José Javier
Esparza: Ricardo Delgado, good evening. Good evening.
A
pleasure to have you here in El Gato al Agua, although you know
that we are both going to be in trouble later. But anyway, it's
a pleasure.
Ricardo Delgado: The pleasure is mine.
First of all, I'd like to
thank this television station and the program for the
opportunity to present the preliminary results of the study.
I think it's vital due to the situation we are in, where
practically everybody questions, as I say, the vaccination
vials' background. Today, it's difficult to even think about the
possibility that the official media is telling the truth.
So,
first of all, as I say, thank you.
What we've done is the research that anyone should do. Somehow I
always give the same example, but if we ask what ingredients or
about them, we always ask what ingredients can be in a
hamburger.
Then, how can we not know for sure what's the real
composition of the vaccine when its content goes directly into
the vein, right? And also, several times, several doses,
probably up to a third and a fourth a year.
All this began... As Dr.
José Luis Sevillano said back then:
"When they start vaccinating, we're really going to know what
they might be injecting."
Then, as I say, all this began when we
saw the phenomenon of the magnetic anomaly, a phenomenon that
for a long time was denied, but today has been already proved.
There are millions of videos of people going around the world.
A phenomenon that for a long time was denied, but today has been
already proved. There are millions of videos of people going
around the world.
Videos about this phenomenon of, let's call it
'pseudo-magnetism acquired after inoculation', but it can also
be acquired through other ways.
So, once we conducted that basic
epidemiological study, we started to wonder what materials or nanomaterials can cause magnetism in the body.
And not only
magnetism, but that could act as energy capacitors, because I
have also measured in a multimeter an important charge...
José Javier Esparza: A moment, Ricardo. Excuse me for a
moment.
If anyone has remained on the sidelines because they
have been on Mars during these last months, we are talking about
that phenomenon that has filled the Internet, of people who get
vaccinated and who don't get vaccinated who take little magnet
they have in the refrigerator and it sticks to them.
And there
are people who even get spoons stuck to them:
When, as Kalcker
explained, spoons shouldn't get stuck because we're talking
about stainless steel and it does not have magnetism.
But it is
true that they do stick and we have all seen it.
So then, people
has been inoculated with something we don't know what it is, and
asking about it it's forbidden.
Ricardo Delgado: Indeed, and not only metal objects.
This is a
phenomenon of electromagnetic induction in the metal that
adheres near the inoculation area. In addition, we have found
that the magnetism then moves towards the head. And this is very
important. Surely for the purpose they may seek.
In addition, a
potential difference is measured with a multimeter:
the person
becomes a superconductor.
That is, it emits and receives
signals.
And when we found the materials that can cause this
type of alterations in the body, we began to talk about graphene.
We suspected it was graphene oxide since it had all the
characteristics that magnetized people expressed after
inoculation.
José Javier Esparza: Why is graphene bad?
Because every day we
eat, drink..., in short, or inject (those who inject), we
introduce into our bodies a lot of things that nothing but crap.
Why particularly graphene could be alarming?
Ricardo Delgado: Graphene is toxic, it is a chemical, a toxic
chemical agent. Introduced in the organism in large quantities,
it causes thrombi. It causes blood clots.
We have all the
scientific articles to back it up. It causes post inflammatory
syndrome, it causes alteration of the immune system.
And when
the redox balance is broken, in the sense that there is less of
the body's own reserve glutathione than an introduced toxicant
such as graphene oxide, it generates a collapse of the immune
system and a cytokine storm.
In other words, something very
similar to the fashionable disease, isn't it?
José Javier Esparza: The entire COVID disease.
And then you, who
already suspected what all this was about, got a vial of
vaccination and took it to the Public University of Almeria.
Ricardo Delgado: Indeed, all possible through Rafa Navarro
(cop225), the policeman managed to obtain a vial.
We met at the
time, and we had it delivered. I requested a service provision
that you have here. The invoice to the University of Almeria is
to analyze the content.
José Javier Esparza: I think we have the image of the one we
have also received.
The letterhead of the Public University of
Almeria. It's in the report, in fact. And I would like to
emphasize that this is an objective scientific report from the
Public University of Almeria.
That is to say, we are not talking
here about something minor, we are talking about a real clinical
analysis.
Excuse me, Ricardo. Proceed.
Ricardo Delgado: Indeed.
A university professor, with a PhD in
Chemical Sciences and a degree in Biology, took charge of the
research.
Today there are already more people collaborating with
him, and he published a preliminary report with quite strong
conclusions since there was solid evidence of the presence of graphene derivatives in the sample.
Today we even know more and soon we will publish complementary
studies that will make this preliminary report more solid.
But
it's very important:
from this point on we must not to stop,
because remember that the marketing of face masks was stopped
precisely because they carried graphene particles, both a run of
500 thousand in Madrid, in La Rioja, in Castilla-La Mancha,
etc., in a large part of the world and in Canada.
You all know
that masks with nanotechnology, such as those of Decathlon, and
with the graphene symbol, are still being marketed.
So, what we
have to ask ourselves is:
if the masks were removed because they
caused or could cause pulmonary affections by introducing the graphene toxicant, how is it possible for it to be introduced
into the vial?
Moreover, in a considerable amount.
What we have found there, according to what the university that
has done this study says, is that the main component is
precisely graphene oxide and in a very small amount of something
else, but above all it is graphene oxide.
And given that all the
people who are inoculated with the Pfizer vaccine, which was the
one we sent for analysis, as well as
-
Moderna
-
AstraZeneca
-
Johnson&Johnson
-
Janssen
-
Sinovac,
...and all types of vaccines
acquire magnetic properties, we suspect with many indications
that they all contain more or less doses of graphene, of
graphene oxide.
