|

by Mia Osmonbekov
July 23, 2026
from
Fortune Website
Article also
HERE
Italian version
|
Mia Osmonbekov
is a Dow Jones News Fund fellow at Fortune covering
breaking news. She holds bachelor's and master's degrees in
journalism from Arizona State University and previously reported for
local and regional outlets in her home state. |

How many bots are eating the
internet,
or how many
aren't?
.Getty Images
A.I. agents are
eating the Web,
growing by
nearly 8,000%
and rewiring the
Internet's business model...
The
dead internet theory has floated
around internet forums since the 2010s, and the idea that the
internet is dominated by non-human activity was often dismissed as a
fringe conspiracy.
Now it has become a measurable fact.
Not only do
multiple cybersecurity firms agree that bots outnumber humans
online, they likewise are struggling to answer when the flip
happened or what metrics to use to measure it.
CloudFlare, the Internet security and performance giant used by
millions of websites worldwide, says the crossover occurred in June,
with bots generating 57.5% of webpage requests.
Thales, a French tech group that protects data
security for organizations and governments, dates the crossover back
to 2023, issuing a "Bad
Bot Report" that put bot traffic at 53% in 2026.
The discrepancies reflect that there's no one standard way to
measure bot traffic, as no single provider has access to activity
across the entire web, according to
Rudy Yang, Pitchbook's
enterprise and retail fintech analyst who wrote the firm's
July report about agentic A.I.
traffic.
"There's a lot of missing pieces of
information, but a lot of the observed data suggests the same
thing, which is like there is more bot activity," Yang told
Fortune.
"Agentic A.I. activity is driving a lot of
the browser activity you're seeing."
The surge of agents is massive everywhere you
look.
Traffic generated by agents that actually take action on the
web, like clicking links and filling out forms, grew 7,851% year
over year, according to cybersecurity firm
HUMAN Security's 2026 State of A.I. Traffic & Cyberthreat Benchmark Report.
Scraper traffic, by
comparison, grew 597% over the same stretch, and A.I. training
crawlers, while still 67.5% of A.I.-driven traffic, are a shrinking
share of the total.
The timing caught even bot-watchers off guard. CloudFlare CEO
Matthew Prince
had predicted in March that bots
wouldn't cross the halfway mark until the end of 2027.
Instead, the
crossover arrived more than a year early.
"For companies and developers, this means
that building for agent traffic will become nonnegotiable," Yang
wrote in the report.
The Internet's business model - ad impressions,
conversion funnels, pageview-based analytics - was built on the
assumption that the visitor is a human being.
If most of them are
now agents, that assumption is upended and reshapes how companies
monetize web traffic
The same autonomy driving that agentic A.I.
traffic is what let an
OpenAI model slip its cage this
week - meaning the volume surge is just the visible symptom of a shift
businesses can neither fully measure nor, yet, fully control.
"They consume the web completely differently than humans do," Yang
told Fortune.
"It's almost like an entire new category,
customer category, was created, and it means a lot for
businesses because no one, as a business owner, is going to want
to silo themselves from being able to serve a completely new
customer segment."
Change of Strategy for the 'Machine
Economy' and the Limits of A.I. Agents
Companies are noticing this shift, and developers have started
adapting to this reality.
Stripe
reported that 70% of its commands
used to access data through an API are coming from agents. API
brokerage firm Alpaca also
noted that its monthly API calls
grew from single digits in Q4 2025 to 30% in Q1 2026 driven by
agents.
In response, approximately
25% of developers now design APIs
with agents as the primary end consumer rather than humans, and over
half of them cite unauthorized agent access as a security concern.
Yang listed,
Visa, Ramp, Mercury, ElevenLabs,
Stripe, Coinbase, MoonPay, and
DoorDash,
...as companies that have
launched command line interfaces (CLIs) - commands that retrieve
data from an API - geared toward agents.
"As more companies launch agent-native CLIs, agents gain broader
access to execute work, driving further adoption," Yang wrote.
"Companies will then build more agent-first
infrastructure, accelerating the cycle."
The issue is that bot-detection systems can only measure traffic
that explicitly identifies itself as automated or trips a known
signature, while agentic browsers that mimic human behavior patterns
routinely slip past traditional filters.
A
recent academic study of bot-detection
systems from the University of Bamberg found soft block rates of
7%-15% simply from detection systems misfiring on real traffic, let
alone the reverse problem of agents undetected entirely.
Seer
Interactive, a digital marketing firm, has been
warning clients since 2023 that
agentic browsers can,
"inflate engagement, artificially depress
bounce rates, and distort session duration" in ways standard
analytics tools don't catch.
Still, Yang is careful to note that what
Pitchbook calls the "machine economy" remains small relative to the broader economy
- for
now.
The firm estimates only about 1% of the roughly $20 trillion in work
that could plausibly be handed to A.I. agents is actually flowing
through them today.
A separate estimate from the startup Forsy puts
total global "agent GDP" - economic value directly attributable to
deployed agents - at $36 billion a year on a run-rate basis.
Yang told Fortune that A.I. agents can't fully participate in the
online economy yet because payments and liability aren't solved.
"If we don't have the infrastructure to do proper payments for
agents, then agents aren't buying and selling, and if agents aren't
buying and selling, then they aren't generating economic activity,"
Yang said.
|