|
If we allow the cosmos to develop, we cannot know anything about the origin. The current structure, however, can be seen. But inferring the initial state from the current structure only works with time-independent processes, such as a Markov process, since a time can be reversed there.
This is not possible with a development process.
Every engineer knows that you cannot deduce from the final state to the beginning, just as little as you can still recognize the horse-drawn carriage in a modern automobile.
The assumption of an initial state belongs to the realm of belief in a religion. Besides, what time is valid in the cosmos?
The technical replication of elements of nature is the ultimate proof of our understanding of how they work. How can we then succeed in reconciling belief in religion with science?
Our faith ends where
knowledge begins. Fewer and fewer functions of nature are expected
of gods today and more and more functions are recognized and thus
become the responsibility of mankind.
Of course, the authority to interpret the sky was one of the most important goals.
They were added in 1936
by Pope Pius XI through the newly founded Pontifical Academy of
Sciences. 1
However, the application was still based on the large-scale charge separation by means of mechanical power largely by burning fossil fuels.
At the same time, two worldviews competed,
While the electromagnetic worldview of the 19th century brought us from the energy industry to microelectronics and into an unprecedented level of prosperity, the advances on the basis of Newton's gravity seem rather modest.
The question of why the moon and the space probes are not on the earth falling back but swinging into an orbit cannot be explained mechanically satisfactorily.
Even though the worldview that was developed at the Solvay Conferences from 1911 is still adhered to today, many discoveries have been made since the beginning of space travel history that do not fit this picture.
We have to ask why this is so...
Einstein and the Pontifical Academie
The mysticism of the virgin birth was promoted by Lemaître and replaced by a mathematical mysticism.
Paul Dirac was one of the most prominent exponents of this mystification, who, although an avowed atheist, was a member of the newly founded Pontifical Academy of Sciences from the beginning until his death.
Mathematics took the place of religious belief and with it symmetry as an expression of beauty.
Dirac even spoke in this context of God, whom he considered being a "highly brilliant mathematician."
Wolfgang Pauli once put it:
He became the creator of a number of physical phantoms, the existence of which in some cases has even been allegedly proven, such as the spin from the Dirac equation and the neutrino in the radioactive decay of the neutron.
So, it came about that
relativity theory and quantum mechanics emerged as intellectual
fantasy products and were recognized as established theories.
The Dirac equations of quantum mechanics are based on the special theory of relativity, the basis of which is the Lorentz transformation of Maxwell's equations, whose sole purpose for Einstein was to symmetrize these equations.
This symmetrization is a physically completely nonsensical operation since it destroys the character of the equations, namely to describe the propagation of electromagnetic waves.
Lemaître and Einstein
Einstein himself must have taken it as a joke because he confessed to his friend Paul Ehrenfest:
Only anyone who knows
something about physics and geometry knows that curvatures can only
be observed on surfaces and that light rays are influenced in their
direction by diffraction due to optical effects.
Unlike the path on which it is based, it has no direction. Where one begins to count the cycles is left to the discretion of the observer; consequently, the time is relative.
Einstein once remarked that time is what clocks indicate, with which he expressed the relativity of time.
No more and no less...
The Lorentz transformation does the same with Maxwell's equations, which is why this figure shows time and distance distortions.
As Einstein said:
Physicists have learned to solve equations, but apparently, they have not been taught what they mean since Dirac and Heisenberg.
Visual perception wasn't trained when I was studying physics half a century ago. So, physicists tried using mathematics to construct an illusory world for which they were looking for evidence in reality.
However, new phantoms have to be invented because this leads to contradictions, again and again. Then further evidence was sought in reality without being bothered by the fact that this evidence had already been used up for other phenomena.
We have recently started calling something like this alternative facts.
The Pius XII - Lemaître Affair 1951
Alternative facts can
also be invented with a language
This belief was triggered because they could not explain why galaxies do not obey Newton's equation of gravitation but must contain much larger forces in order to explain their rotational speeds at the edges.
To resolve this contradiction, the black hole, dark matter, and dark energy, were invented...
