30 - A Hyper-advanced Problem Case

Some hyper-advanced aliens and their hybrids occasionally try to evacuate and still a certain thought that I may be about to either act on or elaborate for others. In order to avert the thought or conspicuously demonstrate the ability to still a memory, they do so.


This can be frustrating: you know they’re doing it - they even resonate about it, yet at the moment you can’t recall a key aspect of what you were just thinking. The problem, of course, is that they may do this to themselves, essentially evacuating their own concerns and feelings about certain subjects (a smoothing over of contrary thoughts). They may think it more competitive, in a sense.


Imagine a society that does so.

For example, the most visibly posed “three ellipticals” hyperversal now finds himself facing a rising chorus of objections about IFSP manipulation of conflicts here because IFSP direct operatives have committed crimes against humanity. And what’s his response? He says that will spur humankind to evolve. Then, when we say this can be done less destructively, he says the burden is on us.


When we reply that Verdants clearly seek resources here, he tends to go quiet, as though he already did his thinking on the subject. An overseer often appears in conjunction with this “three ellipticals” hyperversal (or is made to seem to appear - their psychotronics can be used to project different facets, or slants on the same hyperversal) and both try to be conspicuous about their sense of rank, yet both betray a kind of insecurity in doing so.


The insecurity relates to their fear that humans will seek other affiliations and will evolve independently. Meanwhile, at one juncture in 2006, a seemingly more open-minded hyperversal alien admitted that Verdants get resources in exchange for their efforts, an incentive for their interventions.

So, to some extent, the three ellipticals faction agrees with part of the Verdant strategy.


But why?


All evidence suggests that they, themselves, were once an expansive mega-population like Verdants. In May of 2010, one hyperversal suggested that in the past the three ellipticals hyperversals’ population was more than 1,000 trillion individuals (one quadrillion), which he said “is not over-sized.” He later said, “Don’t be surprised to see (a population of) 10 quadrillion” either in, or between, a large supercluster(s).

The question of sexuality arises in discussions with a “three ellipticals” hyperversal who has a partly supervisory, partly attending role in the situation here. He says Verdants help change sexuals into non-sexuals, but when the subject came up in October of 2006, one of his subordinate aliens asked where, among the IFSP’s populations, do you see sexuals?


I pointed out the reported 500,000,000,000,000 Verdants, who are 3.3 times more numerous than all other IFSP aliens, combined (a ratio that means there is no effective vote in the IFSP because Verdants drown out all other opinions).

In other words, the subordinate was so wrapped up in the rationale for IFSP expansion that he forgot that Verdant impulses and behaviors are sexual. Admittedly, Verdants are a second stage of sexuality, yet they’re famous for disproportionality and their desire to exploit lesser aliens. Meanwhile, in order to smooth it all over, the attending “three ellipticals” hyperversal simply evacuates his own thoughts on the subject (he’s reportedly non-sexual).


Some of his population may be sexual in order to preserve hardiness and genetic alternatives. However, given certain propagandistic aspects of purported “three ellipticals” subculture, it’s hard to imagine them admitting to what we might regard as weakness.

What do more advanced aliens have to say about this? Sometimes greater perspective comes together in a larger, finer context. Our fractional nature in the universe leads to humbling, sometimes awkwardly discomforting realizations. There are moments of acuity when we see it all from aside and all around in naked, bare bones terms laced with contradictions and existential discomfort.


At one such juncture in the summer of 2006, a hyperversal showed a graphic visual representation of the attending “three ellipticals” hyperversal in order to demonstrate a relationship with Verdants.


The “three ellipticals” hyperversal’s eye structure was like that of Verdants, as was the general shape of his skullcase. He seemed to have a slightly larger brain, in relation to his eyes, and some of his other features are subtler than those of a Verdant. His physique appeared to be slightly sturdier.

It was all quite revealing. We could easily see the case for his group’s genetic contributions to Verdants in the past. This was affirmed by other hyperversals, hence there’s at least some evidence suggesting that the “three ellipticals” faction (or what is outwardly posed as a faction) had a direct genetic role in Verdant history.


