Weird Weather Warfare & "Energetics
Weapons"
Dear Dr. Evans (Myron):
My deepest thanks to you for this definitive statement,
and my strong congratulations to you and your theoretical colleagues
for this important work you have done.
Having followed the development of these extreme Russian
weapons for two decades as best I could, I would like to assure the
scientists receiving your message that this Russian weapon program
started by 1950, and was well-underway by the mid-50s. In January
1960 Khrushchev, speaking to the Presidium, referred to such weapons
as "fantastic weapons", and as "just
within the portfolio of our scientists, so to speak." In short, the
weapons were in final development in January 1960. They are loosely
known as "energetics" weapons.
The first large energetics weapons were deployed by the
Soviets in 1963. They were not yet available - fortunately - during
the Cuban Missile Crisis a few months earlier, else that grave
confrontation might well have had a quite different outcome.
I personally gathered open reports of hundreds of
incidents of testing of these Russian weapons. The power achieved by
the weapons is awesome, and very much differing from high power
microwaves, lasers, and radars. For a hard reference of very good
quality (multiple trained witnesses, investigation by good scientists
of conventional training, etc.), eyewitness
reports and the investigation of an enormous event are scientifically
reported in the following two references (both should be read, as the
second contains additional information).
Walker, Daniel A.; Charles S. McCreery, and Fermin J.
Oliveira, "Kaitoku Seamount and the Mystery Cloud of 9 April 1984,"
Science, Vol. 227, Feb. 8, 1985, p. 607-611.
McKenna, Daniel L. and Daniel Walker, "Mystery Cloud:
Additional Observations," Science, Vol. 234, Oct. 24, 1986, p.
412-413.
In this incident, a "cold explosion" (sharply pulsed
creation of convergent EM energy in the interference zone) was created
off the Kuril Islands, above the surface of the ocean. This caused
rapid cooling of the localized air, and a resulting sudden insurgence
of surrounding air. The result was a
sharp upwelling of water and vapor sucked up from the surface of the
ocean, rising rapidly to about 60,000 feet altitude, then spreading
out into a large cloud.
Then in the top of that cloud there appeared
an intensely glowing ball (shell) of light. This shell of light then
slowly and steadily expanded as a sphere, until it reached some 300
miles diameter. The electromagnetic energy in the glowing spherical
shell would thus have been enormous. At that time, the center of the
sphere was at an altitude of about 200 miles.
This is certainly not a natural phenomenon. Nature does
not make intense little stationary balls of light in the tops of
clouds, which slowly and methodically expand to spheres 300 miles in
diameter and remain perfect spheres of light.
This is only one of many dozens of similar reports from
around the world. Such tests were so regularly observed and reported
by airline pilots flying the northern route between Japan to the U.S.,
that everyone lost interest and the pilots mostly ceased reporting
them.
The enormous energy density achieved by these
action-at-a-distance weapons is particularly significant.
I personally published citations of many of these
reports I found in the open literature.
The weather control referred to by Defense Secretary
Cohen is often achieved by using one or more scalar interferometers to
produce slow heating in a selected small area of the atmosphere, e.g.
in a chosen location over the United States. That heating produces
air expansion, reduces the air’s
density, and thus produces a "low pressure" area (ground pressure
measurement).
Simultaneously, at other selected areas, slow cooling
over a selected area is produced, resulting in more dense air and
therefore a "high pressure" area as measured on the ground. By slowly
moving these highs and lows around, the jet streams can be entrained
and deviated - and in fact "steered". By altering and steering the
jet streams, one can "steer the
weather".
On July 4, 1976, apparently as an icon gift from the
Russians for our U.S. bicentennial, regular engineering of the weather
over North America and the United States was initiated (the first
tests were apparently in 1967). It is still ongoing. The Russian
weather engineering has also been steadily expanded over the territory
of other nations, and has added cooling and heating of selected areas
of ocean water as well. In short, it now involves "energy tickling"
and thus "temperature alteration" of El Nino and La Nina.
These weapons cannot be explained by normal U(1)
electrodynamics, since U(1) makes the term "scalar interferometry" an
oxymoron. On the other hand, E.T. Whittaker in 1903 and 1904
published definitive work showing that (1) the
so-called "scalar" potential is actually a bundle of bidirectional
longitudinal EM waves, and (2) all EM fields, potentials, and waves
are decomposable into two scalar potential functions (hence into
scalar interferometry).
Dr. Evans and the AIAS theorists have just rigorously
established the technical basis for the Whittaker scalar
interferometry. The interferometry does indeed produce scalar
potential gradients and curls in the interference zone, and in the
presence of mass such as air, these scalar entities
interact with the masses to produce ordinary EM fields, waves, energy,
etc.
