Christ Conspiracy - The Greatest Story Ever Sold"
In creating their state religion, the Christian conspirators not
only founded the world’s greatest forgery mill but also went on a
censorship rampage that silenced millions of dissident voices by
murder and destroyed books, temples, statues, inscriptions and other
traces of the previous cultures, eventually leading to immense
ignorance and the virtual illiteracy of the Western world.
To get rid of the damning fact that there is no historical basis for
their theological fictions, the Christian priesthood have been
guilty of the heinous crime of destroying nearly all traces of the
concurrent history of the first two centuries of the Christian era.
What little of it they have permitted to come down to us, they have
so altered and changed, as to destroy its historical value.
These censoring Christians were no doubt well aware what literacy
and books really represented, as the words “library” and “liberty”
share the same root, “liber,” the Latin word for “book.”
relates the Church’s modus operandi:
It was always important for religious authorities to control
literature, and to gain the legal right to destroy books that
contradicted their own teachings. Few people were so assiduous in
this endeavor as Christians. In the third to sixth centuries, whole
libraries were burned, schools and universities destroyed and
citizens’ books confiscated throughout the Roman world, on the
pretext of defending the church against paganism.
Under the early
Christian emperors, people were framed by ecclesiastical
investigators who planted “magical writings” in their houses, then
legally confiscated all possessions.
Council of Nicea, per the murderous Constantine’s orders,
the Christians turned up the heat on censorship, leading to the
centuries-long orgy that obliterated millions of texts.
One of the
greatest crimes in human history was the destruction in 391 of the
library at Alexandria perpetrated by Christian fanatics under Theophilus bent on hiding the truth about their religion and its
alleged founder. Because of this villainy, we have lost priceless
information as to the true state of the ancient world, with such
desolation also setting back civilization at least 1,000 years.
portion of the Alexandrian library placed in the Temple of Serapis
“as this very valuable library was
by the Christian Theophilus, and on the spot where this beautiful
temple of Serapis stood, in fact, on its very foundation, was
erected a church in honor of the ‘noble army of martyrs,’ who never
Of this nefarious demolition of the Serapion,
Will any Catholic or Protestant prelate, priest or clergyman tell us
why the Christian emperor, Theodosius the First, should have ordered
the destruction of the Serapeum Library of Alexandria, if not to
destroy the evidence it contained of the spurious nature of the
Christian religion and its heathen philosophical origin?
Some decades later, the Christian patriarch of Alexandria,
instigated mobs to terrorize Jews and to hideously torture and
murder the exalted female Pagan philosopher Hypatia (c. 370415) by
scraping the flesh from her bones with oyster shells.
For his evil
acts, Cyril was later canonized by the “infallible” Church. Hypatia
was so esteemed and renowned for her wisdom and brilliance that her
murder has been considered the “death of the Pagan world.”
The destruction did not end there, however, as the ruination of
literacy and history became an all-consuming Christian pursuit.
“By the fifth century the destruction was so complete
Archbishop Chrystostom could boast of it thus: ‘Every trace of the
old philosophy and literature of the ancient world has vanished from
the face of the earth.’”
At some point, a death penalty was enacted for reading unapproved
books, e.g., those that demonstrated the faith was a sham. Pope
after pope continued the assault on books and learning.
Bishop of Constantinople (@ 540604), the last of the “doctors” of
the Church, actively engaged in book-burning. In the 11th century,
“Saint” Gregory had the Library of Palatine Apollo burned, and the
Council of Trent (154563) reconfirmed the policy against “heathen”
Where the Christians did not destroy the works of the ancient
authors, they corrupted and mutilated them. Indeed, in order to
preserve their texts from these violent hands, the Gnostics
themselves were compelled to Christianize them, such that they also
had to historicize their mythical characters. So extensive
was this practice of fraud that evidently no ancient author’s work
maintains its original integrity.
Walker elaborates upon the
extent of the fraud:
After burning books and closing pagan schools, the church dealt in
another kind of forgery: falsification by omission. All European
history was extensively edited by a church that managed to make
itself the sole repository of literary and historical records. With
all important documents assembled in the monasteries, and the lay
public rendered illiterate, Christian history could be forged with
As stated, in addition to destroying and mutilating books, the
Christians demolished and desecrated the temples, statues and sacred
sites of their predecessors and competitors. The erection of
Christian churches on the ruins of pagan temples and sacred sites
was not only common but de rigor, serving to obliterate the
evidence of the previous deity and worship.
Walker relates the
typical procedure used by Christians to usurp Pagan sacred sites:
After temples were destroyed, monks and hermits were settled in the
ruins to defile the site with their excrement, and to prevent
Such were the efforts the “classy” Christians had to make for
centuries to cement their fictions. The devastation of art and
culture was appalling, yet some of the despoilers’ efforts assisted
in preserving evidence of the fraud:
In some of the ancient Egyptian temples the Christian iconoclasts,
when tired of hacking and hewing at the symbolic figures incised in
the chambers of imagery, and defacing the most prominent features of
the monuments, found they could not dig out the hieroglyphics, and
took to covering them over with plaster; and this plaster, intended
to hide the meaning and stop the mouth of the stone word, has served
to preserve the ancient writings as fresh in hue and sharp in
outline as when they were first cut and colored.
In a similar manner
the temple of ancient religion was invaded and possession gradually
gained by connivance of Roman power; and that enduring fortress, not
built but quarried out of sold rock, was stuccoed all over the front
and made white awhile with its look of brand-newness, and reopened
under the sign of another name - that of the carnalized Christ.
Thus, these hieroglyphs have revealed the truth, because they
contain the celestial mythos and ritual, and demonstrate that the
Christian story is in large part Egyptian.
In addition to this odious Christian behavior was
the most ghastly period in all of human history, in which millions
were tortured and murdered over centuries so that they or their
descendants would conform to the dogma of
the Catholic Church.
