by Marshmallow Snugglez
December
20, 2020
from
Reddit Website
Animal-human
hybrid experiments
in the 90s and
early 21st century,
and the
controversial scientist
at the center of
it...
In November of 1998, Advanced Cell Technology, Inc. (ACT)
succeeded in manufacturing a human-cow hybrid for the purpose of
proving that it was possible to derive stem cells from an
animal-human hybrid, from which to grow various tissues and organs
that could be human enough to be given to humans in need of
replacement organs and tissues.
Stem cells, which were
and perhaps are still considered by many to be available only in
embryos, are wonderful cells that can develop into any organ or
tissue.
The hybrid, which was
aborted twelve days after conception, had been the result of the
implantation of human DNA into a cow's egg whose own DNA had been
removed.
A chemical had been added
to spur meiosis.
The scientists seemed to be using animal eggs
instead of human eggs because animal eggs were easier to obtain. In
contrast, the DNA inserted into the emptied egg could have been
taken from anywhere within any part of the human donor's body - in
the case of this human-cow hybrid, the DNA had come from a man's
leg. 1
(In a 2006 BBC report,
2 I found a reference to how human such a hybrid would
be:
"The resulting embryo
would be 99.9% human; the only bovine element would be DNA
outside the nucleus of the cell."
However, a 2007 report by
CBC News, 3 the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, wrote
that it would be "99.5 per cent human.")
It was revealed in October of the next year that
BioTransplant,
Inc., in the USA, and Stem Cell Sciences in Australia had been
producing pig-human hybrids.
Pigs' organs, of course,
are genetically and functionally very similar to those of humans,
and so one can understand why they would have been selected.
The resulting pig-humans
had been aborted after "around a week." 4
Fast-forward to 2003...
Though they would not
reveal it until 2005, scientists at the Shanghai Second Medical
University in China produced human-animal hybrids consisting not of
cows or pigs, but rabbits.
"They were allowed to
develop for several days in a laboratory dish before the
scientists destroyed the embryos to harvest their stem cells."
5
By 2004, things had
become unspeakably bizarre.
"In Minnesota," wrote
Rick Weiss for the Washington Post, 6 "pigs are being
born with human blood in their veins. In Nevada, there are sheep
whose livers and hearts are largely human.
In California, mice
peer from their cages with human brain cells firing inside their
skulls."
By now, such creatures
had become known as chimeras (it might be best if you reread that
word and imagine thunder rumbling ominously).
Regarding the idea of
endowing animals with human brain cells, such as the aforementioned
mice, Rick Reiss recalled:
The potential power
of chimeras as research tools became clear about a decade ago in
a series of dramatic experiments by Evan Balaban, now at McGill
University in Montreal.
Balaban took small
sections of brain from developing quails and transplanted them
into the developing brains of chickens.
The resulting chickens exhibited vocal trills and head bobs
unique to quails, proving that the transplanted parts of the
brain contained the neural circuitry for quail calls.
It also offered
astonishing proof that complex behaviors could be transferred
across species.
Meanwhile, wrote Weiss,
Dr. Irving Weissman of Stanford University's Institute of
Cancer/Stem Cell Biology and Medicine expressed interest in
producing mice whose brains did not possess some human brain cells,
but were composed entirely of them:
He proposes keeping
tabs on the mice as they develop.
If the brains look as
if they are taking on a distinctly human architecture - a
development that could hint at a glimmer of humanness - they
could be killed, he said.
If they look as if
they are organizing themselves in a mouse brain architecture,
they could be used for research.
Just a few months later,
National Geographic News 7 described the ongoing research
of Dr. Weissman, and quoted him in the context of whether the
production of chimeras ought to be outlawed because of ethical
concerns:
Weissman,
director of Stanford University's Institute of Cancer/Stem Cell
Biology and Medicine in California, is against a ban in the
United States.
"Anybody who puts
their own moral guidance in the way of this biomedical
science, where they want to impose their will - not just be
part of an argument - if that leads to a ban or
moratorium... they are stopping research that would save
human lives," he said.
Weissman has already
created mice with brains that are about one percent human.