But these terms do not say anything more than something invisible and mysterious exists that cannot be described with the known laws of physics.
Really...?
We know light deflection as an optical phenomenon resulting from wave diffraction or refraction at phase boundaries between an optically thinner and an optically denser medium.
This has nothing to do with gravity but with the optical density of the medium in the vicinity of plasma balls. In terms of radiation, black is an absorption range of around 400 nm to 780 nm.
Why should this area be preferred by gravity, or should this phenomenon be extended to the entire electromagnetic spectrum?
That would mean that in
the vicinity of a black hole not even thermal radiation should
occur. In other words, since we can only learn something about the
existence of cosmic objects through electromagnetic radiation, their
existence would not be verifiable, because forces, if they can be
measured, only reveal direction and strength but not the nature of
their origin.
This question is pretty academic and becomes easier to understand if you remember that light contains information about its light source in the form of a spectrum.
This would contradict the 2nd law of thermodynamics in a closed system.
Notwithstanding this, the 2020 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded,
You rub your eyes in amazement...
Has the Black Hole War and its end eluded the Nobel Committee, or was the celebrated astrophysics star Hawking, posthumously disqualified as a dabbler?
No, the general theory of relativity has become the foundation of the Catholic worldview and,
However, this statement would contradict physicists, who understand the universe and black holes as closed systems because the theory never spoke of an exit.
According to Rev. Lemaître,
Now we know that information has something to do with entropy and, according to Ilja Prigogine, this applies to the change in entropy in the overall open system.
This means that the total entropy change of the black hole dSSystem > 0 would always be positive. The black hole could not cool down at all since the total entropy would not decrease at any time.
This would prevent the mass from being able to contract and would be the prerequisite for gravity to grow in a small area.
Thermodynamics disturbs the beauty of the symmetry of the equations, which is why relativists and quantum mechanics want nothing to do with it.
For the above equation, Prigogine was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1977.
Now chemistry, like physics, belongs to the natural sciences. It is assumed that the knowledge of this neighboring discipline should have been incorporated into physics over the past four decades.
Huge electrical currents flow in the center of a galaxy that, in turn, generate huge magnetic fields.
These then cause a charge separation.
This is why we see plasma currents emerging from the center of certain galaxies which is typical for a plasmoid.
After the violation of Maxwell's equations by the symmetry fans among physicists, who say there are no electrical currents in the cosmos, black spots are rather retouched in the images of galaxies at the points of highest luminance to mark a suspected black hole.
Recently, a photo montage of recordings of large radio telescopes of galaxy nuclei has been in the press.
If you know that gas molecules radiate in the radio range and have learned that molecules break down through ionization, it soon becomes clear that the molecules are not preserved in the hot glowing center of a galaxy...
So, the center in the radio range, which is glaring in visible light, comparatively has to emit less radiation.
This is how this photo comes about, which depicts a situation that is interpreted completely differently from what it tells the expert.
Different Black Hole Fakes
These include the alleged proof of gravitational waves from the collision of black holes or neutron stars or the proof of the existence of the so rare god particle (Higgs Boson) that the mass should pass to the other particles.
Obviously, such people
have forgotten that mass is nothing more than an uncountable amount
of particles. The term mass, therefore, becomes superfluous in the
area of individual elementary particles.
Where there is no control, you always have to expect to be cheated, especially since experiments are so expensive today that independent control is no longer possible in a timely manner.
Unfortunately, general knowledge in the natural sciences and especially in physics has steadily declined over the past few decades, which is a fundamental disadvantage for a nation that, like ours [Germany], is dependent on education because,
This requires an understanding of how the cosmos and especially the sun work as an open system, and understanding here means the construction of a fusion generator that delivers so much entropy from the fusion of atomic nuclei that a gas turbine can be operated with it.
From a thermodynamic point of view, the Tokamak principle is obviously based on a wrong approach, namely that of a closed system in which high temperatures can be reached, but not a higher order, as required by fusion.
But that is a topic for
another essay...
|