During those many centuries, no dissenter was allowed to flourish
and few to live at all. Anyone who dared to question the fairytales
now being forced upon them - in other words, all the honest
people - were forced to convert or die. Either way, the people would
then become fiscally beneficial to the greedy, deceitful Church, by
serving as slaves, tithing or forfeiting their assets through death,
natural or otherwise.
Of this endless destruction, Doane remarks:
Besides forging, lying, and deceiving for the cause of Christ, the
Christian Fathers destroyed all evidence against themselves and
their religion, which they came across. Christian divines seem to
have always been afraid of too much light.
Fortunately, they will not be able to escape the light today, as it
is too bright.
As Higgins says:
Notwithstanding the strenuous exertions of the priests, for the last
two thousand years, to eradicate every trace of the means by which
their various doctrines, rites, and ceremonies have been
established; yet they have not entirely succeeded.
In fact, a number of important texts fortunately survived the purges
intact enough to trace how Christianity was created and shaped.
these various surviving texts, as well as other archaeological
evidence already examined, can be illustrated the development of
Christianity as outlined herein. To recap, the early contributors to
the Christian version of the ubiquitous celestial mythos were the
Syrian Gnostics, who were attempting to create a syncretistic
religion that would encompass the wide variety of cultures from
around the “known world.”
By the end of the first century CE, at
Antioch, for one, the Gnostics were already involved in committing
to writing the various sayings and deeds of the characters of the
celestial mythos and savior cult that had been transmitted orally
within the brotherhood for millennia.
Eventually, as Doresse says,
“In the time of Hadrian (A.D. 11038), Gnosticism passes over from
Syria into Egypt...”
Meanwhile, in Palestine, possibly emanating out of Galilee and/or
the ancient monastery on Carmel, with an outpost at Qumran, the
Jewish/Samaritan priesthood of Masons and astrologers, the Zadokites/Sadducees,
had been anticipating the Great Year’s end and agitating that they
were the Elect, the inheritors of “the Lord’s” kingdom on Earth,
which would be brought about by a “wondrous child” and “restorer.”
After the destruction of Palestine, this group and others dispersed
into various other brotherhood branches, including those at Antioch
and Alexandria. The new influx reignited the centuries-old
internecine struggle for supremacy over each other and the Gentiles.
Thus began the conspiracy to set the ubiquitous solar hero sayings
and narratives in Judea, with Jews as both protagonists and
In the middle of the 2nd century, the original Gnostic schools began
to dissent from the Judaizing and historicizing activity, objecting
that their original work was not meant to be taken literally.
end of the 2nd century, the historicizing push increased with the
success of the Roman play for domination, and the canonical gospels
were completed somewhat, although they were continuously reworked to
agree at least superficially with other newly forged manuscripts.
This tinkering went on for centuries until relative uniformity was
achieved with dozens of councils as well. In fact, the mutilation
continues to this day in translations that obfuscate original
The aim of this priestcraft, of course, was to create a new god-man
that would not only roll into one all the others but also unite the lunistellar and solar cult priesthoods, as well as usher in the new
Thus, to the Krishna/Christos myth were added fish motifs
from the Osiris/Horus myth, as well as numerous other elements of
the Egyptian and other religions, such as the December 25th birth-date, which was established in the fourth century to usurp the
cult of Mithra.
So it went for centuries, as the fable was cobbled
together and the texts overhauled, with ongoing purges.
In this effort, the largely astrological and mythological works of
the eclectic Gnostics/Therapeuts were latched onto by historicizers
of the second, third and fourth centuries, including,
To the conspirators list can be added,
...the four “doctors,” so-called because they had
the highest degrees from the Therapeutan Alexandrian school.
villains in the mythmaking included,
Pope Innocent II created
the Council of Basel (143-149), in large part in order to call for book-burning.
The first archbishop of York, Paulinus (d. 645),
purportedly tampered with scriptures from Armenia and Upper Egypt
newly discovered in his time. We can be certain that there are many
others behind the scenes whose names have never made it into records
books - at least not overtly.
These individuals no doubt have been
extremely wealthy and powerful.
The Intertestamental Literature and Christian Apocrypha
As seen, the Dead Sea scrolls dating to the centuries before and
after the beginning of the Christian era survived unknown and
untouched by the forgers, and reveal the Palestinian contributors to
the Christian myth.
In addition to the Samaritan Gnostic Marcion’s
New Testament, other texts utilized by the Christian conspirators
included the intertestamental literature composed of the Jewish
Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha, as well as the Christian Apocrypha.
Many of these books were originally canonical but were later removed
and condemned, demonstrating how often “God’s infallible Word” has
A number of the Jewish Apocrypha, however, have been
retained in the Catholic Bible, but not in the Protestant texts,
illustrating that the latter is a corruption of the former and not a
“return to primitive Christianity.” Moreover, in the various texts
either removed or kept out of the biblical canon may be found more
truth about the origins of Christianity than in those made
As the editor of The Other Bible says:
Deprived of all scriptures between the Testaments, the common reader
is left with the impression that somehow Christianity sprang
self-generated like a divine entity, with no past, into its
Yet a reading of the texts between the
Testaments shows how major eschatological themes of the New
Testament - the appearance of the Son of Man, the imminence of the
End, the apocalyptic vision in the Book of Revelation, the notion of
salvation through the messiah - are all preoccupation of intertestamental literature.
Indeed, the self-generating impression is contrived to cover up the
ruse, yet there are enough of these ignored texts such that a
thorough exegesis could fill a volume in itself.
The Book of Enoch
Among these texts was “The Book of Enoch,” which was given
scriptural recognition in the New Testament Letter of Jude and which
was in the Christian canon for 500 years.
