|

by Ben Potter
May 28, 2014
from
ClassicalWisdom Website
Article also
HERE

Greek Pantheon
Much time and care is taken to bring the ancients to life:
to imbue modern society with the idea that
they were just like us in all their goodness and evil, their
intoxication and sobriety, their love and lust, as well as their
hate and chastity.
To downplay this would be both false and
feckless, as well as an insult to a common humanity, evidenced by
timeless art, extraordinary literature and the evocative tales found
therein.
Nevertheless, there appears to be a sizeable exception, one in which
the madness may be the same, but the method is barely
recognizable... and that is
the gods and religion.
The polytheistic panoply atop Mount Olympus and in the heaving halls
of Hades have great range and romance, but, almost inevitably, very
little for citizens of secular or traditionally monotheistic
societies to empathize with.
True, there are familiar elements:
virgin births, resurrections, fratricide,
patricide and capricious cruelty.
However, such moments merely serve to punctuate,
and therefore reinforce, the strangeness.
One explanation for the disconnect lies not in innate practical
differences, but in the lack of a codified text. In other words,
there's no Ancient Greek bible...
Or is there?
Well... No, there isn't.
But at any rate,
if one wished to make a case for such a thing
then there is really only one contender; Hesiod's
Theogony.
Hesiod, from Boeotia on the
Greek mainland, was a contemporary of the Near Eastern Homer
– dating him to the 8th century BC.
Homer's epic and upper-class material far
outstretched the pious, practical and homespun efforts of Hesiod,
but despite their stylistic differences, their fame grew in
parallel.

Gustave's Painting of Hesiod
(That's not to say Hesiod was a down to earth poet of the people,
the language he used was still elevated and rarefied.)
A near-contemporary myth, discredited even in antiquity, stated that
Hesiod beat Homer in a singing contest. Although palpably untrue,
the fact that the two men were mentioned in the same breath says
something about Hesiod's stature.
Additional 'biographical' information reports that he adulterously
impregnated his host's sister and fathered with her the Locrian poet
Stesichorus.
In revenge, he was thrown from a boat into the
sea, only to be rescued and brought back to shore by a pod of
philanthropic dolphins.
Such pleasant nonsense is first seen in the writings of
Thucydides, three centuries
after the fact. And, whilst telling us nothing of his life, such
resonance does confirm that his legacy was almost as important as
Homer's.
So what of Hesiod's epic piece,
the Theogony? Is there any case to make for a polytheistic bible?

Triumph of the
Bacchus
Well, not quite.
It does not lay down doctrinal law, give advice
on genital grooming, recommend who and how to love, or tut-tut at
your choice of pizza topping.
It does, however, give a pretty comprehensive
list of gods, how they came to be, some of their key attributes,
with whom they fought and with whom they... ahem... loved.
So if your definition of a holy book is one that outlines the origin
and nature of gods, then the Theogony certainly qualifies.
However, we aren't exactly dealing with a text of
unalloyed veneration. Theogony is a warts-and-all account. There is
no sugar-coating of the incest, murder, back-stabbing, cannibalism
and madness that the Gods indulged in.
Homer, to a far, far greater extent either
humanizes, condones or simply ignores Divine guilt.
Something else which lends weight to the holy text debate is the
fact that the various wars, affairs, births and castrations of the
Theogony are almost certainly not a product of Hesiod's fertile
imagination.
He, like Homer, was either chronicling or playing
with established stories and themes.

Pandora's Box
It's been suggested that Hesiod's material can be traced back to the
mythology and pantheon of the Babylonians, however, any similarities
here could be purely coincidental.
After all, the Incas had a story unerringly
similar to that of Pandora's box...!
But what does Hesiod teach us?
For starters, we are supplied with the origins of the ancient
sacraments, which were an offshoot of Prometheus deceitfully
serving some rather bony beef to Zeus:
"[Zeus] took the fatted portion in his hands
and raged within, and anger seized his heart to see the trick,
the white bones of the ox.
And from this time the tribes of men on earth
burn, on the smoking altars, white ox-bones".
Moreover, we are precisely told our distance away
from
our Divine keepers, provided we
know how big an anvil is and have a working knowledge of physics
(which, alas, I don't - write in if you do!):
"An anvil made of bronze, falling from
heaven, would fall nine nights and days, and on the tenth would
reach the earth; and if the anvil fell from earth, would fall
again nine nights and days and come to Tartarus upon the tenth".
In addition to,
the origins of creation, sacrifice, the wars
that shaped the universe and a travel guide to heaven,
...Hesiod's work supplies us with some charming
etymological snippets - some thought to have been coined by the poet
himself...

Cyclops
For instance, Cyclops is round-eyed, not one-eyed, as
it comes from the Greek, kuklos (circle).
Aphros (foam) refers to the birth of
Aphrodite, who was issued from the foam congealing around the
discarded testicles of the castrated Uranus.
Most pleasantly of all, Hesiod tell us,
the Titans are called so because of the
teino (strain) of their insolence.
This makes phrases like,
'a titanic struggle' or 'a clash of the
titans' near-tautologies...
Indeed, there is much to be learnt about Greek,
polytheistic culture from the pages of Hesiod.
However, anybody who seriously makes the 'bible'
argument is most probably guilty of retrospectively interpolating
our current societal fundamentals into Ancient Greece…
Hesiod (and even more so
Homer)
is far more akin to Dante
or Milton i.e. (presumably)
pious,
with a god-given talent and a
god-thirsty audience.
However you wish to view Hesiod, as prophet, poet, public
servant, or even some combination of the three, his work has stood
the test of so much time that it almost boggles belief.
And why is this?
Well... I'll leave it to the man himself to
explain:
"When a man has sorrow newly on his mind and
grieves until his heart is parched within, if a bard, the
servant of the Muses, sings the glorious deeds the men of old
performed, and hymns the blessed ones, Olympian gods, at once
that man forgets his heavy heart, and has no memory of any
grief, so quick the Muses' gift diverts his mind."
|