With this in mind, having heard that “less than .0X percent” of Andromeda (less than 1/10,000th) is IFSP, we have reason to think that the “three ellipticals’” project in question may be less significant than they pretend it to be. The three elliptical galaxies in question may end up being Centaurus A, N5102 (a small elliptical near Centaurus A that’s 1/5 the apparent size of the Andromeda galaxy), and perhaps another small elliptical or the future merged Milky Way-Andromeda elliptical-to-be.


Remember, the first graphic representation of a three ellipticals project (replete with images of hyperversal-hybrid aliens posed above the extended, opposing top and bottom central black hole vortices of three large galaxies) was intended to inform us about the social and ecological implications of merging galaxies.


There were conspicuously prototypical aspects to the graphic, as though we’re seen as a trainer case set against a more complex backdrop. A noted astronomer told me that the entire Virgo supercluster essentially centers on three large elliptical galaxies.

So, the question arises: Is an ongoing, consanguine relationship the reason why the given “three ellipticals” hyperversal puts the IFSP’s human casualties out of mind so neatly? It may be why he evacuates his own feelings on the subject, which could handicap his judgment (a smoothing over of contrary thoughts).


If, as was stated, his population had a guiding genetic role in Verdant history, then there are material and resource motives in his posture. His faction (or what is posed as his faction) may be incapable of seeing beyond them. Worse yet, there could be a literally animal devotion to spreading their own genes via interventions, a kind of sociobiological scheme behind their destructiveness. Again we’re reminded that they’re of animal origin and fallible.

Which raises another question: Is our planet now the target of an interbred alien expansion scheme? If such is the case, it increases the likelihood that neighboring aliens see the IFSP presence in our vicinity as unwelcome and undemocratic. And if that’s true, then there’s reason to think that the IFSP intervention here can be warded off, as some aliens suggest we need to do to preserve the Milky Way ecology.

One easily overlooked danger of an intervention, here, by IFSP aliens is that some humans may think it provides an excuse to ignore a larger, universally-enforced restriction on the use of negative-cycle weapons in space. Although some may say such weapons are needed to defend against the IFSP, there are fail-safe constraints on the use of such weapons in this galaxy.


On February 14, 2007 one or more hyperversal aliens suggested that planets that ignored such constraints have perished in this galaxy (perhaps by design). Meanwhile, Verdants take crude advantage of the weapons prohibition by using it as an excuse to trip their human operatives toward destructive, potentially planet-killing excess. However, Verdants gave exactly such technology to a human crime cabal. By tilting the human economy toward greed and secrecy via Rothschild, Du Pont and other reported cohorts, they frustrate resolution of human conflicts.


And how do such operatives affect the human economy? The French Rothschild is an owner of the Federal Reserve Bank, which prints all US money.


His grandparents and a Rockefeller betrayed tradition established by Andrew Jackson, who dissolved the Rothschild-influenced Second Bank of the United States, which Jackson thought was a royalist threat to the nation’s future because it had a monopoly on printing US money.

** Sometimes, an IFSP direct operative is specified in a way that I find difficult to insert into a book like this. For example, in Feb. of ’08, a hyperversal suggested that Prince Phillip is IFSP direct operative. About a year earlier, a hyper-advanced alien stated that Queen Elizabeth knew about the plan to kill Princess Diana beforehand and that she agreed to it. Phillip’s status would cast a different light on reported basing of the TR-3B in England and the question of how Tony Blair was influenced to support Bush Jr.’s Iraq war.

Due to a bias in favor of material gain, Verdants have made mistakes that jeopardize their status here.


For example:

their bizarrely overgrown population, the planet-killing failure of their last known intervention (the grays’ planet), the IFSP/grays’ reported use of scalar electromagnetic weapons to kill dozens of US guards while freeing captive grays from an underground US facility (see reports by Clifford Stone, Michael Wolf, and Bob Lazar), the materially-motivated scramble of the IFSP’s direct operatives (implicated in weapons propagation, crimes against humanity, and the worst organized crime money laundering on Earth) - all such behaviors cast doubt on the Verdant rationale about weapons.

