by Mike Adams
the Health Ranger
March 01, 2010
Most people are familiar with traditional weapons of mass
destruction such biological weapons, nuclear weapons and chemical
weapons. The point of all such weapons of mass destruction is to
inflict a large number of casualties on civilian populations as a
way to cripple a nation into political or military submission.
When it comes to actually deploying weapons of mass destruction
against civilian populations, no country has murdered more innocent
civilians than the United States of America through its bombing of
two Japanese cities during World War II. (This isn't rhetoric, it's
an historical fact.)
Atomic bombs were very visible WMDs deployed in World War II as a
way to force the empire of Japan to surrender to western forces.
Since that time, full-scale nuclear weapons have never again been
used directly on civilian targets, meaning the United States of
America maintains the distinction of being the only nation in the
history of human civilization to have dropped atomic weapons on
It begs the question: If national leaders believe dropping atomic
weapons on civilian populations is justified, what other weapons
might they feel justified in unleashing upon civilian populations?
What if a nation wanted to reduce its own civilian population but do
it covertly? The way to accomplish that would be to slowly poison
the civilian population through exposure to toxic chemicals, heavy
metals, hormone-disrupting molecules and nerve toxins.
And as any terrorist can tell you, the most covert way to accomplish
that would be to inject such chemicals into the everyday products
that people routinely consume:
personal care products
Here's another interesting fact:
If you examine what's in the water,
food, products and medicines sold across North America, you'll
discover a dangerous assortment of chemicals that, taken
together, could quite reasonably be considered weapons of mass
the fluoride dumped into public
water supplies was originally an
offshoot of the enrichment processing
facilities for uranium to be used in nuclear weapons.
These days, however, fluoride is usually
just the toxic waste from fertilizer manufacturing factories or the
waste from smokestack scrubbers of coal-fired power plants.
Either way, it's not good for your
The entire fluoride agenda largely a
convenient, low-cost way to dispose of industrial waste
chemicals while calling it a public health program.
Antibacterial soaps derive their
antibacterial properties from chemicals that are molecularly quite
similar to the infamous Agent Orange used in the Vietnam War.
And yet these products are openly marketed for use by children.
Similarly, children and adults continue to be poisoned by heavy
metals like mercury thanks to the highly toxic practices of modern
dentistry - an industry which astoundingly has still failed to admit
to the obvious toxicity of a heavy metal its practitioners continue
to install in people's mouths as "silver fillings" (which actually
contain more mercury than silver).
There are hormone-disrupting chemicals in most of the plastics used
in the processed food industry - especially canned soups which are
often highly toxic for a variety of other reasons. MSG and other
nervous system destroyers are used throughout the food supply in
soups, snack foods, salad dressings, flavorings and dips.
These are all chemical assaults of one kind or another, but the
greatest assault on the minds and bodies of western consumers comes
in the form of pharmaceutical chemicals.
That's why I call them 'Weapons of Mass
nation by destroying the health of its citizens
If you want to destroy any nation, simply unleash
Big Pharma into its medical system.
Within just two generations, its people
will suffer widespread organ damage, sharp decline in cognitive
function and rampant degenerative disease brought on by the side
effects of everyday pharmaceuticals.
Antidepressants, for example, cause diabetes and obesity. Cancer
drugs cause neurological disorders. Some arthritis drugs actually
Virtually all pharmaceuticals cause nutritional deficiencies. Most
of them also contribute to long-term organ damage that affects the
liver, heart, brain and kidneys. Pharmaceuticals are synthetic
chemicals which are inherently incompatible with human biology.
Whatever "therapeutic effects" appear to be present from
pharmaceuticals are really just poisoning side effects that
temporarily appear to be therapeutic but are actually disruptive to
Many pharmaceuticals are, in fact, blatant poisons to begin with.
Popular blood-thinning drugs,
which are usually just rebranded warfarin chemicals, are
molecularly identical to rat poison. (Warfarin
is actually used as rat poison. It's true. This is not an urban
Chemotherapy chemicals are extremely poisonous, and cancer patients
frequently die from the toxicity of these drugs.
Those who don't die often suffer from
"chemo brain" - a severe loss of cognitive function routinely
experienced by victims of chemotherapy.
environment with chemical weapons
Meanwhile, the sheer quantity of prescription medications being used
on civilian populations is resulting in the mass contamination of
public water supplies with HRT drugs, painkiller drugs, cholesterol
other Big Pharma chemicals.
It's so bad now that even the fish that
swim near major cities are
contaminated with medications.
At some point, all the chemical contamination with pharmaceuticals
brings the obvious question to mind:
Are Big Pharma's drugs actually
Weapons of Mass Destruction?
Is the U.S. civilian population
being targeted in a cover chemical war that accomplishes the
same thing as dropping bombs on Hiroshima, only more slowly
And if so, what would be the
purpose of such a chemical war on the American people?
Reshaping the human
gene pool - clever!
Population control is the obvious answer... not only because
pharmaceuticals kill so many people but also because pharmaceuticals
cause widespread infertility. By dumping so many chemicals onto
civilian populations, the
population can be suppressed in the
long term through chemically-induced infertility.
Now here's an interesting advantage in all this: If all these
mainstream consumer chemicals cause infertility, they're only
causing it among those mainstream consumers who are stupid enough to
keep eating, drinking and swallowing all these synthetic chemicals
in the first place.
And that means this "population control"
measure, if it actually does exist, is theoretically causing the
greatest infertility in those who have the least intelligence. It's
potentially a way to achieve a significant shift in the gene pool of
the human race by eliminating the genetic futures of those who are
stupid enough to poison their own bodies (and therefore compromise
their own genetic code) through mass exposure to synthetic
As I've often said, there are a huge number of people in western
nations right now (such as the USA, Canada, UK, etc.) who are
collectively winning the Darwin Award by removing themselves
from the human gene pool. And pharmaceuticals, it turns out, are the
perfect WMDs to allow those who most deserve to be removed from the
human gene pool to accomplish exactly that.
The future of the human race belongs solely to those who can protect
the integrity of their genetic code.
And that, my friends, is not accomplished by contaminating your body
with synthetic chemicals. That's why prescription drugs may actually
be Weapons of Mass Genetic Deterioration.