Copies of Enoch were found at the Dead Sea,
demonstrating that the scrolls were not the writings of an isolated
sect and that the Sadducean originators of Christianity used Enoch,
which contained much of the story of “Jesus Christ” and which
predated the alleged advent of the Jewish godman by centuries.
this book Wheless says:
The Book of Enoch, forged in the name of the grandson of Adam, is
remains of a whole literature which circulated under the pretended
authorship of that mythical Patriarch.... This work is a
composite of at least five unknown Jewish writers, and was composed
during the last two centuries B.C...
In this Book we first find
the lofty titles: “Christ” or “the Anointed One,” “Son of Man,” “the
Righteous One,” “the Elect One,” - all of which were boldly
plagiarized by the later Christians and bestowed upon Jesus of
[The Book] abounds in such “Christian” doctrines as
the Messianic Kingdom, Hell, the Resurrection, and Demonology, the
Seven Heavens, and the Millennium, all of which have here their
apocryphal Jewish promulgation, after being plagiarized bodily from
the Persian and Babylonian myths and superstitions, as we have seen
There are numerous quotations, phrases, clauses, or
thoughts derived from Enoch, or of closest of kin with it, in
several of the New Testament Gospels and Epistles...
And Carpenter states:
In The Book of Enoch, written not later than B.C. 170, the
spoken of as already existing in heaven, and about to come as Judge
of all men, and is definitely called “the Son of Man.” The Book of
Revelations is full of passages from Enoch; so are the Epistles of
Paul; so too are the Gospels.
The Book of Enoch relates that the messiah will come and establish
“The Chosen One will have the sinners destroyed.”
judgment day, Wells
Enoch’s picture of the final
judgment is strikingly paralleled at
Matthew 25:3146. Enoch says that “the Lord of Spirits seated the
Elect One on the throne of his glory”; Matthew reads: “When the Son
of man shall come in his glory... then shall he sit on the throne
of his glory.” Both writers go on to describe how the righteous are
vindicated while the rest are banished to flame and torment.
Enoch, of course, is not a historical character but is part of the
As Massey says,
“In the Book of Enoch one form of the
Messiah is the ‘Son of Woman’; this was Enoch or Enos, the Egyptian
Sut-Anush [Set], who had been twin with Horus but was superseded by
Then came Enoch, or Anûsh, words which mean knowledge; he was known
as Uranous, and, according to a Hebrew manuscript, as Hermes, the
inventor of astronomy, mathematics, and of divine worship. Aonac, an
Irish word (pronounced Enoch), signifies a cycle of the sun. He was
also known as Atlas, whence Atlantis, of which country he was the
Supreme Pontiff. His symbol was the Bull, emblematic of the shepherd
In actuality, the bull was the emblem of
the Taurean age, which
would mean that the book reflects a tradition 4,000 or more years
old. The book is in fact highly astrological, as is to be expected
since it contains the mythos.
Regarding the Book of Enoch, Higgins
Here are all the leading doctrines which I have been contending for
The residence or birthplace of the theology,
Upper India; the signs of the Zodiac; the change of the Equinox from
Taurus to Aries;... the Hindoo Trinity, than which nothing can be
more clear... and a history similar to the Jewish, but not copied
from it; the prophecy of an elect one as described by all the
prophets, including the prophecy of Virgil, and the elect one put to
death, noticed by me in the cases of Buddha, Cristna, and him of the
Apollo of Miletus...
It has been the subject of this work
to show that an universal system extended over the whole of the
old world; and the principal facts for which I have contended
are supported by this curious and unquestionably genuine
Higgins avers that, based on the astrology, Enoch reflects it was
composed around 2400 BCE in the latitude of Northern India.
Another pseudepigraphic writing attributed to Enoch is the
the Secrets of Enoch, one of the “366 books” allegedly written by
him, a number symbolic for the 365+ days of the year. As in the OT,
in the Secrets it was said that Enoch lived to be 365 “years”; in
other words, he is the sun, and his “life” is the length of a year.
In the Secrets, Enoch continues the solar imagery when he describes
how the “angels,” or angles of the zodiac,
“bore me away to the
east, and placed me at the sun’s gates, where the sun goes forth
according to the regulation of the seasons and the circuit of the
months of the whole year, and the number of the hours of day and night.”
This Enochian text is thus astrotheological, no doubt
the reason it was eventually considered “apocryphal.”
The Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs
Although they are purported to be the products of the mythical “sons
of Jacob,” the Jewish Pseudepigrapha “The Testaments of the Twelve
Patriarchs” were written likely between 137 to 107 BCE.
Testaments, the editor of
The Forgotten Books of Eden says:
When you look beyond the unvarnished - almost brutally frank - passages
of the text, you will discern a remarkable attestation of the
expectations of the Messiah which existed a hundred years before
Christ.... The instances of the influence of these writings on
the New Testament are notable in the Sermon on the Mount which
reflects the spirit and even uses phrases from these Testaments. St.
Paul appears to have borrowed so freely that it seems as though he
must have carried a copy of the Testaments with him on his travels.
Dead Sea scrolls, these texts contain the blueprint for
Christianity; however, some of them have been interpolated by
conspiring Christians to give a semblance of “prophecy” of their
As Barnstone says,
“Indeed, because of the
messianic nature of Jewish Pseudepigrapha, they were favorite
readings of the early Christians and many of them were altered and
‘Christianized,’ falsified if you will, to make them reveal
In their cunning priestcraft, the
mutilating Christians later accused the Jews of removing material
from the originals. Nevertheless, some of the Christian-like passages
are apparently genuine, such that they constitute proof that the
forgers of Christianity were of the same school as the Testaments
writers and used their texts.
These testaments were written and/or interpolated for the express
raising the Semites over the other “sons of Noah”
uniting the tribes of Levi and Judah as the rulers over other
Israelites and over the Gentiles
laying the foundation for
the coming king, who, in anticipation of the destruction of
Jerusalem/Judea, was to be made into a spiritual “son of God” as
The Testament of Simeon, for example, seeks to raise the Semites, or
“sons of Shem,” over the Japhethites and Hamites.
