Here are two maps by Peter Eyre
(former UK Naval Intel, and weatherman) that he just sent to me
for DOWN WIND air flow at three altitudes - Low, Medium and High
- for Afghanistan, India and Australia.
This provides yet more details on
the secret DU nuclear war being carried out right before our
eyes in Afghanistan.
INDIA MAP
This shows low, medium, high
altitude air flow on September 2, 2009, from Helmand in southern
Afghan where heavy bombing/fighting is going on right now, and
for the more northern Kabul region in Afghanistan.
The highest death rate in the world
of pregnant women is north of Kabul in the NE corner of Afghan
(attached). You can clearly see that the Punjab (near Lahore
green arrow) is really getting the highest concentration of DU
in air directly from Afghanistan.
The summer monsoon will do heavy rainout of the DU. The air
currents carry it on across northern India, and then over the
Himalayas where there would be high DU rainout and even higher
DU snow-out rates (95% of particles removed by snowflakes - most
efficient scavenging agent for nano-particles) in the Himalayas
where the 7 major rivers of SE Asia have their headwaters.
In 1981 I flew in a Russian Ilyushin
over the Himalayas from China and landed in Tibet on the gravel
of the river that runs past Lhasa. Deng Xiao Peng invited 69
scientists from 32 countries to the first International
Geological Congress on Tibet.
I saw those glaciers all along the
top of the Himalayas that are the headwaters for the SE Asian
river water.
AUSTRALIA MAP
This is the airflow map for
Australia today Sept. 6, 2009 at low, med., and high altitudes.
This is REALLY interesting - the
yellow stars are the bombing ranges where DU is being used, and
the red arrows are the low altitude air flow currents, with
heavy contamination of Perth, Adelaide, Brisbane and Sidney
getting the highest brunt of the DU exposure.
Conclusion:
depopulation.
The air currents carry the DU on to
the NW (Indian Ocean and SE Asia region) and east from southern
Australia, as well as down to the New Zealand, Tasmania region.
This DU contamination will be added
on top of the uranium dust contamination from mining and milling
in Australia, causing extermination of 50% of the Tasmanian
Devil population in Tasmania since 1993 - when Australian
uranium mining and milling DOUBLED in one year.
PHOTO of DU (?) BOMBING at Raymond
Island/SHOALWATER BAY - on the east coast of Australia midway
down, where the Great Barrier Reef lies just offshore.
PETER EYRE WANTS CONFIRMATION THAT
THIS IS A DU BOMB.
THIS IS THE ONLY DOCUMENTATION OF DU
BOMBING IN AUSTRALIA AND CAME FROM AN ACTIVIST'S SITE THERE WITH
NO INDICATION OF WHAT THE BOMB IS - SO WE NEED DOUG TO CONFIRM.
Your comments are welcome. PETER EYRE
peter.eyre7@btinternet.com
please be sure to include me on any comments.
Maps and photo may be used by anyone on this list and beyond as
long as Peter Eyre is given credit for them.
Comment
From Paolo Scampa:
The WHITE color of the bomb (some parts) indicates temperature
in excess of 2000°c. Probably radioactive.
Comment
That bomb was dropped on Raymond Island during Exercise Talisman
Sabre 2005. Here is what the AU DOD said in their press release
June 7, 2005:
"Prior to the 2005 exercise the
Australian Department of Defense issued a press release
which stated that depleted uranium "will not be used in TS05
[Exercise Talisman Sabre 2005] by either Australian or US
forces" and that this was "unequivocal"."
http://www.defence.gov.au/media/AlertTpl.cfm?CurrentId=4909
See the background on
Exercise Talisman Sabre.
Comment
From David Bradbury
Until you've got absolute PROOF that DU has been, is being used
in Australia by US forces, you are undercutting your credibility
and the credibility of the peace movement here in opposing US
war exercises in Australia.
Putting up a map showing red, yellow
and red arrows and the direction of the prevailing winds over
Australia plus an old DOD official photo we put out in 2005
showing Raymond Island, Australia being bombed during the 2005
war 'games' is a far fetched cry from PROVING the US is/has used
DU in exercises in Australia. As per your email.
