|
by Joseph A. Olson February-March 2011 from JenniferMarohasy Website
Strengthened with a few facts, a superstition becomes accepted reality until new perceptions can reopen debate. That is an exciting possibility in today's Nouveau Renaissance.
Humanity's new course needs a road sign:
Climategate has shown that even the most well funded science can be wrong.
All objective, science trained minds have left the Global Warming station. Well meaning scientists are already doing damage assessments and future hazard avoidance studies.
It is now a perfect time
to reassess another possibly defective theory on the origin of the
universe.
Fourteenth century scientists struggled to explain these readily observable events and attempted to explain them as nested spheres, driven by great gears, which were below the flat Earth and thus invisible.
Mechanical clocks were
just then being perfected and animated character clocks made this
seem plausible to the masses.
To those in power it was time to silence the messenger. It is hard to refuse the offer,
The original Renaissance involved a startling across the board shift in paradigms.
Enlightenment was no one
trick pony.
New prophets and new visions are confronting the established twentieth century theories of Relativity, Big Bang and Quantum Mechanics.
All of these theories appear correct within certain ranges but have conflicts at their boundaries.
Scientists struggled thru
the last half of the twentieth century to find a "Unified Field
Theory" that could join these theories.
Since noting behaved according to the predicted mass calculations, then there must also be anti-matter and dark matter. Newtonian physics require a force for acceleration and nothing ever explained the force required to accelerate entire galaxies.
We are approaching the
fourteenth century dilemma of too many spheres and too many gears.
Many others have been
troubled by these one sided debates and hungered for alternative
explanations.
As the Earth circles the Sun in a 180 million mile ellipse, we witness closer points moving more relative to the distant points.
As you walk across your
backyard the tree in your yard appears to move relative to the two
trees on the hill down the street. Those two distant trees do not
appear to have any movement relative to each other.
Even more startling was
that the further the apparent distance, the greater the apparent
speed.
To an observer on the
balloon surface there would be some dots visible on the opposite
side of the balloon but there would also be a horizon beyond the
balloon with ABSOLUTELY NO DOTS.
Repeated experiments have
shown that light does bend as predicted and to see how this would
change the Big Bang Theory, we must introduce two other concepts of
Physics.
It is at first hard to believe that the two eyes and two ears that you have used your whole life are not the perfect place from which to understand the universe.
In fact, there is no
perfect place and everything appears different depending on your
unique place. This does not imply that there is no right or wrong
answers to scientific question, a fact I learned on many
examinations.
The further from the center spindle, the greater the angular acceleration. Points of light along the album would all appear the same from the center UNLESS the light was required to circle the album in a spiral to the center.
Under this condition the
further away the light, the greater the apparent acceleration.
Our next 'breakthrough'
may be when we see all the way around the universe to the backside
of the Milky Way.
The farther away the galaxy, the greater mass required to pass and the greater the apparent acceleration. Imagine a non-expanding universe.
It appears that it is
never too late to open a hundred year old debate.
The thought that there was a Non Expanding Theory has been introduced by a trained engineer, who has turned rogue astronomer.
The following quote from
Dr X does add credibility to this challenge to eight
decades of 'settled' science:
What gives this Dr X
usurper, along with that engineer turned rogue astronomer, the right
to challenge this cornerstone of modern astronomy?
...who with coworker Milton LaSalle Humason first observed the red-shift of light from distant stars.
Continuing,
One interesting fact is that this interview was for Time Magazine and was published as "Science - Shift on Shift" on Dec 14, 1936. Here you have proof that the 'father of the Expanding Universe Theory' had misgivings just years after his 1929 disclosure.
Following the motto of P.T. Barnum, of,
...the existing 'big
science' teams saw an unlimited opportunity to expand astronomy
budgets.
Bureaucrats do have an
affection for expanding concepts, witness the vast expansion of
planetary maladies they have been able to ascribe to the 'expansion
of carbon dioxide' gas in our atmosphere.
In the Times interview, he communicated to the National Academy of Sciences that:
Having birthed this brand of Franken-science the good doctor was now powerless to stop what now had a life of its own.
He was,
In a Pontius Pilate moment during the interview, Dr Hubble states his hope that the new 200 inch Caltech super telescope to be completed in the 1940's would settle this question.
Since the ability to
gather light is a function of area, and therefore of a square, this
new eye in the sky could see four times as much, four times as far
back, as the Hooker telescope.
The world had to take
time out to counter a virulent form of 'master race planet
domination' which caused a delay in completing of the 200 inch Mt
Palomar telescope until 1948.
This is the name for the newest and most distant cluster galaxy estimated at 9.6 billion light years away and closest yet observed to the 13.7 billion year old universe edge.
As the speed of these
supposed distant galaxies are now approaching the actual speed of
light, we are left to question some of the hypothesis of these
bureaucratically over fed cosmologists.