This book states:
“Then the Mighty One of Israel shall glorify Shem. For the Lord
shall appear on earth, and Himself save men.”
Thus, the Semites will
subjugate all other races and God Himself will incarnate ostensibly
as a Semite, according to the latter sentence, which is a Christian
As such, the Semitic godman will represent the tribes
of Levi and Judah over the other Israelites, and provide salvation
for all the nations, as Simeon also says:
And now, my children, obey Levi and Judah, and be not lifted up
against these two tribes, for from them shall arise unto you the
salvation of God. For the Lord shall raise up from Levi as it were a
High Priest, and from Judah as it were a King, God and man, He shall
save all the Gentiles and the race of Israel.
In this union of Levi and Judah is the spiritual “savior” plus the
temporal “messiah,” which is equivalent to “Jesus the Christ.”
Furthermore, in the Testament of Levi, which was purportedly written
between 109-107 BCE, appears this stunning blueprint for
And behold I am clear from your ungodliness and transgression, which
ye shall commit in the end of the ages against the Savior of the
World, Christ, acting godlessly, deceiving Israel, and stirring up
against it great evils from the Lord. And ye shall deal lawlessly
together with Israel, so He shall not bear with Jerusalem because of
your wickedness; but the veil of the temple shall be rent, so as not
to cover your shame.
And ye shall be scattered as captives among the
Gentiles, and shall be for a reproach and for a curse there. For the
house which the Lord shall choose shall be called Jerusalem, as is
contained in the book of Enoch the righteous.
If this passage is not a shameless Christian interpolation, forged
after the fall of Jerusalem, it is quite obviously a seed from which
the Christ myth sprouted. It also verifies the importance of the
Book of Enoch.
The Jewish Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha provide a connection between
not only Judaism and orthodox Christianity but also Judaism and
Gnosticism, evidenced in such texts as the Wisdom of Solomon, the
Haggadah, and the Wisdom of Jesus.
The Wisdom of Jesus, Son of Sirach, or Ecclesiasticus
For obvious reasons, the title of the preChristian “Wisdom of Jesus”
is often represented without the “Jesus,” as “Wisdom of Sirach” or “Ecclesiasticus.”
Purportedly written around 180 BCE by “Jesus” and translated into
Greek by his grandson “Jesus,” the text evidently represents the
lineage of the preChristian Joshua/Jesus cultists.
The Wisdom of Jesus contains hundreds of wisdom sayings, including Old Testament
aphorisms such as,
“To fear the Lord is the source of wisdom.”
as in Gnosticism, wisdom is identified as a female entity (Hokmah/
Sophia). This lengthy book also contains several New Testament
Sayings of Jesus, or Logia Iesou, and is without a doubt Therapeutan,
in that it prescribes the putting of oneself in the hands of a
spiritual physician in order to “cleanse one’s heart from sin.”
the gospel Jesus, the preChristian or Wisdom Jesus exhorts “faith
and meekness” to win the approval of the Lord, excoriates hypocrites
and admonishes his followers not to exalt themselves.
The preChristian Jesus also exhorts his would-be servants of
the Lord to,
“prepare yourself to be tried. Set your heart right and be firm... hold fast to him, and do not forsake him, so that you may be
honored when your life ends,” exactly as the followers of the gospel
Jesus were told to be as “martyrs for the faith.”
Like the gospel
Jesus, who entreats his followers to give away their belongings, the
Wisdom Jesus says, “So charity will atone for sin” and urges his
followers to do good works for those less fortunate, so that they
may become like “sons of the Most High” (El Elyon).
The Wisdom Jesus
is also very similar to Paul in his sexist attitudes, saying, “A
silent wife is a gift from the Lord,” among other noxious and
repressive comments. In this large collection may basically be
discovered a significant portion of the wisdom sayings attributed to
the gospel Jesus and his cohorts.
Of the Wisdom of Jesus, Massey
... the Book of Ecclesiasticus contains the logia of a
Here are two of his sayings:
neighbor the hurt that he hath done unto thee, so shall thy sins
also be forgiven when thou prayest.”
“Lay up thy treasures according
to the commandments of the Most High, and it shall bring thee more
profit than gold.”
These are assigned to the Jesus of Matthew’s
Furthermore, the preChristian Jesus, like the gospel Jesus, calls
God “Father” and says:
He created me from the beginning before the world, and I shall never
fail.... They that eat me shall yet be hungry, and they that
drink me shall yet be thirsty. He that obeyeth me shall never be
confounded, and they that work by me shall not do amiss.
Obviously, either this text is interpolated, which would yet again
demonstrate Christian fraud, or it serves as proof of the
preChristian Jesus, eucharist and all.
Many of the exhortations in this book are for initiates into the
brotherhood and are Buddhistic/Gymnosophic in nature.
In fact, the
Wisdom Jesus reveals his solar cult affiliation with his long homage
to the sun, in which he states that the sun “has not permitted the
saints of the Lord to recount all his wonders,” i.e., to record in
writing the mysteries of the solar mythos:
The light-giving sun looks down on everything, and his work is full
of the glory of the Lord. He has not permitted the saints of the
Lord to recount all his wonders, which the Lord, the Almighty, has
firmly established, so that the universe might stand fast through
his glory.... The glory of the height is the firmament in its
purity; The sight of the heavens with the spectacle of their
The sun, when he appears, making proclamation as he goes
forth, is a wonderful instrument, the work of the Most High; at
noonday he dries up the country, and who can withstand his burning
heat?... He breathes out fiery vapors, and shoots forth his
beams, blinding men’s eyes. (42:1643:5)
In fact, the Wisdom Jesus’s paean to the sun is about as close to
Pagan sunworshipping as it gets.