Knowing the nature of the Beast and from what has happened in
Okinawa, Puerto Rico, etc, we all SUSPECT that there is a
heightened risk of DU use and it certainly goes with the
territory of inviting the US to come in and engage in joint
exercises with Australian Defense Forces far from the maddening
crowds in isolated parts of Oz.
But we've had no leaks (and this is
a country which 'leaks'...) from anyone saying the US has used
DU on our shores or from ship to shore firing. Aussies might be
smucks to do the bidding of the US military for some false sense
of 'protection' from China or whoever. But there's been enough
info out now since Blowin' in the Wind etc so that if its used
against the official Australian Defense Forces policy of not
allowing here, someone on the inside would 'blab'.
Until we get that positive proof, it
only undercuts our credibility by making hysterical and wild
accusations. Che Gueverra once said you should always
tell the cold truth, even in defeat, as honestly as you know it
so the people will come in time to trust you and believe you
when it really counts.
Nor does it serve any useful purpose to grab at straws and say
the Tasmanian Devil's facial cancers is coming from the winds
blowing radioactive dust from the 'doubling of mining and
milling of uranium in Australia' (where did you get that 'fact'
from? The amount of Australian yellowcake production is set to
skyrocket in the next few years as the government here gives a
radical increase in uranium mining and exploration the
green-light - but it hasn't come into production yet.
So levels as far as I know have been
pretty constant over the last decade or two. Five thousand tons
a year from Ranger mine in the Northern Territory and between
4,000-5,000 tons a year from BHPBiliton's mine at Olympic Dam
SA. We have a third uranium mine only up and running which does
an underground acid leachate extraction.
So far most of the tailings if not
all have been buried in tailings dams so the radioactive dust
cannot blow off the mine-site easily. Leach into the underground
water-table yes but not blow around to Tasmania etc as you
suggest).
I'm open to be proven wrong however on both fronts: the bi
annual war exercises use of DU and the Tasmania Devils facial
cancers. Just give me more proof!
Reply
Dear David,
I think you are very confused about
what I sent today, and what you think I said. Read my email
again very carefully.
There is NO question that DU is being used in Australia. I have
had a number of long conversations with Major Doug Rokke
ret., including today, about DU in Australia. He confirmed, once
again from his own trips to Australia as the US DOD's top expert
on DU, that he had toured and inspected the three military sites
marked on the air flow map (Perth area, northern territories
area, and Shoalwater Bay area) and confirmed that DU munitions
have been used at all three places.
Dr. Chris Busby has also
visited Australia, and both Doug and Chris addressed the DU
contamination in Australian soldiers. Both of them pointed out
that the US DOD lied to the Australian DOD and AU govt. about DU
contamination in Australian soldiers and misled the AU DOD on
how to measure for detection of DU in AU soldiers. They may have
also taken samples and measured radiation levels but I do not
know for sure whether they did. Since they are on this list,
they can answer that question.
The air flow maps were simply to show airflow at three different
altitudes on a particular day... period. The airflow is
constantly changing, every day, and this information is what
pilots use to create their flight plans.
These air flow patterns demonstrate
that particulates in the atmosphere are transported in every
direction, on different layered air flows, and can be in many
directions. In the case of mining and milling uranium in
Australia, with depleted uranium bombing added to the uranium
aerosols in the atmosphere - Australia is facing very dangerous
consequences as the air flow patterns show that anything going
into the atmosphere is going to be carried all over Australia in
different circulation cells - AND by regional circulation
patterns for the southern hemisphere, that transport anything
picked up in Australia straight south to New Zealand and
Tasmania.
I looked up the regional circulation
patterns for the southern hemisphere - and they go right from
Australia south to NZ and Tasman.
The photo I sent of the bombing at Raymond Island during
Exercise Talisman Sabre 2005 - was sent as a question to
confirm whether or not it was a DU bomb. I am waiting for Doug
to look at it and confirm that it is DU, but I did have
confirmation today from two other experts. We will wait for
Doug's opinion, hopefully tomorrow.
Mining and milling of uranium increased from 6 months a year for
each activity to 12 months a year for both in 1993. That is when
the facial cancers started decimating the Tasmanian Devil, and
the population has crashed 50% since 1993. Along with the
Tasmanian Devil decline, in the same years, diabetes has
increased drastically in Tasmania and that region with no
explanation.