José Javier Esparza: Ricardo, Pedro Ferré Barbadillo and Carlos
Esteban ask you something. Pedro.
Pedro Ferré: Good evening.
I wanted to ask you about this
phenomenon of the magnets, of magnetism, does it pass with time
or do the people who detect it, who feel it, continue to
maintain it even though months have passed?
Ricardo Delgado: It seems that the body has a certain capacity
to naturally eliminate graphene oxide through certain
immunological mechanisms.
Once inside the body it acts as if it
were a biological agent as such, as if it were precisely
SARS-CoV-2. precursor of glutathione.
So that is why, we
probably suspect, they are trying to introduce a second and a
third dose. Now intranasally.
They are already talking about new
intranasal vaccines with graphene oxide nanoparticles. Both for
influenza and COVID-19, because in aerosols it is much more
potent.
We've also seen scientific studies from February to
September 2020 of a treatment for COVID-19 with N-Acetylcysteine,
which is a precursor of glutathione.
And on the one hand we know
that precisely N-acetylcysteine or glutathione itself degrades
graphene oxide.
That is why we think that we probably hit
directly on the causative or etiological agent of the disease.
Pedro Ferré: I understand.
José Javier Esparza: Ricardo, a question from Carlos Esteban
now.
Carlos Esteban: Hello, good evening. I am going to play devil's
advocate.
Ricardo Delgado: OK. Go ahead.
Carlos Esteban: The University of Almeria examines this and
determines that graphene is present in the vial that you have
sent.
And this vial,
-
How do we know that it is indeed that of
the vaccine?
-
How has the process of how it has been extracted
been recorded?
-
Or do we simply have to believe it?
Ricardo Delgado: If they play devil's advocate, they will
probably to try to appeal to is what is called 'traceability' and
'custody'.
The custody of the vial was done by a policeman, Rafa
Navarro, and I simply sent it to the university. Then, the
person who has made this study collects it.
The university says:
"Traceability origin: Unknown"; "State of conservation:
refrigerated"; "Maintenance during the study: refrigerated"; and
"Coding of the sample problem RD1" (Ricardo Delgado 1),
...which is
me, of course.
It's convenient to note that the vial was sealed, okay?
Sealed
vial with rubber and intact aluminum cap of 2ml capacity
containing a cloudy aqueous suspension of 0.45ml.
"RNA
extraction and quantification is performed, and the presence of
uncharacterized nanometric microbiological visible even under
the optical microscope."
Those are the first conclusions.
Here
and in this sense, as you ask me, well, obviously I am not going
to put anything in the sample. What we are doing today is
getting more samples.
In fact, we have obtained a dozen more and
they are going to be added to make the sample more
representative.
José Javier Esparza: OK. Got it. José Antonio Fuster?
José Antonio Fuster: My question is, how does it make you feel
when you see all these verifiers out there? Infernal on the
Internet, Newtral and all the others?
Well, they say that this
is a hoax. Just like that. False. Absolutely false.
Everywhere
it has come out:
"This is a hoax."
Ricardo Delgado: Well, it affected me directly.
Those
verification agencies that many of us already know the content
they have and the final purpose they have, because I experienced
it in very direct family members. In my mother and my father.
In
fact, that's how I realized that they had really been
vaccinated.
They had deceived me for some time and finally
admitted it. And we're not just talking about spoons and metal
objects or neodymium or ferrite magnets.
We are talking about
measurements with electromagnetic field measuring devices,
magnetometers, teslasmeters, EMF pencils, etc.
In other words,
we cannot use the excuse of grease, as has been said, nor that
of sweat or any other nonsense, because there is no other word
for it.
José Antonio Fuster: Got it. One more question.
Ricardo, what
else is in the vaccine?
Ricardo Delgado: There is a small trace of RNA that does not
correspond to, let's say, the main component.
98% to 99% of the
vial is precisely graphene oxide, that is, the main component of
the vaccine is graphene oxide...
So this is what is worrying,
because we even suspect that AstraZenca probably carried more
doses than those that have been administered lately and that is
why it generated more thrombi initially.
We have to remember that graphene oxide, like any material has
what is called an electronic absorption band. This is a specific
frequency above which it is excited and oxidizes very quickly.
In other words, with a radio frequency telephone signal, it can
oscillate very quickly and cause havoc in just four or five
hours, as happened in March and April 2020.
José Javier Esparza: We certainly remember it. Well, Ricardo,
thank you very much.
I hope
it solved the Internet problem you had with all the companies,
which is mind-boggling. Anyway, we're wordless. and also with
Dr. Sevillano, right?
We have not been able to talk to him today
to continue talking about this, because we simply have to talk
about it.
That is to say, one can obviously discuss, debate,
disagree on the conclusions that can be drawn, on the
extrapolations, but what are concrete facts are objective facts
that have to be put on the table.
Ricardo Delgado: Yes, of course.
And to say goodbye, I would
like to appeal, first of all, to the health authorities who have
not yet responded to the magnetic phenomenon.
We have been
demanding an explanation for 45 days.
We don't need it from Risto Mejide or the
fact checkers.
They should be given directly
by the health authorities.
And that people go to their doctor to
denounce the phenomenon:
that it be registered in their medical
record.
Of course we are going to sue in court just with the
preliminary report so that, at the very least, applying the
precautionary principle, the inoculation campaign is stopped
immediately and urgently.
José Javier Esparza: Ricardo Delgado, thank you very much for
being here tonight on El Gato al Agua.
Ricardo Delgado: Thanks to you. Best regards.
