
by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
March 31, 2025
from
PaulCraigRoberts Website
Paul Craig Roberts
is a renowned author and
academic, chairman of The Institute for Political
Economy.
Dr. Roberts was previously
associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street
Journal.
He was Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury for Economic Policy during the Reagan
Administration. |

Foreign mercenaries
fighting for Kiev
regime forces
should leave
immediately
Source
Last Saturday
The New
York Times
completely
abandoned
the
official narrative of
the
Ukraine Conflict,
thus
overturning the apple cart full of lies.
Jeff Childers
gives us
the gist of
The
New York Times abandonment
of the
ruling lie...
Here is an excerpt from the NYT article,
'The
Secret History of the War in Ukraine - The untold story of America's
hidden role in Ukrainian military operations':
With remarkable transparency, the Pentagon
has offered a public inventory of the $66.5 billion array of
weaponry supplied to Ukraine - including, at last count, more
than,
-
a half-billion rounds of small-arms
ammunition and grenades
-
10,000 Javelin antiarmor weapons
-
3,000 Stinger antiaircraft systems
-
272 howitzers
-
76 tanks
-
40 High Mobility Artillery Rocket
Systems
-
20 Mi-17 helicopters
-
3 Patriot air defense batteries
But a New York Times investigation reveals
that America was woven into the war far more intimately and
broadly than previously understood.
At critical moments, the partnership was the
backbone of Ukrainian military operations that, by U.S. counts,
have killed or wounded more than 700,000 Russian soldiers.
(Ukraine has put its casualty toll at 435,000.)
Side by side in Wiesbaden's mission command
center, American and Ukrainian officers planned Kyiv's
counteroffensives.
A vast American intelligence-collection
effort both guided big-picture battle strategy and funneled
precise targeting information down to Ukrainian soldiers in the
field.
One European intelligence chief recalled being taken aback to
learn how deeply enmeshed his NATO counterparts had become in
Ukrainian operations.
"They are part of the kill chain now," he
said.
The partnership's guiding idea was that this
close cooperation might allow the Ukrainians to accomplish the
unlikeliest of feats - to deliver the invading Russians a
crushing blow.
And in strike after successful strike in the
first chapters of the war - enabled by Ukrainian bravery and
dexterity but also Russian incompetence - that underdog ambition
increasingly seemed within reach.
by Adam Entous
The Secret History of America’s
Involvement in the Ukraine War
The New York Times - March 29,
2025
What is the explanation?
My guess is that
the Deep State has decided to
abandon the conflict and is most likely the author of the Times'
article.
The purpose of the article is to set up
Zelensky as the scapegoat who caused the war to be lost and
to get rid of him so that the conflict can be brought to an end.
These paragraphs show the purpose:
It was going according to plan, the Times
sadly said, "until it wasn't."
The problem wasn't the Russians, the
Americans, or even the slowly draining numbers of trained
Ukrainian military forces. No, the problem was one
spotlight-hogging Vladimir Zelenskyy.
With two y's, for you've got to
be kidding me, squared.
"Zelensky was hoping to attend the United
Nations General Assembly," the Times reported.
"A showing of progress on the battlefield
would bolster his case for additional military support.
So the Ukrainians upended the plan at the
last minute - a preview of a fundamental disconnect that
would increasingly shape the arc of the war."
Childers' translation:
Zelensky started making his own decisions -
ones not approved by the Americans - and the war began
unraveling.
A few of us have known from day one that the
Ukraine conflict was Washington's war run out of Wiesbaden.
The questions are:
Why didn't Putin know, and if he did know why
didn't he do anything?
Now that The New York Times has admitted
that the conflict in Ukraine was America's war with Russia
disguised as Russia's "invasion" of Ukraine, a war that, as I
have often said, Trump has no stake in, Trump can end the conflict
by ceasing to participate.
There is no reason for bureaucrats and emissaries
to hold endless negotiations.
Trump simply declares the war is over...!
Let's hope Trump and Putin have the
wits to see this...
|