Phase Five
The Political Management of Iraq and its Ancient ET
Technology
In the 2000 Presidential election campaign, George Bush
jokingly responded to a question concerning the ET presence by
saying that that was Richard Cheney’s area of expertise.
[76]
Cheney served as Secretary of Defense in the first Bush
administration and according to the formula first used
during the Eisenhower administration to determine the
members of MJ-12, Cheney would have been a
former active member of MJ-12, and was very likely a
current member of
PI-40. Bush
would have been briefed at some point by Cheney and/or his
father about the ET presence, and was simply deferring to the clear
expertise
Cheney had in the area.
Other key administration figures in the
new Bush administration such as Donald Rumsfeld,
Secretary of Defense during the Ford administration,
also would have served on
MJ-12
according to the Eisenhower era formula, and would have
subsequently sat on PI-40, before finding himself
elevated once more to
MJ-12. Other new Bush administration
officials such as Paul Wolfowitz and
Richard Perle, both of whom had earlier held prominent
positions in the Department of Defense, were probably briefed on the
ET presence, during their tenures.
What distinguished this senior group of officials in the Bush
administration with backgrounds in the Department of
Defense, was their ‘hawkish’ Republican world view that espoused
such novel international theories as preemptive military
intervention against rogue states and creating a global defensive
shield against them.
While such a theory ostensibly was focused on
the threat such states posed if they possessed Weapons of Mass
Destruction, the knowledge these officials had concerning
the ET presence, suggested that they were merely continuing the
threat based assessment of the ET presence that had earlier
dominated the Reagan administration.
The global
defensive shield against rogue states using ballistic nuclear
missiles against the US, was again a convenient cover for the true
intent to be able to military intervene against ET craft anywhere on
the planet. Aside from the close ties this group of Bush
administration ‘hawks’ had with the Department of Defense,
some of them also had extensive ties with corporate military
contractors that worked on various clandestine projects concerning
the ET presence.
The professional background and policies of the
Bush administration ‘hawks’ suggests they formed the public
head of a ‘cabal’ of senior military officials
based in clandestine organizations that promoted a militaristic
responses to the ET presence.
[77]
Such officials would no doubt have been aware of clandestine
organizations of other countries with whom they cooperated/competed
with in terms of gaining maximum strategic advantage vis-à-vis the
ET presence, and the strategic significance of different rogue
states in the tenuous balance of power that existed on the planet
between different ET factions and clandestine government
organizations. A key rogue state in such a strategic struggle was
Iraq under Saddam Hussein.
There is evidence that Iraq once hosted an advanced
civilization that interacted extensively with ET races.
[78]
The likelihood that this interaction led to the development of
technology either left behind by these ETs or based on ET
technology that lay buried in the Iraqi desert has been
argued to be the primary motivation for the US led military
intervention in the 2003 Gulf war.
[79]
Once the need to invade
Iraq emerged for reasons that primarily concern the political
management of the ET presence and the strategic importance of Iraq,
it became important to manage this in a way that would minimize
global chaos. This was especially important since clandestine
organizations in the US were competing with similar organizations in
France,
Germany, Russia and even China
that presumably already established some understanding of precisely
what was available in Iraq, and its strategic significance for the
global balance of power.
The influence of key ‘hawks’ in the Bush administration,
Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Cheney,
Richard Perle and others, was likely viewed by
MJ-12/PI-40 as a useful political tool
for gaining access to Iraq’s strategic ET resources.
This had to be managed in a way, however, that would maintain global
consensus and not precipitate a conflict that could easily spiral
out of control and lead to the intervention of ET races.
Like the
Reagan administration
before it, the more militaristic impulses of the Bush
administration
needed to be restrained by MJ-12/PI-40, if Iraq’s ET
resources were to be gained over the objections of clandestine
organizations based in France, Germany, Russia and China.
