|

by Dylan Charles
October 21, 2016
from
WakingTimes Website

If there's one thing we've learned so
far from
election 2016 it's that the
American people do not understand their government.
The perception is that we have a democracy, and that in this
democracy we the people have vested power in our government which we
exercise through the act of voting.
'Throw the bastards out,'
...has long since been the war cry of
the impotent democrat, yet we no longer even have a democracy to
cling to, and although most people choose to ignore it, this fact of
life has been visible for decades.
An oligarchical government is a form of rule in which
a small group of wealthy individuals
have control over the critical mechanisms of,
-
state power
-
industry
-
economy
These people are
unelected,
unaccountable and they exercise control on behalf of
their personal financial interests, drawing on the productive power
of a nation to support their lifestyles and geopolitical ambitions.
The ruling class in such a nation
is often comprised of dynastic families who pass the baton of power
back and forth between themselves, managing the illusion of change
and evolution while never actually ceding their franchise over the
masses.
The 'Bush,
Clinton, Bush, Clinton'
phenomenon is a contemporary example of this exchange.
In 2014, a Princeton study in the
academic journal
Perspectives on Politics
published their conclusion that America had officially transitioned
to an oligarchy.
Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter
has even recently made comments to this effect, telling Oprah
Winfrey and her audience that 'now
it's just an oligarchy.'
These two warnings follow decades of
comments and public admissions by former presidents and
key political figures warning us
that our country was being taken over by shadowy financial
interests.
Unarguably, there is an
invisible government running America,
yet we are still urged to cast our vote for president every four
years.
Why do they allow us to participate in this charade if they know our
vote doesn't make any difference?

Mao Zedong
casting a vote for
himself.
Voting as a Tool to Create the
Illusion of Consent
Even many true dictatorships hold
political elections as tools to manufacture the illusion of consent
for their party.
Stalin is perhaps the most
astounding example of this, for, during his rule, while the people
of the nation were being brutalized by
The Red Terror, election results
came in
showing over 99% support for the Communist
Party.
Saddam Hussein also used this
tactic to great effect in a 1995
in a referendum aimed at creating the illusion of public
support for his reign, with 99.9% of the population voting in favor.
China's Mao, arguably the
greatest murderer of all time, also
forced his subjects into the ballot booth,
using the results as propaganda to support his totalitarianism.
America is not yet a dictatorship, it is but an oligarchy
with big dreams of becoming one.
As such, we are still transitioning out
of the ideology of personal liberty and self-rule, and are still
dependent on the ritual of voting as acknowledgment of
this heritage, even though selecting a president does nothing to
favorably influence the direction of the nation.
The oligarchy still needs us to believe
that we are free so that we won't get serious about revolution, and
voting is the best tool for maintaining this illusion. It serves the
dual purposes of providing an outlet for our righteous indignation,
pacifying our anger and sapping our political
drive, and of acting as a survey to determine which policies
will meet the least amount of popular resistance.
When we show up on election day, knowing
full well the candidates we've been presented with do not represent
our ambitions for this nation, we are tacitly expressing our
willingness to being governed in this manner.
We are contributing to the
perception that our rulers have our permission to carry on, and by
doing such we are acquiescing ever further to their dominion over
us.
Final Thoughts
If you're one of the few Americans
who hasn't already committed yourself, heart and soul, to one of the
two majorly phony political parties dominating the U.S., and are
still trying to decide which taste of bitters you'll go for on
election day, consider this:
there is no
Constitutional requirement that you vote.
There is not yet a law in America that
obliges you to consent to the corruption, lies, criminality,
war-mongering, fear, hate, stupidity, tyranny, surveillance and
self-destruction being championed by today's candidates.
You are
still free to opt-out and explore the moral highroad of
conscientious objection, should your value system be so
utterly insulted by the fake election process taking place before
us.
"The American people are being
guilted, bullied, pressured, cajoled, intimidated, terrorized
and browbeaten into voting.
We're constantly told to vote,
-
because it's your so-called
civic duty
-
because you have no right to
complain about the government unless you vote
-
because every vote counts
-
because we must present a
unified front
-
because the future of the
nation depends on it
-
because God compels
us to do so
-
because by not voting you
are in fact voting
-
because the "other"
candidate must be defeated at all costs
-
because the future of the
Supreme Court rests in the balance.
You are under no moral
obligation to vote for the lesser of two evils. Indeed,
voting for a lesser evil is still voting for evil."
John W. Whitehead
|