|

by Ladislav Zemánek
June 15, 2026
from
RT Website

© Global Look
Press/Yan Yan
The most
important message from
Chinese
President Xi Jinping's
two-day trip to
Pyongyang
earlier this
month
was what
remained unsaid...
Chinese President Xi Jinping's two-day trip to Pyongyang
earlier this month was his first foreign visit of the year, his
third trip to North Korea overall, and his first since June 2019.
More importantly,
it took place at a moment when the global
geopolitical landscape is undergoing profound changes.
Official statements framed the summit as part of
the effort to strengthen what both sides describe as a relationship
of the highest strategic importance.
Yet beyond the formal language, the visit
highlighted the growing convergence of Chinese and North Korean
interests, demonstrated the durability of their partnership, and
reflected an evolving regional environment in which old assumptions
are increasingly being reconsidered.
Ditching the Old Preconditions
One of the most notable aspects of the meeting was not what was
discussed publicly, but what apparently was not.
For years, denuclearization of the Korean
Peninsula occupied a central place in regional diplomacy. Yet
recent developments suggest that the issue no longer dominates the
agenda as it once did.
Chinese statements in recent years have noticeably reduced their
emphasis on denuclearization, and references to the
subject have become increasingly infrequent in official exchanges
with Pyongyang.
The summit continued that trend. Instead, both
sides focused on broader strategic and political questions.
Reports indicated that Beijing and Pyongyang reached what was
described as,
a satisfactory common understanding regarding
the international political situation.
This language is significant because it is not
automatically included in summit readouts.
Its appearance suggests a meaningful degree of
agreement on major global developments and shared concerns about the
evolving security environment.
In the days preceding the summit, North Korea signaled support for
Chinese positions on issues that Beijing regards as core national
interests, like Taiwan and regional tensions with Japan.
At the same time, Pyongyang sent a clear message
that it expected discussions to proceed on its own terms by publicly
highlighting its growing nuclear capabilities.
In summary,
the summit was focused on coordinating
Chinese and North Korean responses to a changing world - not on
changing North Korea's behavior.
This reflects a reality increasingly acknowledged
across the region:
Near-term denuclearization is no longer
viewed as a realistic objective.
Economic Reconnection
If security issues formed the backdrop to the summit,
practical cooperation provided its main substance.
The discussions focused on expanding economic ties and restoring
exchanges that were disrupted in recent years.
Areas highlighted included,
trade, agriculture, construction, science and
technology, healthcare, education, infrastructure development,
border management, transportation, and people-to-people contact.
This reconnection is already underway.
Cross-border rail services have resumed, and
Chinese airlines have restarted regular weekly flights to North
Korea. These may appear to be modest measures, but they represent
important steps toward rebuilding normal channels of communication
and commerce.
Trade between the two countries has historically represented the
overwhelming majority of North Korea's external commerce.
Before the
Covid-19 'pandemic', bilateral
trade volumes reached several billion dollars annually, making China
by far North Korea's most important economic partner.
For Beijing, economic engagement offers a means of reinforcing
long-term influence. By deepening practical cooperation, China can
help ensure that North Korea remains closely connected to its
economic orbit even as Pyongyang simultaneously develops ties with
other partners, particularly
Russia.
Growing cooperation among China, North Korea, and Russia could also
breathe new life into regional development concepts that have
existed for decades but have never realized their potential.
An example is the
Greater Tumen Initiative, which
seeks to transform the border areas linking the three countries into
a hub for trade, transportation, and industrial development.
If linked effectively to emerging Arctic shipping routes and the
Northern Sea Route, these border regions could gain increasing
strategic relevance over the coming decades.
These ambitions remain long-term and face
considerable challenges, but the renewed emphasis on connectivity
suggests that economic geography is once again becoming a major
factor in regional planning.
Kim Jong-un's
Diplomatic Moment
The summit also represented a significant success for Kim Jong-un
personally.
Over the past several years,
North Korea has expanded its
diplomatic profile through closer engagement with Russia while
simultaneously preserving and revitalizing relations with China and
reaching out to the US.
That balancing act has elevated Pyongyang's
international standing in ways that would have seemed unlikely only
a decade ago.
Coming after Kim's prominent appearances at major international
commemorations in Beijing, where he was positioned alongside both
Xi Jinping and Russian
President
Vladimir Putin, the summit
underscored North Korea's growing role within a broader network of
strategic partnerships.
Perhaps most importantly from Pyongyang's perspective, the visit
focused on issues that promise tangible benefits for economic
development and public welfare rather than on sanctions or nuclear
negotiations.
This allowed North Korea to project an image of a
country engaged in normal state-to-state diplomacy rather than one
defined exclusively by security disputes.
Pyongyang seeks recognition as an active participant in regional
affairs, rather than a security challenge to be contained.
To that end, North Korea has been showing increasing flexibility in
its foreign policy. While maintaining alliance-based ties with both
China and Russia, it also seeks to demonstrate that it retains
independent decision-making authority.
The image being cultivated is one of a state
capable of navigating relationships among major powers rather than
serving as a subordinate actor to any of them.
What is China
Getting Out of this?
Beijing seeks to simultaneously manage its relationships with
Washington, Moscow, and Pyongyang while safeguarding its own
interests across Northeast Asia.
Strengthening ties with North Korea serves several objectives.
It helps maintain stability along China's
northeastern border, preserves influence over developments on the
Korean Peninsula, and reinforces Beijing's role as a central
diplomatic actor in regional affairs.
Chinese analysts have also increasingly
emphasized North Korea as an important partner against what they
view as ‘Japan's new militarism'.
Likewise, Beijing and Pyongyang share
reservations regarding South Korean plans to acquire
nuclear-powered attack submarines with US assistance.
At the same time, Beijing has long encouraged
North Korea to study aspects of China's own development experience.
The basic idea is to maintain political
continuity while expanding market activity, attracting investment,
increasing trade, and pursuing gradual economic modernization.
While North Korea will undoubtedly follow its own
path, economic cooperation with China provides opportunities to
incorporate selected elements of this model.
A Partnership adapting to New
Realities
The Xi-Kim summit was not a dramatic breakthrough, nor was it
intended to be.
It was part of the long-term process of
steady consolidation of a relationship that both sides view as
strategically indispensable.
The visit demonstrated growing political
coordination, expanding economic engagement, and a shared desire to
adapt to an international environment very different from only a few
years ago.
It also suggested that regional diplomacy is
entering a new phase in which,
...may matter more than longstanding debates that
have produced few tangible results.
In a region shaped by strategic competition, the steady
strengthening of China-North Korea relations is a development
that neither supporters nor critics can afford to ignore.
|