| 
			  
			  
			
			
  by Dr. 
			
			Paul Craig Roberts
 
			February 26, 2013 
			
			from
			
			GlobalResearch Website 
			  
			  
				
					
						
							
								
								In the United States everything is polluted.
 Democracy is polluted with special interests and corrupt 
			politicians.
 
 Accountability is polluted with executive branch exemptions from law 
			and the Constitution and with special legal privileges for 
			corporations, such as the Supreme Court given right to corporations 
			to purchase American elections.
 
 The Constitution is polluted with corrupt legal interpretations from 
			the 
								Bush and 
								
								Obama regimes that have turned constitutional 
			prohibitions into executive branch rights, transforming law from a 
			shield of the people into a weapon in the hands of government.
 
			
 Waters are polluted with toxic waste spills, oil spills, chemical 
			fertilizer run-off with resulting red tides and dead zones, acid 
			discharges from mining with resulting destructive algae such as 
			prymnesium parvum, from toxic chemicals used in fracking and with 
			methane that fracking releases into wells and aquifers, resulting in 
			warnings to homeowners near to fracking operations to open their 
			windows when showering.
 
 The soil’s fertility is damaged, and crops require large quantities 
			of chemical fertilizers.
 
			  
			The soil is polluted with an endless array 
			of toxic substances and now with glyphosate, the main element in 
			
			Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide with which GMO crops are sprayed. 
			Glyphosate now shows up in wells, streams and in rain.
 
 Air is polluted with a variety of substances, and there are many 
			large cities in which there are days when the young, the elderly, 
			and those suffering with asthma are warned to remain indoors.
 
 All of these costs are costs imposed on society and ordinary people 
			by corporations that banked profits by not having to take the costs 
			into account. This is the way in which unregulated capitalism works.
 
 Our food itself is polluted with antibiotics, growth hormones, 
			pesticides, and glyphosate.
 
 Glyphosate might be the most dangerous development to date. Some 
			scientists believe that glyphosate has the potential to wipe out our 
			main grain crops and now that Obama’s Secretary of Agriculture, 
			Thomas Vilsack, has approved genetically modified Roundup Ready 
			alfalfa, maintaining sustainable animal herds for milk and meat 
			could become impossible.
 
 Alfalfa is the main forage crop for dairy and beef herds. 
			Genetically modified alfalfa could be unsafe for animal feed, and 
			animal products such as milk and meat could become unsafe for human 
			consumption.
 
 On January 17, 2011, Dr. Don Huber outlined the dangers of approving 
			Roundup Ready alfalfa in a letter to Secretary of Agriculture Vilsack. Huber requested that approval be delayed until independent 
			research could evaluate the risks. Vilsack ignored the letter and 
			accommodated Monsanto’s desire for monopoly profits that come from 
			the company’s drive to control the seed supply of US and world 
			agriculture by approving Roundup Ready alfalfa.
 
 Who is Don Huber, and why is his letter important?
 
 Huber is professor emeritus at Purdue University. He has been a 
			plant pathologist and soil microbiologist for a half century. He has 
			an international reputation as a leading authority. In the US 
			military, he evaluated natural and manmade biological threats, such 
			as germ warfare and disease outbreaks and retired with the rank of 
			Colonel. For the USDA he coordinates the Emergent Diseases and 
			Pathogens Committee.
 
			  
			In other words, he is high up in his scientific 
			profession.
 You can read online what Huber told the Secretary of Agriculture. 
			Briefly, the outcome of many years of Roundup Ready GMO corn and 
			soybeans has been a decline in nutritional value, the outbreak of 
			new plant diseases resulting in widespread crop failures, and severe 
			reproductive problems in livestock, with some herds having a 
			spontaneous abortion rate that is too high to maintain a profitable 
			business.
 
 Glyphosate is a powerful biocide. It harms beneficial soil 
			organisms, altering the natural balance in the soil and reducing the 
			disease resistance of crops, thus unleashing diseases that devastate 
			corn, soybean, and wheat crops, and giving rise to a new pathogen 
			associated with premature animal aging and infertility.
 
			  
			These 
			developments, Huber told the Agriculture Secretary, 
				
				“are threatening 
			the economic viability of both crop and animal producers.” 
				 
			The 
			evidence seems to be real that genetically modified crops have lost 
			their genetic resistance to diseases that never previously were 
			threats.
 There is evidence that the new pathogen is related to a rise in 
			human infertility and is likely having adverse effects on human 
			health of which we are still uninformed. Like fluoride, glyphosate 
			might enter our diet in a variety of ways.
 
