by Gary Armstrong
November 99, 2024
from GaryArmstrong Website
 

 

 

 



 


Imagine a world where every country, big or small, has a say

This is what people mean when they talk about a "polyphonic world."

 

Instead of a world run by a few powerful nations, like,

...it's a world where many voices and ideas shape global decisions.

 

In this world, different countries, cultures, and perspectives work together, each adding a unique perspective.
 

 

 


Some countries, like Russia and China, like this idea

They often challenge systems led by Western nations.

 

With so many different national interests, getting everyone to talk openly and agree can be tough.

Smaller countries have a lot to gain - and large, powerful nation-states have much to lose - in this complex game of global politics.

Today, the world is filled with over 110 conflicts, and the biggest powers haven't managed to make it safer.

 

In most cases, the most powerful nations have influenced government regime changes by funding arms and intelligence to create chaos in order to change governments for their own national interest.

 

This isn't just about wars:

it's about how countries try to get what they want, often through regime change so that powerful countries can extract resources from a destabilized country, at the expense of others.

This system of rivalries and alliances doesn't always make the world a safer place.

 

Today, we are living in a global world order with unending conflicts due to national self-interests.

 

 

 


But if we did move to a polyphonic world order, things would change

Imagine smaller countries having a real voice in big decisions.

They could work more closely with regional groups, like the African Union in Africa or ASEAN in Southeast Asia, to solve problems that affect their regions directly.

These groups know their own areas best, so they might be able to bring in solutions that actually work for their societies.

A world where no one country is the "global policeman" could also mean less chance of big powers using smaller countries as battlegrounds for proxy wars or to test out their new military technology, as if these smaller, weaker countries were military laboratories.

 

Instead, countries might choose to settle their disagreements through networks that are closer to them.

This approach could cut down on wars and help keep peace.

 

 

 


Such a world order would make organizations like the United Nations stronger

If countries worked together equally, then the UN could do a better job of helping with big problems and keeping the peace.

 

With many voices at the table, there would be less dominance by any one power and more chances for countries to solve their problems locally.

 

 

 


A polyphonic world order would only work if all countries were truly committed to working together

There would need to be a shared focus on diplomacy, fair cooperation, respect for each country's values, and perspectives.

 

And while it has the potential to create a more peaceful world, there are some real obstacles.

 

For example,

if every country wants a say, it might take longer to make decisions.

 

Rivalries between neighboring countries could still cause trouble.

 

And in emergencies, this slower process might mean less immediate help where it's needed most.

In the end, a polyphonic world depends on everyone's willingness to make it happen.

 

If countries can find a way to work together, not for their own greed but for the greater good, we could build a safer, more inclusive global community.

As Annie Jacobsen, author of Nuclear War - A Scenario, has mentioned,

the world is ever closer to nuclear war - a nuclear holocaust that would take less than three hours to destroy all the power and water infrastructure, and less than four weeks to create a nuclear winter of -60°C across the whole planet, due to the blocked sunlight from radioactive smoke of burning buildings, structures, crops, and forests...

 

 

 

 

 


 

A Polyphonic World System

Vladimir Putin offers a Higher Hypothesis for Global Diplomacy
by Dennis Speed
November 09, 2024

from LaRoucheOrganization Website

 

 

Sometimes, it is possible to introduce "frontier concepts" of great power and depth - what are sometimes called "heavy ideas" - into societies that normally prefer to ignore or avoid their world-shaking implications.

 

We are now living in such a moment.

 

Russia's President Vladimir Putin, speaking in Sochi at the Valdai Discussion Club on a multiplicity of topics, including the Nov. 5 Presidential elections in the United States, offered the following international thought-experiment.

"The rise of nations and cultures that have previously remained on the periphery of global politics for one reason or another means that their own distinct ideas of law and justice are playing an increasingly important role," Putin said in his opening remarks.

 

"They are diverse. This may give the impression of discord and perhaps cacophony, but this is only the initial phase.

 

It is my deep conviction that the only new international system possible is one embracing polyphony, where many tones and many musical themes are sounded together to form harmony.

 

If you like, we are moving towards a world system that is going to be polyphonic rather than polycentric, one in which all voices are heard and, most importantly, absolutely must be heard.

 

Those who are used to soloing and want to keep it that way will have to get used to the new 'scores' now."

In this way, Vladimir Putin is not merely invoking the "better angels" of the nature of Western Civilization.

 

His reference to a "polyphonic world system" should not be instantly misunderstood as a clever rhetorical pivot from the politically-charged term "multipolarity."

 

Indeed, the above proposal - the immediate basis for a way out of thermonuclear war, if implemented - is only capable of being competently comprehended for action, from the standpoint of the Ten Principles for a New International Strategic and Development Architecture composed by Schiller Institute founder, Helga Zepp-LaRouche.

 

This document, particularly in the remaining days between last Tuesday, November 5, and the inauguration of the American President on Martin Luther King Day, January 20, 2025, should be closely studied.