Moreover, these sayings constitute
one of several places where the preChristian Jesus exalts the sun,
moon and stars and displays astrological/astro-theological
The Teachings of the Twelve Apostles, or The Didache
The early Christian apocryphon “The Teachings of the Twelve
Apostles,” also called the “Didache,” was utilized in the
manufacture of the canonical gospels.
ben Yehoshua states it was
based on writings concerning the “12 tribes,” and Larson say it
combines the Logia Iesou, or Sayings, with the Manual of Discipline
found at the Dead Sea.
The Didache does not contain a narrative but
provides explanation and instructions concerning baptism, the
eucharist, tribulation and parousia, or arrival of “the Lord in the
The Gospel of the Hebrews and Syrians
Dating to around 115125 CE, the
Gospel of the Hebrews was reputedly
used first and almost exclusively by the early Jewish-Christian
church, and was also called by Eusebius the “Gospel according to the
Hebrews and Syrians,”
“by which he meant it was used by the Jews in
Syria, as elsewhere,” a view confirmed by Jerome, who also affirmed
that, “the Gospel of the Hebrews was written ‘in the Chaldee and
Syriac languages.’ It appears it was used by the Nazarenes residing
in Berea, Syria...”
The Gospel of Hebrews was sometimes
confused with the Gospel of Matthew, possibly because it represented
the Egyptian “Oracles of TahtMatiu.”
The Gospel of the Hebrews
contained the “Logia Iesou” or Sayings of Jesus and was
non-historicizing, containing no immaculate conception, genealogy
“from Abraham to Christ” or childhood history.
The Gospel of the Egyptians or Diegesis
Another text utilized in the creation of Christianity was the
“Gospel of the Egyptians,” which predated the canonical gospels and
was written by the Therapeuts.
Of the Gospel of the Egyptians, Waite says:
The original of this gospel may have been in use among the
Therapeutae of Egypt, a long time before the introduction of
Christianity, the passages related to Christ being afterward added.
Or it may have been written in another country, and brought into
Egypt, with the Christian religion. In either case it may be dated
as early as A.D. 110 to 115...
The story of Joseph and Mary
appears not to have been known when this gospel was written. Neither
is any thing said, so far as we have information of its contents, of
the miracles of Christ, or of the material resurrection.
Taylor states that the “narrative” mentioned by Luke, i.e., the
Diegesis, was the Gospel of the Egyptians:
The first draft of the mystical adventures of Chrishna, as brought
from India into Egypt, was the Diegesis; the first version of the
Diegesis was the Gospel according to the Egyptians; the first
renderings out of the language of Egypt into that of Greece, for the
purpose of imposing on the nations of Europe, were the apocryphal
gospels; the correct, castigated, and authorized versions of these
apocryphal compilations were the gospels of our four evangelists.
The Gospel of Truth, the Gospel of Thomas and the Acts of Thomas
In addition, a number of the Gnostic gospels barely mention “Jesus”
or “Christ,” referring instead to the abstract “Savior,” such as the
Gospel of Truth (150 CE) and the Gospel of Thomas, which was
composed primarily of the Logia Iesou and written in Aramaic/Syriac,
representing the Tammuz faction.
Furthermore, the apocryphal Acts of
Thomas were likely forged to explain how the “Christians of St.
Thomas” ended up in India; however, as demonstrated, these
“Christians” were Tammuz followers already in India possibly
millennia before the Christian era.
The Protevangelion, or Book of James
Used by the forgers of Matthew and Luke, the Protevangelion is one
of the oldest Judaized narratives, written by a Hellenic Jew around
The text was originally Indian and Egyptian, with the
myth of IsisMari and Seb becoming Mary and Joseph, and was somewhat
“historicized” with the mythical persecution by Herod, who is made
to take the role of both the Indian Kansa and the Egyptian SetTyphon.
Furthermore, into the portions of the Protevangelion used by the
evangelists were interpolated phrases to “fulfill prophecy”: For
example, the verses at Matthew 1:22-23 about the “virgin” conceiving
and bearing a son called Emmanuel are not found in the earlier Protevangelion.
Also missing is Luke 4:24:
“And he said, ‘Truly, I
say to you, no prophet is acceptable in his own country.’”
interpolation was made to make Jesus, the ubiquitous solar savior
and wisdom genius, appear to be a Jewish man.
The Gospel of the Infancy
Dating to around 120130, the Gospel of the Infancy was attributed by
Jerome to “Matthew” but was “received by the Gnostics,” thus not
The original Gospel of the Infancy was based on the
Hindu story of Krishna’s childhood, the Bhagavat Purana, apparently
procured from the Indian Nazarene brotherhood, with Zoroastrian
influence. This and other infancy gospels were used to construct the
brief gospel accounts of Jesus’s childhood.
One interesting phrase
may have been inserted as a clue to its allegorical nature, in a
passage (vi. 18) following a description of the infant Christ’s
miraculous healing powers:
“The people therefore said, ‘Without
doubt Joseph and Mary and that boy are Gods, for they do not look
This book is quite obviously fiction, such that it was not included
in the canon, snipped to reduce the roles of the gods Mary and
Also omitted are the tales depicting Jesus as a vicious boy
and frightening sorcerer who changes other boys into kids, i.e.,
baby goats, so he can be their “shepherd,” and strikes dead a Jewish
boy who destroyed the young “savior’s” fish pools because they had
been built on the sabbath.
The Gospel of Luke
We have already seen that the Gospel of Luke was based on Marcion’s
gospel, with interpolations to historicize and Judaize it.
addition, the entire story of Jesus’s entry into Jerusalem at Luke
19:2948 is missing from Marcion; as demonstrated, this story is a
part of the ancient mythos. The writers of Luke also interpolated
the Masonic phrases regarding Jesus being “the head cornerstone the
builders rejected” at 20:918, verses not found in Marcion.
