27 May 2019
It is shared by people and nations Worldwide.
Today's "culture of war" is a US hegemonic project
predicated on the creation of conflict and divisions
within and between countries.
It is this (unilateral) project of global warfare
which is intent
upon destroying civilization."
One sees a contrast between a real issue and an imaginative problem.
The motivating factor signals one thing that American ruling elite thinks:
The na´ve malignity mindset of the American current leadership...
In the 21th century advanced technological warfare consequential outcomes will leave nothing intact except the dead entities of all the living beings.
Be it Mr. Bolton, Pompeo or Trump, they have no logical understanding as to how their actions could undermine the rest of living humanity. In all probabilities, the war hysteria is a distraction from domestic issues facing the Trump administration.
Rationality for peace requires objective reasoning.
Resolution of problems by reason and dialogue rather than belligerency and aggression.
Sanctity of human life is grounded in the tenets of moral and intellectual leadership and being open to listening and learning to voices of REASON.
If the Iranian leadership was smart, it should have acted fast to seek unity of the immediate neighbors (Turkey, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia) and of all the Arabs and Muslim nations to counteract a powerful moral force of reason to thwart the US plan.
The world is fast becoming a violent place at crossroads. All ways of human life require safeguard and protection from great evils.
Ben Tarnoff ("Weaponised AI is Coming - Are Algorithmic Forever Wars our Future?"), notes the speedy belligerency:
America or its allies in the Arab Middle East face no formidable enemy except themselves against their own na´ve designs of military superiority.
There is no substance to any perceivable challenge or military threat to America from Iran.
It is not for peace, and not to protect the humanity from any imminent threat of war from any corners of the strategic game-play in the region.
Rationally speaking, American leadership mindset appears devoid of reason and accountability. Wars do not bring diverse humanity to peacemaking but simply destroy the opportunities for dialogue and peaceful resolution of problems.
Undoubtedly, the US current administration needs a powerful challenge to make a navigational change.
Today some 62 of the
American organizations have asked the US Congress to consider a
resolution to stop the war threats against Iran. America is imposing
a sadistic war strategy on the rest of mankind.
The global humanity feels tormenting pains and wants to foresee systematic change and development of a new global organization responsible to the global community, not the abstract Nation States.
Like in the past, once again few Western egoistic leaders have manipulated the time and opportunities to dictate and undermine the interests of the mankind...
The global humanity is
the net object of all their deliberations but without any meaningful
role in challenging the few global warlords.
Once America was enriched with intellectual foresights to safeguard the rest of the mankind. But its contemporary leaders and major institutions seem to defy the logic of co-existing with the rest of the global community.
For sure, American leaders lack even the essence of Thomas Paine's historic "Common Sense" (or PDF version "Common Sense - Addressed to the Inhabitants of America, on the following Interesting Subjects") to change, but historical change will replace America's global leadership image with others, more understanding and relevant to the mankind.
American politicians are
used to ignore the imperatives of global peaceful co-existence.
The Washington-based war culture has incapacitated the US policy makers to think rationally and act responsibly in global affairs.
Strange as is, President Trump and John Bolton cannot explain why every day 18 to 25 US war veterans commit suicides? ("Why Do Soldiers Commit Suicide and Global Warlords").
Moral and intellectual darkness is renewed under the current leadership of the Commander in-Chief of the US armed forces.
Do the leaders care to protect the precious human life...?
Most contemporary politicians are not responsible leaders but stage actors pretending to be representing the national interests. They learn to excite the emotions of the electorates to win elections but fail to act as responsible leaders.
They view the humanity just in numbers, not an object of precious life and value in the larger universal context.
Most often, these people are disconnected with the annals of normal human thinking and affairs, suspicious and paranoid and they see success to be achieved at the cost of ruthlessness, hatred, degeneration and viciousness - all part of their inborn value system, making politics as a dreadful game of egomaniac mind, deceptions and strategic priorities.
This requires intelligent commitment to principles of international peace and security for all, non-aggression in the working of global systems, protection of life and a balanced ecological culture of co-existence within the encompassed Universe:
America, a leading industrialized power is indifferent to these pertinent factors of life.
All wars perpetuate violence, fear and vindictiveness against mankind and are aimed at destruction of civilizations and dehumanization of succeeding generations.
Bruce Gambrill Foster ("The Scourge Of War - The Shameless Marketing of Violence"), observes:
The global mankind is the net victim of the catastrophic madness of the few warlords.
After all listening and learning are critical factors for the changing role of the 21st century political leadership and so is the flexibility mechanism to be built-in for effective leadership.
But there are no intelligent and proactive leaders with a vision of the future to see the imperative of One Humanity except na´ve and self-geared egomaniac full of the sensation of power using triviality and viciousness to torture and kill the mankind and destroy ecological habitats.
But contrary to the
brutal perceptions and actions of the US-former Europeans
imperialists, the international community is informed, mature, and
enjoys the moral and intellectual capacity to know and understand
the facts of life and to challenge the politically imperiled
insensitivity to universal accord and Unity of the mankind against
brutality of the Terrorism of Wars that unites them with a common
fate more than divides them by any token of adversity and separate
Mankind is neither blind, nor inept, it defines its own purpose, meaning and identity for peace and harmony that the established institutions of governance, be it in America, the Middle East or Europe or elsewhere miserably failed to recognize or value their importance in global political affairs.
Paul Craig Roberts (The Next War on Washington's Agenda), had a rational thought to ask the right question: