|
January 12, 2007
from
MerkabaTribe Website
Genetic Science - Old
and New
-
R-Complex - The primal
limbic thinking complex which gives rise to aggression, war,
territorialism, social hierarchies, etc.
-
Puerto Rico - Home of the
largest US owned genetic lab in the world.
-
Deformity from Radiation
-
…radiation blasts were
harming fetuses and newborns which terrified the
populace. But, one of the most striking and telltale
lines here is that Skanda became “goat-faced.” We
shall see this from the Vedas to the goat-lined sphinx’s
at Karnak and in every ancient text, always the mark of
the evil one, just as mythology has told us.
The lineages from Indra
were all
dolichocephalic (long
headed) while the original Niburians were
lion-faced, or
mesocephalic (moderate
headed). Our Satan, in the Bible, or Indra,
is suffering from an acute pathocrine disorder,
probably acute
acromegaly. His thyroid
and pituitary has either been in contact with
radioactive properties and/or affected by the magnetic
reversal.
Always he is represented with
mishappened horns
like a goat, no doubt
fibromas and the most
identifying trademark, his offspring are androgynous. To
these people, what we take for granted, was a disaster
to them
Lana Cantrell (The
Greatest Story Never Told)
-
It is believed by one
researcher that DNA is itself an electromagnetic
generator with RNA as an amplifier, the cell wall a
noise filter and amino acids and enzymes as effectors of
signals
Biological and Clinical
Effects of Low-Frequency Magnetic and Electric Fields,
by J. G. Laurado
-
Junk DNA
-
The big surprise to the
scientists was that active genes make up only tiny
fractions of the entire genome. Incredibly, they only
make up 3 percent of the total DNA in our chromosomes.
The genes are either alone or clustered together in
larger groups, but in between each gene sequence, there
are long stretches of DNA which do not appear to contain
any type of code for anything.
These stretches have now
been referred to by scientists as “Junk DNA,” mainly
because they have not figured out what
secret message it contains.
Michael Tellinger (Slave
Species of God)
-
General Notes on Genetics
-
In 1980 a ruling by the U.
S. Supreme Court permitted the U. S. Patent and
Trademark Office to grant a PATENT on a genetically
engineered "oil-eating" bacterium. The bacterium was
categorized as a "non-natural manmade microorganism."
Over the following eight years, some 200 patents were
granted for bacteria, viruses, and plants that had been
genetically modified.
-
In 1988 a patent was granted
on a mouse strain in which the cells had been engineered
to contain a cancer-predisposing gene sequence (activated
oncogene sequence). Technically referred to as a
"transgenic nonhuman eukaryotic animal," each mouse of
this type can be used to test low doses of
cancer-causing substances and to test the effectiveness
of drugs considered as possibly offering protection
against the development of cancer.
-
1997 was the year of the
first successful cloning of mammals, a sheep and a
monkey. Immediately President Bill Clinton signed
a law making it illegal to experiment with or clone a
human being.
The cloning of mammals was the next necessary step
before the introduction of combining different sequences
of DNA in to the nucleus to create whole new life forms.
Alien DNA group of researchers
working at the Human Genome Project will be announcing soon
that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe
so-called non-coding sequences (97%) in human DNA is no less than
genetic code of an unknown extraterrestrial life form.
The non-coding sequences are common to all living organisms on
Earth, from molds to fish to humans. In human DNA, they constitute
larger part of the total genome, says Prof. Sam Chang, the
group leader.
Non-coding sequences, also known as
"junk DNA", were discovered years ago, and their function remains
mystery.
Unlike normal genes, which carry the information that intracellular
machinery uses to synthesize proteins, enzymes and other chemicals
produced by our bodies, non-coding sequences are never used for any
purpose. They are never expressed, meaning that the information they
carry is never read, no substance is synthesized and they have no
function at all. We exist on only 3% of our DNA.
The junk genes merely enjoy the ride with hard working active genes,
passed from generation to generation.
Those were the question many scientists
posed and failed to answer - until the breakthrough discovery by
Prof. Sam Chang and his group.
Trying to understand the origins and meaning of junk DNA Prof. Chang
realized that he first needs a definition of "junk".
He once mentioned the question to an
acquaintance, Dr. Lipshutz, a young theoretical physicist
turned Wall Street derivative securities specialist.
"Easy," replied Lipshutz. "Well run
your sequence through the software I use to analyze market data,
and it will show if your sequences are total garbage, 'white
noise', or there is a message in there."
This new breed of analysts with strong
background in math, physics and statistics are getting more and more
popular with Wall Street firms. They sift through gigabytes of
market statistics, trying to uncover useful correlation between the
various market indexes, and individual stocks.
Working evenings and weekends, Lipshutz managed to show that
non-coding sequences are not all junk, they carry information.
Combining massive database of the Human Genome Project with
thousands of data files developed by geneticists all over the world
Lipshutz calculated
Kolmogorov entropy of the
non-coding sequences and compared it with the entropy of regular,
active genes.
Kolmogorov entropy, introduced by
the famous Russian mathematician half a century ago, was
successfully used to quantify the level of randomness in various
sequences, from time sequences of noise in radio lamps to sequences
of letters in 19th century Russian poetry.
By and large, the technique allows
researchers to quantitatively compare various sequences and conclude
which one carries more information than the other does.
"To my surprise, the entropy of
coding and non-coding DNA sequences was not that different",
continues Lipshutz. "There was noise in both but it was no
junk at all. If the market data were that orderly, I would
have already retired."
After a year of cooperation with
Lipshutz, Chang was convinced, there is a hidden information in junk
DNA.
However, how could one understand its
meaning if the information is never used? With active sequences you
try to watch the cell and see what proteins are being made using the
information. This wouldn't work with dormant genes. There will be
experiment to test a hypothesis; one should rely on the power of his
thought. Since there are letters, it should be tested in some old
languages, perhaps Sumerian, Egyptian, Hebrew, and so on.
Prof. Sam Chang solicited help from
three specialists in the field, but none of them managed to find a
solution.
There were no cultural clues, no
references to other known languages, the field was too alien for the
linguists.
"I asked myself: who else can
decipher a hidden message?" Chang continues.
"Of course, cryptographers! In
addition, I began talking with researchers at the National
Security Agency. It took me few months to make them return my
calls. Were they running background checks on me? Alternatively,
were they too busy lobbying senators on retaining and
strengthening their authority to control exports of encryption
technologies?
Eventually, a junior fellow was assigned to answer
my questions. He listened, requested my questions in writing and
after another, few months turned me down. His message was polite
but meant, "Go to hell with your crazy ideas. We are a
serious agency, its National Security, dude. We are too busy."
Well, Sam, forget the Government, talk
to the private sector.
Therefore, I began approaching computer
security consultants. They were genuinely interested, and a couple
of them even began working on my project, but their enthusiasm
always faded after a month.
I kept calling them until one nice
fellow told me:
"I'd love to work on your project if
I had more time. I am overbooked. Emissaries of major banks and
Fortune 500 companies are begging me to plumb the holes in their
networks. They pay me $500 an hour. I can give you an
educational discount, can you afford $350?"
Scrambling $15/hr for a post doctoral
studies is a big deal in academia, $350 sounded as something
extraorbital.
Eventually Prof. Chang was referred to
Dr. Adnan Mussaelian, a talented cryptographer in the former
Soviet republic of Armenia. Poor fellow barely survived on a $15 a
month salary and occasional fees for tutoring children of Armenian
nuveau riches. A $10,000 research grant was a struck of luck, he
began working like a beaver.
Adnan promptly confirmed the findings of his Wall Street
predecessor: The entropy indicated tons of information almost in the
clear, it was not too strong cryptographic system, it didn't appear
to be a tough problem. Adnan began applying differential
crypto-analysis and similar standard cryptographic techniques.
He was two months in the project when he noticed that all non-coding
sequences are usually preceded by one short DNA sequence. A very
similar sequence usually followed the junk. These segments, known to
biologists as alu sequences, were all over the whole
human genome.
Being non-coding, junk sequences themselves, alu
are one of the most common genes of all.
Trained as a cryptographer and computer programmer, and having no
knowledge of microbiology, Adnan approached the genetic code as of
computer code. Dealing with 0, 1, 2, 3 (four bases of genetic code)
instead of 0s and 1s of the binary code was a sort of nuisance, but
the computer code was what he was analyzing and deciphering all his
life. He was on familiar territory.
The most common symbol in the code that
causes no action followed by a chunk of dormant code. What is that?
Just playing with the analogy Adnan
grabbed the source code of one his programs and fed it into the
program that calculates the statistics of symbols and short
sequences, a tool often used in decoding messages. What was the most
common symbol? Of course, it was "/", a symbol of comment!
He took a Pascal code, and it were { and
} ! Of course, the code between two slashes in C is never executed,
and is never meant to be executed; it is not the code, it is the
comment to the code!
