by Montalk from Montalk Website
Mainstream spirituality is becoming less of an oxymoron by the day. Movies like “What the Bleep” and “The Secret” are gaining appreciable popularity.
But the belief that you create your own reality (YCYOR) is tricky business; on the one hand being a chronic cynic does invite an extraordinary share of misfortunes, but staying positive by ignoring negative issues that need to be solved is also dangerous.
The situation regarding “The Secret” (and the imminent
flowering of related “spiritual” themes in mainstream culture) is
precarious because as the saying goes, a little knowledge is a
dangerous thing. Pitfalls include denying personal and world
problems that still need attention, and misappropriating
metaphysical principles to satisfy ego-based greed and materialism,
which treads dangerously
close to black magick.
I have noticed a prevalent problem of faux spirituality mixed into the alien disinformation literature out there. It employs concepts like nondualism, zen-like consciousness, integration of polarities, and getting away from victim-mentalities. Sounds nice, but the way these are portrayed is a mere simulacrum of the real thing.
For instance, nondualism in this case encourages ignorance of functional differences rather than acknowledging these difference in context of the fundamental unity of all things. Or the zen-like consciousness is said to be a “spiritual” state of mind achievable via transcendental meditation, yet TM lowers consciousness into hypnotically suggestible states.
Victims are told
that victimhood is merely a perspective that can be eliminated by
welcoming and seeing their abuse as a good thing rather than using
freewill and awareness to break free of their oppressors. And the
integration of polarities is used to justify the idea of human +
alien coming together to form a mixed hybrid race with the best
traits of both, but really that is genetic enslavement of the human
soul matrix.
But that would be like buying from every salesman who knocks on your door.
The flaw of this reasoning rests on the fact that there is a difference between agreeing to face the possible risk of a negative experience, and agreeing to go through that experience itself. For instance, every time you drive a car you choose to face the risk of an accident, but you do not actually choose to get into an accident per se.
The difference is choice - in
a situation of possible risk you can choose, through awareness, to
avoid the negative possibilities, whereas having already chosen to
experience one of those possibilities would mean violating your own
freewill in avoiding it. This is just one example of how negative
aliens use cunning to manipulate their victims into willingly
accepting their abuse.
The only way
alien deceivers can assimilate us
willingly is to make us aware of higher dimensional reality and the
interplay between mind and matter. It is a Luciferic deception
because they bring light, but it is a false light unaccompanied by
the warmth of wisdom and true understanding that comes from the
heart. The plan is not that they enslave us violently, rather that
we welcome them smilingly.
For truth-seekers like ourselves, this is an advantage in that if the deceptive part can be revealed for what it is, replaced by a superior truth alternative, then the total outcome is positive.
For instance, if my friends never listened to me about the idea of reality creation (Law of Attraction), but through some outside agenda they eventually are convinced of its merits and go nuts for it, there may come a time when I could successfully say,
My main drive in life is to discover deceptions, expose them, and come up with superior alternatives.
I think if a deception can be
laid out clearly enough, many people would listen in time. However,
that is assuming they are rational… sometimes the ego is so invested
in a false belief it will use irrational methods to argue away the
uncomfortable truth.
Well, why can’t it be “be positive but also acknowledge the negative”?
That third choice transcends the first two… but I have noticed that people generally have a hard time getting past that fallacy of false opposites and are somehow wired to think in a binary either/or way instead of acknowledging a third transcendent choice. The interesting part is that if this third choice is shown to them, they will misinterpret it as defending the other side’s position and attacking their own.
It’s no different from people who think Democrat and Republican are
the only two choices, and will classify any political view into
either category.
Left alone, it would doom this planet to become willfully assimilated. But if carefully exposed and redirected it could do the opposite.
The situation could be a divine plan potentially derailed by negative forces, or perhaps a negative agenda being overturned at the last moment by divine forces who had it planned all along.
|