In August of 2002 when debate over a preemptive US attack was at its
height, Kissinger released a significant policy statement
that cautioned the Bush administration from alienating
its historic allies in dealing with Iraq, and argued that,
“the
notion of justified pre-emption runs counter to modern international
law which sanctions the use of force in self defense only against
actual rather than potential threats.”
[80]
This combined with key statements from other former officials from
Republican administrations, such as former Bush Snr.,
National Security Advisor and a likely PI-40 member,
Brent Scowcroft, led to President Bush moving towards a
more internationalist agenda that embraced the role of the UN. [81]
This culminated in Bush making a speech before the UN a day
after the anniversary of September 11 where he emphasized the
importance of confronting Saddam Hussein and the
important role of the UN in playing a leading role in containing the
threat posed by rogue states.
[82]
Kissinger and
Scowcroft represented a very visible initiative by
MJ-12/PI-40 to reign in the Bush Hawks insofar as
the importance of global consensus was recognized as a key
ingredient for the strategic goals of militarily intervening in
Iraq, removing the Saddam regime, and gaining
access to whatever ET technology was hidden in Iraq. The
Republican hawks within the Bush administration had
been temporarily outflanked by Kissinger, other Republican
moderates and MJ-12/PI-40
members.
The clandestine organizations in France, Germany and
Russia
therefore had more time to reach an accommodation with the Bush
administration. Security Council Resolution 1441 was a
triumph for
Kissinger’s approach to politically managing the ET presence.
By February of 2003, it had become clear that Germany, France and
Russia were maneuvering to block the US intervention. Rather
than this being purely an altruistic desire to preserve global peace
in the face of an unjustified US attack to destroy ‘non-existent’
weapons of mass destruction, these European states desired to keep
the US out of Iraq due to the increased strategic power this would
give to US based clandestine organizations.
Kissinger’s role
is indicative of the strategic struggle occurring behind the scene
over ET technology in Iraq, and the shifting alliances this
caused. Kissinger subsequently came out with a key policy
speech criticizing France and Germany as threatening the NATO
alliance.
[83]
His speech indicated that
the time was ripe for a US military invasion. Kissinger and
MJ-12/PI-40
had given the blessing for an invasion which was now
inevitable.
Rather than regional devastation as was first feared,
what occurred instead was a rapid collapse of the Saddam
regime. US clandestine organizations had achieved their
military objectives without precipitating regional and global chaos.
The passage of a new UN Security Council resolution in May 2003 by a
margin of 14-0 endorsing US administration and reconstruction of
post-war Iraq by the UN, marked a decisive victory for the
Bush administration, and the influence of MJ-12/PI-40
in politically managing the ET presence.
What was significant in the post-conflict administration of Iraq was
the speedy departure of the Pentagon appointed civil administrator,
Jay Garner, and his replacement by Paul Bremer, a former
State Department Ambassador at Large for Terrorism, and someone with
strong connections to Kissinger, formally in charge of the
civil administration of Iraq.
This indicated that the more moderate
policies backed by Kissinger in dealing with the ET presence,
had prevailed over the more confrontational policies of the Bush
hawks. A power struggle between moderate and hawkish factions of
MJ-12/PI-40 was occurring behind the scenes, and the
Kissinger backed moderates had been successful.
The policies implemented by Bremer in terms of setting back the
schedule for the election of an interim Iraq administration,
indicate that the US is set to remain in military control of Iraq
for a number of years.
Iraq’s role in terms of being a host
to ancient ET technology and analyses which suggest it plays a
significant role in the possible return of ET races that sponsored Iraq’s
ancient
Sumerian civilization, makes Iraq a significant actor in
the political management of the ET question.
Back
to Contents
Conclusions
Political management of the ET presence has evolved greatly since the
Second World War era.
Starting initially as a process firmly
controlled by Presidential administrations that exercised executive
oversight, thereby making it part of the democratic process despite
its secrecy and lack of congressional participation, political
management evolved to the point where Presidential administrations
were not fully informed of and had no executive control over many
aspects of the ET presence.