See these articles, DU is very
deadly even at very low concentrations in drinking water:
Atmospheric convection and airflow
patterns are essential in order to understand where the DU is
going, how fast it is transported, and who it is impacting.
Two years ago when I started
educating the public about the link between uranium and
diabetes, the public was unaware of the causal effect. However,
I discovered that it was known by mainstream scientists in
Hiroshima-Nagasaki survivor studies, Chernobyl studies, DU
studies, nuclear power plant studies, and now the Navajo study
"Populations Exposed to Environmental Uranium".
Leuren
Comment
From Peter Eyre
Hello David,
Thought I would just add some information to Leuren's comments
if you don't mind. I am Australian and have worked in the oil,
gas and mining industry for many years. I have worked under the
umbrella of Rio Tinto Australia and later under a consortium of
Woodside Petroleum, BHP, BP etc and so have got to know much
about what goes on in these industries.
I have also served in the Military
and in my civilian life spent much time in aviation support for
these industries and in particular covered the Cyclone/Weather
Watch service for these operations.
I note with interest that "The Ranger Project" and adjoining
Jaliluka Mining Lease are open pit mining. Therefore what was
previously natural bonded uranium (Yellowcake) in the earths
crust is now totally exposed and released into the atmosphere in
the same way as all open pit mining anywhere in the world. This
would certainly allow dust aerosol particles to drift on the
wind.
I also note that once again we see mining taking place close to
areas of natural beauty and in these case is incredibly close to
the wonderful Kakadu National Park. The land in question also
happens to be Aboriginal Land owned by The Mirrar Gundjeihmi
People who object to its usage for some time... it went to
court as usual but the good old UN intervened and they lost
their fight.
Again we see an almost identical
situation as per the US whereby the native Americans have become
a victim of this terrible greed, at whatever the cost, and then
have to pay the ultimate price in inhalation and ingestion of
the highly toxic aerosol from the open pit mine. Their fate is
very each to measure!! The mine started in August 1981 and
continues to this day.
Now, we have another major mine North of Adelaide the Olympic
Dam which mines copper gold and contains much uranium. This
project is considered the largest in the world based on the
uranium body. The mine has huge open stockpiles of ore body also
on the surface and would also succumb to the same possibility of
allowing particles to become airborne aerosols to roam on the
wind.
Based on the wind map I made up yesterday for Australia one can
see that the main population areas of Australia could receive
such aerosols with little effort. Add to this any joint military
exercises that take place from time to time as well as live
firings on a weekly basis (under normal training practices) we
have a potentially very serious environmental situation
developing.
For my part having been ex military and having watched many
conventional bombs, rockets, shells exploding I would have some
grave concern for the one we observe in the attached
photograph....it definitely shows some signs of not being a
conventional
weapon and would lean towards a weapon with uranium component.
Kind Regards
Peter Eyre
Additional Reply
From Leuren Moret
Mouth cancers - Tasmanian Devils and US soldiers
The Tasmanian Devil is suffering from aggressive cancers on
their faces, actually mostly on their muzzles, that become
contaminated contaminated while they are foraging for food and
drinking water out of contaminated streams. They also have
cancer in their mouths.
US soldiers are also suffering from an epidemic of mouth and
throat cancers that increased drastically when the US conducted
835 air strikes in Afghanistan (a few in Iraq) in the month of
July (heavy monsoon rains) 2007. An epidemic of mouth cancers in
US soldiers was so severe that the US DOD investigated and came
to the conclusion that the soldiers were having "too much oral
sex, and would be vaccinated with Gardasil - given to young
women to prevent cervical cancer in the US."
The other point to be made with the viral diseases etc. in other
wildlife in Australia, is that their immune systems are being
compromised by the chronic exposure to low level radiation from
constant DU and uranium dust flying around in the atmosphere.
The increase in skin cancer
(melanoma) and these face cancers in Tasmanian Devils, and mouth
cancers in US soldiers could also be explained by the
particulate effect of uranium aerosols - and that causes cancer
within 2 months we learned from the 2003 Iraq war when 8 out of
20 soldiers in one unit had cancer 2 months after exposure to DU
in "Shock and Awe".
The DU traveled quickly across the Pacific because we know from
Los Angeles Power and Water Company, that they have been
measuring uranium in drinking water in LA since 1998 - EVERY
source of drinking water in LA. It is clear from their sampling
results that uranium contamination DOUBLED in 2007, and that it
came down in rainfall.
