by Israel Shamir
July 24, 2026
from UNZ Website

Article also HERE

A couple of weeks ago, in Ankara, the capital of Turkey, there was a NATO conference that sought yet more rearmament and militarization,

steps that must inevitably lead to a new Great War...

As an answer to this NATO conference,

200 ministers, members of parliament, ambassadors, politicians, activists, journalists, retired generals, academics, diplomats, military personnel and experts from many countries,

...gathered in Ankara last weekend to prevent NATO's new Great War...!

Among them were a few of our fellows, Unz Review writers, notably Larry Johnson and Scott Ritter.

The Alliance to Prevent the Great War concluded that the threats that could lead to a Great War originate from the United States, the EU and Israel.

The US and Israeli attacks on Iran, NATO's build-up of military power in Ukraine and the deployment of proxy forces against Russia, Israel's genocide in Gaza and the attacks on Lebanon,

these are regional wars that carry the risk of triggering a Great War...

NATO, as an Instrument of US hegemony, poses a Threat to World Peace

The countries targeted by NATO, foremost among them Russia, do not pose a threat to Europe.

The militarization of Europe should be stopped. The course towards confrontation between NATO and Russia must be reversed. The escalation of the conflict poses a direct threat of nuclear war.

Western leaders must not cross Russia's 'red lines', provoke or 'test' the strength of the Russian people and their president.

Conference participants stated that arms supply to Ukraine must cease. Further arms supply to Kiev will sooner or later lead to an expansion of military operations in Europe.

In short, the Alliance to Prevent the Great War calls for the strategic union of four states:

Russia, China, Iran and Turkey, against the US, EU, and Israel.

Never before has Israel been considered such an enemy - not by Russia, neither by Turkey.

Putin in his first visits to Israel tried to befriend the Jewish state, saying that there are more than a million ex-Soviet citizens in Israel, speaking Russian and maintaining family ties with Russians in Russia.

However, recently Israel has become a stage for anti-Russian emigres with a strong sympathy for an independent Ukrainian state.

These are mainly Soviet Jews who were born in the Ukraine, or their ancestors were from the Ukraine, and it turned them towards the Ukrainian statelet of Mr Zelensky.
 

Many Soviet Jews were Extremely pro-American

A Russian writer Viktor Pelevin wrote once that a modern cultural Jew - whether living in Moscow or New York - often faces a subconscious dilemma, unable to definitively answer whether they are primarily a patriot of Israel or a patriot of the United States.

The support of Ukraine by Israel spoiled its relations with Russia, though Israel tried to hide its pro-Ukrainian stance.

A Russian-Israeli journalist Artem Kirpichenok wrote (tongue in cheek) of Israel's contributions to the Ukraine war:

1. Israeli anti-tank weapons have been transferred to Ukraine via NATO countries. With their help, a column of Russian troops near Kharkiv has already been destroyed.
    

2. 'Volunteers' - veterans of Israeli special forces - have been deployed to Ukraine. As MP Gerashchenko stated:

'The best of the best. They, too, want to take part in the struggle of light against darkness. Shabbat Shalom!'

3. Doctors and hospitals have been deployed to assist the Ukrainian army and the civilian population.
    

4. 76 per cent of Israelis support Ukraine (i.e. everyone except the Arab minority)
    

5. The renowned Israeli thinker Yuval Noah Harari noted in a television interview that Putin believes Ukrainians are Russians, and that only a handful of Jews who have taken over Ukraine are preventing them from pelting Russian tanks with flowers. Thus, Putin is a psychopath and an anti-Semite.
    

6. Religious circles emphasize the fact that Putin launched a war against the Jew Zelensky on the eve of Purim and will therefore inevitably suffer the same fate as Haman and Stalin.

Turkey was once rather friendly to Israel, but Israel's attack on the Mavi Marmara boat that carried Turkish volunteers to Gaza spoiled it.

Israel's genocide of Gaza turned the people of Turkey against Israel, while Israeli objections to the US sale of jets to Turkey added to the enmity.

And finally, Israeli officials claiming that,

"Turkey is the next Iran" firmly shut this door forever.

Thus has Israel been doing its part to get Russia, China, Iran and Turkey together into a strategic union.

Still Turkey remains a member of NATO, and President Trump calls President Erdogan "his best friend". Russian relations with Iran are very good, and could be described as "strategic".

The Alliance to Prevent the Great War stated:

"One of the factors that undoubtedly prevented the United States and Israel from using nuclear weapons in their attacks against Iran was the nuclear umbrella provided by Iran's partnership with Russia and China.

 

Had a strategic alliance between Turkey, Russia, China and Iran already been established, this would have made an American-Israeli attack on Iran impossible from the outset."

What should be done with NATO?

The Alliance to Prevent the Great War ruled:

It is not the reorganization of NATO, but its abolition, that would serve global security.

 

European countries would thereby also be freed from the new and onerous burden imposed by the United States on NATO members.

Among interesting speakers there was Prof Dr Ulrike Guérot of Germany.

A renowned political scientist, Prof Guérot presented a radical vision for the future of Europe. Arguing that NATO has completed its historical mission, Prof Guérot stated that Europe must break free from American hegemony, transition to a neutral stance, and build its future with Eurasia, particularly with Turkey.

Giving extensive space to the war in the Ukraine in her speech, Prof Guérot claimed that this conflict is a proxy war that has been prepared for a long time.

Criticizing NATO's eastward expansion policies, the political scientist argued that NATO has ceased to be a security alliance and has become an element of tension, stating:

"We did not tear down the Berlin Wall; we merely moved it a thousand kilometers to the East, to Kiev.

 

We are building a rigid NATO line and dividing the European continent."

Prof Guérot proposed a concrete model of cooperation to reduce Europe's dependence on the United States.

She argued that a strong tripartite cooperation mechanism established between Paris, Moscow, and Istanbul could build a lasting order of peace and independence on the continent.

Responding sharply to Israel's policies toward Gaza, Prof Guérot described the silent collaboration and ongoing arms support of the European Union as a "deep shame."

Probably Israel vs. Palestine is the deepest bifurcation point between the US and the rest of mankind.

While the world supports Palestine, President Trump stands for Israel, and he does not care about genocide.

 

I think it will be his undoing.

Scott Ritter

Our Scott Ritter said:

"To be honest, what happened in Ankara (the NATO conference) was an affront to Turkey's sovereignty.

 

We must never forget that the countries gathered in Ankara are not Turkey's friends.

 

Not a single one of them. Neither the United States, nor France, nor Germany, nor the United Kingdom, nor other NATO members, nor Greece."

What took place there was nothing more than a grand political spectacle.

It was a large-scale political charade staged to drag Turkey into NATO's adventure in Ukraine and to exploit Turkey's strategic position - painstakingly built up by President Erdogan over the last decade - in Europe's interests and to Turkey's detriment.

People need to understand this:

Everything NATO does - frankly, everything the United States does - runs counter to Turkey's interests.

 

Because Turkey has never been a priority.

 

Neither for the United States nor for NATO...

NATO has used Turkey for its own interests from the very first day of its accession to the alliance.

Turkey was drawn into the alliance to ensure the security of NATO's southern flank. But that task effectively came to an end with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

Now they are trying to drag Turkey into an even greater quagmire:

Ukraine...!

They want Turkey to become an active participant in a war that has dragged on for far too long, has resulted in far too many casualties, and seems unlikely to end as NATO intends - namely, with a strategic defeat for Russia.

So,

why did President Erdogan allow NATO's conference to be hosted in Ankara?

I think the answer lies in the Turkish economy.

I think President Erdogan was hoping to create an atmosphere of goodwill by hosting Western countries in Ankara, which could have yielded positive results for Turkey.

However, I believe he will be disappointed in this regard.

On the contrary,

I believe that in the coming period Turkey will continue to develop relations with Russia, China and, increasingly, Iran.

This is because Turkey will realize that working together with these countries, which oppose American global hegemony and NATO's subservient role within that hegemony, is the right path for its own future.

Larry C. Johnson said:

"The Ukraine war is not simply a war between Ukraine and Russia. The West is waging a 'NATO proxy war', using Ukraine against Russia."

European leaders are facing a crisis of confidence in their own countries. Examples of this include Germany's de-industrialization, the Volkswagen crisis and the economic downturn.

NATO's stockpiles are depleted; factories cannot cope with the workload.

The war in Ukraine is currently,

'the most dangerous flashpoint in the world'...

NATO's preparations for direct war are increasing the risk of nuclear escalation, and Russia has reached the point where it could deploy tactical nuclear weapons.

Germany was also represented by Admiral Kay-Achim Schönbach, the man who commanded the German Navy and retired to avoid fighting Russians.

He said:

My name is Kay-Achim Schönbach.

 

I am a retired Vice-Admiral of the German Navy, and until 2022 I served as Commander-in-Chief of the German Navy. As a citizen of a European country and as a German, I can only express my deepest concern on this matter.

 

Not since the dark and dangerous days of the Cuban Missile Crisis have we been so close to an escalation that could lead to a major war in Europe.

 

And I do not believe I am the only one to have reached this conclusion.

The war in Donbas, in particular, has shown us that ignoring the historical context and failing to undertake a more in-depth and, above all, impartial examination of the causes of the conflict has been one of the fundamental factors that made this armed conflict possible.

The wars in Eastern Europe could have been avoided. We know this. We all know this...

Drawing on my own experience, I can say with confidence today that diplomacy based on mutual respect and conducted on an equal footing provided all the necessary means to prevent this smouldering conflict from escalating into a full-scale war.

 

And I do not think I am the only one who shares this view.

 

However, we must all acknowledge that the influential players in the international system had ample opportunities to resolve this conflict.

 

Perhaps there was no complete agreement on every detail, but they managed to prevent the conflict from spiraling out of control.

The Admiral explained this behavior of his superiors by "moralizing and misguided idealism", in my view this is too optimistic an explanation.

The Greek journalist Dimitris Konstantakopoulos chaired one of the sessions. Konstantinopoulos stated that Europe's sanctions against Russia are not sustainable.

Issuing a warning, the Greek expert assessed the situation as follows:

"Both in Ukraine and in Western Asia, we are heading towards a very dangerous situation which, if it escalates, could even lead to nuclear war...

 

That is precisely why we must de-escalate tensions, and I fear that very few political forces in Europe realize this. This makes the situation extremely dangerous."

The Greek expert noted that the sanctions imposed by Europe have not worked.

Konstantinopoulos said:

"The sanctions have proved ineffective...

 

However, if you wish to achieve the United States' long-term strategic objective, they have proved effective: namely, to separate Europe from Russia (and the former Soviet Union in the past) and make Europe entirely dependent on the United States.

 

If that was the aim of the sanctions, then they have achieved it.

 

Incidentally, I believe that the entire operation in Ukraine - by which I mean the 2014 coup, because the Ukrainian issue did not begin with Russia's intervention in 2022 but many years earlier - all this Western aggression in the territories of the former USSR was planned.

 

It was a pre-emptive policy aimed at preventing a potential alliance between Europe and Russia, or, as the former French Prime Minister De Villepin put it, between Europe, Russia and China."

It takes more than a conference to stop the coming Great War.

Still, the Alliance to Prevent the Great War was a very useful discussion of the possible ways to do it, and surely much better than NATO's own conference of trial balloons for their future war crimes...