			  
			For example, the label on 
			a bottle of Vitamin D says, “Other ingredients: soybean oil, corn 
			oil.”
 Monsanto disputes Huber’s claims and got support for its position 
			from the agricultural extension services of Iowa State and Ohio 
			State universities. However, the question is whether these are 
			independently funded services or corporate supported, and there is 
			always the element of professional rivalry, especially for funding, 
			which comes mainly from agribusiness.
 
 The Purdue University extension service was more circumspect.
 
			  
			On the 
			one hand it admits that there is evidence that supports Huber’s 
			claims:  
				
				“The claim that herbicides, such as glyphosate, can make 
			plants more susceptible to disease is not entirely without merit. 
				   
				Research has indicated that plants sprayed with glyphosate or other 
			herbicides are more susceptible to many biological and physiological 
			disorders (Babiker et al., 2011; Descalzo et al., 1996; Johal and 
			Rahe, 1984; Larson et al., 2006; Means and Kremer, 2007; Sanogo et 
			al., 2000; Smiley et al., 1992)...    
				Although some research 
			indicates there is an increase in disease severity on plants in the 
			presence of glyphosate, it does NOT necessarily mean that there is 
			an impact on yield.” 
			On the other hand, the Purdue extension service maintains its 
			recommendation for, 
				
				“judicious glyphosate use for weed control.” 
				 
			However, one of Huber’s points is that weeds are developing Roundup 
			resistance. Use has gone beyond the “judicious” level and as glyphosate builds up in soil, its adverse effects increase.
 A submission to the Environmental Protection Agency by 26 university 
			entomologists describes the constraints that agribusiness has put on 
			the ability of independent scientists to conduct objective research. 
			The submission, in which the scientists are afraid to reveal their 
			names because of the threat of funding cutoffs, is included as an 
			item in one of the bibliographical references below.
 
			  
			Here is the 
			statement: 
				
				“The names of the scientists have been withheld from the public 
			docket because virtually all of us require cooperation from industry 
			at some level to conduct our research.    
				Statement: 
			Technology/stewardship agreements required for the purchase of 
			genetically modified seed explicitly prohibit research.    
				These 
			agreements inhibit public scientists from pursuing their mandated 
			role on behalf of the public good unless the research is approved by 
			industry.    
				As a result of restricted access, no truly independent 
			research can be legally conducted on many critical questions 
			regarding the technology, its performance, its management 
			implications, IRM, and its interactions with insect biology. 
			   
				Consequently, data flowing to an EPA Scientific Advisory Panel from 
			the public sector is unduly limited.” 
			Monsanto is not only sufficiently powerful to prevent any research 
			other than that which it purchases with its funding, but also 
			Monsanto succeeded last year in blocking with money and propaganda 
			the GMO labeling law in California.  
			  
			I would tell you to be careful 
			what you eat as it can make you ill and infertile, but you can’t 
			even find out what you are eating.
 You live in America, which has “freedom and democracy” and 
			“accountable” government and ”accountable” corporations. You don’t 
			need to worry. The government and responsible corporations are 
			taking good care of you.
 
			  
			Especially Obama, Vilsack, and 
			Monsanto... 
			  
			  
			  
			  
			Video 
			  
			  
			  
			
 
			  
			  
			  
			Short 
			bibliography 
				
				http://fhr.branditimage.com/hot-topic-letter-to-us-secretary-of-agriculture/http://www.fooddemocracynow.org/blog/2011/apr/6/don-hubers-cover-letter-euuk-commissions/
 http://www.greenpasture.org/utility/showArticle/?objectID=7169
 http://ourecovillage.org/2011/04/11/dr-hubers-cover-letter-to-secretary-vilsack/
 http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/51-2012/14164-glyphosate-and-gmos-impact-on-crops-soils-animals-and-man-dr-don-huber
 http://www.non-gmoreport.com/articles/may10/consequenceso_widespread_glyphosate_use.php
 http://www.monsanto.com/newsviews/Pages/huber-pathogen-roundup-ready-crops.aspx
 http://southeastfarmpress.com/resistant-pigweed-plagues-central-georgia-cotton
 http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/blogs/time-for-usda-to-wake-up-to-weed-resistance-and-ban-agent-orange-corn-once-and-for-all/
 
 
			  |