As a result, in discussions between aliens, here, questions arise about how surrounding populations can help to limit Verdant expansion.

After seven years of sometimes-unwelcome interactions with the “three ellipticals” sub-group and its subordinates, their behavior can be outlined more neatly. The three ellipticals section is too closely tied to Verdants, which corrupts their perspective. The behavior and statements of aliens posed as “three ellipticals” hyperversals suggests that they, themselves, were once an oversized mega-population like the Verdants, which may explain some of their attitudes.

However, hyperversals also pose to accommodate a variety of recently evolved aliens. They both cultivate and respond to different human and alien perspectives, but there are hard-liners among them who see the elimination of weapons offenders as a necessary evil. Their staging is so far beyond us that they can do that using a variety of sub-parties.


So, please remember, judgments are made and (infiltrated) planets die then refugees are scooped up and sometimes used by an intervening population.

Over time, the most disturbing aspect of (what is posed as) “three ellipticals” faction behavior has been their nauseatingly quick impulse to try to cut off independent thinking. At times they’ve tried to pre-empt human contact with independent, critical aliens.


They seem to fear that independent, critical thinking by humans will lead to the conclusion that the “three ellipticals” faction and Verdants committed unnecessary crimes against humanity.


They drone on and on, trying to pre-empt moments when our native neighbors might express themselves in finer, more civilized terms. At times, for me, the “three ellipticals” section’s diversions and propaganda have been nightmarish.


Given the exploitative, sometimes destructive nature of the Verdant empire, some humans are now discreetly exploring preliminary relations with native neighbors rather than the token IFSP enclaves hastily assembled by Verdants (IFSP enclaves like “Pleiadians” who include Semitics and Nordics; gray variants; Tall Whites and more).

At times in recent years, when humans explored contacts with alternative networks of less offensive, actual native neighbors, “three ellipticals” and IFSP aliens tried to avert such contacts by resorting to petty, often infantile routines and diversions. Ironically, the diversions were framed with a low-order, often low cultural character - attempts to debase good human thought by intruding with run-on, nauseating routines often framed in terms of the worst of human pop culture or the lies and fears of corrupt human subcultures.


It was either an attempt to divert high-minded human thought, or it was just the opposite - an attempt to provoke it.

Over time, the diversionary behaviors of (what are posed as) “three ellipticals” hyperversals became so ridiculous that some humans saw a need to make a clean break with them. On the one hand, it’s obvious that the “three ellipticals” faction may not be up to compelling change in Verdant behavior, while on the other hand, they seem to be incapable of admitting that such is the case.


Why not?


For two reasons.

  • One, they see Verdant intervention as a timely way to bring about or provoke quick changes in humankind.

  • And two, exopolitical circumstances prevent them from taking only one side or the other.

Given their many advantages, hyperversals can take a variety of positions regarding Verdants, yet none are stated as their one, single policy.


The question is whether the “three ellipticals” profile represents their population’s mainstream. Like any society, it probably features some very insular aliens, some of whom lack critical thinking skills.

The inadequacies of the three ellipticals faction force us to seek larger comparison. It now appears that the three ellipticals faction is either simply posed as the hard-line face of one hyperversal population, or they may be an opportunistic basket case. They try to say they aren’t on our map (when referring to our map of the visible universe), but the assertion appears to be deflectory and partly false.


We know that their physics and their way of communicating and configuring their living centers models the universe as being more condensed and less flatly spacious than a typical human might imagine (hyperversals network more quickly than other aliens). However, hyperversals certainly don’t live without reference to our visible map of the universe.


They appear to have alt-cycled their living centers, possibly even the sub-nuclear structure of entire planets that they lived on, but they clearly live in a marginally deeper, alt-cycled aspect of our same universe. However, for reasons of pride and insular distinction, the “three ellipticals” faction prefers to act as though they’re independent of nearly all that we see.