Furthermore, a number of passages were added “to fulfill prophecy.”
Luke was not only interpolated but also expurgated to remove hints
of the brotherhood. For example, at Luke 24, the “two men in
dazzling apparel” were originally said to be "those in white
clothing," i.e., monks or priests of the solar cult, or "Brotherhood
of the Sun." (White
The Life of Apollonius
Accounts of the life of the Greek/Samaritan Nazarene/Therapeut/Gnostic
miracle-worker Apollonius (c. 2 BCEc 102 CE) purportedly existed
during the second century, prior to Philostratus’s composition in
210 at the request of Empress Julia Domna.
One or more of these
accounts was used in the creation of the New Testament narrative, as
alleged by a number of accusers, including Hierocles, the proconsul
under Diocletian (284305), who wrote the “Philalethes”
(303) exposing the Apollonius-Jesus connection.
It should be noted
that Philostratus’s account makes no mention of any Jesus Christ,
not even as a rival to Apollonius, who purportedly lived precisely
at the time alleged of Jesus.
Other texts originally non-Christian but later Christianized include
the Apocalypse of Adam and the Paraphrase of Shem, as well as the
Apocryphon of John, as Barnstone states:
The Apocryphon of John (here called The Secret Books of John) was
“originally composed as a nonChristian text” whose Christian thrust
was added by a later Christian editor.
The historicizers also used the works of
Josephus and the teachings
of the Gnostics Menander, Saturninus and Carpocrates, as well as
those of the Neoplatonist
Ammonius Saccas and others already
In this mythmaking effort and religious conspiracy, hundreds of new
texts were created, and these compositions produced turmoil among
the warring priesthoods. The books of the NT, in fact, reveal how
the warring factions developed and were counteracted. For example,
in the synoptic gospels is the synthesis between the solar gods of
the East and the West.
The Gospel of John was compiled to debunk the
second century Gnostics and to correct the errors of the other
gospels revealed by Pagan critics. The Epistles of John served to
excoriate those who claimed Christ never existed. In Acts, the
battle between Simon Peter and Simon Magus represents the break
between the Roman and Syrian Gnostic churches.
Indeed, the confusion
and fighting over Christ’s life and doctrine within the Church has
existed because the Christian plagiarists over the centuries were
attempting to amalgamate and fuse practically every myth, fairytale,
legend, doctrine or bit of wisdom they could pilfer from the
innumerable different mystery religions and philosophies that
existed at the time.
In doing so, they forged, interpolated,
mutilated, changed, and rewrote these texts for centuries.
Eusebius’s Dirty Work
Constantine, perhaps no single person had a greater hand in
creating Christianity than
Eusebius, who mutilated the New Testament
books and works of the earlier Christian founders in a number of
ways, including by allegedly inserting the newly coined phrase
“Jesus Christ,” as well as interpolating other instances of the
single titles of “Jesus” or “Christ.”
The question is, then, whether or not there are any genuine
autographs prior to the fourth century that contain the phrase
“Jesus Christ” or “Christ Jesus.”
In fact, in the canonical gospels,
the word Jesus appears hundreds of times and the word Christ dozens,
but the phrase Jesus Christ only five times altogether, twice in the
first chapter of Matthew, once in the first verse of Mark and twice
A favorite trick used to interpolate the newly created name
“Jesus Christ” was to tack it on at the beginning or end of a book
or chapter, as was done in the gospels. In this way, if the
interpolation was discovered by comparison with older versions
(which were generally destroyed after copying) or writings in which
the book had been quoted, it could be justified as a “copyist’s
note” to clarify the text.
It must be remembered that there were no
printing or copying machines, and all such reproduction was done by
hand, such that few copies were ever made of many manuscripts. Thus,
it would not be difficult to change text without discovery or
censure, particularly if one had the full weight of Rome behind
one’s endeavor to squash dissension or whistleblowers.
In addition, the Epistle of James makes no mention of any aspect of
Christ’s “life” or sayings and only mentions him by name at the
beginning of chapters 1 and 2. This text is older than the canonical
“history” or narrative and was written, for the most part, by an
One example of how language was changed and interpolated to create
references to “our Lord Jesus Christ” where there originally were
none is found in the First Epistle of Clement, allegedly an early
Christian text, but no doubt worked over by later forgers. In this
epistle we find the following phrase:
“This is the way, beloved, in
which we may find our Savior, even Jesus Christ the high-priest of
all our offerings...”
In the footnote we discover that “our
Savior” evidently was originally rendered,
“That which has the power
to save us,” an abstract concept, rather than a person.
The Epistle of Barnabas
The Epistle of Barnabas provides several examples of the mythmaking
obfuscation of texts. In the Latin version of Barnabas, for
instance, we find the obligatory “our Lord Jesus Christ”
interpolated at the beginning, yet in the
Codex Sinaiticus, there is
no such phrase. In this epistle, references to “Jesus” are in
reality to “Joshua,” the northern Israelite solar hero, also called
the “Son of God.”
The verse in Barnabas regarding the Lord
“delivering up” his body “to sanctify us by the remission of our
sins; which is effected by the sprinkling of His blood,” reflects
the old sacred king drama, as performed by followers of Joshua in
In Christian scriptures, it was always a challenge to
determine whether to translate “Joshua” as “Joshua” or “Jesus,” and
the identification between the two characters is clear, particularly
in this epistle.
For example, the following passage in the
Codex Sinaiticus version is translated thus:
Again, what has that other prophet, Moses, to say to them? Look,
this is what the Lord God says: Enter into the good land which the
Lord vowed he would give to Abraham and Isaac and Jacob... What
it is, in fact, saying is, “Put your hopes in that Joshua who shall
be shown to you in mortal guise.”