This meant that the political management
process had dubious constitutional validity and was controlled by a
few actors who could be tied to the Rockefeller-Kissinger axis,
and their respective ties to US corporations and elite foreign
policy bodies such as the Council on Foreign Relations.
The
US-British-Australian intervention in Iraq suggests that political
management of the ET process has evolved to yet another level. Now
the US and its allies are prepared to militarily intervene in others
in order to gain strategic goals vis-à-vis the ET presence.
The most
important of which are,
-
to maintain official
secrecy of the ET presence,
-
withhold from the general
public the true nature of the historic role played by ETs in ancient
civilizations,
-
and to gain whatever
military advantage possible from the reverse engineering of ET
technology found in countries that, like Iraq, have been prominent
sites hosting an ET presence.
According to
whistleblowers sources, there are numerous ancient ET bases
that are being increasingly discovered around the planet. [84]
Consequently, it is likely that the intervention in Iraq will set a
precedent for similar interventions elsewhere across the planet for
reasons that increasingly have to do with the political management
of the ET presence.
The strategic thinking of organizations such as MJ-12/PI-40
is based on the perception that the best analytical minds and
strategic thinkers are employed in managing the ET process, and that
while this may not be acceptable from a democratic standpoint which
emphases executive or congressional oversight of all government
activities, it is acceptable from a national security perspective.
What can be concluded here is that the view that indeed the ‘best
minds’ are in charge of the political management of the ET presence
is misplaced. Information of the ET presence has been increasingly
controlled and spun in a way that suggests that real decision
making power has been inexorably restricted to fewer and
fewer individuals who reflect conservative political philosophies
typically associated with the Republican party.
While it is
impossible to say exactly how many individuals exercise real
influence in politically managing the ET presence, the history of
the Rockefeller-Kissinger involvement and the
prominent roles played by Corporate America and the
Council on Foreign Relations, suggests that this influence
is restricted to very few.
Eisenhower’s warning about the ‘best minds’ not being in
control suggests that the elite club of ‘experts’ that dictate how
the political management of the ET presence is to be conducted, are
overly influenced by Corporate and elite interests sympathetic to
world views associated with the military-intelligence communities.
Introducing greater transparency into all aspects of managing the ET
presence will make it possible to expand the restricted circle of
power and influence that controls information concerning the ET
presence in a way that does indeed make it possible for the best
minds to be formally in charge of politically managing the ET
presence.
The erosion of executive control over the political management of the
ET presence has reduced Presidents to at best, rubber stamps of
MJ-12/PI-40 policies (this appeared to be the case in
the
Nixon, Ford,
Reagan and both Bush administrations), or, at worst, to
political impotence as appears to have occurred in the cases of the
Carter and
Clinton administrations. The policies of the present Bush
administration indicate that the US presidency is reduced to
little more than a vehicle for the realization of questionable
policies concerning how to manage the ET presence.
When combined
with the blanket of secrecy that has prevented the US Congress and
the American public playing a meaningful role in the political
management of the ET presence, the current situation is a profound
problem for those truly committed to principles of democratic
governance and liberty in the US and elsewhere on the planet.
President Eisenhower demonstrated he became all too aware of
the true problem confronting the US as a nation in dealing with the
ET presence – a de facto political coup by interests closely allied
with Corporate America and the military-intelligence
communities.
It is time that the American public understood the true
nature of his warning and begin comprehensive political reforms to
address the threat to liberty Eisenhower was alluding to.
Back
to Contents
ENDNOTES
[1] I am
very grateful to Elizabeth O’Rourke for her editorial assistance and
suggestions in proof-reading and editing this Study.
[2] For more
discussion of such a political coup, see Steven Greer,
Extraterrestrial Contact: The Evidence and Implications (Crossing
Point Publications, 1999).