It’s a contradictory assertion. At times they’ve resorted to nightmarish extremes of propaganda and diversion in order to discourage us from assimilating with “independent” aliens, yet the three ellipticals faction tries to act as though they, themselves, are independent of our map of the visible universe. It simply doesn’t add up.


Again, a counter-posed hyperversal said that one of the three ellipticals hyperversals left “his retirement garden” in Centaurus A, a clearly visible galaxy. In the end, evidence suggests that those same hyperversals steered or determined the pattern for the Verdant empire.


Questions remain about the “three ellipticals” sub-group.

  • One, are they a local sub-group in our vicinity, or is the “three ellipticals” phrase a reference to the Virgo supercluster? If the reference is to Virgo, that would explain the diversity of their observations. However, the “three ellipticals” framing may simply be propaganda that reflects their local ambitions.

  • Two, do they abet or support Verdant-like offenders in part because they fear that the scattered complexity of many independent populations could overwhelm their minds and their sense of order?

  • And three, are some rigid and programmatic in part because in old age, they have a hard time understanding how a population could do other than what they, themselves, did in the past?

Sometimes, hyper-advanced aliens’ quick shifts of mind in alt-cycled time have a dangerous consequence.


They don’t allow for the simple, unadorned passage of time. They don’t step back enough to see how a population like ours needs time to make changes. Instead, they manipulate and control as though they want their hands on all the levers. The error is the result of billions of years of an industrial approach to abduction and use of other aliens and humans, which harms the lives of many in the process.


By not allowing for the passage of time then adjustment, they can be harsh and failure-prone. It’s a mega-population’s dilemma. Another problem is the way that finely fluctuating interactions via faint and distant resonance can be so enthralling for some hyperversals that their own, inner complications and psychological distortions can seem to bounce back to them from outside, rather than exist within them.


When hyper-advanced aliens in different locations interact via thought-amplifying psychotronic systems, they may, at times, resonate only with minds like their own, minds that need help or resensitization. However, they may be aware of that.

We’ve seen “three ellipticals”/IFSP aliens prone to a kind of stalker-shadow mentality when, using psychotronics, they monitor and try to influence humans, knowing that we can’t fully identify them. When such aliens work unseen, psychological distortions, moods, or impulses can amplify and resonate with the psychological distortions of other participating aliens.


What we see then is a subdued form of mob mentality, an ability to participate in crime and manipulated mass harm rationalized in terms of structured, external agendas. Under such circumstances, the dark, animal side of the psyche can be expressed - even among fairly normal aliens. That’s complicated by an alternately slowed, ethically frozen quality in offending alien minds. In other words, even among hyper-advanced aliens, anonymity breeds perversity and the abuse of power.

It helps to remember that psychotronically conditioned societies (like Verdants who immerse in a mind-activated/mind-sensing psychotronic network) get used to the technologically resonated group stimuli and assumptions of that network.


To be immersed in a constant stream of back-and-forth psychotronic stimuli results in a kind of state-dependent thinking. As a result, Verdants are likely to cling to, and depend on, their own psychotronic imagery and sensations, their own themes - which can include a subtle propagandistic flavor. So, it’s hard for them to sympathize with the thoughts of peoples who aren’t immersed in their culture of psychotronic communications.


For a Verdant to feel into a human mind can feel like falling flat without the larger, inflated stimulus and support realm of Verdant psychotronics. In other words, to Verdants there’s an unreal quality to those of us who exist outside of their psychotronic cocoon. As a result, it’s possible for such aliens to do great, apocalyptic harm to others without feeling much.


The fact that we live brief lives compared to a Verdant could make us seem that much more expendable to the hard-liners among them.

“Three ellipticals” and IFSP offenders force us to look deeper into Virgo and elsewhere for better example. From the perspective of other hyperversals and aliens tasked with more challenging galaxy mergers deep within Virgo, the relatively quick screw-up of the “three ellipticals” faction way out here on Virgo’s fringes may look bad.


In the short space of 150-200 million years, the three ellipticals faction allowed Verdants to exceed normal population limits by a factor of some 5 to 10-fold.