The Latin version is translated thus:
Moses also in like manner speaketh to them; Behold thus saith the
Lord God; Enter ye into the good land of which the Lord hath sworn
to Abraham, and Isaac, and Jacob... . It is as if it had been
said, Put your trust in Jesus, who shall be manifested to
you in the flesh.
The editor of the Sinaiticus epistle notes in reference to this
“Joshua, who led the Israelites into the
Promised Land, is a wellknown type of Jesus. In Hebrew the two names
are the same.”
Also, references in the Barnabas epistle to “God’s
Son” are to Adam, not Jesus, but this fact is conveniently
overlooked, with the excuse that Adam is also a “type of Jesus.”
As stated, the Epistle of Barnabas serves as an illustration of the
recurrent sacred king drama or “Passion” that preceded the Christian
Era, complete with reenactment of the “blood upon us” ritual using
scarlet wool on “wood,” or branches that were then “sprinkled” on
the faithful, a ritual also reflected in the canonical Letter to the
Hebrews, as well as at Numbers 19:210. The Epistle of Barnabas,
then, represented the Joshua cult, not the “historical” Jesus
Christ, and served as instructions into the age-sold mysteries.
initiate into those mysteries, Barnabas also admits that “IE,” the
designation of Apollo, is the same as “Jesus.”
Barnabas further demonstrates his affiliation with the northern
kingdom of Israel/Ephraim/Samaria when he mentions the story of
Jacob’s blessing of Joseph’s son Ephraim, raising him above
“So you can see who is meant by His decree
that ‘this People shall have the primacy, and inherit the
The Shepherd of Hermas
An even earlier example of how “Christian” texts originally had
nothing to do with “Jesus” or “Christ” is the non-canonical book “The
Shepherd of Hermas,” which was considered by Irenaeus and Origin to
be divinely inspired and which was widely read in churches.
the book was included in the New Testament until the fourth century
and deemed “apocryphal” thereafter.
Although the book is attributed to the “Hermas” who purportedly
flourished around 140 CE, it is certainly an older writing and was
asserted by Origen, Eusebius and Jerome to be the product of the
“Hermas” referred to in the Pauline Epistle to the Romans.
Encyclopedia Biblica places the book to around 40 CE, and Fox to 90
CE. In any case, the book contains numerous Masonic and astrological
references, indicating it was possibly a Hermetic writing of the
This lengthy text speaks many
times of “God,” “the Lord,” “the Holy Spirit” and “the Holy Church,”
as well a number of times about “the devil,” “salvation,” and “sin,”
but, in several dozen pages, makes no reference whatsoever to
“Jesus” or “Jesus Christ,” names no apostle, and makes only one
reference to Christians, an evident interpolation.
Only twice, at
the very end, is the word “Christ” used, also apparent
The book even refers to the “Son of God,” who was
the “rock” and “gate” - Masonic terms - but mentions no name. In fact,
there are few if any references to a “historical” life of Jesus and
no quotes from either the Old or New Testaments. In comparison, the
later Epistles of Ignatius, for example, make reference in nearly
every other sentence to “our Lord Jesus Christ.”
How Hermas escaped
massive Christian interpolation can only be explained by the fact
that it was so well known and publicly read in churches. Other
prominent Masonic symbols in the Shepherd are the tower and
vineyard, emblem of Carmel.
Why Place the Christian Myth at this Time
We have already seen reasons why the gospel tale was placed at the
time alleged, including that it was a period of tremendous unrest
and that the advent had to take place before Jerusalem’s
destruction, as asserted by Eusebius.
In dating the gospel tale, in
fact, Eusebius insists upon what should have been known, had it
Herod, as I have said, was the first foreigner to be entrusted by
the Roman senate and the Emperor Augustus with the Jewish nation. It
was without question in his time that the advent of Christ
This insistence is odd, because the gospel story was supposedly
written down long before the fourth century, when Eusebius wrote,
and the date of Christ’s advent should not have been a factor that
needed to be addressed. Furthermore, if it was “without question,”
why did Eusebius need to state it so definitively? As we have seen,
many people were questioning it.
Eusebius further explains that the gospel fable had to occur at that
particular time in order to fulfill the prophecy at Genesis 49:10:
“The scepter shall not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from
between his feet, until he comes to whom it belongs,” i.e.,
“Shiloh,” or the Messiah, who, according to the next passage, would
have garments washed in wine and eyes “red with wine.”
states that Herod was the “first foreigner to become king of the
Jewish nation,” thus fulfilling this prophecy and ending the rule of
Jewish leaders. This deposal, of course, spurred messianic fever,
since it meant “Shiloh” would come. In fact, Eusebius is applying
Jesus over the history of Herod, because, Herod himself was thought
to be the long-awaited Shiloh.
As Larson says,
“Galilee teemed with
fanatics, including Essenes, Pharisees, and Zealots, as well as
Herodians, who believed Herod was himself the Christ...”
Obviously, Herod was not the messiah, but the historicizers in
hindsight determined that Christ must appear to have come during his
rule. In fact, the Shiloh passage refers to no “prophecy” at all, as
Judah, the “lion’s whelp,” is in reality the constellation of Leo,
and the wine-drenched ruler to whom Judah passes his scepter is that
of Virgo, the time of the grape harvest.
Moreover, in attempting further to affix Christ’s advent to this
era, Eusebius later admits that there was a debate as to when it
What is the need of such debate and attestation if
the tale found in the gospel depicted real history? Why so much
confusion and murkiness, particularly after three centuries of
alleged continuous apostolic lineage? Had Eusebius, the keeper of
records, no testimonies of the many purported eyewitnesses who
surely would have repeatedly talked about Herod and Pilate’s
At the time of Eusebius, it was claimed that the
Church had immediately sprung up with established hierarchies, a
great deal of money and power, and a continuous lineage to his era,
yet the Church’s own historian evidently had no records at all
except for the gospels, which were not sufficient to demonstrate
when - and if - Christ’s advent occurred.