The supposed vacuum force
is many times greater than gravity, but curiously also invisible.
A radio interview last
week indicated that a hopeful cosmologist was seeking grants for two
new additional invisible dimensions.
What began with a real
scientist and a Hooker at the observatory has turned into a science
whorehouse. What we must do is to show these spend thrifts the real
meaning of 'invisible' as in the invisible universe that we are all
now experiencing.
It is time for the honest voices of science to demand that this circus side show be closed. I'm certain that Dr X would heartily agree.
By the way, that engineer
turned rogue astronomer is ME.
When coupled with a natural curiosity and the ability learn from our mistakes, we have lifted most humans from the vulgar realities of our ancestor's existence.
For those bent on
controlling others, tools and communication must be controlled and
manipulated.
The great philosopher, Bertrand Russell said,
The mystic oracle of truth, Barry Obama said,
Before he could reflect on other possible explanations, a radio interview stumbled onto the phrase "Big Bang" and a run-away train left the station.
Dr Hubble was
uncomfortable with both the concept and the catchy nick-name, but he
had a 'conflict of interest' on this issue.
Dr Hubble, during his 1936 interview, stated that he was,
What Dr Hubble meant was that with four times the light gathering power and four times the distance of past light sources, the anticipated light speed would exceed half the speed of light.
In addition to building a giant government funded telescope during a depression, the dear doctor also very much coveted a Nobel Prize.
The problem was that at that time, astronomy was not considered a branch of any science that could receive the award. It is hard to speak out against your 'signature' science and simultaneously promote that science as worthy of the world's highest honor.
Hubble was prevented from speaking against the 'Big Bang' due to his vested interest in Palomar and HIS potential Nobel Prize.
He was to be given the
award in 1953, but a sudden heart attack and untimely death
prevented that.
Einstein won the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921 for the 'photoelectric effect' . He was a marked man in his Nazi occupied homeland and luckily fled to America in 1933.
He was now a stranger in a land with powerful pro-Nazi forces.
Prominent pre-war Nazi supporters included,
Many other leaders were virulent anti-Semites including,
No further proof of FDR's feelings is necessary than the fact that he was completely briefed on the locations and operations of all major Nazi death camps in 1943.
Not one allied bomb fell on these death factories or the rail lines that served them.
Einstein was in the
unfortunate position of begging this scientifically illiterate
leader for funds to develop an 'atomic' weapon. His begging letters
to FDR are available on-line.
His correspondence with
the Robert Oppenheimer who headed actual weapons team are
still classified. It is doubtless that Einstein had many
involvements which prohibited his free discussion of the 'Big Bang'.
It is very doubtful that he could accept the outer limits of this possible expansion to be approaching the velocity of light. If you do accept the expanding Big Bang theory, then you must also recognize that the distant light indicates the possible position at the distant time of that lights origin.
Light with its position distorted by half the speed of light, would have then originated at half the projected distance.
All projections from data that is this distorted should be viewed as very suspect.
Well, in 1925 a high school science teacher, John Scopes was tried by the State of Tennessee for violation of the states, Butler Act.
Yes, John had dared to
teach evolution to his students. He was acquitted in a nationally
publicized trial.
It is not an endorsement of Creationism to state the obvious.
We now know that Darwin was wrong...
One problem confronting evolutionists is that they cannot replicate the dramatic upgrade in biological complexity.
Joseph A Olson, PE
from TimeMagazine Website recovered through WayBackMachine Website
But the telescopic observations of a universe which seems to be blowing up like the fragments of an explosive shell have come mainly from Mount Wilson Observatory's brilliant Astronomer Edwin Powell Hubble.
Beginning in 1928, Hubble and his coworker, Milton LaSalle Humason, showed that the light from the most distant nebulae (clouds of stars) which he could photograph in Mount Wilson's giant telescope was shifted far toward the red end of the spectrum.
Such a redshift is observed in the light of a star known to be retreating from Earth, so it was assumed that the distant nebulae were retreating in all directions.
On these observations,
and on the theoretical expanding universes formulated by de Sitter
and Lemaitre before any observations were made, the case for the
expanding universe rested.
But the speeds indicated by the amount of redshift, some of which now equal 25,000 miles per second, have made many astronomers doubt. Other causes for the redshift were suggested, such as cosmic dust or a change in the nature of light over great stretches of space.
Two years ago Dr. Hubble admitted that the expanding universe might be an illusion, but implied that this was a cautious and colorless view.
Last week it was apparent
that he had shifted his position even further away from a literal
interpretation of the redshift, that he now regards the expanding
universe as more improbable than a non-expanding one.
The distribution of these bodies in space forced him to conclude that a non-expanding universe theory,
If the red-shifts do not really indicate velocity, he wrote, one has a,
On the other hand, to assume that the shifts really indicate receding velocity forces one to adopt a very curious model of the universe.
In plainer language, this meant that,
Additional Information
|