That calls into question the “three ellipticals”’ ability to be responsible for the more turbulent yet urbane dynamics of deeper Virgo neighborhoods. Unlike our galaxy group, which contains only three large galaxies, Virgo contains 150. However, that’s a very finite number, so we can imagine news highlights about hyperversal relations across the entire Virgo supercluster.


Meanwhile, Centaurus A, the focus of the “three ellipticals’” strategy, is smaller than many large elliptical galaxies in Virgo. Another large elliptical, Maffei 1, is millions of light years closer to us than Centaurus A. Compared to Virgo’s large ellipticals, Centaurus A formed more slowly, and the next big galaxy merger in its vicinity should occur billion years from now.

In other words, even if we allow for absorption of another spiral into Centaurus A during the next 3.5 billion years, the Centaurus A neighborhood is relatively tranquil and shouldn’t be too difficult to tend to. Nonetheless, Verdants are far beyond safe limits. Their tendency to ruin planets and ruthlessly exploit other aliens poses a dilemma for surrounding galaxies. Worse yet, the IFSP is an empire largely controlled by sexuals, unlike some other collectives.

How do hyper-advanced aliens regard IFSP crimes against humanity? Some appear to be sympathetic.


However, we’ve tested the attitudes and responses of some “three ellipticals” hyperversals who work with Verdants here. When they’re attentive and we mention IFSP operatives’ crimes against humanity, some “three ellipticals” hyperversals go cold. From their perspective, such doings are far removed from their living enclosures.


Although “three ellipticals” hyperversals aren’t physically vulnerable to the epidemics, manipulated violence, and sabotage that IFSP operatives do to humankind, they can be psychological casualties, nonetheless.

In one Feb. 2010 test, I raised the subject of the IFSP’s mass crimes and the given few hyperversals sat in a kind of dark-state, a starless alt-cycle mind configuration (which has some essentially frozen qualities). They waited a second then simply re-stated their objectives. I repeated the test with a more sterile, non-judgmental mention about human casualties. Again, they simply recited rationale.

Old “three ellipticals” non-sexuals may look at our situation and see only their own, long-term schematic logic, not quite getting the depth on human consequences.


But Verdants have studied non-sexuals’ logic and know that old hyperversals of the sort don’t comprehend the nature of human casualties. Like Verdants, “three ellipticals” hyper-versals took too far much and are blind to the universal equivalency between populations. Verdants know how to take crude, material advantage of that fact.

Because old “three ellipticals” hyperversals never get physically close to the suffering inflicted by IFSP operatives (mass murder, sabotage of human peace and ecology efforts, human families ruined by HIV, etc), for such hyperversals the IFSP intervention can sometimes have a strangely game-like quality. As juveniles/students, they almost certainly played reality games.


They rehearsed tasks using psychotronic game technology, possibly using previously recorded aspects of actual events in the exercises. The challenge for them is to maintain extra shells of remove and not respond to direct baiting. Meanwhile, the IFSP’s abduction and lab work is done by subordinates, so for most “three ellipticals” hyperversals there’s a distant quality to that, also.

“Three ellipticals” hyperversals live in total comfort. They express annoyance with human odors and other ugly details. Secure in their artificial environments, “three ellipticals” hyperversals are free to relax and sip nutrition drinks or check news and science reports. They can simply disregard human victims and turn, instead, to their scheduled tasks. They live in contained-craft where thoughts and performance are monitored by their regime.

So, when such hyperversals make mistakes, how does reality “bite” for them? Is the only consequence discomfort? Is there even an unpleasant effect on their careers?


They could, conceivably, fear transfer to places that, unlike Earth, are boring and peaceful. If cited for errors, they could face travel restrictions. So for some, the temptation is to simply contain human discussion about mass crimes in order to avoid possible career consequences. “Three ellipticals” offenders are reluctant to do anything substantive to thwart IFSP crimes, which raise a further question.


Are there better, more humane hyperversals in deeper, more dynamic sectors of Virgo - more creative, socially skilled hyperversals who are quick to challenge Verdant-like excess?


