by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
March 31, 2025

from PaulCraigRoberts Website

 

 

Paul Craig Roberts

is a renowned author and academic, chairman of The Institute for Political Economy.

Dr. Roberts was previously associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal.

He was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy during the Reagan Administration.

 

 

 

 

Foreign mercenaries

fighting for Kiev regime forces

should leave immediately

Source
 



Last Saturday

The New York Times

completely abandoned

the official narrative of

the Ukraine Conflict,

thus overturning the apple cart full of lies.

 

Jeff Childers gives us the gist of

The New York Times abandonment

of the ruling lie...

 



Here is an excerpt from the NYT article, 'The Secret History of the War in Ukraine - The untold story of America's hidden role in Ukrainian military operations':

With remarkable transparency, the Pentagon has offered a public inventory of the $66.5 billion array of weaponry supplied to Ukraine - including, at last count, more than,

  • a half-billion rounds of small-arms ammunition and grenades

  • 10,000 Javelin antiarmor weapons

  • 3,000 Stinger antiaircraft systems

  • 272 howitzers

  • 76 tanks

  • 40 High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems

  • 20 Mi-17 helicopters

  • 3 Patriot air defense batteries

But a New York Times investigation reveals that America was woven into the war far more intimately and broadly than previously understood.

 

At critical moments, the partnership was the backbone of Ukrainian military operations that, by U.S. counts, have killed or wounded more than 700,000 Russian soldiers. (Ukraine has put its casualty toll at 435,000.)

 

Side by side in Wiesbaden's mission command center, American and Ukrainian officers planned Kyiv's counteroffensives.

 

A vast American intelligence-collection effort both guided big-picture battle strategy and funneled precise targeting information down to Ukrainian soldiers in the field.

One European intelligence chief recalled being taken aback to learn how deeply enmeshed his NATO counterparts had become in Ukrainian operations.

"They are part of the kill chain now," he said.

The partnership's guiding idea was that this close cooperation might allow the Ukrainians to accomplish the unlikeliest of feats - to deliver the invading Russians a crushing blow.

 

And in strike after successful strike in the first chapters of the war - enabled by Ukrainian bravery and dexterity but also Russian incompetence - that underdog ambition increasingly seemed within reach.
by Adam Entous

The Secret History of America’s Involvement in the Ukraine War

The New York Times - March 29, 2025

What is the explanation?

My guess is that the Deep State has decided to abandon the conflict and is most likely the author of the Times' article.

 

The purpose of the article is to set up Zelensky as the scapegoat who caused the war to be lost and to get rid of him so that the conflict can be brought to an end.

These paragraphs show the purpose:

It was going according to plan, the Times sadly said, "until it wasn't."

 

The problem wasn't the Russians, the Americans, or even the slowly draining numbers of trained Ukrainian military forces. No, the problem was one spotlight-hogging Vladimir Zelenskyy.

 

With two y's, for you've got to be kidding me, squared.

"Zelensky was hoping to attend the United Nations General Assembly," the Times reported.

 

"A showing of progress on the battlefield would bolster his case for additional military support.

 

So the Ukrainians upended the plan at the last minute - a preview of a fundamental disconnect that would increasingly shape the arc of the war."

Childers' translation:

Zelensky started making his own decisions - ones not approved by the Americans - and the war began unraveling.

A few of us have known from day one that the Ukraine conflict was Washington's war run out of Wiesbaden.

 

The questions are:

Why didn't Putin know, and if he did know why didn't he do anything?

Now that The New York Times has admitted that the conflict in Ukraine was America's war with Russia disguised as Russia's "invasion" of Ukraine, a war that, as I have often said, Trump has no stake in, Trump can end the conflict by ceasing to participate.

 

There is no reason for bureaucrats and emissaries to hold endless negotiations.

Trump simply declares the war is over...!

Let's hope Trump and Putin have the wits to see this...