States appears to be
the US Navy, as detailed in “Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism
& Toxic Warfare,” by Dr. Len Horowitz.
Many government watchdogs claim global
depopulation, the targeted reduction of the world’s population by
two-thirds, is secretly the reason behind chemtrail spraying.
Chemtrails differ from ordinary contrails in that they hang in the
sky for hours and are often observed to be emitted from planes that
fly criss-cross routes, leading to the formation of ‘X’ and
grid-like patterns in the sky. Chemtrails also directly effect
localized weather by turning a clear blue sky into a hazy overcast.
Last year, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that
fell to earth from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels
of Barium (6.8 ppm) and Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of
other chemicals including arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and
silver. Of these, all but one are metals, some are toxic while
several are rarely or never found in nature.
The newscast focuses on Barium, which
its research shows is a “hallmark of chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium
levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more than six times the toxic
level set by the EPA.”
KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control
Center, about the effects of Barium on the human body.
Ryan commented that,
“short term exposure can lead to
anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term exposure
causes blood pressure problems.”
The Poison Control Center further
reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance,
would contribute to weakening the immune system, which many
speculate is the purpose of such man-made chemical trails.
Indeed, barium oxide has cropped up repeatedly as a contaminant from
suspected geoengineering experimentation.
Barium causes asthma, which has reached epidemic proportions across
the world. It is also a powerful immune suppressant. In the barium
mines the workers all have what’s called
baritosis, a special type
of asthma, which surprisingly is worse on the weekend when they’re
not in the mines working. It gets better when they return to work.
Did you also realize that we have a flu
season every year and that it can last over 8 to 9 months?
The incidence of allergies have risen so
much that pharmaceutical companies’ profits have tripled on their
allergy medications and it can only be coincidence that those rise
in profits also mirror the rise in aerosol operations which began in
earnest in the fall of 1998.
Weather Modification may adversely impact agricultural crops and
water supplies. If the weather is changed in one state, region or
county it may have severe consequences in another region, state or
county. And who is going to decide the type of weather modification
experimentation and who it will benefit or adversely impact?
Artificial weather modification can
impact all of us by reducing water supplies, changing agricultural
crop production cycles, reducing crop production, and water
availability. Since most experimental weather modification programs
use chemicals released into the atmosphere the public could be
subjected increasingly toxic or unknown substances that could
adversely impact agricultural crops and trees.
Global dimming and persistent chemtrails that produce man-made
clouds may have serious impacts on crop production.
A recent corn
crop study in Illinois shows that cloud cover reduces corn crop
production while direct sunlight increases production. In addition,
increasing man-made clouds may reduce the effectiveness of solar
Gil Smolin, an Avian Bird Flu expert, noted on the Ron Owens Show on
KGO Radio (January 5, 2006), that the flu was spread more quickly in
the winter when there was a “lack of sunlight”.
Would man-made clouds be contributing to
the lack of sunlight which might cause the Avian Bird flu to spread
more quickly at other times of the year? Experimental weather
modification programs could also exacerbate this problem by changing
climate patterns and our weather.
In 2007, Rosalind Peterson, lifelong California resident, was
invited by to address the United Nations Conference during both a
workshop, held on September 5th, and a round-table session, held on
September 6, 2007.
Rosalind was invited to address this
conference due to her research and work in the agriculture field
relating to climate change, global dimming, and the affects of
man-made clouds and experimental weather modification programs on
Rosalind is co-founder and President of the
Excerpts of her speech included the following:
International weather modification companies are modifying our
weather with programs that cover thousands of square miles.
Most of these programs use toxic
chemicals or particulates to alter the weather with either
ground-based or airborne releases that change or modify our local
One of the things I am concerned about and that we need to address,
now and in the future, is how these programs are affecting the
micro-climates needed for our crops to survive and for pollination
to take place.
If we artificially change the growing seasons, our pollinators like
bees and birds (many now in sharp decline across the United States),
may not survive, leaving many flowers, native plants, agricultural
and trees crops that are not pollinated.
Native grasses, plants, trees, and
agricultural losses could be devastated not only in the United
States but on a worldwide basis.
The “mitigation” drumbeat heard everywhere sounds impressive.
However, these undefined measures may be
detrimental to human health, crop production, soils, and drinking
water supplies. It is now necessary to define what is meant by
mitigation and to place all of these measures under congressional,
agriculture, and pubic oversight.
We do not want to place ourselves in the
position of making huge mistakes by trading one pollution problem
for another more serious problem.
The following example reflects a “monetary mitigation” agreement
that allows polluters to purchase the ability to pollute more:
Chronicle - September 2007
California makes deal with
ConocoPhillips so that it can expand its refinery in the San
Francisco Bay Area while paying the State of California $10 Million
total so that it can release an additional 500,000 tons of
pollutants from their Rodeo, CA, facility.
