|
by Jon Rappoport
March 09,
2022
from
NoMoreFakeNews Website
They
confess:
they had no
virus when they concocted
the test for the
virus;
they "contrived"
a model
by pretending to
find
what they wanted
to find;
it's called a
self-fulfilling prophecy
This is the con and the crime
that drove
millions of lives,
and economies,
into ruin
Quiz:
If an agency of the
federal government revealed they had no basis for constructing a
diagnostic test that was used on millions of people, but the
test was the cornerstone of a national lockdown, and the
lockdown drove the economy off a cliff; and destroyed millions
of lives, however, NOW, that agency says, they DO have a basis
for the test,
would you buy
what they're selling?
If your answer is yes,
you're in good company:
the company I call
Blind, Ignorant, Denialist, Hoaxing Journalists...
The CDC issued a document
that bulges with devastating admissions.
The release is titled, "07/21/2021:
Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing."
It begins explosively:
"After December 31,
2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)
of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR
Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020
for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only.
CDC is providing this
advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time
to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized
alternatives."
Many people believe this
means,
the CDC is giving up
on the PCR test as a means of "detecting the virus."
The CDC isn't saying
that at all...
They're saying,
the PCR technology
will continue to be used, but they're replacing what the test is
looking FOR with a better "reference sample"...
A better marker. A better
target. A better piece of RNA supposedly derived from SARS-CoV-2.
CDC/FDA are confessing
there has been a PROBLEM with the PCR test which has been used to
detect the virus, starting in February of 2020 - right up to this
minute.
In other words,
the millions and
millions of "COVID cases" based on the PCR test in use are all
suspect...
Actually, that statement
is too generous. Every test result of every PCR test should be
thrown out.
To confirm this, the CDC document links to an FDA release titled, "SARS-CoV-2
Reference Panel Comparative Data."
Here is a killer quote:
"During the early
months of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic,
clinical specimens [of the virus] were not readily available to
developers of IVDs [in vitro diagnostics] to detect SARS-CoV-2.
Therefore, the FDA
authorized IVDs based on available data from contrived samples
generated from a range of SARS-CoV-2 material sources (for
example, gene specific RNA, synthetic RNA, or whole genome viral
RNA) for analytical and clinical performance evaluation.
While validation
using these contrived specimens provided a measure of confidence
in test performance at the beginning of the pandemic, it is not
feasible to precisely compare the performance of various tests
that used contrived specimens because each test validated
performance using samples derived from different gene specific,
synthetic, or genomic nucleic acid sources."
Translation:
We, at the CDC, did
not have a specimen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus when we concocted
the PCR test for SARS-CoV-2.
Yes, it's unbelievable,
right?
And that's the test we've
been using all along. So we CONTRIVED samples of the virus. We
fabricated. We lied.
We made up (invented)
synthetic gene sequences and we SAID these sequences HAD TO BE close
to the sequence of SARS-CoV-2, without having the faintest idea of
what we were doing, because, again, we didn't have an actual
specimen of the virus.
We had no proof THERE WAS
something called SARS-CoV-2.
This amazing FDA document
goes to say the Agency has granted emergency approval to 59
different PCR tests since the beginning of the (fake) pandemic.
59...!
And,
"…it is not feasible
to precisely compare the performance of various tests that used
contrived specimens because each test validated performance
using samples derived from different gene specific, synthetic,
or genomic nucleic acid sources."
Translation:
Each of the 59 different
PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2 told different lies and concocted different
fabrications about the genetic makeup of the virus - the virus we
didn't have.
Obviously, then, these
tests would give unreliable results.
THE PCR TESTS USED CONTRIVED
SPECIMENS OF THE VIRUS WE DIDN'T HAVE...
BUT, don't worry, be
happy, because NOW, the CDC and the FDA say, they really do have
actual virus samples of SARS-CoV-2 from patients:
they have better
targets for the PCR test, and labs should start gearing up for
the new and improved tests...
In other words,
they were lying THEN,
but they're not lying NOW. They were "contriving," but now
they're telling the truth.
If you believe that, I
have Fountain of Youth water for sale, extracted from the
lead-contaminated system of Flint, Michigan.
Here, once again, I report virology's version of "we isolated the
virus":
They have a soup they
make in their labs.
This soup contains human and monkey cells, toxic chemicals and
drugs, and all sorts of other random genetic material.
Because the cells start
to die, the researchers ASSUME a bit of mucus from a patient they
dropped in the soup is doing the killing, and THE VIRUS must be the
killer agent in the mucus.
This assumption is entirely unwarranted.
The drugs and chemicals
could be doing the cell-killing, and the researchers are also
starving the cells of vital nutrients, and that starvation could
kill the cells.
There is no proof that SARS-CoV-2 is in the soup, or that it is
doing the cell-killing, or that it exists.
Yet the researchers
call cell-death "isolation of the virus"...
To say this is a
non-sequitur is a vast understatement.
In their universe,
"We assume, without
proof, we have the virus buried in a soup in a dish in the lab"
equals, "We've separated the virus from all surrounding
material."
Virology equals,
"how to spread
bullshit for a living and scare the world"...
Other than that, it's
perfect...
|
