November 2, 2013
What is truth?
Not a simple question.
Even within these three very basic concepts of truth, there rests a plethora of subtleties upon the definition of truth - correspondence, coherence, constructivist, consensus, and many more.
within these subtleties we find a foundational dichotomy between the ‘truth’
of Mainstream Media (MSM) and the ‘truth’ of the Alternative Press
Consensus theory holds that truth is whatever is agreed upon, or in some versions, might come to be agreed upon, by some specified group. Such a group might include all human beings, or a subset thereof consisting of more than one person. 1
A prime example of this is found in a statement by Joseph Goebbels; chillingly insightful, coming from a Nazi.
Another truth subset found in the MSM, acting as an extension of globalist shapers over the centuries, is constructivist truth theory.
Social constructivism holds that truth is constructed by social processes, is historically and culturally specific, and that it is in part shaped through the power struggles within a community.
Constructivism views all of our knowledge as "constructed," because it does not reflect any external "transcendent" realities (as a pure correspondence theory might hold).
Rather, perceptions of truth are viewed as contingent on convention, human perception, and social experience.2
This theory is evidenced most notably in school books from K - PhD., and can best be expressed in the saying "History is written by the victors". This is why we were taught Columbus discovered America, and not the Vikings, hundreds of years prior; reams of historical data notwithstanding.
Social constructivist truth reigns supreme in history and social science departments of most major universities, stamping out clones to perpetuate the dissemination of falsities to coming generations of scholars and students, and so on and so on.
Discovery and The History Channel are two of the worst television perpetrators of this truth theory.
Over generations, we
accept certain things as ‘true’, simply because we have heard it our entire
lives from various sources - but who actually says anything happened
a particular way?
The more firmly the lie takes root in our
collective psyche, the greater chance becomes that this original lie will
become a consensus truth. It is in this fashion we accept so much.
If MSM is Goliath, the Alt. P. is David.
Being the underdog in this dichotomy, it is
incumbent upon the Alt. P. to provide this form of proof, as what is
being posited on Alt. P sites (the key word here being ‘alternative’ [to the
accepted, or prevalent norm]) is in direct contravention to the consensus
theory of truth, which reigns supreme in North America at this moment in
The MSM has the power system in place to foist blatant falsehoods on the public, beating it into our heads 24/7 via CNN, FOX, etc.
The Alt. P. has the Internet, which is a mighty, mighty tool. One can paint with a broad swath in stating that television is the realm of deception and the Internet is the realm of truth. (The brush is very wide).
It is therefore unremarkable to understand that, for the most part, almost every single television network and channel can ultimately be traced through corporate threads to be in the holding and control of only five global media conglomerates. 5
It is chilling to realize that ultimately, (very
simplistically stated) five corporate chairmen decide what the world
will see, hear about and read about. Anything different from this consensus
truth construct is relegated to the ‘alternative’ media.
This is not out of the realm of reason.
* There is strong support in both camps that the military either did or did not create the Internet. Whether Berners-Lee or Arpanet genius sparked the concept of the Internet, it stands to logic (for funding reasons, for the enormous scope of authoritative geographical cooperation required of such an infrastructure, and the simple fact such a marvelous capacity for both weapons evolution and social programming and monitoring capabilities could breathe life), that government involvement is almost unavoidably certain.
When one considers, as did Goebbels, that,
If the Internet is the primary means of
disseminating the truth, it is by proximity a mortal enemy of the
globalists, as they are the primary espouser of lies. And of course, one
realizes when one says ‘globalists’ one is also saying ‘military’.
Anything less is a seed planted in rocky soil.
Doubt flourishes for lack of evidence.
This conception of empirical truth (physical
evidence) was, after all, a cornerstone in a U.S. Court of Law criminal
trial, though for a different America than we know today.
The theory is opposed to the coherence theory of
truth (a mainstay of MSM… news programs especially so), which holds that the
truth or falsity of a statement is determined by its relations to other
statements rather than its relation to the world.
Science is a cornerstone of empirical evidence. One must logically acknowledge forthcoming scientists stand to gain nothing beyond complacency of soul, and stand to lose much in social and professional standing. One cans aught but conclude there is but one goal in their presentation of facts contrary to the consensus theory of truth espoused by the MSM, and that is to make known the truth of empirical, irrefutable truth.
One may find the reports themselves suspect, (as
ultimately, anyone can, at any time, suspect the truth of anything), but one
cannot deny the career jeopardy these scientists place themselves in,
and (will hopefully) examine the scientists premise for action.
Ah, just another evening on prime time network
family entertainment. No cultural manipulation going on here! No Sir!
One must understand, and realize for and when your children do not, a simple truism, phrased here in the form of a question.
It is not the symbols themselves, but the moral
decay which the performances and symbols endorse and promote. This is
A destroyed family (and does a divorce do nothing else if not destroy the family?) acerbates the division of the family unit, and with the loss of the family unit, a populace is that much easier to control, lacking the strength of conviction that only a nuclear family unit can inspire the average Joe to heroic acts of defense.
The broken man, bitter woman, disenfranchised
and neglected child... what will they fight for at risk of life? Beyond the
animal defense instinct that kicks in for everyone faced with immediate
death, most rudderless citizens will sweep to the oars of a globalists
If one here can concede there is a globalists
cabal with a specific agenda of global domination, then one must also agree
there are those standing in opposition to such designs. You probably agree,
shills withstanding. To accomplish the foul deeds required to see global
domination realized, a few eggs must be cracked.
Enter the ‘big five’, in unison,
Problem solved… for now.
Rerunning the numbers Thursday, CP found Cyrus' Monday rating 100, with
Syria down at 2. On Tuesday, Miley went down to 63, but Syria remained less
than one tenth of that, at 6.
This is why the truth movement is growing daily and the globalists employed inferior forms of constructive and consensus truth are crumbling in the face of empirical truth, and that is why we will triumph when all is said and done.
And that’s the truth!