Any and all that dismiss the AT&T-Israeli-Mossad-Unit 8200-Converse-Boeing connection(s) are either intentionally misleading or unintentionally dilettante whereas this link was merely part of a greater learning curve.
This article has sources that cannot be named;
however, feel free to ask your elected officials about buckeyball euthanasia
For starters, Glen Greenwald and the Guardian crew wrote about the NSA a full six years after a friend of mine stumbled across NSA Prism. Let's look at the NSA/Greenwald/Guardian "intelligence" a bit differently…
It is nearly fall 2014:
...is vintage 1990's technology.
Mining data from internetwork-datagrams is
partying like it's 1999, albeit with only a few new tweaks and perks.
Such an NSA coup de grâce with everyone both fully aware and willing party to domestic wet-work (legal party to domestic murders) seems highly unlikely; such scenario would mean the U.S. CIA is onboard with shooting itself in the foot.
The problem with the NOW'ers is one is supposed to lump the right-wing 1942 OSS (Office Strategic Services) in with the left-wing 2014 NSA/Prism.
Pardon the crude epithet, but let's all back the fuck up, a moment, this is both a journalism phopaw and damned important… Calling any and all NOW'ers, gun and food hoarders, extreme right-wingers, left-wing-to-the-point-of-facism'ers…
Do you believe that the OSS has morphed into being on board with the NSA, Morgellon's Disease, Domestic wet-work, and listening to you tinkle in a commode?
Perhaps this is a good time to ponder the difference between two acronym buzzwords,
Does having a case-manager listen to you tinkle
in the commode sound intelligent to you; or, rather, does it sound "secure"?
These last two programs are currently being shut down by the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency; the CIA would like very much not to be put into a NWO/NSA/N.O.W./mass-media category.
The CIA's main product is, after all,
The CIA is doing more wet-work domestically
than abroad at this time and it is to the CIA's benefit rather than to my
own that this paper is written.
The phase four/five assassins of the NSA are just more psycho-sociopaths. Now imagine 100 of these psychopaths disappearing simultaneously off of the face of the Earth for keeps, no DNA, no trace of any kind left behind because the CIA finds their disappearances an "Intelligent" act for the country.
Let's grind the ideology down to the Foie Gras:
One side has the left and the media (NSA).
There is a covert but extremely deadly war going
on in the U.S. The attrition rate at this time is about 50 NSA dead per 1
(one) CIA dead.
The persons who have done this to
America and their families are paying for it by disappearing in a very like
manner in many respects except they do so en masse rather than
http://olivebiodiesel.com/ page has been updated many times; what
the concept has lacked was time for both human cooperation to evolve and
time for olive saplings and seedlings to grow.
Most of the local City and County large "diesel" vehicles now run on CNG.
The more private companies can convert or replace fleets with CNG vehicles, the more companies and their customers will see familiar pricing on an ongoing basis. Part of what impressed me about the CNG big rig (aside from it being a CIA-truck) was very quiet, rapid rpm wind-up (high torque-curve) with no smoke whatsoever, no soot.
While the NSA was inventing ways to listen to
us all pass gas and ways to kill our own, the CIA was trying to plod a
way for all 328,000 of us to make our ways through the future.
While ISIS and ISIL cut off heads abroad, the CIA is rapidly cutting the head off of the NSA.
The plan was for the Oligarchs to hide in Antarctica while hydro, medical cannabis moves a death gene through the useless-eaters populace. That is the NSA plan for American's future, death by hydro-cannabis.
The CIA figured we might all survive that plan and be in need of meat trucks, bread trucks, etc. Don't think hydro, think Compressed Natural Gas - if you farm, think CNG combines rather than diesel for the future.
What were those guys thinking?