In his writings, Eusebius in
actuality was fulfilling his task of creating the bogus history not
only of Christ himself but of the Church.
As Walker says,
church never did have any continuous record of popes or ‘bishops of
Rome’ from the beginning; most of the early popes were fictitious.”
Regarding his forged history of the Church,
“As for men, I have failed to find any clear
footprints of those who have gone this way before me; only faint
traces, by which in differing fashions they have left us partial
accounts of their own life-times.”
Could there be any clearer
admission that there was no “apostolic lineage” representing a
Where the Bodies are Buried
We have already seen a tremendous amount of evidence as to the
mythological nature of Christianity and its founder.
may be found in a variety of places, although it may not be wise to
make them public, because fanatics have forever destroyed such
evidence, burning and looting temples and libraries, and desecrating
and defacing sacred images and symbols.
A number of these sites may
also have been destroyed in various wars, including the two World
Wars. In addition, some areas are so forbidding that it will even
today be difficult both to access them and to convince the keepers
of their secrets to release them. It is reported that priests, high-ranking Masons and members of other such brotherhoods are
informed about the real origins of Christianity but are sworn to a
blood oath against revealing the truth.
Perhaps some of these
individuals will be encouraged that others not thus bound are
exposing this all-important information.
The evidence of the Christian myth may still be found in libraries
in many parts of the world, clandestine and public, such as the
Library of Ambrose at Milan, the Florentine library, and the library
of Mt. Athos, the mysterious mountain of monasteries in Macedonia,
although it would be very difficult to gain the evidence from such a
place as Mt. Athos.
Oddly enough, considering Athos takes its name
from the Egyptian goddess Athor or Hathor, Mt. Athos has been
completely closed off to women for centuries. So terrified are these
sexually repressed monks of all that is female, they will not allow
even female animals in proximity of the monasteries.
It may also be difficult to obtain evidence from the Marionite
monastery of Mt. Lebanon in Syria, but we are told that it is, or
was, there. Such evidence in the form of texts may also be obtained,
we are informed, in monasteries in what was Armenia, in the locale
of Mt. Ararat. Evidence may also be procured from the “Cluny Abbey”
and from “Mor Gabriel” in Turkey.
The Vatican Library and the miles
of tunnels of booty under the Vatican, of course, also provide a
treasure trove of proof of the artifice. The churches of Russia
likewise hold ancient manuscripts that would be valuable in our
quest. Also, there may still be hidden texts in Jerusalem and other
parts of Israel and Palestine, such as Mt. Carmel.
Such evidence can also be discovered in the ruins and statuary of
preChristian cultures such as in Ireland, in the county of Armagh,
or at Padua, Florence, Venice, Geneva and Rome, where there are, or
were, statues of “the apostles” that were in reality Pagan gods made
Such archaeological evidence may likewise be found at
Heliopolis, the “City of the Sun,” in Egypt, and in the sunken
Phoenician city of Tyre, if it has not already been discovered and
hidden or destroyed. Proof of the mythos also may be found in Upper
Egypt, where arose one of the most ancient cultures and some of the
India, of course, is rife with the mythos, and
evidence of the life of Krishna/Christos can be found in the caves
at Elephanta, for example.
Regardless of whether or not this evidence is extant in these
places, there are many sites already well-known that provide proof of
the ubiquitous solar and celestial mythos that was carnalized,
historicized and personified in Jesus Christ. That the mythos once
extended around the world in much the same form is a fact that
cannot be disputed.
The answer is, of course, is has been obscured; it is not
gone but simply concealed beneath a surface of subterfuge and
deception developed to enrich and empower a relative handful
providing them with dominion over the “sheep.”
After becoming aware of such “mysteries” revealed herein concerning
Christianity and its alleged founder, many people may find the
scholarship on this subject to appear less than satisfactory, to say
the least, as it becomes clear that this information is known by the
This fact becomes evident from admissions such as
the following, which appears in Fiction as History by GW Bowersock,
a Professor of Ancient History at Princeton University in New
... in a series of Norton lectures, Frank Kermode also turned to
the Bible, and in particular to the New Testament, to develop a
sophisticated analysis of novelistic elements in the Gospels. He
argued that the problem of historical truth is so elusive in the
Gospel narratives that those accounts are better viewed simply as
fiction with a semblance of truth.
The meaning, and obviously, the
inspirational value of works of this kind do not depend upon their
historical veracity, although apprehension of that meaning
nonetheless does depend upon a provisional or temporary belief in
their veracity. This is, in Kermode’s words, a “benign deceit” that
readers even today continue to countenance.
Here we have the scholar Kermode admitting that the New Testament is
fiction, and Prof. Bowersock relating the opinion that such “benign
deceit” does not matter, because the book has “inspirational value.”
First of all, this deceit has not been benign but utterly malignant
for almost 2,000 years, contributing to endless genocide and killing
the spirit and mind.
Secondly, how do deception and lying have any
value in a spiritual quest or religious life? Is it not the complete
opposite of such an experience? Is it not the goal in becoming a
mature, spiritual human being to be rid of deceit and mendacity?
is clear that scholars have known about the mythological nature of
the Bible, yet they have gone to immense lengths to hide it,
including using sophisticated language, like the priestly
counterparts who have utilized the dead language Latin to go over
the heads of the uneducated masses. It is possible that any number
of these scholars are also Masons or members of some such secret
brotherhood who are under the blood oath.
Or they may merely be
products of their occupation, in that many universities and colleges
are under the dominion of the fraternities and the grand master, the
the Catholic Church.
In any case, they have been pawns,
unwitting or otherwise, in the Christ conspiracy, which has obscured
ancient knowledge and wisdom under a false front of historicity, by
the most thorough of methods, including secrecy, forgery, force and