Being unable to resist the temptation to further play with the
analogy, Adnan began comparing statistical distributions of the
comments in computer and genetic code. There must be a striking
difference. This should show up in statistics. Nevertheless,
statistically, junk DNA was not much different from active,
coding sequences.
To be sure, Adnan fed a program into the
analyzer: surprisingly, the statistics of code and comments were
almost the same. He looked into the source code and realized why:
there were very few comments in between the slashes, it was mostly
C code the author decided to exclude from execution, a common
practice among programmers.
Adnan, religiously inclined person, was thinking about the
divine hand - but after analyzing the spaghetti code inside the
sequences he convinced himself that whoever wrote the small code was
not God. Who wrote the active, small coding part of human
genetic code was not very well organized, he was a rather sloppy
programmer.
It looked like rather somebody from
Microsoft, but at the time human genetic code was written, there was
no Microsoft on Earth.
On Earth? It was like a lightning... Was the genetic code for all
life on Earth written by an extraterrestrial programmer and
then somehow deposited here, for execution?
The idea was mad and frightening, and
Adnan resisted it for days.
Then he decided to proceed. If the
non-coding sequences are parts of the program that were rejected or
abandoned by the author, there is a way to make them work. The only
thing one needs to do is to remove the symbols of comments and if
the portion between the /*......*/ symbols is a meaningful routine
it may compile and execute!
Following this line of thought, Adnan
selected only those non-coding sequences that had exactly the same
frequency distribution of symbols as the active genes.
This procedure excluded the comments in
Marcian or Q, whatever it was. He selected some 200
non-coding sequences that most closely resembled real genes,
stripped them of /*, //, and similar stuff and after few days of
hesitation sent e-mail to his American boss, asking him to find a
way to put them in E-coli or whatever host and make them work.
Chang did not replied for two weeks.
"I thought I was fired", confessed
Dr. Mussaelian. "With every day of his silence I more and more
realized how crazy my idea was. Chang would conclude I was a
schizophrenic and would terminate the contract. Chang finally
responded and, to my surprise, he did not fire me. He had not
bought my extraterrestrial theory but agreed to try to make my
sequences work."
Biologists have attempted for years to
make junk sequences express, without much success.
Sometimes nothing
turned out; sometimes it was junk again. It was not surprising. Grab
an arbitrary portion of the excluded computer code and try to
compile it. Most likely, it will fail. At best, it will produce
bizarre results. Analyze the code carefully, fish out a whole
function from the comments, and you may make it work.
Because of careful Mussaelians
statistical analysis 4 of the 200 sequences he selected, began
working, producing tiny amounts of a chemical compounds.
"I was anxiously awaiting the
response from Chang," says Dr. Mussaelian. "Would it be a more
or less normal protein or something out of ordinary?"
The answer was shocking: it was a
substance, known to be produced by several types of leukemia in men
and animals. Surprisingly, three other sequences also produced
cancer-related chemicals. It no longer looked like a coincidence.
When one awakens a viable dormant gene, it produces cancer-related
proteins.
Researchers began searching Human
Genome Project databases for the four genes they isolated from
junk DNA. Eventually, three of the four were found there,
listed as active, non-junk genes. This was not a big surprise: since
cancer tissues produce the protein, there must be somewhere a gene,
which codes it!
The surprise came later: In the active,
non-junk portion of the code the gene in question (the researchers
called it "jhlg1", for junk human leukemia gene) was not preceded by
the alu sequence, i.e. the /* symbol was missing.
However, the closing */ symbol at the
end of "jhlg1" was there.
This explained why "jhlg1" was not
expressed in the depth of the junk DNA but worked fine in the
normal, active part of the genome. The one who wrote the basic
genetic code for humans excluded portion of the big code by
embracing them in /*... */ but missed some of the opening /*
symbol. His compiler seems to be garbage, too: a good compiler, even
from terrestrial Microsoft, would most likely refuse to compile such
program at all.
Prof. Sam Chang with his students began
searching for genes associated with various cancers, and almost in
all instances they discovered that those genes are followed by the
alu sequence (i.e. protein as a comment closing symbol
*/), but never preceded by the comment opening /* gene!
"This explains why diseases result
in cell damage and their death, whereas cancers lead to cell
reproduction and growth. Because only few fragments from the big
code are expressed, they never lead to coherent growth.