In addition, their proposed expansion
agreement would add one million tons a year of carbon dioxide from
another facility that currently releases yearly 1.9 millions tons a
This expansion also increases the amounts of nitrogen oxides, sulfur
dioxide, soot and other pollutants that will be emitted when the
facility expansion is completed.
Geoengineering schemes, many developed to place chemicals, salt or
other particulates into our atmosphere to control global warming,
are waiting in the wings to be implemented or have already been
The release of chemicals or
particulates, like highly polluting sulfur, are now being discussed
at NASA Ames (November 2006 Geoengineering Meetings), and by many
scientists worldwide waiting in the wings for funding.
These chemicals and particulates are being proposed so that the
amount of direct sunlight reaching the earth is reduced in order to
cool the planet. What is not being discussed, for example, is that
California in 2006, took highly polluting sulfur out of diesel fuel
due to asthma and other environmental problems. Now there are
proposals to place sulfur back into our atmosphere to reduce global
Where is the discussion about environmental, agriculture, and human
health declines from this proposal? What about public and
congressional oversight of these proposed programs?
No public oversight, hearings or
regulations are being proposed that would protect agriculture or
The actions of placing chemicals into
our atmosphere is certainly going to have negative effects on crop
production and tree health. And if you place in our skies chemicals
to reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the earth, you are going
to reduce the photosynthesis needed for crop production.
In order to produce crops and for plants and trees to grow and
thrive they need direct sunlight. A recent corn crop study at the
University of Illinois shows that increased cloud cover reduces corn
crop production while direct sunlight increases production.
Photosynthesis is the process where plants and trees gain the energy
to grow and produce crops.
If we “mitigate” to reduce the amount of sunlight reaching the
earth, negatively affecting crop production not only in the United
States but worldwide, we could put the world in a food shortage
Two experiments are now believed to be reducing crop production in
the United States:
Micro-climate shifts caused by
experimental weather modification programs and, a lack of
photosynthesis cause by persistent jet contrails that produce
(according to NASA), man-made clouds that change our climate.
(Solar voltaic panels are beginning to produce less power due to
NASA noted in an October 2005 newsletter, and from other study
results, notes that increasingly persistent contrails are turning
into man-made clouds that are,
“trapping warmth in the atmosphere
and exacerbating global warming.”
NASA goes on to note that:
“Any increase in global cloud cover
will contribute to long-term changes in Earth’s climate.
Likewise, any change in Earth’s climate may have effects on
natural resources.” (The Power Point Presentation begins at this
point in Rosalind’s presentation.)
Jets leaving persistent jet contrails
are changing our climate to the degree that one jet leaving a
persistent jet contrail has the following affect according to NASA’s
Patrick Minnis (February 2007):
“We had found that (jet) contrails
were producing much more cloud cover than we ever thought they
did. This one particular aircraft produced a contrail that
covered an area of four thousand square kilometers and lingered
for six hours.
But we also found that there were contrails
covering much larger areas and lasting more than twenty hours.”
Dr. Wayne Evans, Atmospheric Scientist:
“You see the two contrails
forming cirrus clouds. While most natural clouds actually
reflect more sunlight back into space than they supply infrared
heat energy towards the earth.
However, cirrus clouds are
different. They actually radiate more heat energy than they
reflect solar energy back into space. Therefore, cirrus clouds
contribute to global warming.”
The picture up on the screen shows just
one jet leaving a persistent jet contrail - that one trail can
expand to cover an area of four thousand square kilometers and
linger for more than twenty hours.
This phenomenon was unheard of in the
early fifties, sixties and seventies. It was not until the late
1980s that there was a huge change and people began to see the first
persistent jet contrails that persist like we see today on a massive
NASA studies show that climate change and global warming problems
could be attributed to these types of persistent jet contrails and
that jets cause them to form in our once clear blue skies.
One of the issues needed to be addressed
as we go forward is:
“HOW DO YOU LIKE YOUR SKIES: NATURAL
And right now we are making manmade
clouds like the ones you see up on the screen. And these man-made
clouds are trapping warmth in our atmosphere.
Isn’t it time that all of us addressed
this global warming issue?
Atmospheric Heating and Testing Programs
There are also other experiments taking place in our atmosphere.
The colors in this man-made cloud
photograph in Mendocino County, CA, shows just one of many
experiments. These colors represent a chemical reaction produced by
experiments conducted by NASA and the United States Air Force. They
are sending up canisters loaded with toxic chemicals designed to
explode when superheated in order to conduct atmospheric and
ionosphere experimental tests.
Some persistent jet contrails and man-made clouds, I believe, allow
scientists to observe the results of these tests from either
satellites or ground-based observation platforms. Without man-made
clouds these tests could not be observed, as the chemicals would not
produce a visible marker.
