by Tarik Cyril Amar

November 07, 2025

from RT Website

Vladimir Zelenskyy.

© Getty Images/Antonio Masiello
 

In a fleeting glimpse of lucidity,

the mainstream media has noticed

a tiny fraction of the corruption

and authoritarianism in Kiev...

It's that time of the great proxy war crusade against Russia again.

Someone in the mainstream West has woken up to, if not the facts about the politics of Ukraine, then at least a quantum of disquiet.

The last major wave of the likes of the Financial Times, The Economist, and the Spectator "suddenly" noticing - all at the same time, as if on cue - that Ukraine has an authoritarianism and corruption problem (and then some) took place less than half a year ago.

Now it's Politico - usually a steadfast party organ of Russophobia, Zionism-come-what-genocide-may, and servility to NATO - that feels vaguely troubled by the realities of the Kiev regime or, as the publication puts it, the "dark side" of Vladimir "I don't like elections" Zelenskyy's rule.

Not all of those realities, of course. That would be asking too much...

Instead, Politico is homing in on one great scandal (out of countless ones) concerning one man and the anguish of a few "civil-society"-NGO types, both with good connections to the West.

This time, the scandal concerns the obvious, shameless political prosecution of Vladimir Kudritsky, formerly a high-ranking and effective energy infrastructure executive and de facto civil servant.

Yet what about noticing,

the murder in Ukrainian detention of critical blogger - and US citizen - Gonzalo Lira?

 

Or the vicious persecution of leftist war critic Bogdan Syrotiuk?

 

Or the mean, indecent harassing of Christian clergy and believers for not saying their prayers in quite the right Ukrainian-nationalist-approved manner?

Perish the thought!

In a similar spirit of extreme selectiveness, some Western outlets are now registering - a little and very slowly - the brutal realities of Ukrainian forced mobilization that feed the Western proxy war:

Recently, a war - pardon, "defense" - editor of the ultra-gung-ho British tabloid The Sun has returned shell-shocked from NATO's de facto eastern front, not because of the bloody and wasteful fighting but because the uncouth Ukrainians press-ganged his fixer.

In a similarly traumatic experience, Hollywood's Angelina Jolie had her local driver snatched away at a Ukrainian military roadblock.

Yet violent forced mobilization has been an everyday occurrence in Ukraine for years already. So much so that Ukrainians have chosen the term "busification" (from minibus, a popular vehicle for mobilization manhunts) as word of the year for 2025.

For quite a few of its victims, it ends up even worse than for those privileged enough to work for Western movie stars and British propagandists.

Roman Sopin, for instance, who did not even resist, has just been beaten to death in a mobilization precinct in central Kiev, as an official medical assessment of his cause of death implies as clearly as anyone may dare under Zelenskyy's regime.

But let's get back to the few things Western media deign to notice occasionally...:

Already dismissed last year, Kudritsky is now facing the courts under transparently trumped-up charges.

The reason is obvious to everyone.

He has been too popular and far too vocal about corruption at the highest levels and the authoritarian power grabs of Zelenskyy's presidential office in particular.

Kudritsky's case - comparatively harmless, really - does raise many disturbing questions:

Why is it that the Zelenskyy regime has such a nasty record of abusing arbitrary financial sanctions and politically perverted legal processes, or lawfare?

 

And haven't we been told that this regime under its "Churchillian" leader is fighting for Western values of democracy and legality?

 

Are Zelenskyy, his sinister fixer-in-chief Andrey Yermak and their team preparing the ground for elections after a possible end of the war - that is, after losing it - by preemptively crippling domestic critics and rivals?

 

Does this mean Zelenskyy, Ukraine's most catastrophic leader since independence in 1991 (and that's a high bar) is seriously considering not slinking away into exile but imposing himself even longer on his unfortunate country?

 

Or is all of this part of decimating whatever is left of Ukraine's mangled society to continue the meatgrinder war for as long as the NATO-EU Europeans are willing to pay...?

If things go the way the bloodthirsty fantasists at The Economist want, then the West will shell out another cool $390 billion over the next four years.

Apparently, they believe that waves of forced conscription in Ukraine will provide the human cannon fodder to go along with the Western funding.

Yet if Zelenskyy's fresh authoritarian moves are really aiming at preparing for a postwar election next year, then that is a terrible sign, too.

It would indicate not only that he is planning to damage Ukraine even further by his presence, but also that those postwar elections will be anything but fair and equal. In other words, in that scenario, Zelenskyy will try to stay around, and so will the authoritarian regime he has built.

To be fair to Zelenskyy, his authoritarianism has never been a response to the war, as his Western fans still believe, even when they are finally deigning to notice a little of his "dark side."

Zelenskyy was building an authoritarian regime - widely known and criticized in Ukraine back then already as "mono-vlada" - long before the escalation of February 2022.

Zelenskyy is not a benevolent leader who has been forced to adopt dictatorial habits by an emergency.

 

In reality, if anything, he has exploited the emergency for all it was worth to indulge his lust for unlimited power and extreme corruption.

So, trying to take his misrule into the postwar period is at least not inconsistent:

it has never been tied to wartime.

But behind all of this, there is one great irony and one bigger question.

The question is simple:

If Politico really believes that going after Kudritsky with lawfare and frustrating the "civil-society"-NGO crowd is "the dark side" of Zelenskyy's rule, what, if we may ask, is the 'bright side' supposed to be?

 

Indeed, where is the better side of real-existing Zelenskyy-ism?

 

Is it the humungous corruption?

 

The Bakhmut-style military fiascos, the Kursk Kamikaze incursion, and now Pokrovsk?

 

The fact that the media have been mercilessly streamlined?

 

The raging nepotism that makes sure that the poor fight and the sons and daughters of Ukraine's gangsterish "elite" go on holidays and party?

 

The personality cult?

 

Or is it - and this brings us to the great irony - that Zelenskyy-Ukraine is allegedly in sync with "Western values"...?

 

And do you know what?

It really is...!

But not the way that the propagandists of both Ukraine and the NATO-EU West want us to believe.

What the Zelenskyy regime and its supporters in the EU really have in common is that,

neither care about either democracy or the rule of law.

 

Zelenskyy going after critics with individual financial sanctions to evade normal legal procedures and leave his victims not even a slim chance to defend themselves, for instance?

 

That is exactly what Germany and the EU are now doing to the journalist Hüseyin Dogru, and not only to him.

 

Zelenskyy using a perverted reading of the law to harass whoever does not submit or is a political danger to him?

Bingo again...!

That as well is now EU practice, too. Ask, for instance, Marine Le Pen in France.

Finally,

widespread abuse of political office for self-enrichment and influence peddling?

Bingo again:

Less than a month ago, the Financial Times ran a detailed article on "scores" of EU parliament members who "earn income from second jobs in areas that overlap with their lawmaking," raising "questions about disclosure of potential conflicts of interest."

How delicately put. And it sounds just like Ukraine's Rada...

Here's the real news:

The "dark side" of Zelenskyy's rule is all of Zelenskyy's rule.

And it is also what has become the new normal in an increasingly authoritarian and corrupt EU.

Who has learned from whom?

 

Kiev from NATO-EU Europe or vice versa?

Either way, this is not a bug but a feature.

And it must stop. Everywhere...!