In the Virgo supercluster, there has to be diversity among hyperversals. There are greater, stronger challenges. Normally, in greater population centers there are finer, more cultured interactions. Amid the closer, more civilized conditions in Virgo, hyperversals must adapt to a more complex social environment. They have to think more creatively. They need to actually feel how other aliens feel there.


Out here, on Virgo’s fringe, “three ellipticals” hyperversals could be more likely to simply recite their objectives or pose diagrams, rather than admit that mistakes have been made.

When confronted with the IFSP’s crimes, some “three ellipticals” hyperversals feign that, for them, none of it is psychological - as though they have no vulnerabilities. That kind of response is noteworthy, in itself. We see structural weaknesses in their scheme, yet some don’t want to be seen as doubting their regime or be cited for a role in mass crimes.


So, the natural response is to pretend that only IFSP subordinates or humans do such crimes. Meanwhile, the “three ellipticals” section has a direct role in IFSP doings, and the deflectory responses of “three ellipticals” test subjects suggest a semi-hypnotic stilling of thought and conscience. We’ve seen that pattern elsewhere. But there’s a further problem. Despite their dark-state of mind, “three ellipticals” test subjects are nonetheless excited by the danger and animal stimulation of certain situations. It’s a lower brain response to stimulus - with at least some possibly voyeuristic qualities.


It’s possible that in the back of their minds, such hyperversals want to screw up because that will force recently evolved aliens to take responsibility on a larger scale, thus relieving old, tired hyperversals of a burden.

If we confront them with a list of crimes, their tendency is to draw back and coolly defend their objectives. Given that some of them reportedly attended the ruin of the grays’ original planet, the best we can do is cool such situations down and maintain a safe, healthy distance from such aliens. They can be dangerous.
However, there’s one, most obvious irony.


“Three ellipticals” hyperversals’ droning adherence to the Verdant scheme suggests that along this fringe of Virgo, the “three ellipticals” hyperversals may be much smaller than the Verdants, in number. In other words, “three ellipticals”’ dogmatic rigidity may be a sign of weakness because they can’t directly control the Verdant empire at this point because it’s too big, and Verdants know it.


So, rather than look weak and compromised, it may be that “three ellipticals” hyperversals essentially pose beside the IFSP in order to make humans and Verdants think they’re on top of it all. Meanwhile, Verdants have become a threat to the order and ecology in surrounding sectors, and it may be that receding, “three ellipticals” hyperversals sometimes counter-pose and help target populations see that for what it is - out of frustration with Verdant arrogance.

On a larger scale, the “three ellipticals” faction could, conceivably, be regarded as slightly backward, focused as it is out near the edge of a modest-sized supercluster.


Whether they’re regarded as failure-prone or not, the consequences of having allowed Verdants to become so extreme, so quickly, may be that the “three ellipticals” routine poses a threat to the consensus among Virgo’s hyperversals. If what is posed as the “three ellipticals” faction was, itself, once a Verdant-like problem case, Virgo’s hyperversals may worry that it will cause skepticism and animosity among trillions of recently evolved aliens, or that, for old grudge reasons it might seek divergent alliances for strategic purposes, rather than integrate into an effectively counter-balanced interaction between galaxy superclusters.


By failing to control Verdants, “three ellipticals” hyperversals could have isolated themselves, perhaps assuring that other hyperversal sub-groups won’t separately affiliate with them. In other words, there may be tensions between hyperversals, also.

A key question regarding “three ellipticals” hyperversals is whether they made the decision to reduce their own population long ago, hence they need to rely on recently evolved mega-populations for some purposes.


“Three ellipticals” hyperversal technology is so advanced that they don’t need to be vastly numerous for security reasons. So the question reduces to whether they’re still numerous enough to directly control certain mega-populations of our time, or whether they feel secure enough to simply guide such populations more loosely.

The following is a case study that illustrates how the minds of hyper-advanced aliens can be affected by long years of intervention duty.        


Back to Contents