Later this year he may conduct another experiment where the mice
have 100 percent human brains. This would be done, he said, by
injecting human neurons into the brains of embryonic mice.
Before being born, the mice would be killed and dissected to see
if the architecture of a human brain had formed.
If it did, he'd look
for traces of human cognitive behavior.
Weissman was soon granted
permission to perform the experiment.
Just before spring in
2005, scientists at Stanford University announced that they would,
indeed, attempt to produce a mouse whose brain cells were entirely
human.
Wrote James Langton
for the Telegraph, 8
"Researchers at
Stanford University have already succeeded in breeding mice with
brains that are one per cent human cells.
In the next stage
they plan to use stem cells from aborted fetuses to create an
animal whose brain cells are 100 per cent human."
Granting the team
permission to carry out the experiment, Prof. Henry Greely,
the head of the university's ethics committee, said that,
"if the mouse shows
human-like behaviors, like improved memory or problem-solving,
it's time to stop."
(A fear that began to
grow among scientists, Langton mentioned, involved human cells
spreading to the chimeras' reproductive organs, potentially causing
them to produce human eggs or sperm.
If these chimeras then mated
with each other, it could theoretically result in human embryos
being conceived within the wombs of non-humans.)
Mysteriously, MSNBC later
reported this: 9
Weissman, who has
already created mice with 1 percent human brain cells, said he
has no immediate plans to make mostly human mouse brains, but
wanted to get ethical clearance in any case.
A formal Stanford
committee that oversees research at the university would also
need to authorize the experiment.
The MSNBC report also
referred to bizarre goings-on at the University of Nevada-Reno.
Dr. Jason Chamberlain
had injected human brain cells into the brain of the fetus of a
sheep two months earlier, and would soon euthanize its pregnant
mother, extract the unborn chimera, and study it.
"He can't wait to
examine the effects of the human cells," it said.
By 2007, we were
producing sheep that were only 85% sheep, their organs saturated
with human cells, 10 and the technique by which chimeras
are produced by injecting human cells into animal fetuses was being
ironed-out.
The
Roman Catholic Church
had decided to publicly address the production of chimeras.
Summarizing the
proclamation of the bishops representing the Vatican, Jonathan Petre
for the Telegraph wrote 11 that the,
"bishops, who believe
that life begins at conception, said that they opposed the
creation of any embryo solely for research, but they were also
anxious to limit the destruction of such life once it had been
brought into existence."
He went on to quote their
announcement, which said in part,
"At the very least,
embryos with a preponderance of human genes should be assumed to
be embryonic human beings, and should be treated accordingly."
The entire written
statement by the bishops is available for reading. 12
Bovine humans were produced again by British scientists in 2008.
13 Shortly thereafter, scientists at Newcastle University
in Australia announced what was already pretty obvious:
the process
was easy.
In fact, by this point,
over 270 chimeras had been produced. 14
According to BBC News, things looked bleak in 2009 for endeavors in
the UK to continue hybrid cloning. Although a push the previous May
to outlaw the whole spectrum of animal-human hybrid experimentation
had failed, researchers were nevertheless finding it difficult to
secure funding and as a result no such experiments were known to be
taking place in the UK.
There were suspicions
that moral convictions were behind this, but these were refuted.
In
addition, efforts to derive stem cells from adult human tissue were
showing promise, potentially negating the necessity for the hybrids.
Of note:
the estimated
humanity of the hybrids had been apparently been recalculated;
the creatures were now "some 99% human and 0.1% animal" (this
was likely a typo and ought to have read "99% human and 1%
animal"). 15
Yet, behind closed doors,
human determination was enabling the experiments to continue in
Britain after all - cloaked in secrecy...
Though it would not be
revealed until 2011, these experiments produced over 150 hybrid
embryos, all of which were aborted within two weeks of conception.
16
That revelation came on the heels of a dire warning from the UK's
Academy of Medical Sciences that experiments involving the placement
of human brain cells into apes could produce speaking apes whose
thought processes displayed traits idiosyncratic to humans.
According to the
Telegraph, 17 the report published by the academy
referred to such creatures as "monsters."