So either the Tasmanian Devils are having too much oral sex like
the US soldiers and need Gardasil vaccines too, or the US
soldiers are getting mouth and throat cancer from foraging
habits like the Tasmanian Devils and the cause is on the food
and in the water and air.
The uranium from mining, milling,
and munitions is creating a huge catastrophe for all living
things in the southern hemisphere region of Australia... and the
indicators are telling us there is a major health care problem
($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$) looming. When animals
and humans are sick and dying in the same region - there has to
be an environmental link.
The fact that Tasmania has the
highest diabetes in that region, indicates that uranium is
probably the cause.
Get it, David?
Leuren
Comment
Dr Chris Busby
Randy Parrish is wrong in two areas. The first is the dispersion
of DU. In Kosovo I found DU particles several months after the
bombing in areas distant from the attacks where the particles
had been washed out by rainfall: they had therefore been
re-suspended.
This happens, I believe , through
electrostatic mechanisms and due to the very small size, so they
behave as a gas. Uranium has a very low energy work function and
therefore blue light (<430nm, sunlight) can charge the
particles.
There is a continuous static electrostatic field of 100-200V/m
at the earths surface which collapses in rainfall. There is thus
a pump which moves particles long distances and provides an
atmospheric loading. UNEP found DU in HVAS in Montenegro long
after the bombing and they reported this in their paper on the
subject.
I previously attacked them (Director
J-O Snihs) in the EU Parliament meeting in Strasbourg in 2002
over their failure to employ air filter measurements in Kosovo,
so they put some up in the Montenegro study. Second, we found
uranium increased significantly in the Aldermaston UK filters at
the time of GW2, whilst the wind blew from there to the UK
(Saoirse Morgan and me). I also found excess alpha activity in
the air in S Iraq.
Measurements I have obtained from
the MoD which they recently presented in their report attacking
me for a coroners inquest which I will be addressing this week,
Thursday, in Smethwick W Midlands case show that the material
travels farther than the 50m they originally stated, but they
havent looked further (naturally).
Parrish is also wrong in comparing
exposure from DU particles with uranium in general diluted dust.
There is an anisotropy argument, one is pure uranium, the other
very dilute uranium in ores. It is not valid to compare overall
alpha dose with the doses from particulate DU because of the
anisotropy (hot particle) argument which has been endlessly
rehearsed by
ECRR see
www.euradcom.org.
There also is the photoelectron
amplification effect for particles below 500nm.
ICRP are still reeling from
this idea and have refused to discuss it. The ICRP model that
Parrish bases his argument on has now been destroyed on many
levels. The Scientific Secretary of ICRP Dr Jack
Valentin (editor of the 2007 ICRP103 model) has resigned and
admitted uncertainties of 2 orders of magnitude in a public
meeting where I debated this with him in Stockholm in April this
year. I have this admission and the debate on videotape and will
be using it.
Finally I last week sent Parrish a Freedom of Information
request under the FoI over his treatment of the analytical data
from the Beirut Lebanon car filter which he took for analysis
and never sent us the results despite many requests. This filter
contained enriched uranium. Parrish told the DUOB at a meeting
that there was evidence of Enriched Uranium in the environment,
and agreed with
the DUOB to analyze this filter
which had already been looked at by 2 other labs for me.
Parrish has better equipment than
anyone in this game and so is a key player. For various reasons
I do not see him as trustworthy. Finally, I have done
experiments which indicate that the plastic bottles used for
analysis of U samples in water or urine adsorb uranium from
solution and so dilute the urine or water samples so that the
final results are wrong (low).
I raised this question in a DUOB
meeting but was unable to get them to agree to carry out
experiments. Thus all the urine measurements of the DUB are
suspect on concentration (as well as on isotope ratio due to the
enriched uranium in the environment, see the final report of the
DUOB, the second part of which I wrote.)
Incidentally, they MoD shut down that website so the final
report was impossible to find. I bought the name
http://www.duob.org.uk and put
it back up.
Haha. I shall be arguing this at the
above inquest on the death of Stuart Dyson who was exposed in
Iraq in GW1 and died of colon cancer aged 39.
Cheers
Chris
