So, our awareness begins on an
inter-galactic scale, right from the start. In order to better
understand such populations and compete where necessary, we must
know more about them.
way to make sense of them is to probe and investigate entire
categories, rather than one case or another. To limit our awareness
to a single mega-population is to fall into their hole, in a sense.
Their peculiarities shouldn’t define our larger understanding
because there are billions of galaxies. In mega-populations,
independent critique is sometimes displaced, so we now join the
ranks of myriad others who must look for needed improvements both on
and off-world, despite our limitations.
Although it may, at first, appear to have a faded, seemingly remote quality, it is here for those who begin with the requisite science and insight. Because the universe cycles back into itself, hyperspace is an inverted kind of energy resonance across great distances. It feels like an inverted event horizon that resonates hyper-quickly all across a great, orb-like hyper-space because it’s simply a fraction of the larger, intra-cycling universe.
You can feel it, finely and faintly, because you’re
composed of those greater, fractional relationships.
Instead, that negative cycle resonates “mass” down through the nucleus and far out into space-time at the same time. So, it isn’t three-dimensional. It foldedly twists inward - into a kind of negative space (from the old-world perspective) while it resonates far out across hyperspace. It does so precisely, like clockwork. Once our world begins to experiment with gravitic technology, we appear on the larger energy map of the universe. Different mega-populations will try to tell us that they are the guardians of the Δt/alt t conservation.
Some will use that excuse to take
advantage of a vulnerable population.
Meanwhile, mega-populations will
tell you that all worlds need to accord, all peoples must
collectively interact to some extent. That much is true, however
some megas grew essentially uncorrected, going from one kind of
imperialism to a larger kind of presumption without learning to
treat others as equals, without opening their governments to
independent critique and binding rules against potentially
Detached from both their victims and higher order understandings, they don’t anticipate the almost Tao-like re-cycling of all being and implications. Some of the ugliest consequences occur in offending mega-populations: stifling of dissent, a rigidly presumed “oneness” of group mindform (policed by psychotronics), plus the threat that may pose to various neighbors.
So, the message for those content to merely feather their own small nest in the United States or elsewhere on Earth is that you can’t possibly live safely, you won’t preserve your freedom and resources unless you share with all others on this planet.
Failure to do so will result in catastrophe: rising violence and sea levels, disease and depletion of resources - all of which lead to dependency on off-world manipulators. You can’t hide behind weak-minded ideas about 3-D anonymity in elite economy and expect your children to live safely when you’re gone. Your very thoughts and observations affect all that you see, however faintly.
The new physics is all
about transparency in hyperspace, so you must plan for the future of
all on this planet. If you don’t, no matter how richly you live now,
your children will suffer and will condemn your generation for
weak-kneed obedience, an epic failure to act when necessary.
As if to underscore such an attitude, on a previous occasion one of the “three ellipticals” hyperversals (monitored by a more advanced hyperversal) showed us a graphic about a recurrent, if not prototypical alien situation. In the graphic was a highly technological, interstellar-capable alien with large, dark eyes standing next to his planet of origin just as the planet, or home star, is going critical - which will require a move to another planet.
The hyperversal said something like,
In other words, from the hyper-advanced alien’s perspective, situations of the sort pose a conundrum.
If it seems as though I drone on and on about the “new” physics of aliens, it’s for good reason.
Different explanations and metaphors help the beginner
understand such basics. There are a mixed variety of fantastic, yet
precise ironies in the physics of the universe. Although black holes
may, at first, seem to be coldly unforgiving traps and dead ends,
aliens suggest that they are deeply dimensioned with a kind of
genius - in the best of mind(s), yet black holes also pose a limit
for the worst of minds.
Mega-population growth may seem wasteful and disproportionate to humans, yet some mega-populations have actually been encouraged to exceed normal bounds. Hyperversal aliens who evolved from large, aggressive mega-populations may be biased and will favor the growth of at least one overgrown population in each galaxy for a variety of reasons. Numerous ongoing discussions with “the three ellipticals” hyperversals have elucidated their thinking on the subject.
discussed such reasoning with hyper-advanced aliens at numerous
junctures, while seemingly more independent hyperversals watched
Meanwhile, more modest, competing populations exist and sometimes argue to the contrary.
They say the following:
Of course, we can expect to encounter galaxies of breathtaking variety.
Mindful of such diversity, it’s better to suffer doubt and caution rather than smugly rationalize one preference over another. Populations of all sorts must keep others in check throughout the universe. They must limit specious excess. Within one organizing strategy or another, we’re all responsible for the long-term ecology. In our case, the die is already cast: there’s no room for us to grow disproportionately.
There are mega-populations here,
already, and we’re due to merge with Andromeda.
In every case, surrounding populations
must judge whether a given mega-population respects wild,
uninhabited terra that must be preserved for future evolution. Empty
planets don’t strain the larger Δt/alt t ecology.
Ever present in such discussions, in which some humans participate, are hyperversals’ concerns that independent aggregations of newly evolved aliens may organize on a larger scale than some hyperversals are prepared for, at a given time.
More doubt and discomfort that we
must live with. There are no easy answers in collective reckonings
of the sort.