[3] An online copy
of Truman’s letter authorizing creation of Majestic 12 is available
HERE
[4] See Richard
Dolan, UFO’s and the National Security State: Chronology of a
Cover-up 1941-1973 (Hampton Roads, 2002) 1-3.
[5]
See “Quotations
from Chairman Wolf,”
http://www.drboylan.com/wolfqut2.html ; and
Dr Neruda, Interview #1
[6] See Jim Marrs,
Alien Agenda: Investigating the Extraterrestrial Presence Among Us
(HarperPaperbacks, 1997) 92-95; and Richard Dolan, UFO’s and the
National Security State, 5-6.
[7] See Stewart
Swerdlow, Montauk: The Alien Connection (Expansions Publishing Co.
2002); Preston Nichols & Peter Moon, Montauk Revisited: Adventures
in Synchronicity (Sky Books, 1991); Wade Gordon, The Brookhaven
Connection (Sky Books, 2001).
[8] An online copy
of Truman’s letter is available
HERE
[9] This report can
be found in Robert and Ryan Wood, The MJ-12Documents Book. The
Report and book available online at
http://www.majesticdocuments.com/products.html
[10] See Dolan,
UFOs and the National Security State, 16-35; and Marrs, Alien
Agenda, 132-49.
[11] See Kevin
Randle and Donald Schmitt, The Truth About the UFO Crash at Roswell
(Avon Books, 1994) Phillip
[12] For
extensive discussion of these projects and their policy
implications, see Dolan, UFOs and the National Security State.
[13] See Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 198-99.
[14] For
discussion of events surrounding Forrestal’s ‘breakdown’ and
‘suicide’ see Dolan, UFO’s and the National Security State, 70-76.
[15]
See,
“Testimony of Master Sergent, Dan Morris,” Disclosure, ed., Greer,
359; and Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse, 198-99.
[16] See Marrs,
Rule By Secrecy, 46.
[17] For
discussion of the Rockefeller’s support for liberal
internationalism, see Will Banyan, “Rockefeller Internationalism”,
Nexus Magazine, May-June 2003, 19-22, 74. Nexus Magazine’s homepage
is
http://www.nexusmagazine.com
[18] See Corso,
The Day After Roswell. See also a number of whistleblowers
testimonies on top secret corporate military projects focused on
reverse engineering ET technology in Greer, Disclosure.
[19] See Banyan,
“Rockefeller Internationalism”, Nexus Magazine, 22; and Jim Marrs,
Rule By Secrecy (Harper Collins, 2000) 31-38.
[20] Marrs, Rule
by Secrecy, 36.
[21] See Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 207-10. See also Michael Wolfe, Catchers of
Heaven: A Trilogy (Dorrance Publishing Co., 1996).
[22] Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 209-210. Another source for Kissinger’s
leadership position is former Air force Colonel Steve Wilson who
described Kissinger as the overseer of MJ12/PI-40. See online
interview with Dr Richard Boylan, at
http://www.drboylan.com/mj12org2.html
[23] Behold a
Pale Horse, 210.
[24] For this
reason, William Cooper claims that in the documents he witnessed,
this body was called Majority 12. Behold a Pale Horse, 208
[25] Cooper,
Beyond a Pale Horse, 208-10. For Hoover’s knowledge of ETs/UFO’s,
see Marrs, Alien Agenda, 180-81.
[26] Eisenhower
Presidential Departure Speech, January 1961.
[27] Stephen
Greer is a leading advocate of the view that the lack of
congressional/executive oversight of clandestine military projects
and decision making processes, is evidence that a silent coup has
occurred. See Greer, Extraterrestrial Contact.
[28]
Quoted in
“Testimony of Brigadier General Steven Lovekin,” in Disclosure, ed.
Greer, 235.
