by Jon Rappoport
October 21, 2015
"If you controlled the
meaning of The Good,
and you had unlimited
propaganda resources and access to the press,
and if you also had control
over the Armed Forces and the police,
you could build a new society
in short order.
You could wreck centuries of
tradition in a few decades.
And if you had the education
system in your back pocket,
you could wipe out the memory
of what formerly existed.
No one would remember. No one
This is happening now, in
Ignorance is enlightenment."
(The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
One of the basic principles
of elite Globalism is:
the end of borders, the end of
The European Union was built for
this purpose, step by step, out of the ashes of World War 2:
a super-bureaucracy and political
management system for the whole continent.
But that was not enough. There had to be
a way to wipe out separate and sovereign nations at ground level, to
irrevocably change the landscape.
It is open borders;
floods of immigrants; "replacement
populations"; an influx of people who have no intention of accepting
the customs and way of life in their new homes.
The end result?
A de facto reconfiguring of national
populations, so that, when you look at the makeup of Europe 20 years
from now, you will say:
"Why do we think of Germany or
France or England? They don't really exist. All of Europe is a
vast mix of immigrants. Europe is really one country now. So
let's erase all those old artificial borders."
Eventually, even uttering words like
"Swedes, Norwegians, Germans, French, Dutch…" will be considered
micro (or macro) aggressions against the "people of Europe."
Of course, in reaching this point, there will be a certain amount of
chaos and violence. The EU is banking on its ability to control it,
to put it down where necessary, and to maintain its hold as the one
and only governing force in Europe.
On a cultural level, names like Locke, Shakespeare, Goethe, Mozart,
Beethoven, Bach, Lorca, Goya, Cezanne, Monet, Van Gogh,
Michelangelo, Rembrandt, Dante, Galileo, Faraday, and even "modern"
names like Bartok, Stravinsky, Rimbaud, Orwell, and Camus will be
vague dusty ghosts that provoke uncomprehending stares.
"The past is dead."
"Oh, but don't worry about that. The important thing is, every
person living in Europe is a citizen of Europe, and is entitled
to benefits. This is humane, this is The Good, this is the
triumph of the benevolent State. Nothing else matters."
All European languages will eventually
be reduced. Who has the right to speak words that the majority of
people can't understand?
What I'm sketching in here is the grid that will be laid over
And of course, as automation comes on with a rush, many
"citizen-workers of Europe" will become unnecessary. Even great
corporations will fall, because they won't be able to sell their
products to an impoverished population. They'll hope against hope
that the billions of people in the East, China and India, will give
them new markets.
Against this background, the individual human being will be looked
at, from the top, as a cipher, a unit in "models and algorithms."
The question is,
How many individuals will take
the bait and regard themselves as mere "parts" in the
How many will give in and
consider their future a function of how much they can obtain
from The State, free of charge?
How many will come to believe
that their power, as individuals, is inconsequential - or
even a delusion?
Why do I bother bringing this up?
Because, regardless of the prevailing
collectivist mindset - propagandized and promoted and exploited from
an elite level - State repression, in all its forms, falls on each
If the very concept of the individual is wiped out, what is left?
In 1859, John Stuart Mill wrote:
If it were felt that the free
development of individuality is one of the leading essentials of
well-being…there would be no danger that liberty should be
Conversely, when the free development of
individuality is of no concern, liberty will die.
Boris Pasternak, the Russian novelist and poet, who knew a
thing or two about political repression, wrote (1960):
They [the Soviet bureaucrats] don't
ask much of you. They only want you to hate the things you love
and to love the things you despise.
This reversal is being imposed now, in
Defectors from the old USSR would recognize it in an instant, having
lived through it themselves. The European version seems softer and
gentler, but that is just a matter of strategy. The culture is being
cooked more slowly.
But just because secret police aren't knocking on doors in the
middle of the night and making mass arrests, that isn't a sign that
individual freedom reigns.
A number of European political leaders are telling their
"You have no right to oppose the
flood of immigration on any grounds. To do so, to utter such
public statements, is an offense."
Does that sound familiar?
The wet dream of every collectivist is coming true. All power at the
top; all conformity (called "unity") everywhere else. The new USSR.
In the old days, the East German police kept records on every
citizen and blanketed the population with snitches and spies. The
modern Surveillance State has
replaced that, searching for "nodes of discontent."
Collectivists may pay lip service
to the dangers of State surveillance, but when it is used to root
out people who can't envision a better world based on, among other
features, open borders, well, this is just an enforcement of The
Good upon those who can't discover it for themselves.
If The Humanitarian Way needs a nudge and boost, why not?
For dyed-in-the-wool collectivists, freedom isn't just a roadblock;
it's an irrelevant illusion. It never existed. All humans are
operating according to programs, and have been since birth.
Therefore, install a better program, by any means necessary and
available. Produce "kinder people."
This is both a political and a technological imperative.
Open borders and unlimited immigration is a good test case. For
people who feel imposed upon, who feel their communities are being
torn apart, who feel personally threatened, who feel this is,
indeed, a covert operation to transform Europe into a new
USSR, there is a need for re-education at the deepest level
Because, surely, such people are
suffering from profound disorders. Their circuits are crossed. Their
brains are defective. They can't see the larger picture.
They would never be able to see, for example, the wisdom of the
Zbigniew Brzezinski, David
Rockerfeller's alter ego, who wrote, in 1969:
The nation state as a fundamental
unit of man's organized life has ceased to be the principal
creative force: International banks and multinational
corporations are acting and planning in terms that are far in
advance of the political concepts of the nation-state.
Between Two Ages - America's Role
in the Technetronic Era - Page 28
Here is the Globalist tactician at work,
a man who seems to hate the old USSR, but is seeking to install a
version of the same collectivism, through other means.
If Lenin were alive today, he would look out over Europe and
agree that his agenda is alive and well.
He might object to the relatively slow
pace. He might want more violence. But he would grudgingly
acknowledge that his descendants have discovered a few new tricks.
He would have to approve of the "humanitarian altruism," and the way
it is being modeled and manipulated, so that the edifice of The Good
appears as a shining beacon in the darkness.
Nice movie. Excellent production design. Tears of sympathy rolling
down the cheeks of the audience.
Minds reduced to one constant:
we must care for the less fortunate.
Trillions and trillions of dollars
devoted to elicit that sentiment, regardless of the circumstances,
or the true malignant outcome, or the actual sinister intent of
the elite artists of reality.