Meanwhile, disdain of the
sort can degrade into thinly veiled contempt, which can be
dangerous. An ecologically irresponsible population is extremely
Meanwhile, there are hyperversals who
see a need for both megas and independent populations, assuming that
they work out such responsibilities among themselves rather than
rely on hyperversals to do the heavy lifting.
Like humans, they may have been brash and conflicted, hence limited, during early phases yet are usually challenged and humbled later.
No doubt there are various degrees of involvement with mega-populations.
Some planets simply trade with them, which deepens their involvement. Others prefer to remain self-sustaining and distant in order to develop a more mature second or third-depth awareness globally so they can better judge the risks and implications of larger interactions before they dunder into them. Some mega-populations may be exemplary, of course.
However, as is
now obvious on Earth, premature concession of bases to an aggressive
mega-population can be treacherous, if not fatal. Before the target
people even know about aliens, they begin to lose control to a
resource-hungry predator. Then manipulated conflicts follow - a
“pacification program” that features infiltrated saboteurs.
At times, the routine seems pretentious. Many times
we’ve seen Verdants plunge into a human situation with an “Are you
important?” kind of attitude that’s shamelessly elitist. The same
applies to some of the IFSP’s direct operative humans, who inflate
their own importance in order to drill fear into native humans.
Sometimes they seem like stimulus-seeking patients on a psych ward.
Behavior of the sort is associated with inordinate use of energy and
Although such questions sound extraneous, their implications permeate every aspect of existence.
In other words, the only sustainable regard for others is anything, if not everything but self-importance.
There are galaxy-wide and larger energy networks (due to Δt/alt t) and questions about how various networks affect each other.
Again, we’re talking about
more advanced societies, not environmentally ruinous human precepts.
Some 229 million years after first contact, they still take too much in order to enjoy themselves (some are stimulus-seeking sexuals).
Within their ranks,
Such aliens need to see beyond their limited, internal conventions and reassess the whole, then fade down to a more modest state.
and only then, will they be able to help others do similarly. In
order to evolve into communities of mind, they must ask whether the
best ecology is a stasis of pretended greatness, or whether it lies
in a receding, greater kind of out-of-body identity. Steady-state
ideas about empire lead to defensive, lying propaganda mills and
However, you may not hear about this in some
cases, depending on the alien who speaks to you. Complicating the
situation are hyperversal pressures to busy certain mega-populations
or cut them off in some ways, while also moving them toward
hyper-assimilation. Major snafus can arise: “butterfly wing”
distortions that amplify a given foul-up, and ailing regime-think.
There may be Big Brother pressures in such cases, a compulsion to foul, if not kill numerous species in order to expand a mega-population’s sphere of influence. Common sense suggests that manipulated planet death is the worst possible outcome, but an overgrown, aggressive colonial may want to play god, instead.
We’ve heard (Verdant-related) talk about imposing non-physical social identities through mass extinctions, leaving but a shell of the old identity. Fawning acolytes of the IFSP call this “the Earth Changes” strategy, in our case.
Destruction of the sort
weakens a people, sometimes making it easier to control them.
Dogmatic rigidity can creep into the
equation, a smothering of critique. Aging mega-population aliens
sometimes assume that they ALREADY DID all of the necessary thinking
long ago, hence they need merely resonate and observe coldly,
thereafter. Some may try to obscure their own, multiple sourced
histories and pretend not to notice that their specious
rationalizations presume a mastery of insight about other aliens’
do we explain that slowed, seemingly trapped quality?
They suggest that black holes could be “dark energy stars.” Because objects falling into a black hole should stretch out so extremely that outside observers would note a freeze of time, causing the object to appear to linger at the event horizon forever (they don’t), physicists have searched for alternatives to the standard quantum model.
Chapline and Laughlin note that when superconducting crystals go through “quantum critical phase transition,” electron spin doesn’t fluctuate wildly, as the standard model predicts it should. Instead, electron fluctuations slow down - as though time is literally slowed! So, Chapline and Laughlin came up with a startling, new explanation.
Working with colleagues, Chapline and Laughlin posit that when large stars end their fusion cycle, instead of forming a “black hole,” a phase transition (a sudden change of state) creates a thin “quantum critical shell,” the size of which depends on a star’s mass.
that the energies involved match those of the expected dark energy
of the entire universe.
Chapline further suggests that the inside of a black hole may act like a superfluid, i.e. super cold Helium 4, a superfluid that climbs up container walls. It’s a useful model and seems to agree with alien statements about negative energy and hyperspace (plus aspects of Bearden’s Δt). In May of 2007, researchers from John Hopkins University and the Space Telescope Science Institute photographed a “dark matter” ring around galaxy cluster Cl 0024+17.
In the photo, a huge radial symmetry permeates the space around the galaxy cluster - all of it pointing inward toward the center of aggregate mass in the cluster. It’s the first visual evidence of the sort, and it suggests that dark energy and dark matter are structured collectively, in a sense. In the photo, space itself appears to hold the missing mass.
Physicist Gordon Kane says that dark energy is assumed to be the energy of the vacuum (empty space).
Physicist Hong Sheng Zhao thinks dark energy and dark matter may be two aspects of the same phenomenon.
advanced community will span across and exceed such groups to remind
them about potentially ghastly ironies and distortions that can
arise later in a universe cycle, should they fail to integrate more
However, we’re new to such interactions and still have much to learn.