|
by James Corbett
Shocking, isn't it?
And the most shocking thing of all:
It's a solution that
attacks the root of the problem and, by extension, threatens the
globalist agenda itself.
Naturally, the establishment lapdogs over at
Politico have only reported on this solution in order to disparage
the idea and those who are forwarding it. But still, to see an
actual solution being discussed on a dinosaur media platform at all
is itself an amazing development.
Let's put on our reading glasses and take a look.
And, if you do exclusively follow those sources of misinformation, then you'll have some vague, woolly-headed idea that the Paris Agreement is a magical parchment that will - through some mystical process you can't quite explain - placate the weather gods enough to limit future global temperature increases to 1.5°C (2.7°F).
If, however, you are a dedicated Free Searcher, then you'll know that:
But, like it or not, unless you happen to be a resident of Iran, Libya or Yemen - the only three nation-states on the planet that have not ratified this net zero death pledge - you are subject to this agreement.
Enter Trump...
Back in 2017, Trump announced Washington's withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.
However, by a strange coincidence, the earliest date that the US could actually withdraw from the treaty was November 4, 2020, the day after the American presidential (s)election.
And, as we all know, Sleepy Uncle Joe won the (s)election and promptly signed up the US to rejoin the agreement.
Well, we could choose to believe that the Orange Man is our MAGA saviour and, in order to end all climate nonsense forever, Americans will just have to vote even harder in 2024!
But that is an aggressively stupid take, one which fundamentally misunderstands the reality of the situation and thus arrives at a "solution" that is no solution at all.
Even if you believe Trump is actually against the globalists - which / is, needless / to / say, an / easily / demonstrable / lie - then the only thing that the US' failed Paris withdrawal demonstrates is that,
Imagine a universe in which the voting machines had declared Trump the winner in 2020 and the US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement had stuck.
Americans would be in the exact same boat today that they were then:
No, leaving the United States' - or any other country's - participation in the climate scam up to the caprice of a would-be ruler's whims is no solution at all.
So, how can the US exit Paris for good...?
How to REALLY Exit Paris
Enter Politico...
Earlier this month, the Washington propaganda rag published an article on "How Trump could exit Paris - and make it stick," which purports to reveal a new idea cooked up by "prominent conservatives":
That "could" in the last sentence is doing a lot of heavy lifting, but for the time being let's take the idea at face value:
At first glance, proposing that the US withdraw from the UNFCCC seems like a refreshingly radical idea.
("Radical" as compared to the usual milquetoast platitudes and meaningless gestures that generally accompany American political campaigns, anyway.)
No doubt, this suggestion is closer to being a solution to the problem of the growing UN climate tyranny than the withdrawal charade that Trump teased the public with during his administration.
But the devil, as always, is in the details...
Upon further inspection, it turns out that this "withdrawal" is - exactly like Trump's ineffectual action - part of a parlor game being played by the political establishment.
This time, the globalists on the right are reading the anti-establishment mood of the average voter and are deciding to cosplay as crusading anti-globalist populists in order to win votes.
Specifically, this UNFCCC withdrawal strategy - first reported on by E&E News - sources back to "Mandate for Leadership - The Conservative Promise," a "policy roadmap" put together by an organization called Project 2025.
Project 2025 describes itself as a,
It is being spearheaded by The Heritage Foundation and bankrolled by the likes of Leonard Leo and Pierre Omidyar, among many others.
As an elitist group of Beltway insiders funded by questionable Deep State operatives, you might expect that they have embedded a booby trap in their policy roadmap... and you'd be correct.
You see,
No, Project 2025 doesn't want to question the climate narrative itself and consign the entire $100 trillion house of cards that is the green swindle to the dustbin of history.
They just want to negotiate a bigger slice of that $100 trillion pie for Uncle Sam.
Lest there be any doubt on this point, Project 2025 member Mandy Gunasekara recently explained to E&E News what the group wants to see happen with this climate deal in the future:
Ah, I see...
This is of course exactly the way Trump framed the problem when he failed to withdraw from Paris the first time.
Speaking about his decision to pull out of Paris in 2017, Trump stressed that the agreement,
That's why he refused to rebuke the entire climate hoax and withdraw from the UNFCCC altogether.
In fact, he was eager to make clear that he was not seeking to end US participation in the climate hoax, but rather to,
So, just to be clear,
Having said that, the underlying idea that they are teasing the public with is a first step toward a real solution to this UN tyranny.
Yes, the US and every other country on the planet should withdraw from the UNFCCC.
Not just because pulling out of the UNFCCC will automatically end the Paris Agreement, and not just because these agreements are economically disadvantageous to American workers, but because the UNFCCC is a blatant political power grab masquerading as concern for Mother Earth (that is, in fact, based on psuedoscientific woo-woo).
Considering the incredible power of this simple idea, the next logical question is . . .
Why Stop There?
After all, as we are aware by now, the WHO is planning a political power grab of its own at the upcoming World Health Assembly in Geneva this May.
Specifically, the WHO technocrats are hoping to rubber stamp a raft of amendments to the International Health Regulations and a new Pandemic Agreement that may or may not include a slew of new tyrannical biosecurity measures (although no one can be sure, because they are still negotiating the details behind closed doors).
So, if member states can withdraw from the UNFCCC in order to bring down the Paris Agreement,
Of course they can...
For those who are concerned about the legalities and procedures involved with such a move: fret not! There are lawyers working on this very problem as we speak.
Dr. Francis Boyle, for example - the man who drafted the US legislation implementing the Biological Warfare Convention and someone who has been calling out the scamdemic since day one - provides his own assessment of the legalities of member state withdrawal from the WHO in "Exiting The World Health Organization":
What's interesting about Dr. Boyle's proposed approach is that it is not specific to the WHO itself and does not rely on appeal to any particular clause of the WHO Constitution or withdrawal procedure in the WHO playbook.
Merely by making the point that the WHO has undergone a fundamental change of circumstances, a transformation into,
...any state could enact a unilateral and immediate withdrawal from the organization.
Indeed, the legal mechanics of a withdrawal from the WHO are fascinating... but they seem to me to miss the point.
In the final analysis,
Withdrawal from the WHO or from the UNFCCC isn't the end result of a magical legal incantation, it's a unilateral action.
And - much like the phoney baloney paper money Ponzi scheme being run by the central banks of the world - the only thing keeping the UN's whole house of cards from coming down is that every country plays along with the fiction that they are legally obligated to participate in these organizations.
After all, if the US or another major member simply pulled out of the WHO,
Oooh, scary.
So, once we've formed the widespread, grassroots movement that will be responsible for effecting our withdrawal from the UNFCCC and the WHO - because, needless to say, neither Project 2025 nor any other group of partisan Beltway insiders will actually accomplish any of this for us,
Given that both the UNFCCC and the WHO are merely organs of the United Nations beast, so,
Don't let the door hit your ass on the way out, Earth Federation!
(What, you don't know about the Constitution for the Federation of the Earth? You need to watch more Corbett Report!)
Of course, after we've uncorked this bottle and let the withdrawal genie out, we might as well take it all the way.
In other words,
We can get to work organizing the secession of the states from the USA, of the provinces from the dominion of Canada, of the prefectures from Japan, and of the countries from the UK.
And then we can begin declaring sovereignty of counties.
And then it's time to devolve power down to the municipalities, and next to neighbourhoods, and finally... to sovereign individuals?
Well, one can always dream.
But, until people wake up and reclaim their individual sovereignty, we can at least start withdrawing from the WHO and the UNFCCC and all the other globalist death pledges that we find ourselves bound to.
I say:
Who's with me?
|