What we
get with cancer, is expression of only few of genes alien to
humans and symbiosis with some genes of bacterial parasites that
lead to illogical, bizarre and apparently meaningless chunks of
living cells. The chunks have its own veins, arteries, and its
own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer
drugs.
"Our hypothesis is that a higher extraterrestrial life form
was engaged in creating new life and planting it on various
planets. Earth is just one of them. Perhaps, after
programming, our creators grow us the same way we grow bacteria
in Petri dishes. We can't know their motives - whether it was a
scientific experiment, or a way of preparing new planets for
colonization, or is it long time ongoing business of seedling
life in the universe.
If we think about it in our human terms,
the extraterrestrial programmers were most probably working on
one big code consisting of several projects, and the projects
should have produced various life forms for various planets.
They have been also trying
various solutions. They wrote the big code, executed it, did
not like some function, changed them or added new one, executed
again, made more improvements, tried again and again. Of course,
soon or later it was behind schedule. Few deadlines have already
passed.
Then the management began
pressing for an immediate release. The programmers were ordered
to cut all their idealistic plans for the future and concentrate
now on one (Earth) project to meet the pressing deadline. Very
likely in a rush, the programmers cut down drastically the big
code and delivered basic program intended for Earth.
However, at that time they were
(perhaps) not quite certain which functions of the big code may
be needed later and which not, so they kept them all there.
Instead of cleaning the basic program by deleting all the lines
of the big code, they converted them into comments, and in the
rush they missed few /* symbols in the comments here or there;
thus presenting mankind with illogical growth of mass of
cells we know as cancer."
There are three options to the problem.
Either delete all the /* symbols and comments and clean this way the
basic code, or add all the missing */ and avoid illogical mixing of
the basic code with the big code.
Alternatively, in the third option,
remove all the / symbols and let work the basic code with the big
code as a complete program. Unfortunately, none of these options are
within our capacity. If we were able to efficiently insert genes
into the chromosomes of living men, our breakthrough discovery would
mean instant cure for all future cancer cases; at least from the
programmer point of view.
Theoretically, we can do it in a
laboratory, but we have no practical means to implant the repaired
DNA into living subjects. The mystery of "junk DNA" and cancer seems
to be solved, but no quick cure shall be expected. The best thing we
can do now is to try nourishing new, cancer-free line of humans with
gradually debugged basic genetic code.
That will take a long time.
For us and our children, there is no
hope on the horizon.
"However, from the programmers point
of view, there is also positive outlook in it. What we see in
our DNA is a program consisting of two versions, a big code and
basic code. First fact is, the complete program was positively
not written on Earth; that is now a verified fact. The second
fact is, that genes by themselves are not enough to explain
evolution; there must be something more in the game. What it is
or where it is, we don't know.
The third fact is, no creator of a
new work, be it a composer, engineer or programmer, from Mars or
Microsoft, will ever leave his work without the option for
improvement or upgrade. Ingenious here is, that the upgrade is
already enclosed - the "junk DNA" is nothing more than hidden
and dormant upgrade of our basic code!
We know for some time that certain
cosmic rays have power to modify DNA. With this in mind,
plausible solution is available.
The extraterrestrial programmers
may use just one flash of the right energy from somewhere in the
Universe to instruct the basic code to remove all the /**/
symbols, fuse itself with the big code ("junk DNA") and
jumpstart working of our whole DNA. That would change us
forever, some of us within months, some of us within
generations.
The change would be not too much physical, (except
no more cancers, diseases and short life), but it
will catapult us intellectually. Suddenly, we will be in time
comparable to coexistence of Neanderthals with Cromagnons. The
old will be replaced giving birth to a new cycle.
The complete program is elegant,
very clever self-organizing, auto-executing, auto-developing and
auto-correcting software for a highly advanced biological
computer with build-in connection to the ageless energy and
wisdom of the Universe. Software wise, within us is either short
and diseased life, or potential for a super-intelligent
super-being with a long and healthy life.
This triggers puzzling questions -
was the reduction to the basic code done by sloppy programmers
in a rush (as it appears to us), or was the disabling of the big
code purposeful act which can be cancelled by a "remote control"
whenever desired?"
Soon or later, we have to come to grips
with the unbelievable notion that every life on Earth carries
genetic code for his extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is
not what we think it is.
This discovery may well shake the very
roots of humanity - our beliefs in our concept of God and in
our own power over our destiny.
With the right paradigm, we may discover
one day that all forms of life and the whole Universe is just one
huge intellectual exercise in thoughts expressed mathematically, by
Design, by Creator
|