The NASA/U.S. Air Force CRESS 1990 Press Kit outlines an
atmospheric NASA testing program (linked to
H.A.A.R.P. and the U.S.
Air Force, that could produce 4 the Vibrant Spectrums (auroras),
referenced above, as shown in my poster pictures.
In this program canisters are loaded
with chemicals and superheated at different atmospheric levels.
These canisters contain the following
chemicals that could be polluting our air and are showing up with
unusual spikes in drinking water supplies in across California
(California State Department of Health, Drinking Water Division
Water Test Results- Public Records, Sacramento, California), and
In briefing notes published in May
2008 from the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) 'Geoengineering
- Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale',
the elite internationalist group lays out the exact same radical
ideas now being touted by the Obama administration.
The following excerpts are taken from
Among all geoengineering
schemes, those currently considered most feasible involve
increasing the planetary albedo, that is, reflecting more
sunlight back into space before it can be absorbed.
There are a number of different
methods that could be used to increase the planet’s
Add more small reflecting
particles in the upper part of the atmosphere (the
stratosphere which is located between 15 and 50
kilometers above the Earth’s surface).
Add more clouds in the lower
part of the atmosphere (the troposphere)
Place various kinds of
reflecting objects in space either near the earth or at
a stable location between the earth and the sun.
Change large portions of the
planet’s land cover from things that are dark
(absorbing) such as trees to things that are light
(reflecting) such as open snowcover or grasses.
Stratospheric Aerosols that might be
engineered to migrate to particular regions (e.g. over the
arctic) or to rise above the stratospher (so as not to interfere
in stratospheric chemistry).
Adding more of the right kind of fine particles to the
stratosphere can increase the amount of sunlight that is
reflected back into space.
Applied to geoengineering, various technologies could be used to
loft particles into the stratosphere, such as naval guns,
rockets, hot air balloons or blimps, or a fleet of highflying
Potential types of particles for
injection include sulfur dioxide, aluminum oxide dust or even
designer self-levitating aerosols.
A CFR geo-engineering meeting summary
document from 1999 (PDF pages 12,13,14) also categorically states
that the ultimate goal under “A technology strategy for global
warming” is the implementation of a global Carbon Tax.
An valuable file folder is available containing 8 PDF’s, all
published by the CFR, and all concerning their Geo-Engineering
An excellent new video (below) summarizing concerns about chemtrails
entitled Geoengineering and Eugenics has just been released by Media
This footage shows huge windowless airplanes
dispersing chemtrails, as well as aircraft that appear to turn
chemtrail emissions on and off in mid-flight.
The fact that something is being
deliberately dispersed is clear from the video and cannot be
confused with crop-dusting which is done by light aircraft at low
Geoengineering Definition of Terms
Geoengineering is the
artificial modification of Earths climate systems through two
primary ideologies, Solar Radiation Management (SRM) and Carbon
Dioxide Removal (CDR).
CARBON DIOXIDE REMOVAL (CDR)
Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR)
and sequestration. This is artificial trees,
etc. These projects are declassified for the most part. This
method of geoengineering IS NOT the focus of this report.
SOLAR RADIATION MANAGEMENT (SRM)
Solar Radiation Management (SRM),
controlling sunlight before it reaches the planet.
STRATOSPHERIC SULFATE AEROSOLS
The ability of stratospheric
sulfate aerosols to create a global dimming effect has made them
a possible candidate for use in geoengineering projects,
to limit the effect and
impact of climate change due to rising levels of
to delivery of precursor
sulfide gases such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S)
or sulfur dioxide (SO2)
by artillery, aircraft and
Tom Wigley calculated the impact of
injecting sulfate particles, or aerosols, every one to four
years into the stratosphere in amounts equal to those lofted by
the volcanic eruption of Mount Pinatubo in 1991, but did not
address the many technical and political challenges involved in
potential geoengineering efforts.
If found to be economically,
environmentally and technologically viable, such injections
could provide a “grace period” of up to 20 years before major
cutbacks in greenhouse gas emissions would be required, he
Direct delivery of precursors is
proposed by Paul Crutzen. This would typically be achieved using
sulfide gases such as dimethyl sulfide, sulfur dioxide (SO2),
carbonyl sulfide, orhydrogen sulfide (H2S). These
compounds would be delivered using artillery, aircraft (such as
the high-flying F15C) or balloons, and result in the formation
of compounds with the sulfate anion
According to estimates by the
“one kilogram of well placed
sulfur in the stratosphere would roughly offset the warming
effect of several hundred thousand kilograms of carbon
is the publics term for the CLASSIFIED ONGOING artificial
modification of Earths climate systems using reflective nano-materials
(aerosols) to reflect sunlight.
The aerosols are dispersed via jet
aircraft trails that expand into reflective artificial clouds.