The academy described its
new plans for a larger and more powerful oversight board and tighter
restrictions on experiments that could lead to the production of
such creatures.
From the Telegraph:
Professor Thomas
Baldwin, a member of the Academy of Medical Sciences working
group that produced the report, said the possibility of
humanized apes should be taken seriously.
He said:
"The fear is that
if you start putting very large numbers of human brain cells
into the brains of primates suddenly you might transform the
primate into something that has some of the capacities that
we regard as distinctively human... speech, or other ways of
being able to manipulate or relate to us.
"These possibilities that are at the moment largely explored
in fiction we need to start thinking about now."
No such experiments are
currently known to have been taking place at that time... in the UK,
anyway.
Now, a word about apes: It has been demonstrated that some species
of apes are capable of learning basic American Sign Language
(ASL).
The most celebrated case
is a chimpanzee named
Washoe (1965-2007), who over the course of her
life as a research subject learned and used well over two hundred
signs and also provided controversial evidence that she possessed
traits such as self-awareness and empathy. 18
(Evidence of such
human traits among apes raised in ape nurseries tends to be
controversial because of its implications and its origin:
its implications
question the ethics of subjecting apes to medical
experimentation and the urbanization of their natural
habitats; its origin is typically ape nurseries, which are
often involved in campaigns against such things.
Thus, those who
advocate the use of apes in medical experiments, as well as
those who intend to urbanize regions recognized as ape habitats,
accuse those who provide such evidence as having fudged the
evidence.)
Another relatively famous
case is
Koko, a gorilla born in 1971.
According to BBC News,
Koko, who has an I.Q. of at least 75,
"uses a sign language
of 1,000 gestures to communicate with humans and can understand
2,000 words of spoken English." 19
A bonobo in Iowa named
Kanzi is another nice example of the high intellectual capacity
demonstrated by some apes.
According to a 2006
article in the Smithsonian magazine by Paul Raffaele, he allegedly
knows over three hundred illustrated symbols and three thousand
spoken English words.
He has also shown himself
capable of building and lighting a campfire and then roasting
marshmallows over it (this is a learned skill, of course). 20
In 2010, research revealed that at least some chimpanzees can
conceptualize volume, 21 strengthening suspicions that,
while not geniuses, apes are remarkably intelligent.
The fear expressed by the
Academy of Medical Sciences in 2011 was that the lack of
restrictions on and responsible and sensible oversight of
human-animal hybrid experimentation could soon lead to situations
wherein the brain of an ape, apparently intelligent enough already
to learn basic English and contemplate volume, would be augmented
and enhanced by the insertion of human neurons.
Again, it was in the UK that those ethical concerns were being
expressed.
The world is a big place,
with lots of scientists involved in hybridization research in a
number of countries.
How difficult would
it be, I wonder, for just one team somewhere in the world to
unofficially "neglect" to abort just one embryo?
How difficult would
it be, I wonder, for just one team to unofficially allow one
such embryo into a consenting womb?
Such a thing could never
be acknowledged, of course...
If you tell a human not to do something, and also tell that human
that it is possible to do that thing, the human will naturally feel
inclined to do it - with drooling eagerness if the consequence is
feeling like a god.
Such is fallen human
nature. Yes, it will inevitably happen...
Somewhere, someone will
inject human neurons into the brain of an ape fetus, or someone will
fail to abort and will then implant a hybrid embryo.
And, that someone will
know demi-godhood...
How few are those humans who have rejected
recognition as gods! Indeed, such recognition has throughout history
proven to be intoxicating... and never enough.
Besides, if one is crafty
enough to produce one hybrid, and if the experience is intoxicating,
why stop at just
one...?
References
-
Details of
hybrid clone revealed,
BBC News, June 18, 1999.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/371378.stm.
Human-pig embryo accusation provokes debate, Australian
Broadcasting Network, October 9, 2000.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2000/10/09/196491.htm
-
Fergus
Walsh, "Plan to create human-cow embryos,"
BBC News, November
6, 2006.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/6121280.stm
-
Creation of
human-animal embryos sparks debate in Britain,
CBC News, January 5,
2007.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2007/01/05/chimeras.html
-
Human-pig
embryo accusation provokes debate,
Australian Broadcasting
Network, October 9, 2000.
http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2000/10/09/196491.htm
-
Maryann
Mott, "Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy,"
National Geographic News,
January 25, 2005.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0125_050125_chimeras.html
-
Rick Weiss,
"Of Mice, Men and In-Between: Scientists Debate Blending Of
Human, Animal Forms,"
Washington Post, November 20, 2004.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63731-2004Nov19.html
-
Maryann
Mott, "Animal-Human Hybrids Spark Controversy,"
National Geographic News,
January 25, 2005.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/01/0125_050125_chimeras.html
-
James
Langton, "Scientists to make 'Stuart Little' mouse with the
brain of a human,"
Telegraph, March 6, 2005.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1485070/Scientists-to-make-Stuart-Little-mouse-with-the-brain-of-a-human.html
-
Scientists
create animals that are part-human: Stem cell experiments
leading to genetic mixing of species,
MSNBC, April 29,
2005.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7681252/ns/health-cloning_and_stem_cells
-
Claudia
Joseph, "Now Scientists Create a Sheep That's 15% Human,"
Daily Mail, March
27, 2007.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-444436/Now-scientists-create-sheep-thats-15-human.html
-
Jonathan
Petre, "Chimera embryos have right to life, say bishops,"
Telegraph, June 26,
2007.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1555639/Chimera-embryos-have-right-to-life-say-bishops.html
-
Great
Britain:
Parliament: Joint Committee on the Human Tissue and
Embryos (Draft) Bill,
Evidence, vol. 2 of
Human Tissue and Embryos (Draft) Bill (London: The
Stationery Office, 2007), 294-97.
-
Maggie Fox,
"British Scientists Make Human-Cow Embryos,"
Reuters, April 2,
2008.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2008/04/02/uk-cloning-cows-idUKN0242023320080402
-
Clive
Cookson, "Scientists Find Hybrid Embryos Easy to Make,"
Financial Times,
June 20, 2008.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/96d72196-3e62-11dd-b16d-0000779fd2ac.html
-
Clare
Murphy, "Uncertain future for hybrid research,"
BBC News, January
13, 2009.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7826331.stm
-
Daniel
Martin and Simon Caldwell, "150 human animal hybrids grown
in UK labs: Embryos have been produced secretively for the
past three years," Daily
Mail, July 22, 2011.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2017818/Embryos-involving-genes-animals-mixed-humans-produced-secretively-past-years.html
-
Nick
Collins, "Ethical rules needed to curb 'Frankenstein-like
experiments' on animals."
Telegraph, July 22, 2011.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/science-news/8652093/Ethical-rules-needed-to-curb-Frankenstein-like-experiments-on-animals.html
-
Nick Perry,
"'Signing' Chimp Washoe Broke Language Barrier,"
Seattle Times,
November 1, 2007.
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2003986892_washoe01m.html
(accessed October 3, 2012); Benedict Carey, "Washoe, a Chimp
of Many Words, Dies at 42,"
New York Times,
November 1, 2007.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/01/science/01chimp.html?_r=1&ref=science&oref=slogin
(accessed October 3, 2012).
-
'Talking'
Gorilla Demands Dentist,
BBC News, August 9, 2004.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3548246.stm
(accessed October 3, 2012).
-
Paul
Raffaele, "Speaking Bonobo,"
Smithsonian Magazine,
November 2006,
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/10022981.html
(accessed October 3, 2012); Laurentiu Garofeanu, "Amazing
Photos of Kanzi the Bonobo Lighting a Fire and Cooking a
Meal," Telegraph.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/howaboutthat/8985122/Amazing-photos-of-Kanzi-the-bonobo-lighting-a-fire-and-cooking-a-meal.html
(accessed October 3, 2012).
-
Matt
Walker, "Chimps Are Intelligent Enough to Appreciate a Full
Pint," BBC News,
February 23, 2010.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/earth/hi/earth_news/newsid_8528000/8528534.stm
(accessed October 3, 2012).
|