[29] Available
online at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/johnf.htm
[31] Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 215. For further references to Kennedy’s
ultimatum and documentary sources supporting that this had indeed
occurred: see Linda Moulton Howe, JFK, MJ-12 and Outer Space,
Available online at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/kennedy&1.htm
[32] One of the
strongest advocates for such a view is Cooper, Behold a Pale Horse,
215-20. For similar views from government/military insiders, see
Linda Moulton Howe, JFK, MJ-12 and Outer Space, Available online at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/kennedy&1.htm
[33] For
whistleblower testimony from a military contractor on the loss of
executive oversight, see “Testimony of A.H. Boeing Aerospace,”
Disclosure, ed. Greer, 401.
[34]
See
“President Lyndon Johnson, 1963-69” at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/presiden2.htm
[35] For Steven
Greer’s description of various administrations not having this
information, see Extaterrestrial Contact.
[36]
Corso, The
Day After After Roswell, 290. See also, “Testimony of Master
Sergeant Dan Morris, US Airforce,” in Disclosure, ed., Stephen
Greer, 358.
[37]
As mentioned
earlier, Cooper believes Kissinger was one of the two directors of
PI-40. Behold A Pale Horse, 210.
[38] See Richard Dolan, UFO’s
and the National Security State, 4-15. Marrs, Alien Agenda, 98-107.
[39]
See Dolan,
UFO’s and the National Security State, 4-15. See also “Testimony of
Master Sergeant Dan Morris,” Disclosure, ed., Greer, 363.
[40] For a brief
biographical summary of Kissinger, see Seymour Hersh, The Price of
Power: Kissinger in the Nixon Whitehouse (Summit Books, 1983) 25-27
[41] For evidence
of the relationship between the Army’s Counterintelligence Corp and
the ET presence, see the following declassified report from 22 July
1947 concerning the Roswell incident
HERE
[42] See Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 207.
[43] See Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 202-04; Richard Boylan, “Official Within MJ-12
UFO-Secrecy Management Group Reveals Insider Secrets,”
http://www.drboylan.com/wolfdoc2.html
; Phil Schneider, MUFON Conference Presentation, 1995, available online at:
http://www.ufocoverup-conspiracy.com/20.htm ; See
Dr Neruda, Interview #1 ; Boylan gives a more extensive coverage
of events surrounding the Treaty signing in “Extraterrestrial Base
On Earth, Sanctioned By Officials Since 1954,”
http://drboylan.com/basespst2.html
; See also Corso,
The
Day After Roswell, 292
[44] See Testimony
of A.H. Boeing Aerospace, Disclosure, Greer, 400; Cooper, Behold a
Pale Horse, 210.
[45] See
Testimony of A.H. Boeing Aerospace, Disclosure, Greer, 400; Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 210.
[46]
See Phillip
Corso, The Day After Roswell, 287-95.
[47] Cooper,
Behold a Pale Horse, 210.
[48] See Seymour
Hersh, The Price of Power, 18.
[49]
For
discussion of the Secret Studies Group, see Richard Boyland
http://www.drboylan.com
[50] Seymour M.
Hersh, The Price of Power.
[51] See Hersh,
The Price of Power, 32-34.
[52] Hersh, The
Price of Power, 36.
[53] According to
former Col Steve Wilson, Kissinger was the overseer of MJ-12/PI-40.
See online interview with Dr Richard Boylan, at
http://www.drboylan.com/mj12org2.html
[54] For
Kissinger’s fondness of Bismark and realpolitik, see Kissinger,
Diplomacy (Simon and Shuster, 1994). See also Kissinger, Does
America Need a Foreign Policy: Toward a Diplomacy for the 21st
Century (Touchstone, 2002).
[55] Both
Kissinger and Bismark admired the work of the Renaissance scholar,
Nicholo Machiavelli who espoused this view concerning morality in
his famous work, The Prince.
[56] For a copy
of Carter’s report, see Greer, ed., Disclosure, 448-50.
[57] See
“Testimony of A.H. Boeing Aerospace,” in Disclosure, ed. Greer,
400-01; and “Testimony of Mr John Maynard, (ret) Defense
Intelligence Agency,” in Disclosure, ed. Greer 426; and “Testimony
of Phillip Corso, Jr.,” in Disclosure, ed. Greer, 469.
[58] See
“Testimony of Dr Alfred Webre, Senior Policy Analyst,” in
Disclosure, ed. Greer, 441-44
[59] See Study
Paper #2
[60] For
references to Reagan’s anti-ET rhetoric, see “Ronald Reagan, 40th
President, January 20, 1981-January 20, 1989.” Online article at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm
[61] See “Ronald
Reagan, 40th President, January 20, 1981-January 20, 1989.” Online
article at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm
[62]
For
discussion of ET infiltration of clandestine organizations, see
Michael Salla, “Responding to Extraterrestrial Infiltration of
Clandestine Organizations Embedded in Military, Intelligence and
Government Departments,
Study
Paper 4” May 31, 2003.
[63] For a
revealing insight into the rigidity he adopted in his thinking, see
his response to a CIA briefing on the Palestinian issue when he was
President-elect. “Ronald Reagan, 40th President, January 20,
1981-January 20, 1989.” Online article at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm
[64] “Ronald
Reagan, 40th President, January 20, 1981-January 20, 1989.” Online
article at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm
[65] See “Ronald
Reagan, 40th President, January 20, 1981-January 20, 1989.” Online
article at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm
[66] “Ronald
Reagan, 40th President, January 20, 1981-January 20, 1989.” Online
article at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm
[67] “Ronald
Reagan, 40th President, January 20, 1981-January 20, 1989.” Online
article at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/reagan_ufo_story.htm
[68] Corso, The
Day After Roswell, 291-93.
[69] See Glenn
Krawczyk, “Mind Control and the New World Order,” Nexus Magazine
(Feb/March 1993) excerpts available online at:
http://www.projectfreedom.cng1.com/mc_nwo.html
[70] See Webster
G. Tarpley & Anton Chaitkin,
George Bush: The
Unauthorized Biography
[71] For analysis
of factors for why the Cold War ended, see Ralph Summy and Michael
Salla, ed., Why the Cold War Ended (Greenwood Press, 1995)
[72] This
certainly is Stephen Greer’s view after interviewing/briefing
various senior officials in the Clinton administration.
Extraterrestrial Contact.
[73] Dr. Steven
Greer Interview with Art Bell August 30, 2001, available online at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/part5.htm
[74] Available
online at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/part5.htm
[75] “Remarks by
the President and the First Lady at a the Lighting of the City
Christmas Tree,” Belfast City Hall, Belfast, Northern Ireland,
November 1995. Published online at:
http://www.presidentialufo.com/part8.htm
[76] For transcript of a CNN interview
where Bush acknowledges Cheney’s expertise on the ET/UFO issue, go
to:
http://www.rense.com/general3/ufobush.htm
[77] Michael Wolf discusses the
influence of such a cabal in Catchers of Heaven, 382-83; see also
his interview with Richard Boylan,
http://www.drboylan.com/wlflk2a.html
[78] See Zecharia Sitchin, The 12th
Planet (Avon Books, 1976)
[79] See Michael Salla, “America’s
Triumph & Europe’s Angst - The Secret Race to Control Iraq’s ET
Technology,” Study
Paper #2
[80] Kissinger “Calls for Policy
Outline,” ABC News, Australia, August 13, 2002; "click"
HERE
[81] See Brent Scowcroft, “Don't Attack
Saddam: It would undermine our antiterror efforts.” Wall Street
Journal, August 15, 2002 ; "click"
HERE
[82] President George Bush, “Address to
the United Nations General Assembly,” New York, NY September 12,
2002. "click"
HERE
[83] See “Transatlantic anger” Daily
Telegraph, 11/02/2003, "click"
HERE
[84] See “Testimony of A.H. Boeing
Aerospace,” Disclosure, 401.
Back
to Contents |