March 05, 2020
from SWPRS Website

Spanish version

 

 

 




Wikipedia is generally thought of as an open, transparent, and mostly reliable online encyclopedia. Yet upon closer inspection, this turns out not to be the case.

 

In fact, the English Wikipedia with its 9 billion worldwide page views per month is governed by just 500 active administrators, whose real identity in many cases remains unknown.

 

Moreover, studies have shown that 80% of all Wikipedia content is written by just 1% of all Wikipedia editors, which again amounts to just a few hundred mostly unknown people.

 

Obviously, such a non-transparent and hierarchical structure is susceptible to corruption and manipulation, the notorious "paid editors" hired by corporations being just one example.

 

Indeed, already in 2007, researchers found that CIA and FBI employees were editing Wikipedia articles on controversial topics including the Iraq war and the Guantanamo military prison.

 

Also in 2007, researchers found that one of the most active and influential English Wikipedia administrators, called "Slim Virgin", was in fact a former British intelligence informer.

 

More recently, another highly prolific Wikipedia editor going by the false name of "Philip Cross" turned out to be linked to UK intelligence as well as several mainstream media journalists.

 

In Germany, one of the most aggressive Wikipedia editors was exposed, after a two-year legal battle, as a political operative formerly serving in the Israeli army as a foreign volunteer.

 

Even in Switzerland, unidentified government employees were caught whitewashing Wikipedia entries about the Swiss secret service just prior to a public referendum about the agency.

 

Many of these Wikipedia personae are editing articles almost all day and every day, indicating that they are either highly dedicated individuals, or in fact, operated by a group of people.

 

In addition, articles edited by these personae cannot easily be revised, since the above-mentioned administrators can always revert changes or simply block disagreeing users altogether.

 

The primary goal of these covert campaigns appears to be pushing Western and Israeli government positions while destroying the reputation of independent journalists and politicians.

 

Articles most affected by this kind of manipulation include political, geopolitical and certain historical topics as well as biographies of non-conformist academics, journalists, and politicians.

 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, a friend of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and a "Young Leader" of the Davos forum, has repeatedly defended these operations.

 

Speaking of Davos, Wikimedia has itself amassed a fortune of more than $160 million, donated in large part not by lazy students, but by major U.S. Corporations and influential foundations.

 

Moreover, US social media and video platforms are increasingly referring to Wikipedia to frame or combat "controversial" topics. The revelations discussed above may perhaps help explain why.

 

Already NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed how spooks manipulate online debates, and more recently, a senior Twitter executive turned out to be a British Army "psyops" officer.

 

To add at least some degree of transparency, German researchers have developed a Free Web Browser tool called WikiWho that lets readers color code just who edited what in Wikipedia.

 

In many cases, the result looks as discomforting as one might expect...

 

 

WikiWho / WhoColor