Eerily, for over a century scientists have calculated
the reaction cross section of the scalar potential, never the
magnitude of it. And then we have called that reaction cross section
the "magnitude of the potential." If one examines the definition of
the potential, one finds it defined at a point as the joules of energy
collected (diverged) from those
bidirectional waveflows comprising the potential, around a unit point
charge assumed at that point.
One need only point out that this
rigorously is the reaction cross section of the potential, not the
magnitude of the potential itself. The water swirling around a fixed
rock in a river, is not the river. In the ideal conditions, a fixed
amount of water is in the "swirl", hence the
divergence of the water there has a scalar magnitude. However, the
river itself is not a scalar entity, but is a vectorial entity. In
the same fashion, potential is a multitude of bidirectional rivers.
It is not a scalar entity at all, but is a multivectorial entity.
The
divergence of energy from that potential, at a point, is a scalar
value.
The magnitude of the potential is indefinite. This can
be seen from the very simple equation W = (phi)q, where (phi) is the
reaction cross section of the potential PHI at a 3-space point in
diverged/collected joules per coulomb, q is the number of
diverging/collecting coulombs occupying that 3-space point, and W is
the total number of joules of energy collected by the charge q.
As
can be seen, even from a very weak potential with a
small but nonzero reaction cross section (phi), one can extract as
much energy as one wishes, merely by placing sufficient charges q at
sufficient 3-space points. From a single microvolt (cross section),
e.g., one can collect a trillion joules of energy, given sufficient
intercepting/collecting/diverging charges q.
So all our textbooks teach us to calculate the
multivectorial potential’s scalar reaction cross section at a point,
and call that the "magnitude of the potential’ at that point - which
is a non sequitur. What is extracted from or diverged from an entity,
is not the entity itself.
The O(3) electrodynamics being pioneered by Dr. Evans
and others is highly significant. For the first time, scalar
interferometry has been expressed in proper mathematical terms, and a
paper giving this demonstration has been submitted for formal
publication.
I would like to express my deep personal appreciation
and congratulations to Dr. Evans and his theoretical colleagues for
their strenuous efforts. Many people throughout the Western world owe
them a very great debt for this important work, which is vital to the
defense of our various nations and
our very survival.
Most sincerely,
T.E. Bearden,
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
(Retired)
I would like to bring to the attention of the scientific
community a document in the public domain, part of a speech by the
Honorable William Cohen, U.S. Defense Secretary, at the University of
Georgia, Athens, Apr. 28th 1997, at a conference organized by former
Senator Sam Nunn.
The relevant quote is: "Other (terrorists) are
engaging
even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate,
set off earthquakes, volcanoes, remotely through the use of
electromagnetic waves.........it’s real and that is the reason we have
to intensify our (counter terrorism) efforts." This speech was
released to the press, and is in the public domain.
This kind of statement cannot be understood in terms of
Maxwell Heaviside theory, so there is an extremely urgent need to
develop a new kind of electrodynamics. The principle is that one must
assume that such weapons exist, or be caught by surprise. Bill Cohen
and Sam Nunn are responsible, highly experienced, and level headed.
There is effectively no stable government in the former USSR, a state
of near anarchy prevails, an extremely dangerous scenario for NATO.
The conservative academic adherence to an utterly discredited U(1)
theory is actually leaving NATO wide open to surprise attack in the
opinion of the US Government in the form of the Secretary of Defense.
This is also my personal opinion as a permanent
resident alien of the US, and British / EEC citizen. The O(3) idea is
a first step to what should develop into a massive NATO research
effort. This is why I have been working so intensively on papers in
the past few months, and ask editors and referees to bear with me and
go the extra mile.
If we get the second edition of MNO then the pressure on
editors and referees will be eased.
Dr. M. W. Evans
82 Lois Lane, Ithaca
NY 14850, USA.
http://www.stardrive.org
Letter by T.E. Bearden
President, CTEC Inc.
President, American Association of Distinguished American
Scientists
Fellow Emeritus, AIAS.
http://www.ifpa-fly.com/
http://www.usafa.af.mil/dfp/physsurf/
http://www.hia.com/pcr/vigier/slides/Vigier.HTM
http://www.qedcorp.com/book/
http://qedcorp.com/book/bigtest.html
http://www.qedcorp.com/pdf/PQM1.pdf
http://www.qedcorp.com/pdf/lightring.PDF
http://www.hia.com/pcr/
http://cannon.sfsu.edu/grad/lwilliam/index.html