For example, Principle Four of that document states:

"Since mankind is the only creative species known so far in the universe, and given the fact that human creativity is the only source of wealth through the potentially limitless discovery of new universal principles, one of the main aims of the new International Security and Development Architecture must be providing access to universal education for every child and adult person living.

 

The true nature of man is to become a beautiful soul, as Friedrich Schiller discusses this, and the only person that can fulfill that condition is the genius."

But aren't these only "nice words"?

 

How does this Fourth Principle pertain in any way to what Putin said?

 

And, again:

Why is Putin's idea of a "polyphonic world system" not only the immediate, narrow pathway out of otherwise-inevitable thermonuclear war, but also the way forward to a potentially unprecedented, worldwide renaissance out of our present, century-plus trans-Atlantic New Dark Age - the latest phase of which was sparked by the November 22, 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy?

That very President John F. Kennedy hinted the answer to this question in his own way, three weeks before he was killed:

"The artist, however faithful to his personal vision of reality, becomes the last champion of the individual mind and sensibility against an intrusive society and an officious state...

 

I see little of more importance to the future of our country and our civilization than full recognition of the place of the artist."

Polyphony is a musical term, but perhaps our Idea of music must first be expanded, in order to understand what the actual topic is, that what both Vladimir Putin and Helga Zepp-LaRouche are proposing be discussed for an actually new strategic and development architecture to arise in the world today.

 

The late economist and statesman Lyndon LaRouche, who spoke about this matter often, said, in his document "Music and Science: Before and After the 1815 Treaty of Vienna":

"As Beethoven emphasized, for example, the secret of the great Classical composers was the reciting of poetry as the root of musical ideas.

 

It follows, as is the case, that instrumental music is merely an abstraction from the singing of poetry by choruses.

 

Similarly, the music of a nation is differentiated, essentially, according to the differences in the manner in which the most influential poetry is composed in that language, as Schiller's poetry, according to Beethoven, captures the essence of the principle of composition of German Classical music and as the poetry of Dante and Petrarca is the standard of reference for compositions of music in Italian.

 

Hence, as the poetry composed in a language degenerates, so the power of musical composition of a user of that language degenerates."

The ability of a society to articulate its origin and deeper purpose degenerates.

Soon a nation's population can no longer recognize either their nation, or themselves.

Compare, for example, the speeches of John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King to the best of public orations from any American figure today.

Who recognizes the better angels of America's nature in the common political or social parlance of our time?

For the Schiller Institute, founded 40 years ago with the original intent to reverse the then-ongoing cultural collapse of Western nations by an emphasis on Classical poetry, drama and musical composition and performance, these matters are not secondary.

 

Two weeks ago, the LaRouche Independent candidates Diane Sare and Jose Vega co-hosted an event, "Build a Chorus of Peace Against the Ghouls of War," which employed Classical or Classically inspired musical compositions from around the world as the medium through which the speeches by the various participants, and the two candidates, were delivered.

 

At the event, music was not an interlude; it was very fabric of the composition of, and the driver of the message of peace.

 

Candidate Diane Sare conducted the chorus, performed in a brass quintet, and delivered one of the peace addresses, demonstrating the unity of effect of the whole.

Return, now, to consider Putin's remarks reported above.

Russia's President is identifying polyphony as the potential basis for a renewed relationship with a morally degenerating, economically unraveling trans-Atlantic world - a new polyphonic system of international relations.

It would be a good idea, it would seem, therefore if everyone interested in peace investigated what polyphony is.

 

To respond to that proposal, Western nations need to revisit, re-examine and revive one the most powerful and misunderstood revolutions in human thinking of the past 300-plus years - the well-tempered, polyphonic revolution in musical composition and human thought, embodied in the person and compositions of J.S. Bach, and advanced by musicians and composers such as,

  • Bach's sons

  • Franz Joseph Haydn

  • Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart

  • Ludwig van Beethoven

  • Franz Schubert

  • Robert and Clara Schumann

  • Felix and Fanny Mendelssohn

  • Giuseppe Verdi

  • Johannes Brahms

  • Antonin Dvorak,

...and certain of their associates and collaborators.

 

President-elect Donald Trump should take note of this.

 

A "Special Musical Operation" should be launched by the American people, if not the new Administration, which energetically colludes with Russia, China, and all other nations committed to the cause of polyphony.

 

(It would also help to fully reject the obscene State Department "Global Musical Initiative" that Tony Blinken inaugurated last year with his awful guitar-playing, which is probably a "Color Revolution" front.)

 

Putin knows that Beethoven's great Missa Solemnis was premiered in his hometown, St. Petersburg, Russia, April 7, 1824, two hundred years ago.

Beethoven demanded this because he believed that Russia had many of the best singers in the world, and they were needed...

Thermonuclear war may well be able to be avoided, if we dare to think like Beethoven, and build a world system of polyphony.